HP Inc (NYSE: HPQ) Q1 2020 Earnings Call Transcript

HP Inc (NYSE: HPQ) Q1 2020 Earnings Conference Call

February 24, 2020

Corporate Participants:

Beth Howe — Head of Investor Relations

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Analysts:

Shannon Cross — Cross Research — Analyst

Katy Huberty — Analyst

Toni Sacconaghi — Bernstein — Analyst

Amit Daryanani — Evercore ISI — Analyst

Ananda Baruah — Loop Capital — Analyst

Paul Coster — J.P. Morgan — Analyst

Matt Cabral — Credit Suisse — Analyst

Jeriel Ong — Deutsche Bank — Analyst

Raghunathan Kamesh — Goldman Sachs — Analyst

Presentation:

Operator

Good day everyone and welcome to the First Quarter 2020 HP Incorporated Earnings Conference Call. My name is Chuck and I’ll be your conference moderator for today’s call. At this time, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. We will be facilitating a question-and-answer session towards the end of the conference. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded for replay purposes.

I would now like to turn the conference over to Beth Howe, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead ma’am.

Beth Howe — Head of Investor Relations

Good afternoon. I’m Beth Howe, Head of Investor Relations for HP Inc. and I would like to welcome you to today’s conference call. With me today are Enrique Lores, HP’s President and Chief Executive Officer and Steve Fieler, HP’s Chief Financial Officer.

Before handing the call over to Enrique, let me remind you that this call is being webcast. A replay of the webcast will be made available on our website shortly after the call for approximately one year. We posted the releases and the accompanying slide presentations for both our fiscal 2020 first quarter earnings and HP’s value creation plan we are announcing today on our Investor Relations webpage at investor.hp.com. During the presentation of our value creation plan, we will be webcasting the accompanying slides.

As always, elements of this presentation are forward-looking and are based on our best view of the world and our businesses as we see them today. For more detailed information, please see the disclaimers in these materials relating to forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions and the other disclaimers and notes included in the materials accompanying today’s presentation.

For a discussion of some of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, please refer to HP’s SEC reports including our most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Q. HP assumes no obligation and does not intend to update any such forward-looking statements. We also note that the financial information discussed on this call reflects estimates based on information available now and could differ materially from the amounts ultimately reported in HP’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31st, 2020 and HP’s other SEC filings.

During this webcast unless otherwise specifically noted all comparisons are year-on-year comparisons with the corresponding year-ago period. For historical financial information that has been expressed on a non-GAAP basis, we’ve included reconciliations to the comparable GAAP information. Please refer to the tables and slide presentation accompanying today’s earnings release for those reconciliations.

And now, I’ll turn it over to Enrique.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Beth and thank you everyone for joining us. HP made two important announcements today. First, we shared our Q1 earnings results that demonstrate our incredibly strong foundation. We also announced a three-year value creation plan that reflects the significant opportunities ahead. We have a lot to cover today and frankly, I’ve been looking forward to this call for some time.

We have a winning [Phonetic] plan. Since becoming CEO of HP four months ago, my focus has been to deliver on the strategic priorities I outlined during our Investor Meeting last year. When I talked you through our plan to advance, disrupt and transform, I made clear that we have multiple levers to drive shareholder value and this quarter results show that our plan is working.

On the call today, we will first cover Q1 earnings and then go into detail on our value creation plan. We will also talk about the Xerox proposal and why it undervalues HP and creates risk for our shareholders. But as I said, let me start with Q1. We are out of the gate very strong. Our team is on a mission to out-innovate, out-execute and outperform and it was an impressive quarter for HP. We delivered non-GAAP EPS growth of 25%, significantly above our guidance range. We have now beat or met our non-GAAP EPS for 17 straight quarters, thus every single quarter since separation.

We grew revenue by 1% in constant currency and non-GAAP operating profit dollars by 16%. We generated $1.1 billion in free cash flow and we returned 84% of that to shareholders through share repurchases and dividend. These results show that we have the right plans in place to create value. We are advancing our leadership in Personal Systems and Print.

Let me start with Personal Systems where we grew revenue for the 15th consecutive quarter and we delivered exceptional operating profit. We are creating amazing new experiences for customers while driving profitable growth and outgrowing the market. This team is an execution machine and we see runway for sustained value creation. We will discuss in more detail shortly.

In Print we continued making progress against our plan. Instant Ink surpassed 6 million subscribers for the first time and we saw another quarter of solid growth in Managed Print Services. We are also disrupting industries by leveraging our technology and IP, particularly in graphics and 3D printing. In graphics, we announced an additional $100 million deal with ePac. And in 3D we continued to make progress bringing together end-to-end solutions for customers. An example is New Balance and Superfeet. They are offering customized 3D printed cards for their insource to consumers. They are using HP Fitstation and Multi Jet Fusion printing technologies. And as we advance and disrupt, we are transforming the way we work to unlock value.

In the first quarter, we continued to drive operational performance by reducing costs and improving efficiency. We transitioned our sales force to a single commercial organization that is helping to accelerate our go-to-market. This includes global harmonization in areas such as pricing and as we saw in Q1, the ability to allocate supply more effectively across the globe.

Most importantly, this transformation is bringing us closer to our customers and partners. We are aggressively operationalizing our plan to take structural cost out of the business and are executing our plan to deliver 40% of our gross savings by the end of fiscal ’20. We will discuss this further in the review of our value plan. Our Q1 performance gives us great confidence in our plans for 2020 and beyond.

Before I turn the call to Steve, I want to briefly address the coronavirus situation. First and foremost the well-being of our employees, partners, customers and their families is our number one priority. We are following the processes and protocols outlined by public health authorities. We are also providing resources to asses with the public health response.

