Caterpillar Inc (NYSE: CAT) Q1 2023 Earnings Call dated Apr. 27, 2023
Corporate Participants:
Ryan Fiedler — Vice President, Investor Relations
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Andrew Bonfield — Chief Financial Officer
Analysts:
Rob Wertheimer — Melius Research — Analyst
Tami Zakaria — J.P. Morgan Securities — Analyst
Michael Feniger — Bank of America Securities — Analyst
Jamie Cook — Credit Suisse — Analyst
David Raso — Evercore ISI Institutional Equities — Analyst
Jerry Revich — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Steve Volkmann — Jefferies & Company — Analyst
Chad Dillard — Bernstein — Analyst
John Joyner — BMO Capital Markets — Analyst
Matthew Elkott — Cowen and Company, LLC — Analyst
Kristen Owen — Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. — Analyst
Timothy Thein — Citigroup — Analyst
Mircea Dobre — Robert W. Baird — Analyst
Steven Fisher — UBS Securities — Analyst
Dillon Cumming — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Presentation:
Operator
Welcome to the First Quarter 2023 Caterpillar Earnings Conference Call. Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Ryan Fiedler. Thank you. Please go ahead.
Ryan Fiedler — Vice President, Investor Relations
Thanks Anna, good morning, everyone, and welcome to Caterpillar’s First Quarter of 2023 earnings call. I’m Ryan Fiedler, Vice-President of Investor Relations. Joining me today are Jim Umpleby, Chairman and CEO; Andrew Bonfield, Chief Financial Officer; Kyle Epley, Senior Vice-President of the Global Finance Services Division, and Rob Rengel, Senior IR Manager.
During our call today, we’ll be discussing the first quarter earnings release that we issued earlier today. You can find our slides, the news release and a webcast recap at investors.caterpillar.com under Events and Presentations. The content of this call is protected by U.S. and international copyright law. Any rebroadcast, retransmission, reproduction or distribution of all or part of the content without Caterpillar’s prior written permission is prohibited.
Moving to slide 2, during our call today, we will make forward-looking statements which are subject to risks and uncertainties. We’ll also make assumptions that could cause our actual results to be different from the information we are sharing with you on this call. Please refer to our recent SEC filings and the forward-looking statements reminder in the news release for details on factors that individually or in aggregate could cause our actual results to vary materially from our forecast. A detailed discussion of the many factors that we believe may have a material effect on our business on an ongoing basis is contained in our SEC filings. On today’s call, we’ll also refer to non-GAAP numbers. For a reconciliation of any non-GAAP numbers to the appropriate U.S. GAAP numbers, please see the appendix of the earnings call slides.
Now let’s turn to slide 3 and turn the call over to our Chairman and CEO, Jim Umpleby.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Ryan. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us. I’d like to start by thanking our global team for a strong first-quarter, including double-digit, top-line growth, higher operating profit margins, record adjusted profit per share and strong ME&T free-cash flow. Our results reflect healthy customer demand across most end-markets for our products and services. We remain focused on executing our strategy, and continue to invest for long-term profitable growth. In today’s call, I’ll begin with my perspective on our performance in the quarter. I’ll then provide some insights on our end-markets. Lastly, I’ll provide an update on our sustainability journey.
It was a very strong quarter. Sales and revenues were better than we expected with price realization, dealer inventory and sales to users each slightly better than we anticipated. Sales to users were higher than expected in energy and transportation and resource Industries. Overall, sales and revenues rose by 17% versus the first quarter of 2022. The year-over-year increase was due to strong price realization and volume growth, which was driven by higher sales of equipment to end users. We achieved double-digit top-line increases in each of our three primary segments.
Adjusted operating profit margins increased to 21.1% in the first quarter as we saw margins improve, both on a sequential and year-over-year basis. The adjusted operating profit margins were significantly better than we had anticipated, primarily due to better-than-expected manufacturing costs, including efficiencies in absorption, stronger price realization and volume growth. Andrew will discuss in detail later.
Backlog ended the quarter at $30.4 billion, flat relative to the fourth quarter of 2022. Equipment availability increased during the quarter due to improving supply-chain conditions. While dealer order rates are lower, they remain at healthy levels. As you know, as availability improves order rates typically normalize as dealers can wait longer to place orders for long-lead time items. Our healthy backlog continues to underpin our constructive views about our end-markets. Despite the improvement in supply-chain, pockets of challenge remain as we increased production, particularly for large engines, which impacts energy and transportation in some of our larger machines.
We delivered a strong first quarter, which positions us well for an even better year in 2023 than we previously anticipated. While we continue to closely monitor global macroeconomic conditions, overall demand remains healthy across our products and services.
Turning to slide 4, in the first quarter of 2023, sales and revenues increased 17% versus last year to $15.9 billion. This was primarily due to favorable price and volume growth. Compared with the first-quarter of 2022, overall sales to users increased 13%. For Construction Industries and Resource Industries, sales to users rose by 5%, while energy and transportation was up 39%. Sales to users in Construction Industries were flat, in line with our expectations.
North American sales to users increased as demand remained healthy for both non-residential and residential, despite some moderation of the growth rate in residential. Overall, our North American sales to users were better than we expected. EAME also saw higher sales to users, led by strength in the Middle East. In Latin-America and Asia-Pacific, sales to users declined in the quarter. The decline in Asia-Pacific included further weakening in China.
In Resource Industries, sales to users increased 18% which was our third consecutive quarter of accelerating sales to users. In mining, sales to users benefited from a higher-level of commissioning in the quarter.
Within heavy construction and quarry and aggregates, sales to users also increased, supported by growth for infrastructure-related projects. In Energy and Transportation, sales to users increased by 39% in the first quarter. Oil and gas sales to users benefited from continued strength in new engine sales to customers, including repowering active fleets, upgrading technology to Tier 4 dynamic gas blending and adding incremental gas compression units.