From a business perspective, as you all know, the situation is fluid. We are actively working to return to full production as quickly as possible. We are working with our logistics providers to ensure we get the necessary capacity to meet customer demand. Overall, we are viewing the situation as temporary in nature and we are aggressively navigating the challenges.

Let me now turn it over to Steve to go through the financial results for Q1 and our outlook in more detail.

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Enrique. Q1 was a very strong earnings quarter. We once again grew revenue in constant currency, non-GAAP operating profit dollars faster than revenue and non-GAAP EPS even faster. We are off to a strong start with free cash flow and overall we are very pleased with our results. Now let’s look at the details of the quarter.

Net revenue was $14.6 billion, down 1% year-on-year or up 1% in constant currency. Regionally, in constant currency APJ grew 4%, EMEA was flat and Americas declined 1%. Gross margin was 19.6%, up 180 basis points year-on-year, driven primarily by disciplined execution and improved rate in Personal Systems as well as improved Print hardware gross margins.Non-GAAP operating expenses were $1.7 billion, down $104 million sequentially resulting from significant reductions in SG&A driven by actions taken through our transformation program. Non-GAAP net OI&E expense was $44 million for the quarter. We delivered very strong non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share of $0.65, up $0.13 or 25% year-on-year with the diluted share count of approximately 1.5 billion shares.

Non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share exclude net charges totaling $278 million related to amortization of intangible assets, restructuring and other and non-operating retirement related credits and other tax adjustments. As a result, Q1 GAAP diluted net earnings per share was $0.46.

At the segment level in Personal Systems, it was a very strong quarter. Revenue was $9.9 billion, up 2% or 4% in constant currency. By customer segment, commercial revenue was up 7% and consumer revenue was down 7%. By product category, revenue was up 6% for workstations, up 2% for desktops and 1% for notebooks. The team continued to successfully manage our overall product mix as commercial demand remains solid while navigating the CPU supply constraints.

Personal Systems has been consistently delivering profitable growth, share gains and improved mix over time. This combined with disciplined pricing and supply chain favorability drove exceptionally strong profitability with operating margins of 6.7% and operating profit dollars up 61% year-on-year to $662 million. Personal Systems’ OP represented 47% of HP’s profit mix for the quarter.

In Print, we continued to make progress on our key initiatives, including growing our contractual offerings, gradually shifting more system profitability to hardware and managing supplies, all within a softer print market context. Looking at the details, Q1 total print revenue was $4.7 billion, down 7% nominally and 6% in constant currency. Print operating margins were 16%, up 40 basis points sequentially driven by higher gross margins and reduced opex, partially offset by a lower supplies mix. Commercial hardware revenue was down 1% and consumer hardware revenue was down 13%. Total hardware units were down 10% with commercial units down 12% and consumer units down 10%. The decline in units was driven by market softness, fewer sprocket units along with our ongoing strategy to focus on more profitable customers.

First quarter supplies revenue was $3 billion, down 7% in constant currency and in line with our expectations. We are executing against both the operational and strategic plans laid out in prior quarters. Overall Tier 1 channel inventory levels remained below the ceilings.

Let me now turn to our transformation efforts and specifically our cost savings opportunities. In Q1, about 800 people exited the Company globally as part of the restructuring activities announced in October 2019. We continue to pursue additional cost savings opportunities in addition to our ongoing productivity efforts. We now have line of sight to $1.2 billion of gross structural cost savings that help mitigate headwinds, create investment capacity and drop significant profits to the bottom line. We will discuss our expected $650 million net OP flow-through in FY ’22 later in this call.

Turning to cash flow and capital allocation. Q1 cash flow from operations and free cash flow were very strong at $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion respectively. This gives us confidence that for the full year we will earn [Phonetic] free cash flow between $3 billion and $3.5 billion even with the short-term negative working capital impact from the coronavirus. In Q1, the cash conversion cycle was minus 30 days. Sequentially, the cash conversion cycle is down one day. We returned $691 million to shareholders through share repurchases and $256 million via cash dividends in Q1.

Looking ahead to Q2 and FY ’20 keep the following in mind related to our overall financial outlook. We expect that macroeconomic conditions will remain dynamic as they are today and we expect to our end markets to remain competitive. We’re expecting currency to have about a 1% year-over-year negative impact. With regards to the financial impact from the coronavirus, we are factoring in our best assumptions at this time. Recognizing that the situation remains highly dynamic. In Q2, we expect a negative impact to our top line, bottom line and free cash flow, although we view the impact is temporary with limited impact to our second half. In total, net of mitigations we have factored in an $0.08 EPS impact into our Q2 guidance. We’re also expecting to have a significant impact to free cash flow in Q2 with negative impacts to working capital due to delayed production and manufacturing timing and back-end loaded revenue linearity. Again this should be temporary and not materially impact the full year.

Turning to specific Personal Systems assumptions. We expect industry-wide CPU supply constraints to continue to persist and we expect the cost from the overall basket of components to be less favorable compared to Q1 levels. In printing, we’re assuming a year-over-year unit market decline and consistent with our strategy, we will remain focused on profitable customers. We expect operating margins to improve in the second half of the year versus the first half as cost actions are more fully realized. In addition, for the full year, we expect our non-GAAP tax rate, which is based on our long-term non-GAAP financial projection to be 16% in FY ’20. Our FY ’20 outlook assumes return of capital of at least 75% of free cash flow to shareholders consistent with our SAM messaging. However, we will talk later about our incremental return of capital plans which would create upside in FY ’20 and are not yet factored into our guidance.

Taking these considerations into account, we are providing the following outlook. We are raising our full-year fiscal 2020 non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $2.33 to $2.43 and our full-year fiscal ’20 GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $2.03 to $2.13. We expect Q2 ’20 non-GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $0.49 to $0.53, inclusive of our best estimates of coronavirus. In Q2 ’20 GAAP diluted net earnings per share to be in the range of $0.46 to $0.50.

And now I would like to hand it back to Enrique to discuss our value plan.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Steve. Our Q1 results show a company with an incredibly strong foundation and the three-year value creation plan we are announcing today demonstrates the significant opportunity ahead. We have multiple levers to drive value for our shareholders and a clear set of guiding principles. Specifically, we will intensify our transformation focus in taking cost out, manage our Personal Systems and Print businesses to advance they leading their market and drive a more aggressive balance sheet and capital allocation approach.

Our new financial outlook is expected to deliver $3.25 to $3.65 of non-GAAP EPS in fiscal year ’22. This is underpinned by a rigorous operational plan. This management team have proven ability to take cost out of the business while maintaining a disciplined investment approach today and for the future. We have also proven that this is a company with a team that delivers on its commitment. This is our culture. The strong earnings announced today are yet another proof point. You have every reason to share our confidence in the Company and the opportunities ahead.

Additionally, against this backdrop of strong performance, we believe additional value can be created through consolidation. In fact instead of talking about being a first mover, we have been a first mover. Our acquisition of Samsung’s printer business in 2017 is an important example. However, anything we consider and anything we do must first and foremost make sense for HP shareholders.

Before I go into more detail on our three-year plan, let me address the Xerox proposal and why we firmly believe that this is not in the best interest of HP shareholders. The Xerox proposal meaningfully undervalues HP, it creates significant risk and it compromises the future of HP and the value of HP shares. Simply put, their proposal has a number of fundamental problems. The first is a flawed value exchange. The Xerox proposal does not reflect the value of our Company or the plan that we announced today. The value exchange simply does not work.

The second is that the proposal creates a highly leveraged and irresponsible capital structure. Considering the nature of our business, which operates with a negative cash conversion cycle as well other macroeconomic cycle, this level of debt creates significant unnecessary risk. It results in debt to EBITDA ratio would be the highest in the S&P hardware index. A debt lever [Phonetic], as Xerox is proposing, would virtually extinguish the capital returns that has been an important driver for value creation for HP.

The third is a transfer of value from HP shareholders to Xerox shareholders. Their overstated synergies include many of the initiatives and cost saving activities we are already doing. It is important to keep in mind that there is no overlap between Xerox and over 90% of HP’s business.

In addition, the Xerox proposal uses our balance sheet strength to acquire our Company, creating value for Xerox shareholders but not for HP’s. Beyond these problems, we are looking at two very different companies. HP is a global leader in both Personal Systems and Print. Xerox has no presence in Personal Systems. Xerox position in paint is not nearly as robust as HP. We are a technology leader. And with Xerox exit from the Fuji Xerox joint venture, Xerox has no long-term technology or supply road map. HP has grown by $10.5 billion over the last three years. This revenue growth is meaningfully more than Xerox total company revenue. HP does not need a Xerox combination to create significant value for shareholders.

Now, I’m excited to get to the most important news we are sharing today. The plan we are announcing shows the standalone value our shareholders can expect from us. More specifically, we expect to grow operating profit by approximately $650 million with realistic market assumptions and roughly flat revenue, to generate $10.7 billion to $11.7 billion of free cash flow and to return $16 billion of capital to shareholders. This represents approximately 50% of HP’s current market cap and at least $8 billion to be returned in the first 12 months. Altogether, these plans could deliver non-GAAP EPS of $3.25 to $3.65 in fiscal year ’22 compared to the $2.24 we delivered just last year.

Our significant earnings per share growth will be driven by the principles I outlined at the beginning, aggressive structural cost reductions and ongoing productivity savings, disciplined management of our Personal Systems and Print businesses to lead in their market and a more aggressive balance sheet and capital allocation approach.

Now I want to spend some time talking about each of these EPS drivers. I will start with one of the core elements of our value plan, which is to transform our Company with a relentless focus on cost. As we outlined at our Investor Day, we are driving efficiencies to generate structural cost savings. We have taken and are taking important actions that are driving measurable benefits. We expect our current cost reduction program to increase from the $1 billion announced in October 2019 to a revised plan of $1.2 billion of gross annualized run rate structural cost saving. We’re also announcing today that approximately $650 million of these structural cost savings are expected to flow through to operating profit. As a result of these actions, as previously announced, we are removing 7,000 to 9,000 positions or 13% to 16% of our total workforce and our restructuring dollars remain unchanged.

Complementing these structural savings, we will continue to drive productivity actions across the Company. We treat this as a separate bucket that we do each and every year to maintain our competitive position in the market. This include vendor management, material cost reduction, logistic efficiencies and more. Structural and productivity savings combined can generate more than $2 billion of savings as a standalone company. We have clear line of sight to deliver on these savings. We have defined projects across the organization to support our target with clear onus and timeline.

Let me share some specific examples. I mentioned before the changes that we are making in our sales organization. We have also consolidated marketing activities under one central global team. This is driving improved marketing spend efficiency and effectiveness. We are also creating efficiency in our business units and operations. We are changing our development processes, creating R&D centers of excellence and simplifying our hardware, software and firmware platforms. We have also embarked on our process to optimize the location of our factories and distribution network. We are reducing the cost of our service delivery by reducing the number of call centers, building tools to enable remote support and aggressively improving our product quality. We will be driving down real estate cost by reducing the number of locations and increasing the mobility of our workforce.

And finally we are redefining and digitizing processes to improve efficiency of our back office work and at the same time this creates better experiences for our customers, partners and employees. We anticipate that we will be achieving 40% of the annualized savings in fiscal year ’20, 75% in fiscal year ’21 and we will reach 100% of the savings during fiscal year ’22. Reducing cost is a never-ending task and we will continue to look for opportunities to drive efficiencies.