We also saw strong sales of turbines and turbine related services. Power generation and industrial sales to users continue to remain positive, due to favorable market conditions. Transportation declined from a relatively low base, primarily due to timing in marine deliveries, which was partially offset by deliveries of international locomotives.
Dealer inventory increased by about $1.4 billion in the first quarter, which was slightly above our expectations, compared to a $1.3 billion increase in the same quarter last year. In Construction Industries, the increase in dealer inventory was primarily due to stronger North American shipments, which remains our most constrained region. As we mentioned last quarter, over 70% of the combined dealer inventory in Resource Industries and Energy and Transportation is supported by customer orders.
Moving to slide 5, we generated strong ME&T free-cash flow of $1.4 billion in the first quarter. We returned $1 billion to shareholders, which included about $600 million in dividends and $400 million in repurchase stock. We remain proud of our Dividend Aristocrat status and continue to expect to return substantially all ME&T free-cash flow to shareholders overtime through dividends and share repurchases.
Now on slide 6, I’ll share some commentary on our expectations moving forward. While we continue to closely monitor global macroeconomic conditions, our first quarter results lead us to expect that 2023 will be even better than we had previously anticipated on both the top and bottom-line. For 2023, we currently expect to be in the top half of the targeted range for both adjusted operating profit margin and ME&T free-cash flow. Andrew will provide additional color.
Before I discuss our outlook for key end-markets, I’ll provide some color on how we expect our top-line to progress through this year. As I mentioned, we expect a strong topline for 2023, supported by price and higher sales to users with healthy underlying end-markets. We expect higher sales in the second quarter compared to the first, as is the typical seasonal pattern.
Looking to the second half of 2023, it is important to highlight the second-half of last year included a dealer inventory build of $1.4 billion as dealers began to restock their inventories. We are not planning for this trend to repeat. Instead, we expect to see dealers decrease inventories compared to the first quarter levels and to end 2023 about flat relative to the end of 2022.
Although we expect sales to users to remain positive for our primary segments in each quarter, our planning assumption is that Caterpillar second half sales will have a dealer inventory impact. Let me explain. First, although dealer inventory in some products and regions have normalized, others remain constrained. For example, in North-America, dealer inventory remains below the typical range for many products. However, there is a greater excavator inventory in a few regions as supply dynamics improved in 2022, which coupled with the slowing in China has resulted in improved excavation product availability. Given the improved availability of excavators, we expect that dealers will scale back their levels of excavator inventory in the second half of the year, even though demand remains healthy. As a reminder, dealers are independent businesses and control their own inventory.
Second, in late 2023, we have scheduled a couple of new product changeovers in construction industry factories that will also impact the second half.
Now I’ll discuss our outlook for key end-markets this year, starting with Construction Industries. In North-America, overall, we continue to see positive momentum in 2023. We expect growth in nonresidential construction in North-America due to the positive impact of government-related infrastructure investments and a healthy pipeline of construction projects. Although, residential construction and housing starts have softened, the growth rate of our residential construction equipment remains positive as the supply-chain pressures alleviate.
In Asia-Pacific, excluding China, we expect growth in Construction Industries due to public infrastructure spending and supportive commodity prices. As we mentioned during our previous earnings calls, we expect Chinese above 10-ton excavator industry to remain below 2022 levels due to low construction activity. In 2023, sales in China are expected to be below the typical range of 5% to 10% of total Caterpillar sales.
In the EAME, business activity is now expected to increase versus last year, based on healthy construction project activity, particularly strong construction demand in the Middle-East. Although uncertain economic conditions remain, European Construction is proving to be more resilient than we previously anticipated. Construction activity in Latin-America is expected to be down in 2023 versus the strong 2022 performance.
There were some concerns about the potential impact of a commercial real-estate slowdown. We estimate that North American commercial real-estate accounts for about 1% of total construction industry sales. Any slowdown related to this sector should not have a significant impact on Construction Industries.
In Resource Industries, we expect healthy mining demand to continue as commodity prices remain above investment thresholds. As I’ve mentioned during the last few years, customers remain capital disciplined, which supports a gradual increase in mining overtime. We anticipate production utilization levels will remain elevated. We also expect the aging of the fleet and a lower level of parked trucks to support future demand for equipment and services. We continue to believe the energy transition will support increased commodity demand, expanding our total addressable market and providing further opportunities for profitable growth.
In heavy construction and quarry and aggregates, we anticipate continued growth due to major infrastructure and non-residential construction projects. In energy and transportation, we expect to follow our normal seasonal pattern with higher sales in the second-half of the year versus the first-half.
In oil and gas, reciprocating engines, although customers remain disciplined, we are encouraged by continued strength in demand for both well servicing and gas compression. Power generation reciprocating engine demand is expected to remain healthy, including strong data center growth.
New equipment orders and services for solar turbines in both oil and gas and power generation are robust. Industrial remains healthy. In Transportation, we anticipate strength in high-speed marine as customers continue to upgrade aging fleets.
Moving to slide 7, we are contributing to a reduced carbon future and continuing to invest in new products, technologies and services to help our customers achieve their climate-related objectives. We recently completed an upgrade of more than 15 models across our entire next-generation hydraulic excavator line. The new models reduce fuel consumption by up to 25% compared to previous models, and provide another option for customers to lower emissions, while improving operational efficiency. A customer can realize meaningful emissions reductions by simply moving to the newest Next-Gen model. This example reinforces our ongoing sustainability leadership and how we help our customers build a better, more sustainable world. In addition, we look forward to issuing our 18th Annual Sustainability Report in May.
With that, I will turn the call over to Andrew.