Let me talk now about our business segments. Let’s start with Personal Systems where we are creating amazing new experiences for our customers while driving profitable growth. Personal Systems represents approximately two-thirds of our revenue. As we discussed, we continue to outgrow the market, grow revenue and drive profit. This is a large and growing business that has further expansion opportunity with the next generation of customers and exciting new compute models. We have a winning strategy that’s anchored in premium design, security and innovation to continue gaining share in higher-value categories. That’s exactly what we have done in the past three years and we are still under indexed in higher-margin segments.

We’re also growing the lifetime value of our installed base by broadening our ecosystem of displays and accessories and accelerating in services. And we have demonstrated meaningful progress in driving cost advantage across our platforms and our end-to-end delivery system.

Looking forward, we expect to grow Personal Systems revenue at or better than market while expanding our long-term operating margin target to 3.5% to 5.5%. We feel great about the trajectory of this business and our team’s ability to execute.

Turning to Print, we have an incredible business in the large $200 billion plus print market. We are the market leader in size, scale, profit and innovation across office, home and graphics printing and in a mature industry, everyone wants to be a leader. At the same time, we are still under indexed and attack these categories like contractual and office printing. And as we drive a more consistent customer experience across our foot print portfolio, we are confident that we will achieve significant cost savings and productivity gains.

We continue to execute on our strategy to increase supplies share and to evolve our business model over time by growing contractual sales and optimizing system profitability with improved hardware margins. In addition, as I previously mentioned, we will also expand our solutions in graphics, 3D printing and digital manufacturing. This plays an important role in our long-term plan. And HP’s decades of investment has created a leading portfolio of technology and intellectual property that we are monetizing to create new sources of value beyond hardware across key industrial markets.

Across our Print segment, we are executing a strategy that will advance our leadership, disrupt industries and transform our business to improve our profitability. As a result, we are setting a long-term operating margin target for print at 16% to 18%.

Let me now hand the call over to Steve who will go into more details on the financial plan starting with optimizing the balance sheet.

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Enrique. An important part of our value creation plan is driving a more aggressive balance sheet and capital allocation approach. We are establishing a new capital structure model with a target gross leverage ratio of between 1.5 times to 2 times gross debt to EBITDA. In addition, we have announced a new capital return program, both in the short term and long term which will utilize HP’s balance sheet for the benefit of HP shareholders. Our capital structure will still preserve our ability to pursue disciplined and accretive M&A and to continue to grow our dividend at least in line with earnings.

The plan builds on HP’s strong history of returning capital to shareholders. Looking forward, we expect to return approximately $16 billion to shareholders over the next three years with at least $8 billion of shares repurchased in the 12 months following our 2020 Annual Shareholder Meeting. To support this plan, the Board has increased the total share repurchase authorization to $15 billion, an increase from the $5 billion we announced in October 2019. This increased capital return would be funded by deploying excess cash on HP’s balance sheet and available debt capacity. We remain committed to maintaining an investment grade rating.

We are also increasing our long-term return of capital target from approximately 75% to 100% of free cash flow, unless higher return opportunities emerge. We have a strong value plan, reflecting the significant opportunities across our business. It is a plan built on realistic assumptions and it is a plan that combines operational earnings growth with enhanced return of capital to shareholders.

I’ll bridge our non-GAAP EPS from FY ’19 to FY ’22 in three parts. Starting with the earnings contribution from our Print and Personal Systems business segments, we’re expecting an increase of $0.41 plus or minus from FY ’19 to FY ’22. This assumes approximately flat Company revenue during this period consistent with the growth across our weighted portfolio TAM. We remain well positioned to continue outgrowing our markets, improving our mix into higher growth and margin categories, all while managing improved supplies revenue declines over the three-year period.

Importantly, the primary driver of the expected operating profit growth is the high confident $650 million net flow-through from our transformation cost take-out program. Second, we have $0.35 plus or minus from shares and other using our previously guided 75% capital return. This base operational plan would generate between $2.90 to $3.10 non-GAAP EPS in FY ’22 before any enhanced return of capital. Finally, we add in the benefit from the incremental capital return program announced today, the upfront share repurchases along with 100% return of free cash flow target over the years ahead. This would generate another $0.45 plus or minus. In total for FY ’22 non-GAAP EPS range is between $3.25 and $3.65.

We hold ourselves to high standards and it is the HP way to consistently achieve the goals we set. We take a disciplined approach to capital allocation, including M&A and return of capital. We have experience acquiring and consolidating as well as separating and divesting and we have returned a significant amount of capital to shareholders. And we’ve done all of this while executing globally across both Personal Systems and our Print portfolio and creating new businesses and revenue streams. That’s the foundation we have built at HP. It’s one that you can trust and it is grounded in a purpose driven values of making sustainable impact and doing business the right way.

Now I will turn the call back to Enrique.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Steve. The details we have shared today show that HP has a path to attract the value creation and a compelling investment thesis through execution of our stand-alone plan. Additionally, we believe consolidation on the right terms could create incremental upside to this plan for HP shareholders. HP is reaching out to Xerox to explore if there is a combination that creates value for HP shareholders that is additive to HP’s strategic and financial plan. I am confident in this next chapter of HP we will be more aggressive, nimble and focused and we have multiple levers of value creation.

Now let me stop there and open the lines for your questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question will come from Shannon Cross of Cross Research. Please go ahead.

Shannon Cross — Cross Research — Analyst

Thank you very much and thank you for the detailed explanation of your strategy going forward. I wanted to follow up on the commentary that you made at the end Enrique about that you’re reaching out to Xerox. And I’m curious as to sort of steps and then also what metrics would you need to see to pursue a deal and you probably want to talk more generically, but just in general how are you looking about out that and how are you thinking about consolidation overall within the industry? And then I do have a follow-up. Thank you.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Sure. Thank you, Shannon. I think any conversation we will have needs to address the three issues that we outlined during the call. First, we need to make sure that the value exchange between the two companies reflects the real value of each of them. Second, the resulting entity needs to have a capital structure that makes sense and that will be able to address the needs of the businesses that we will be running. And third, it needs to be based on synergies that are realistic and that can be achieved. This is a conversation that we think is possible to have at this point. And this is what we have opened the communication to — opened engagement to talk about.

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Just to click — just to double click for a second. On those three dimensions that Enrique described, on the first one, on the value exchange, just to put it numerically, given our outlook Xerox’s offer today is roughly a 7 times PE for HP. And if we look at consensus on Xerox over a similar period they are, as of last week, in closer to the 9.4 range. So a striking difference in the respective valuations, despite the fact if you look at our performance HP has been growing and Xerox has been declining.

The quick double click on the irresponsible capital structure. There is no hardware company in the S&P Index with a leverage beyond 3.5 and so we view it as irresponsible. Candidly if we just reflect on the current situation with coronavirus and the working capital required to run our Personal Systems business, it’s really important that you have that flexibility in your operating cash as we do today.

And then the third one on the synergies, it’s important that our investors get the benefit of HP’s cost take-out program and not Xerox taking credit for it in terms of the synergies they are claiming.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

And let me add one more thing. Our number one priority is to execute the plan that we have outlined today. We have an opportunity of creating very strong value for our shareholders and this is what myself, Steve and the rest of the team are uniquely focused.

Shannon Cross — Cross Research — Analyst

Great. Thank you. And then I just wanted to clarify that you’re taking up your cost reduction to $1.2 billion and specifying $650 million flowing through to the bottom line. I’m kind of curious as to what you’ve seen that’s incremental that’s driving that. And also you’d mentioned $2 billion over time. Is that a longer-term target? Just any clarity there? Thank you.

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Yes. So maybe I’ll clear up the numbers. So what we announced at SAM in October was $1 billion growth run rate savings by the end of FY ’22. At the time we did acknowledge that that was to cover business headwinds to invest in the business and we’d have some drop to the bottom line and we didn’t quantify that drop. What we are announcing today is that that $1 billion goes up to $1.2 billion in FY ’22 and not by the end of FY ’22 and that there would be a $650 million net drop from that. The confidence comes really from the start out of the gate, given where we see the headcount reductions that have taken place thus far, the continued work we’ve done over the prior three months, as we said, we will always look at taking additional cost out and we’ll communicate them when we have line of sight. And so since we have line of sight, we’ve increased it to $1.2 billion.

In addition to that, what we didn’t specifically quantify in October, but it’s important for our investors to understand is we also have ongoing productivity initiatives and actions. This takes place every year. It always does at HP, where we see more than $1 billion of productivity. Think about this as vendor management, supplier management, pricing efficiencies which we drive day in and day out. That’s really used more just to make sure that we are competitive in our markets, in our business. And so what’s really important is the structural cost reductions and that’s now $1.2 billion.

Shannon Cross — Cross Research — Analyst

Thanks, Steve. [Phonetic]

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

But, as Steve said, we said in October and we said it today, we will continue to look for opportunities to become more efficient. Removing cost is an activity that never stops and we will continue to do that and continue to improve the efficiency of the Company.

Shannon Cross — Cross Research — Analyst

Thank you.

Operator

Our next question will come from Katy Huberty of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Katy Huberty — Analyst

Thank you. Good afternoon. Commend you on the very aggressive capital return plan. In that context, maybe this is a question for Steve first, if and when the PC market growth turns negative, how do you plan to manage through the negative cash conversion cycle and the potential impact to free cash flow so that you can continue to meet this new share buyback commitment?

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Sure. Yeah, I mean, it’s really a fundamental part of our overall capital structure. And as we said in the prepared remarks, our new target debt leverage ratio is 1.5 times to 2 times. It’s important that we maintain investment grade and we have confidence that operating within that range we’ll do so. And the reason for that is a few fold, one of which is what you just described. It’s important that we can manage across economic cycles and particularly with our Personal Systems business and ensure that we have sufficient cash for operations. Also given what we’ve announced, we think our capital structure still supports our ability to invest and look at accretive disciplined value based M&A and really take advantage of the financial and debt markets as they arise.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

And let me add one comment. Steve said in the prepared remarks, we have very realistic market assumptions that are supporting this plan and basically we are expecting flattish revenue. So this is also an important plan or the confidence that we have about this plan.

Katy Huberty — Analyst

So that actually connects to my follow-up. The operational earnings growth over the next three years is $0.41. That entirely ties to the $650 million of cost savings. So, as you say there is no revenue growth, there is no benefit from margin expansion as you mix into higher value PC categories, as the supplies trajectory improves. And so, just some context around why you’re not betting that operationally you can grow earnings beyond the cost savings over the next three years?

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, I would say first of all, the plus $650 million is a plus or minus, right. And so we obviously have proven in the past few years our ability to profitably outgrow our market and also do so in categories where we’re under indexed and have higher long-term growth in margin accretive potential. That being said, we did want to take a realistic view of the opportunities in markets that we see. We do see and would expect certain parts of our portfolio to continue to grow and we would expect there would be parts of our portfolio that we continue to expect some declines. Supplies being one of them although we do expect that the supplies’ declines will improve over the period.

Operator

Our next question will come from Toni Sacconaghi of Bernstein. Please go ahead.