Andrew Bonfield — Chief Financial Officer
Thanks, Jim, and good morning, everyone. I’ll begin by providing further color on the first quarter results, including the performance of our segments. Then I’ll cover the balance sheet and EAME free-cash flow before concluding with a few comments on the full-year and our assumptions for the second quarter.
Beginning on slide 8, sales and revenues for the first quarter increased by 17% or $2.3 billion to $15.9 billion. The sales increase versus the prior year was due to strong price realization and higher volume, partially offset by currency impacts. Sales were higher than we had expected in January with price realization, dealer inventory and end user demand, each slightly better than we had anticipated.
Operating profit increased by 47% or $876 million to $2.7 billion, which includes the impact of the divestiture of the company’s long-haul business.
Adjusted operating profit increased by 79%, or $1.5 billion to $3.3 billion. Favorable price realization and higher sales volume was partially offset by higher manufacturing costs. The adjusted operating profit margin was 21.1%, an increase of 740 basis-points versus the prior year.
As Jim mentioned, the adjusted operating margin was much better than we had anticipated. Lower than expected manufacturing costs including efficiencies and absorption with the largest variable, while price realization and volume were also stronger than we had envisaged. I’ll provide additional color in a moment.
Adjusted profit per share increased by 70% to $4.91 in the first-quarter, compared to $2.88 in the first-quarter of last year. Adjusted profit per share in the first quarter of 2023 excluded pretax restructuring costs of $611 million, most of this related to the non-cash charge from the divestiture of the company’s long-haul business. This compares to pre-tax restructuring costs of $13 million in the first quarter 2022. Other income of $32 million in the quarter was lower than the first-quarter 2022 by $221 million. The year-over-year decline included about $100 million unfavorable currency impacts related to ME&T balance sheet translation, and adverse impact of $80 million for pension expense.
The dollar strengthened marginally since our last earnings call, so the currency impact within the first quarter of 2023 was about $30 million better than we had anticipated than when we spoke to you in January.
Finally, the provision for income taxes in the first-quarter, excluding discrete items reflected a global annual effective tax-rate of 23%.
Moving on to slide 9. The 17% increase in the topline versus the prior year was driven by favorable price realization and higher sales volume, while currency remained a headwind to sales. Volume improved in part due to a 13% increase in sales to users. The impact from changes in dealer inventory was minimal as a $1.4 billion build in the first quarter was similar to that seen in the first quarter 2022.
Services sales volume was slightly down, mainly due to dealer ordering patterns, while services to their customers remain positive. Compared to our expectations a quarter ago, sales were higher than we anticipated, largely due to slightly stronger volume and better than expected price realization.
On volume, sales to users outpaced our expectations due to strong demand. In addition, the improving supply-chain supported higher levels of production across our primary segments. This enables dealers to increase their inventory levels ahead of the selling season by slightly more than we had expected.
Moving to slide 10, first-quarter operating profit increased by 47% to $2.7 billion. Adjusted operating profit increased by 79% versus the prior year quarter as favorable price realization outpaced higher manufacturing costs. Sales volume was also of benefit. Our first quarter adjusted operating profit margin of 21.1% was a 740 basis-point increase versus the prior year. Now let me explain why our adjusted operating profit margin was so much better than we had expected.
While manufacturing cost did increase year-over-year, the increase was less than we had anticipated, and was the most important factor in the quarter. As we have mentioned, volumes were better than expected due to favorable demand and improvements in the supply chain. This helped manufacturing costs as both factory efficiency and cost absorption were better than expected. Freight costs were also lower than we had anticipated due to lower premium freight utilization and rate reductions. Material costs were in-line with our expectations and did not impact the margin outperformance.
In addition to lower manufacturing costs, price realization was also stronger than we had anticipated a quarter ago. Stronger-than-anticipated volume had a smaller beneficial impact on margins. Spend on strategic investments was also lower than expected as projects spend ramped-up slower than we had planned.
Moving to Slide 11, I’ll review segment performance. Starting the Construction Industries, sales increased by 10% in the first quarter to $6.7 billion due favorable price realization, partially offset by lower sales volume and unfavorable currency impacts. The decrease in sales volume is driven by the impact from changes in dealer inventories which increased by less than the first quarter of 2023 when compared to the prior year. Compared to our expectations, sales were higher due to stronger volumes. While sales to end users were as we had anticipated, the dealer inventory increase was slightly above our expectations.
By region, sales in North America rose by 33% due to favorable price realization and higher sales volume. Supply chain improvements enabled stronger-than-expected shipments in North-America, supporting dealer restocking in the region. This is a positive as North America continues to be our most constrained region from a dealer inventory perspective.
Sales in Latin America decreased by 4% primarily due to lower sales volume, partially offset by favorable price realization. In EAME, sales increased by 5% on favorable price realization, partially offset by favorable currency impacts.
Sales in Asia-Pacific decreased by 21%, primarily due to lower sales volume and unfavorable currency impacts, partially offset by favorable price realization. First quarter profit for Construction Industries increased by 69% versus the prior year to $1.8 billion. Price realization mainly drove the increase. This was partially offset by lower sales volume, including an unfavorable product mix and higher manufacturing costs.
The segment’s operating margin of 26.5% was an increase of 920 basis-points versus last year. The segment margin for the quarter exceeded our expectations on moderating manufacturing costs and better than expected price and volume. Manufacturing costs were lower than we had expected on favorable freight, manufacturing efficiencies and absorption. Production volume was more favorable than we had anticipated, which drove the usual favorable benefits margins from the fourth quarter to the first. You will recall that in January, we said we did not expect that to happen.
Turning to slide 12, Resource Industry sales grew by 21% in the first quarter to $3.4 billion. The increase was primarily due to favorable price realization and higher sales volume. Although aftermarket sales volumes were lower in Resource Industries due to dealer buying patterns, dealer services to customers remained positive.