Toni Sacconaghi — Bernstein — Analyst

Yes. Good afternoon and thank you for the presentation and all the detail. I’m wondering you did talk about reaching out to Xerox to explore a combination. But it doesn’t sound like you’re open to being purchased by Xerox at any price, let’s say, $30 a share or more, simply because under any raised price you would still have the same grievances. Is that correct? So are you — if I literally follow your logic, it sounds like you’re not open to being purchased by Xerox and Xerox having a majority control of the Company under — at any price. Is that fair?

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

I, at this point, Toni, I don’t think that who buys what is a real conversation. The real conversation is to make sure that either two companies get together, we address the issues that we outlined during the call. First, we need to make sure that the valuation of the two companies is fair based on the value that both companies are going to be bringing to the joint entity. We need to make sure that the resulting capital structure makes sense for the businesses where we will be operating and we need to make sure also that there is a fair, a clear assessment of what the synergies are. This is, I think, the important conversation for our shareholders. Once we clarify that, then who, how are things that will be discussed after that.

Toni Sacconaghi — Bernstein — Analyst

Okay, thank you. And if I could just follow up, could you, A, just clarify what your expected supplies growth is through ’22 in terms of decline per year and then maybe you can comment on what feedback you’ve received from investors about this proposal? And the reason I ask is, you’re effectively saying what we outlined in October was $3 a share year in 2022 and the stock market reacted with a share price of $17 or $18 for HPQ. Now you are effectively taking that up to $3.50. But it’s not dramatically different and your stock price is up 33% since then. So I’m wondering, A, what feedback did you receive from investors over the last couple of months since the Xerox offer has come to be. And why do you believe that the market will view earnings that are 15% higher as being an entity that’s dramatically higher value than the price, say, we are willing to ascribe to the Company shortly after the Analyst Day? Thank you.

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

So let me take a first crack at that. So I think there’s a couple of things, just to start with. The first of which is just to remind everyone, we did over deliver on our Q4 results after our Analyst Day and we significantly over delivered on our Q1 results announced today, as well as now two increases in our full year ’20 outlook. So that’s point one. Point two is what we didn’t share in October and what we are sharing today is the underlying financial plan that is consistent with the strategy described at our Security Analyst Meeting. And in that plan in it of itself, and it’s why we bridged it the way we did, would deliver between $2.90 to $3.10 non-GAAP EPS in FY ’22 before any of the incremental increased return of capital discussed today. So I think those are two important data points that have not been shared with, a little bit I guess the earnings beat has. But the value plan itself, this is the first time we’re talking about it in this level of detail. And I think it’s important facts and assumptions that would support the investor dialog, which we’ve continued to have and will continue to have.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

And when I got this question in the past, I always say that we were undervalued because our financial plan was clearly delivering higher value. And this is one of our objectives of sharing this today because now this analysis can be done openly and it will clearly reflect what is the real value of this Company.

Toni Sacconaghi — Bernstein — Analyst

Okay. Thank you very much.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Toni.

Operator

Our next question will come from Amit Daryanani of Evercore. Please go ahead.

Amit Daryanani — Evercore ISI — Analyst

Yeah. Thanks a lot. I’ve a few questions as well and thanks for providing all the details that we hear. I guess, Enrique, when I think about the updated capital allocation there, I’m wondering how does M&A fit into your thought process as we go forward? And specifically a question we get very too often is, will HP turn around and look to acquire Xerox at some point. I’d love to understand how do you view M&A broadly? It seems [Phonetic] you didn’t talk about this perhaps with Xerox specifically.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, let me start and then maybe Steve will provide more detail. The way we have designed the capital structure will provide us flexibility to continue to drive accretive M&A with solid return on investment that will be aligned to the strategy that we have described. We have increased the debt that we are going to be taking, but still we will have enough room to drive the M&A that we will consider appropriate.

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, I mean, I think the only thing I would add is, again, we intend to operate between the 1.5 times to 2 times leverage ratio. It’s important for us to maintain investment grade and we believe that still gives us the capacity to do — would be still an important part of our strategy which is M&A.

Amit Daryanani — Evercore ISI — Analyst

Got it. And then if I just come back to the fundamentals and the quarter [Phonetic] that you guys just reported, supplies it feels like it’s sound and stabilized in the down 6%, 7% range for a few quarters now. I’d love to understand your perspective on how fiscal ’20 starts up, especially because compares start to get easy in the back half for supplies. And then any feedback you’re getting from your customers or channel with the new pricing model?

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Sure. I won’t kind of give any specific guidance as it relates to supplies revenue other than potentially that provide some color commentary. Certainly as it relates to our three-year plan, as I mentioned, we are still assuming the supplies revenue will decline, but we expect it to decelerate and improve over time. The reason for that, there’s a few things. First of all, we’re expecting that the supplies share will improve throughout the period, reasons being our strategy. We are shifting more to contractual based models, both in the home and office. Enrique commented that Instant Ink is now over 6 million subscribers. Number two, we expect to continue growing our industrial businesses, graphics, 3D. Number three, we expect to shift more of our customers to our end-to-end systems. Now this is going to evolve over time, but that’s certainly should help supplies share. And finally operationally, we’re driving changes, we’ve talked about in EMEA, but also executing some of the wins we saw on the ink side where we’ve improved our supplies share into the toner side. So those should all help our supplies trajectory over time.

I would call out that we still have declines in installed base and especially in home. So there’s definitely offset to that, which is why we’re still expecting that decline throughout the period.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Let me emphasize one of the points that Steve made. As a consequence of the strategy that we are driving, we expect the three — the print business to be a much stronger business three years from now than it is today. We will have fewer and profitable customers and we are sharing some details about that today. We will have higher share of supplies. We will have better hardware margin. We will have a higher percentage of contractual business, both for consumers and for businesses and there will be a higher mix of growth businesses like graphics and 3D. So as we execute our strategy, we are really driving a significant improvement of the quality of the print business.