First quarter profit for Resource Industries increased by 112% versus the prior year to $764 million, mainly due to favorable price realization and higher sales volume. This was partially offset by unfavorable manufacturing costs. The segment’s operating margin of 22.3% was an increase of 950 basis points versus last year. Segment margin was better than we expected due to lower manufacturing costs, including favorable absorption, efficiencies and freight. Price realization and volume benefits also exceeded our expectations.
Now on slide 13, Energy and Transportation sales increased by 24% in the first quarter to $6.3 billion, the sales up double-digits across all applications. Oil and gas sales increased by 39%, power generation sales by 27%, industrial sales rose by 23% and finally, transportation sales increased by 14%.
First quarter profit for Energy and Transportation increased by 96% versus the prior year to $1.1 billion. The increase was mainly due to favorable price realization and higher sales volume. Unfavorable manufacturing costs and higher SG&A and R&D expenses acted as a partial offset. SG&A and R&D expenses increased primarily due to investments aligned with our strategic initiatives, including electrification and services growth.
The segment’s operating margin of 16.9%, with an increase of 620 basis-points versus last year, but lower than the fourth quarter as is typical from a seasonality perspective. Compared to our expectations last quarter, margin was better than anticipated on lower manufacturing costs, due in-part to favorable absorption. Volume was also modestly stronger than we had expected.
Moving to slide 14, Financial Products revenue increased by 15% to $902 million, primarily due to higher average financing rates across all regions. Segment profit decreased by 3% to $232 million. The slide profit decrease was mainly due to unfavorable impacts from equity securities, currency exchange losses, and mark-to-market adjustments on derivative contracts. However, higher net yield on average earning assets and lower provision for credit losses acted as a partial offset.
Business activity remains strong and the portfolio continues to perform well. Past dues in the quarter were 2.00%, a 5 basis-point improvement compared to the first quarter of 2022. This is the lowest first quarter past dues percentage since 2006. And whilst retail new business volume declined compared to the first quarter of 2022, this was expected as higher interest rates drove more cash dues and increased competition from banks. Finally, we continue to see strong demand for used equipment as prices remain elevated, while used equipment inventory is at historic lows.
Before I move on, I want to point out that Cat Financial has strong liquidity and broad access to funding. We are funded through the wholesale debt markets rather than from customer deposits, and we match assets and liabilities based on duration, currency and interest-rate profile. As we’ve mentioned previously, in a rising interest rate environment, banks are able to provide more competitive interest rates than Cat Financial, and we tend to lose some share of the machines financed. In the event of a slowdown in lending from regional banks, we are well-positioned to step in and fund creditworthy customers, so they can purchase their machines.
Now on slide 15. We continue to generate strong ME&T free-cash flows. ME&T free-cash flow of $1.4 billion in the quarter was about a $1.8 billion increase compared to an outflow in the prior year. The increase was primarily driven by higher profit. This increase was notable in the quarter that included our annual short-term incentive pay-out, and the rising working capital impacted by an increase in Caterpillar inventory. As Jim mentioned, following the strong half — strong first quarter, we expect to end the year in the top half of our ME&T free-cash flow range of $4 billion to $8 billion.
Capex was around $400 million in the quarter, and we still expect to spend around $1.5 billion for the year. As Jim mentioned, capital deployment was about $1 billion in the quarter for dividends and share repurchases. Our balance sheet remains strong and we have ample liquidity with an enterprise cash balance of $6.8 billion.
Now on slide 16. I will share some high-level assumptions for the full year, followed by the second quarter. Looking at the full-year, we expect a strong top-line supported by price and higher sales to users with healthy underlying end-markets. As Jim mentioned, we expect full year reported sales for Construction Industries to be impacted by dealer inventory movements, particularly in the second-half of the year. Underlying demand remains strong, and as we do expect Construction Industries sales to users to show positive growth in the next three quarters.
We anticipate continued strength in Resource Industries end-markets and stronger end user sales in 2023. In addition, as typical seasonality would suggest, we expect to see some sales ramp in the second half in energy and transportation, given strong demand for large engines and turbines.
Moving on to margins, based on our current planning assumptions, we anticipate full-year adjusted operating profit margins to be in the top half of our target range. Given the favorable impact of cost absorption in the first quarter, which we do not expect to recur, we anticipate margins in the remaining quarters of the year will be lower than the first-quarter level, while underlying demand and end-markets remained strong.
Also, despite the slower-than-expected start, we anticipate the spend related to strategic investments within SG&A and R&D will ramp through the year. We expect price to continue to be favorable, although the absolute dollar value of the year-over-year price increases were moderate as we lap through the increases put through in 2022.
We also expect the relationship between price and manufacturing costs for machines to normalize as the year progresses, as we’ve now caught up to the manufacturing cost increases, which had outpaced price in late 2021 and early 2022. This means that the benefits of margins of price outpacing manufacturing cost inflation will moderate, tempering the possibility of further margin expansion.
Keep in mind, similar to the first-quarter, we still anticipate a headwind of about $80 million per quarter at the corporate level related to pension expense. We also continue to anticipate restructuring expenses of around $700 million a share with around $100 million remaining following the first quarter. And the global effective tax-rate should be around 23%, excluding discrete items.
Now on to our assumptions for the second quarter. We expect higher sales in the second quarter compared to the prior year on strong sales to users and price. Following the typical seasonal pattern, we expect higher sales in the second-quarter as compared to the first. We expect energy and transportation sales will accelerate given strong sales to users, which are supported by healthy demand. We expect to report flattish sales levels compared to the first quarter in Construction Industries and Resource Industries. Both segments are expected to report positive sales to users.
In the second quarter of 2022, we saw a decrease in dealer inventory to $400 million. We expect a smaller decrease in the second quarter of 2023.
Specific to second-quarter margins versus the prior year, adjusted operating margins at the enterprise and segment level should be substantially stronger than the prior on favorable price and volume. However, we do expect to see a return to the typical seasonal pattern of lower second-quarter margins compared to the first quarter, despite higher sales. We expect the year-over-year benefit of price realization in the second quarter to moderate compared to the benefit we saw in the first quarter as we lap prior year increases.
In addition, SG&A and R&D investment spend should increase as we continue to accelerate our strategic investments in areas like autonomy, alternative fuels, connectivity, digital and electrification.
Finally, we do not anticipate that the favorable absorption impact that we saw in the first quarter will be repeated. At the segment level in Construction Industries, we expect lower second quarter margins compared to the first quarter, largely due to the lack of a favorable impact from absorption and the ramp-up in strategic investment spend. Likewise, second quarter margins in Resource Industries will likely be lower than the first quarter as is the typical seasonal pattern. Conversely, energy and transportation should see a slight margin improvement compared to the first quarter levels, supported by stronger sales volume as demand remains healthy.
Now turning to slide 17, let me summarize. Sales grew by 17% led by strong price realization and volume gains. The adjusted operating profit margin increased by 740 basis-points to 21.1%. ME&T free-cash flow was strong at $1.4 billion, and we expect to be at the top half of our ME&T free-cash flow range of $4 billion to $8 billion for the full year. After a strong first quarter, we currently expect our 2023 adjusted operating profit margins will be in the top half of our target range.
The environment remains positive with improving supply-chain dynamics, a strong backlog and healthy underlying end-markets. We will continue to execute our strategy for long-term profitable growth.
And with that, we’ll take your questions.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
As a reminder, management asks that we limit to one question per analyst. If clarification is desired, please rejoin the queue. Your first question comes from the line of Rob Wertheimer with Melius Research. Your line is now open.
Rob Wertheimer — Melius Research — Analyst
Thank you. Good morning. My question is really on North American construction, where I’m curious whether your end-users have seen infrastructure dollars starting to flow, have started to make orders based on that, whether your dealers make orders in anticipation of that, or whether a lot of that is still ahead. So, I’ll stop there.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, Rob. We have seen some positive impact of those infrastructure dollars starting to flow. The projects that don’t require a lot of permitting, things like resurfacing roads, that kind of activity has already started, and we’re seeing a positive benefit of that. And one of the things of course when customers believe there is a pipeline of projects coming, they are more likely typically to make that capital investment to make a purchase of a piece of equipment. But yes, it has started and we expect it to continue for some time.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Tami Zakaria with J.P. Morgan. Your line is now open.
Tami Zakaria — J.P. Morgan Securities — Analyst
Hi, good morning. Thanks so much for taking my questions. So, just to clarify the operating margin expectations for the year. I think you said you’re expecting it to be at the top half of the target range. So, can you remind us what that range exactly is? Are we talking about the 18% to 21% that we saw in the prior quarter’s presentation. What exactly is that range we’re talking about.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, so Tami, to be clear and I realize as we were saying it, that could be interpreted in two ways. One, which is it could be the 10% to 21% range, no, that is not what we’re referring to. If you remember, we have a range of 3% range based on different levels of sales from sales revenues and revenues, that is where we’re talking about. So, for example, if you’re assuming a certain level of revenues, if you remember the graphs we produced, we’ve given you, that will show a margin range, we expect to be in the top half of that 3% range at that level of sales revenues for the year.
Tami Zakaria — J.P. Morgan Securities — Analyst
Okay, got it, that’s helpful. Thank you.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Tami
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Michael Feniger with Bank of America. Your line is now open.
Michael Feniger — Bank of America Securities — Analyst
Thank you. The market is worried about dealer destocking and the impact to construction margin. In prior cycle, margins came under heavy pressure, when there was a big destocking event. Is there anything different in terms of how Cat is managing its production? Your strong pricing, dynamic inventory management with you and your dealers that we should be thinking about this cycle compared to prior cycles.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, so certainly, one of things we’ve done is worked hard on our S&OP process over the last few years, to really minimize the impact of that kind of an issue. Firstly, to keep in mind, the way we are — the market is positioned now, we have strong sales to users, and we feel good about the underlying demand in our end-markets. So, I’ll start with that. During a period of supply constraints which really has occurred because of all the issues you’re aware of during the last few years, it’s not unusual for us to have dealers order in a bit more, and they couldn’t really get the kind of dealer inventory that they would like to have. They’ve been able with some easing in supply chain, although we still have periods of — areas of real constraint, they have been able to start to increase dealer inventory. Having said that, we have talked about the fact that we expect dealer inventory to end the year about flat as to where it ended in 2022, and expect a slight decrease during the year. But again, with our S&OP process, the way we look at that now, the way we work with our dealers, we are comfortable in that process that we’ve really improved it.
Andrew Bonfield — Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. And let me just add, because obviously one of the concerns we talked about dealer inventory in terms of the global dealer inventory number, where we talk about the three to four months. There are some areas with some products which are actually below the bottom-end of that range. And so, we do not see at this stage anyway apart from potentially with excavation, where there is actually any level of stocking, which even gets closer to the top end of that range. So, it’s really — we have to look at it product-by-product, and again just to remind you that last year’s build in dealer inventory, 60% of that related to RI and to Energy and Transportation, of which 70% of that — more than 70% of that is covered by firm customer orders. This is, I think, with respect, a little bit misunderstood by the market. We are not in a situation where we are allowing or expecting dealer inventory to become a headwind for us anytime in the next few quarters.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
And dealer inventory is within the typical range of three to four months. And again, we have strong market conditions.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Jamie Cook with Credit Suisse. Your line is now open.