Operator

And our next question will come from Ananda Baruah of Loop Capital. Please go ahead.

Ananda Baruah — Loop Capital — Analyst

Hi. Good afternoon. Appreciate you guys, we can be in here [Phonetic]. Yeah, two if I could as well. Could you just talk about with regards to coronavirus specifically what’s being impacted from a Component 2 perspective as well as a production perspective? That would be helpful. And then I have a quick follow-up. Thanks.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Sure. Let me start. So as we talk about the coronavirus always our first thoughts how well is our employees, partners, customers and their families, because we have a large number of them in the countries that are being affected — impacted. At the same time we need to acknowledge that if I focus on the business side, the situation is fluid and our number one priority — our number one problem is manufacturing capacity both for Personal Systems, for Print, hardware and supply.

We are working very aggressively with our manufacturing partners and suppliers. I personally have been in contact with most of the CEOs to accelerate the recovery. We are seeing some improvement, but as Steve mentioned, we expect until to see — still to see some impact during Q2.

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. I’ll just — I think it’s important to reiterate that this is a dynamic situation. Our guidance just factors in the best information that we have today. We do view the situation is ultimately a temporary situation that we will work ourselves through. As Enrique indicated, we are expecting that it would impact both our Personal Systems and Print business, hardware and potentially supplies as well in Q2. The impact will be felt across our units’ revenue, profit and free cash flow. We have factored in, as I said in my remarks, an $0.08 net impact, a negative impact in our Q2 outlook. And we’re not expecting any material impact in the second half. So that’s what’s assumed in our guidance.

As it relates to free cash flow, I do want to note that given the delayed manufacturing and production that is likely to make Q2 to be a more back-end loaded revenue quarter and therefore be negative to cash flow, as well as from an inventory and days payable outstanding perspective, the timing of the manufacturing could also pressure working capital there. So it is likely to have a negative impact to our Q2 free cash flow results, again temporary.

Ananda Baruah — Loop Capital — Analyst

That’s helpful. Thanks. And if I — just on cash, if I could squeeze one more in. What — how — is there an opportunity to the cash — for the cash you will be using for the share repurchase and how you’d like us to think about that opportunity costs?

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

When you say cash, you turn to [Phonetic] cash flow or cash on hand?

Ananda Baruah — Loop Capital — Analyst

Sorry. Well for the cash that you can — for the cash usage that you’ll be using for the share repurchase, I can think that M&A potentially could be somewhat impacted, but would there be any other areas that perhaps you kind of pull back on investing in to [Indecipherable] the free cash flow that you would then use for that share repurchase?

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Well, I mean, obviously we’ll continue to look for returns-based opportunities to invest and if we see those we will make those investments. If we don’t see those and there is always opportunities to drop more to the bottom line. We will continue to aggressively lead in our markets as Enrique said in his remarks and again if that leads to upside opportunities that can drop more to the bottom line. That being said, our three-year cumulative free cash flow outlook is between $10.7 billion to $11.7 billion. It’s one of the strengths that we have seen in the past and would expect going forward, which is we generate a lot of cash at HP.

Operator

And our next question will come from Paul Coster of J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead.

Paul Coster — J.P. Morgan — Analyst

Yeah. Thank you very much for taking my question. First off, can you just talk us through the timeline here for when the annual meeting is and when you’ll have the discussion with Xerox and when you will take on the debt and to what extent in this fiscal year the debt will be sort of front-loaded to enable the purchase of shares?

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, in terms of the date of the shareholder meeting, we will be publishing our proxy statement in the next week and then is when the date will be defined. In terms of the engagement with the Xerox team, it’s something that has actually already started and we will be reporting on that as we will have two based on regulatory obligations. And —

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

In terms of debt, I mean the debt and the actual execution of the increased share repurchase, first and foremost we’re going to get out and engage with our shareholders and we will provide greater clarity in terms of kind of the timing and ultimately the structure and debt levels as we get closer to the execution.

Paul Coster — J.P. Morgan — Analyst

Got it, okay. My follow-up question is, obviously this is a really interesting value-creation plan that you’ve outlined here. And if it’s a good idea now, why wasn’t it a good idea back in October? And what do you think you may have done by way of compromising in order to bring out the plan now versus back then?

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Sure. So first of all, let me remember that when we had the Investor Meeting in October, I were still not the CEO and I have been the CEO of the Company only for four months. Within these four months, I have worked with the team and all the team had worked to really look for ways to accelerate the value that we can provide to our shareholders. This is what we have presented today. And at the same time, we wanted to be able to demonstrate our ability to execute in Q1. We have done this today, presenting very strong results and this is why we are having this conversation today.

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

I would want to add in the October time frame, we did announce the Board’s approval for the largest share repurchase authorization in the history of HPQ as a standalone company, both in terms of dollars as well as a percentage of our market cap, because as we said at the time we did view our shares are significantly undervalued. So we did say that at that time.

Operator

Our next question will come from Matt Cabral of Credit Suisse. Please go ahead.

Matt Cabral — Credit Suisse — Analyst

Thank you. In your presentation, you mentioned roughly $1 billion of potential synergies created through the combination with Xerox. Could you just talk a little bit about how you arrived at that number and just the biggest difference that you see versus the plan that Xerox has put out there?

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Sure. Let me take the question. So we have done a lot of work internally to — based in public information, trying to estimate those synergies and also we had a company that is specialized in to validate some of our key assumptions. And we reached kind of a conclusion that Steve mentioned before that synergies are in the range of $1 billion. I want to remind everybody that the overlap between the two companies is relatively small. From our perspective it’s less than 10%. So really we need to always have that in mind when we talk about synergies. Having said that around 40% of the synergies will be in cost of goods sold, around 60% of the synergies are in the opex side. Steve will give you a high-level estimation of the synergies.