Jamie Cook — Credit Suisse — Analyst
Hi, good morning and congratulations on a nice quarter. I guess, Jim, just the market I think is going to be worried at the performance this quarter is backward looking. So can you like speak to how you’re thinking about backlog or book-to-bill in the back-half of the year. Can that continue to be positive? Do you think backlog will be higher at the end of this year versus where we were this quarter. And then just my second question, Andrew, on the margins, can you talk to margins in the back half of the second half versus first half, just trying to understand how much lower the margins would be in the second half and what’s being weighed down by strategic investment. Thank you.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, certainly, Jamie. First to answer your first question on backlog, we are encouraged by the very strong backlog that we have, it’s flat compared to last quarter, but it’s at a very healthy level. Again, we have healthy level of demand as well. As I mentioned earlier, some supply-chain constraints have started to ease, and when in fact availability improves, dealers often wait a bit longer to place orders for new equipment and that is part of what happens. But again, oil and gas is strong, we have, I mentioned earlier that our Solar Turbines business is strong, Cat oil and gas is strong. But again, we feel good about the market conditions and the backlog reflects that.
Andrew Bonfield — Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, again, just to add to that, before talking about margins. Just to remind you, backlog is one of the metrics we look at to look at where we think about demand as the demand signal. It really does often reflect availability, and therefore, often is one part of that equation. Other things we look at is SUS order rates and also conversations with dealers, which gives us optimism rather than just purely focusing on the backlog per se.
With regards to margins, as we said, in the second half, you would normally say we are probably returning more to a normal typical pattern within construction. We didn’t expect that, if you remember last in January, we didn’t expect to see the normal increase from the fourth quarter to the first, we did. We would now expect to see the normal pattern of margins being declining as it goes through the year. That’s a function of production. Obviously as the year progresses, we produced less which impacts on absorption in particular and also factory efficiencies. Within RI, that tends to bounce around a little bit more, and obviously is impacted by the level of sales and revenues, and ME&T, we expect margins actually will progress as we go through the year as per the normal pattern.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of David Raso with Evercore. Your line is now open.
David Raso — Evercore ISI Institutional Equities — Analyst
Hi, thank you. First is a clarification. When you speak of the second half of dealer inventory destocking, I know it moves around a bit year to year, but isn’t a historical pattern that the deal is due, take inventory down in the second half of the year, roughly about $1 billion, just making sure I understand the commentary that it’s a destock versus there’s some normal seasonality to it. I know [Speech Overlap] excavators really might be a destock. I know it’s really hard to get dozers right now to Brazil. So, I’m just trying to understand, is it a destock or is it sort of normal seasonality first, but then I have different question and that’s clarification on them.
Andrew Bonfield — Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, sorry, just to clarify, David. Obviously, versus last year where we saw an increase of [Indecipherable], there is a $700 million increase in both the third and the fourth quarter. We would expect to decrease this year. Yes, it’s not unseasonable, but it is a decrease versus the year-over-year, so just that does create a gap with three overall. So that’s part of the reason we just highlighting it, now just to remind everybody.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, there is a normal spring selling season [Speech Overlap]. Yeah, I gave it to you, it’s exactly right.
David Raso — Evercore ISI Institutional Equities — Analyst
Yeah, okay. I just wanted to make sure it wasn’t something unique, the behavioral pattern is to take it down in the second half.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, correct.
David Raso — Evercore ISI Institutional Equities — Analyst
A real simple question — ’24, I know lead times in some areas are getting better, some are still challenged. But it does appear that dealers are willing to order a little earlier for next year than a normal at this time of the year, ordering for next year, just any early signs you have on order books for ’24 I think would be very helpful. Thank you.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, it is still too early to certainly predict 2024, and as I mentioned, because availability is improving, that gives dealers the opportunity for some products to wait a bit longer when they place their orders, and that’s not the case for every product, but it is too early to really make a call on 2024.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Jerry Revich with Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open.
Jerry Revich — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Yes. Hi, good morning, Jim, Andrew, Ryan. Thanks for making time. I’m wondering if you could just talk about, the margins for you folks are now at the high-end of your framework range and supply-chain performance looks like it’s improving from here and for the rest of the industry, the margins are at the very-high end of their ranges as well. How do you think about the risk of pricing concessions for the industry from here as supply improves further. Obviously, we haven’t seen discounting from you folks in the past, but I’m wondering if you can talk about it, if the cycle is different at all given just the more complexity. Thanks.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, and as you know, we serve a variety of industries. And there is a — it is not a one size fits all. So, we look very carefully at the market conditions and the competitive situation for each product that we sell into the various markets that we have. Certainly, in some areas, product is still constrained and is still quite challenging to get product, and in others as we mentioned like in excavation, there is more availability, so that has an impact as well, but really what we do is, as you can imagine, look at we always take into account our cost inputs, and then we look at the competitive situation for each product in each market and we make a decision based on that.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Steve Volkmann with Jefferies. Your line is now open.
Steve Volkmann — Jefferies & Company — Analyst
Great. Good morning, everybody. I wanted to go back. Jim, I think I heard you say that you thought North American commercial construction was like 1% of CI, correct me if I got that wrong, but it made me wonder what you think really the key drivers are of that business, so that we can sort of monitor those going forward.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
What are the key drivers of commercial construction?
Steve Volkmann — Jefferies & Company — Analyst
I’m sorry, I was trying to understand. If commercial was only 1% of CI, what’s the other 99%?
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, so when we talk a lot about nonresidential and we’ve talked about the fact that we are quite encouraged by the legislation that has passed, whether it’s the IIJA, the CHIPS act, the IRA. So again, looking at that activity that’s been supported by the legislation, we feel good about residential in North America. One of the things we wanted to do was because there have been a lot of commentary frankly about commercial real estate, we wanted to just clarify that it’s a very small portion of CI. Because it seems to be getting a lot more play than it deserved quite frankly.
Steve Volkmann — Jefferies & Company — Analyst
Yes, I agreed. Thank you.
Andrew Bonfield — Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, sorry, I just want to clarify one point that I have responded to the question that, yes, it will be dealer inventory destocking occurring in the second half of the year, but it will not impact us. We will still see positive sales momentum in those quarters, so it does not have an impact, where it takes us down year-over-year at any point in time in the next few quarters. Just to clarify that.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Chad Dillard with Bernstein. Your line is now open.
Chad Dillard — Bernstein — Analyst
Hi, good morning, everyone. So, couple of questions. So firstly, your comment on the lead times in-construction today versus six months ago. And then can you just clarify your comments about the second half. We’ve talked about destocking from factory maintenance. So does that mean that 3Q and 4Q will be reasonably weaker than normal on a sequential basis.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, so, lead times, so because of easing supply-chain constraints in some areas, lead times have improved. We still really have challenges in certain areas. Earthmoving is a great example. We have challenges around availability and lead times around some BCP products as well. Excavation, as I mentioned earlier, has in fact eased, but we are making some changes, in fact changes in the second-half, actually we’re going from a third-party engine to a Caterpillar engine in some products. So, as we make that changeover, that will in fact have a bit of an impact on production that is obviously temporary, and it’s a positive thing for us long term to get our own engines in those products. So, we’ll be making that change later in the year.
Chad Dillard — Bernstein — Analyst
Yeah, can you just clarify [Technical Issues] you talked about destocking from second half. So just wanted to know, does that mean that 3Q and 4Q will be seasonally weaker than the normal [Speech Overlap]
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, back to the comment on this, as I’ve said to David earlier, we did have inventory builds in the third and fourth quarter of last year. So, you’re running against the comparative, which has a build versus a decrease. So, year-over-year, that does impact what would be the normal seasonal pattern. Obviously, while other factors come into that price and also what underlying volume demand is, but that will have an impact on our reported sales in those quarters, so we’re just highlighting that so that as you think about your models, you don’t go to the normal seasonable pattern into those models as you look out for the next several quarters.
Chad Dillard — Bernstein — Analyst
Great, thank you.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of John Joyner with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now open.
John Joyner — BMO Capital Markets — Analyst
So, thank you for taking my question, and sorry to ask another question about the dealer stocks, but I guess if demand and sales to-end users have stayed strong and inventories are not elevated, why would there be dealer destocking and not some restocking. I mean, does it possibly imply a bit of hesitation among dealers when looking ahead?
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, I don’t believe that’s the case. Again, as I mentioned, as availability improves and lead times decrease due to easing supply-chain challenges, it’s not unusual as we looked in the past. It’s unusual for dealers, they can wait longer to place orders and they need a bit less in the inventory because we can respond more quickly. So, it’s not surprising to have that happen.
Andrew Bonfield — Chief Financial Officer
And also, if you recall, we talked about the new sales and operations planning process, and one of the things we are trying to avoid through that process is dealers holding more inventory than is really necessary. They are independent businesses, they make their own decisions about inventory, but we try to work with them to avoid any overstocking, which then has an impact later on, where you have to destock. So, we’re trying just to be more proactive in that regard as we have been historically.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
And again, we can respond more quickly to dealer orders. Dealers feel comfortable holding a bit less inventory.
John Joyner — BMO Capital Markets — Analyst
Got it, thank you.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Matt Elkott with TD, Cowen. Your line is now open.
Matthew Elkott — Cowen and Company, LLC — Analyst
Good morning. So, I know the backlog was unchanged, but how has the timing of the backlog changed? I mean, does it go out further? Did any orders get pushed out because of all the macro uncertainty? And did you guys have any major cancellations that were offset by new orders.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
We have not seen any major cancellations, and we feel quite good about the quality of the backlog that we have. Of course, much of it is for Solar Turbines for oil and gas for mining. So again, we feel quite good about the quality of that backlog, and we haven’t seen major cancellations.
Matthew Elkott — Cowen and Company, LLC — Analyst
Yes, thank you very much.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Kristen Owen with Oppenheimer. Your line is now open.
Kristen Owen — Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. — Analyst
Great, thank you for taking my question. I’m going to switch it up here a little bit and ask you to talk about the LNG announcement that you recently made for the zero-emission fleet. It looks like that includes some related infrastructure. So just a couple of pointed questions there. First, how do you see the rollout progression of a product — a project like this? And then second, how should we think about this in terms of a blueprint for future mine site decarbonization opportunities, and how do you price for that? How do you think about packaging that sort of deal. Thank you.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yes, so certainly, we’ve had a number of requests from many of our mining customers, and MG is one of them to help them decarbonize their operations. And so, we are working within MG specifically to help to provide battery-powered machines to allow them to execute that project. So again, it’s a collaborative process. We’re working closely with them. We’re working through commercial issues with them. But again, we feel quite good about where we are. We demonstrated in November to a number of our customers a fully-loaded battery-powered, large mining truck, operating a diesel-powered performance in terms of speed fully loaded on a flat going up the hill. So again, we feel-good about where we are, but it’s a process, it’s a multiyear process that we’re working with our customers.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Tim Thein with Citi. Your line is now open.
Timothy Thein — Citigroup — Analyst
Thank you, good morning. Yeah, so the question just on the improvement, or whatever improvement you are seeing in supply chains and a little bit better visibility, and thus your ability to react faster. How does that, Andrew, how do we think about that? The interplay with that as we go through the year and Cat’s own inventory. And I know there has been flattered somewhat probably by inflation and other factors. But I’m just thinking of that impact as we go through the year, and ultimately the impact from an absorption standpoint, if in fact we start working that down. Thank you.