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

I think it’s also important to just to reflect upon the flow-through and what we’ve heard is that the assumption of 100% cost flow through to the bottom line that Xerox has proposed is really not anything that’s being achieved today in their cost take-out plans. And so I think we’ve reflected on that and again I think it’s important that whatever the synergy number is it’s an incremental synergy number and doesn’t duplicate the cost plans that HP is already executing and candidly that Xerox seems to be executing on their side as well.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

And this is a — fundamental part is we are driving significant cost out of this Company and the value of that needs to go to HP shareholders. This is their money. This is why we think a big part of why the current proposal doesn’t work for HP shareholders.

Matt Cabral — Credit Suisse — Analyst

Got it. And then really strong EPS upside in the quarter, but it looks like your full year guidance went up by a little bit less than in the first quarter beat. Can you help us understand if there is any pull-forward or anything one time in the first quarter and why we shouldn’t expect the margin upside to continue for the balance of the year?

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Yes. So we increased our full-year outlook by $0.10. I think what we’ve demonstrated there is we do have multiple levers to drive profit of the Company and our outlook does assess the various risks and opportunities that we see. Maybe just a few high-level points. The first is we have factored into our guidance certainly see [Phonetic] in Q2, the impact of coronavirus. We see it as a temporary issue at this point, again this is dynamic. But that is both in Q2, it does reflect our overall full-year guide. In the second half Personal Systems is going to have a tougher compare whereas Print should show a better compare and year-over-year improvement. But also in second half and I think what’s important is is we do expect to see more of the structural cost reductions and savings and we have increasing confidence in that. You factor all those elements together, which is why we increased the full-year by $0.10 and we’ve got confidence in delivering that albeit the coronavirus remains dynamic.

Operator

Our next question will come from Jeriel Ong of Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Jeriel Ong — Deutsche Bank — Analyst

Yeah. Thanks for letting me ask the questions. So I wanted to put together a couple of bread comes [Phonetic] together and just kind of paint a picture here. So it seems like you mentioned you recount the Xerox offer as a combination. You’ve mentioned a repurchase which appears like you’re required to raise some debt if you’re — to complete in the quick manner you’ve guided to and finally there is a commitment to this gross debt to EBITDA of 1.5 times to 2 times. How do you reconcile the idea that if you were to pursue a combination of Xerox, the combination of deal and repurchase could push you over the leverage that you’ve committed to?

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Well, I guess, first and foremost, we’ve got a strong balance sheet and we don’t necessarily look at this as an either or proposition. I mean our return of capital and capital structure is really designed to return significant capital, also preserve the optionality around M&A if it’s ROI based and disciplined and accretive to the Company that could great value for our shareholders. Clearly any specifics or hypotheticals really matter about what any potential transaction could look like. So won’t comment on that. But our capital allocation will remain disciplined and responsible and strategic to — strategically deployed to drive value for the Company and we think the 1.5 times to 2 times target leverage will allow us to do so.

Jeriel Ong — Deutsche Bank — Analyst

Got it. Appreciate that. And one fundamental one if I can. You mentioned a raise on both sides, Personal Systems and Print margins. I want to ask versus perhaps back in October, what gives you confidence in that raise?

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. Our long-term margins for Personal Systems, it’s fundamentally driven by the structural improvements we have made and would expect to making in our mix. You’ve seen that underlying our results over the past many quarters, certainly in the most recent quarters also helped by some of the supply chain cost favorability but the mix really helps. And then the cost take-out, the cost take-out should help both Personal Systems and Print both in the short term and long term.

Operator

Our next question will come from Rod Hall of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Raghunathan Kamesh — Goldman Sachs — Analyst

Hi. This is RK on behalf of Rod. Thanks for taking my question. I wanted to ask about the Windows 10 cycle. Where do you think we are? And could you comment on your expectations for commercial PC trends going forward?

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Sure. As we have said before, we are very confident in the trajectory of the Personal Systems business going forward. We — there is a very large installed base that is — that we can drive an upgrade to some of the new volumes, some of the new units that we have and we think that we have an opportunity to mitigate any impact that they Windows 10 refresh may have going forward.

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. And what we saw in Q1 was our demand remains solid certainly on the commercial side. And so I think that’s an important factor. Ironically, I think the coronavirus may ultimately push out some of the Win 10 refresh timelines given some of the constraints we’re going to see in Q2 so that could support a better second half than we originally anticipated.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Additionally, to some of the shortages we have seen [Phonetic] processors during the last quarter. So this is really moving out the transition to the new systems.

Raghunathan Kamesh — Goldman Sachs — Analyst

Thank you. And on the coronavirus impacts, does your guidance include any impacts to demand outside of China?

Steve Fieler — Chief Financial Officer

No, the guide really reflects the economic conditions as we saw today and the demand impact was really China-based as well as the supply chain and logistics impact from the China production and manufacturing.

Raghunathan Kamesh — Goldman Sachs — Analyst

Great. Thank you.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

And as we said before, the biggest impact is driven by the supply chain impact that of course will have an impact in sales all over the world.

Raghunathan Kamesh — Goldman Sachs — Analyst

Thank you.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

This concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Enrique Lores for any closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Enrique Lores — President and Chief Executive Officer

So thank you everybody for joining. As you have seen during the call, we are very confident in the plans we have laid out today. We will build on our disciplined and sustained cost reduction actions to drive overall operating profit and cash flow across our business and we will keep evolving so we can become a better, leaner, more digitally-driven company. My number one priority is to execute the plan that we have outlined today. Thank you.

Operator

[Operator Closing Remarks]