Andrew Bonfield — Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, so obviously some of our assumptions are that we do not expect the absorption impact to continue. And obviously, yes, some of that will reverse as we move our product out of the plant into the dealer channel. And that’s forecasted within our expectations for margins as we go through the remainder of the year. The other factor obviously to take into account is the potential benefit to cash-flow. As we’ve said, we did see a very strong free cash flow in the first-quarter, despite an increase in Caterpillar inventory. Obviously, other time, we expect as the supply-chain improves to start working that inventory down and start to see a full benefit of that from a cash perspective and converting that back into cash. So that is part of the reason why we are expecting obviously strong cash-flow as we go through the remainder of the year.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Mircea Dobre with Baird. Your line is now open.
Mircea Dobre — Robert W. Baird — Analyst
Thank you. Good morning. Jim, I appreciate your comment earlier about taking a proactive approach to sort of managing this dealer inventory dynamic, but I’m sort of curious here, as you look at the last, call it 18 months to two years, you get a sense that there has been some ordering on important dealers that was just a reaction to elongated lead times, and that those order patterns are subject to pretty meaningful shift now that your lead times in the supply-chain are getting better, and as the year progresses, if it is destocked that you’re expecting sort of fails to materialize the pace that you’re anticipating, are we to understand here that you’re going to take a proactive approach to adjusting production in the back half of this year. Thank you.
Andrew Bonfield — Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, Mirc, it’s Andrew. Let me just try and reiterate again what we do within our sales and operations planning process, as we work closely with the dealers to understand what the level of orders. We use machine learning to try and understand what we think the actual real order rate is based on customer demand versus speculative demand. So, one of the things that does do is, we obviously don’t accept orders for what we would call speculative demand. That helps us trying to manage production. Obviously, the focus for us is to manage production as smoothly as possible over-time, because that’s the most efficient and effective way of doing it. Obviously, as we think about the remainder of the year and we’re looking at inventory and we’re looking at the outlook for the year, just to remind you. We still expect end-user demand to be positive for the remainder of the year. So that will impact us to actually we will continue to actually probably still be ramping production for the remainder of the year, even though we do take — may see a small reduction — relatively small reduction in dealer inventory over the next couple of quarters.
We’re just trying to highlight that to you as a result of the fact that it will impact reported results for some of the individual segments. This is basically overall as we also said, we are not necessarily at the bottom-end of the range for all products and all categories. So there still will be areas where we are still trying to ramp up production. For example, large engines is an area where we’re still constrained, that obviously is an area where we will still be ramping up production rather than adjusting production in any other way.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Steven Fisher with UBS. Your line is now open.
Steven Fisher — UBS Securities — Analyst
Thanks, good morning. I had a question about a couple of elements within E&T. I thought it was interesting that your industrial retail sales with E&T accelerated, but your own construction sales were relatively steady. So, I’m curious what markets drove that industrial acceleration. And then on the Power Gen side, to what extent are there other elements besides datacenters that are driving the strength in that segment. Thank you.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Well, we sell industrial engines for a whole variety of applications, not just other construction equipment. So, part of it is power gen, and then we sell industrial engines to drive everything from cement mixtures. It’s a whole variety of applications. So again, lot of strength there. The business is doing quite well. There’s a lot of momentum. In terms of power generation, we provide generator sets for a whole variety of applications, datacenters is one of them, and we’ve highlighted datacenters because it has been quite strong over the last few years. And if we look forward, we feel-good about that continuing. Just thinking about AI, thinking about the cloud, thinking about all the datacenter users, we feel good about that. But we provide gensets for a whole variety of applications, but the one that is really driving a lot of the growth at the moment is datacenters, which is why we highlighted it.
Steven Fisher — UBS Securities — Analyst
Thank you.
Ryan Fiedler — Vice President, Investor Relations
Emma, we have time for one more question.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Dillon Cumming with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.
Dillon Cumming — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Good morning, thanks for the question. Just wanted to ask one on the kind of financing environment. I think you guys called out the opportunity for Cat Financial maybe having some flexibility to finance customers that might have more difficulty getting kind of financing from smaller banks. Just curious first thing kind of the numbers around that and what the kind of share opportunity there is? And secondarily, if you’re actually seeing evidence on the ground with regards to customers not being able to get financing at the moment over the last three months or so.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, obviously, it’s way too early to see any impact yet from any tightening credit conditions within the regional banks, but obviously our expectation is that that may have an impact. We tend to vary, it can probably be between 5% and 10% percent of machines financed that we could add in times where we are more competitive from a financing perspective with the regional banks. So that’s probably — we’re probably at the lower end of our normal range at the moment. So, we could add 5% to 10% of machines without any problem whatsoever from a capacity perspective, which would be very strong for us. I am very positive for Cat Financial.
Dillon Cumming — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Thank you.
James Umpleby III — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Okay, well thanks. Thank you all for joining us. We appreciate your questions. We are proud of our team’s performance in the first quarter. As we mentioned earlier, we believe that 2023 will be even better than we previously anticipated, both the top and bottom line. So, there is healthy demand across our end-markets, and we remain focused on executing our strategy and continue to invest for the long-term. Again, thank you for joining us.
Ryan Fiedler — Vice President, Investor Relations
Thank you, Jim, Andrew and everyone who joined us today. A replay of our call will be available online later this morning. We will also post a transcript on our Investor Relations website as soon as it is available. You’ll also find our first-quarter results video with our CFO and in SEC filing with our sales to user’s data. Click on investors.caterpillar.com and then click on Financials to view those materials. Do you have any questions, please reach out to Rob or me. The investor relations general number is 309-675-4549. Now I will turn the call back to Emma to conclude the call.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]