Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) Q4 2022 Earnings Call Transcript

Cisco Systems, Inc.  (NASDAQ: CSCO) Q4 2022 earnings call dated Aug. 17, 2022

Corporate Participants:

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Analysts:

Sami Badri — Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC — Analyst

Tim Long — Barclays — Analyst

Rod Hall — Goldman Sachs — Analyst

Amit Daryanani — Evercore — Analyst

Meta Marshall — Morgan Stanley Investment Research — Analyst

Tal Liani — Bank of America Securities — Analyst

Samik Chatterjee — J.P. Morgan — Analyst

Ittai Kidron — Oppenheimer & Company, Inc. — Analyst

Paul J Silverstein — Cowen & Co — Analyst

Benjamin J. Bollin — Cleveland Research — Analyst

Simon Leopold — Raymond James & Associates, Inc. — Analyst

Presentation:

Operator

Welcome to Cisco’s Fourth Quarter and Fiscal Year 2022 Financial Results Conference Call. At the request of Cisco, today’s conference is being recorded; if you have any objections, you may disconnect.

Now, I would like to introduce Marilyn Mora, Head of Investor Relations. Ma’am, you may begin.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Welcome, everyone, to Cisco’s Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2022 Quarterly Earnings Conference Call. This is Marilyn Mora, Head of Investor Relations, and I’m joined by Chuck Robbins, our chair and CEO, and Scott Herren, our CFO.

By now, you should have seen our earnings press release. A corresponding webcast with slides including supplemental information will be made available on our website in the Investor Relations section following the call. Income statements, full GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation information, balance sheets, cash flow statements and other financial information can also be found in the Financial Information section of our Investor Relations website.

Throughout this conference call, we will be referencing both GAAP and non-GAAP financial results, and we’ll discuss product results in terms of revenue and geographic and customer results in terms of product orders, unless stated otherwise. All comparisons made throughout this call will be done on a year-over-year basis.

The matters we will be discussing today include forward-looking statements, including the guidance we will be providing for the first quarter and full year of fiscal 2023. They are subject to the risks and uncertainties that we discuss in detail in our documents filed with the SEC, specifically the most recent reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q, which identify important risk factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements.

With respect to guidance, please also see the slides and press release that accompany this call for further details. Cisco will not comment on its financial guidance during the quarter, unless it is done through an explicit public disclosure.

I will now turn it over to Chuck.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Marilyn, and thanks to all of you for joining us today. I’m very proud to share that we had a strong end to our fiscal year in the midst of an incredibly dynamic environment. In fact, we set several records with our performance this year.

Let me first touch on those. For the full year of fiscal 2022, we delivered record non-GAAP EPS of $3.36, record product orders, which fueled our backlog to the highest level ever recorded, as well as our second strongest year of revenue in the history of the Company at $51.6 billion.

We continue to see strong customer adoption of our software and subscriptions, driven by the targeted investments we’ve been making. We also had record net income, which reflects our operating discipline, despite external challenges, including supply chain and inflation.

Our ongoing business transformation continues to show progress across our KPIs, with annualized recurring revenue or ARR and remaining performance obligations or RPO, both setting record highs. These important metrics illustrate the increasing recurring nature of our revenue streams. This, combined with our record backlog, provides us with enhanced visibility into our business looking forward.

While this was certainly a complex year, we executed well. I want to thank our teams for their perseverance, determination and unwavering commitment to our customers and our partners. Our team’s commitment to accelerated innovation has put us in a unique position of strength for fiscal ’23 and over the long term. Now, I want to be clear on our outlook for fiscal ’23. We expect strong performance across our portfolio, driven by our continued focus on innovation and easing of supply constraints to drive solid top line growth and profitability. While we anticipated some moderation from the unprecedented product order growth of last year, demand signals remain solid. We do expect to continue to experience higher costs in the short term, driven primarily by higher component, freight and logistics costs, which is reflected in our Q1 guide. However, as you’ll see in our annual guidance, we expect this margin pressure to begin to ease as the year progresses. Long term, there are many multi-year growth opportunities ahead of us, that gives me confidence in our future.

There are currently more technology transitions occurring concurrently than I’ve seen in 20 years. Long-term megatrends like hybrid cloud, hybrid work, security, IoT, 400 gig and beyond, 5G and Wi-Fi 6 as well as the move towards application observability will likely provide tailwinds to our growth. With our portfolio in such a strong position to help our customers, I’m quite optimistic about what’s ahead.

Before we discuss the quarter in detail, I want to provide some additional color on the supply situation and how we continue to build greater resiliency. After a challenging April due to the COVID-related shutdowns in Shanghai, and the impact on semiconductor and power supplies, overall supply constraints began to ease slightly at the back half of the fourth quarter and continuing into the start of Q1. While the component supply headwinds remain, they have begun to show early signs of easing. The decisions we made and the multiple actions we have taken over the past two years are helping to improve our resiliency and will help offset cost inflation. These include adding new suppliers, leveraging alternative suppliers, redesigning hundreds of products to use alternative components with similar capability and targeted price increases, all of which position us for the future. These actions along with the tremendous efforts by our supply chain team and the investments we’ve made in building capacity to meet growth have the potential to drive momentum into fiscal ’23.

Moving to performance highlights in the quarter. We delivered revenue above the high end of our guidance range, and non-GAAP EPS came in at the high end of our guidance range. We achieved healthy operating margins and generated solid cash flow and returned nearly $4 billion to Cisco stockholders through cash dividends and share repurchases. With annual product order growth of 14% for the fiscal year, we exited the year with record product backlog. In addition, our RPO totaled more than $31 billion, and when combined with low cancellation rates, which remain below pre-pandemic levels, this sets the stage for increased visibility and strong revenue growth as we head into fiscal ’23.

In terms of our product orders this quarter, we delivered the second highest orders in absolute dollars in the history of the Company. It was second only to our performance in Q4 of fiscal ’21 and on a sequential basis, it was up greater than 15% with strong growth in enterprise, commercial and public sector.

From an annual growth rate perspective, we clearly faced some very tough comparisons from the record orders we saw in Q4 last year, where we had over 30% growth. Based on that, the year-over-year decline was not a surprise nor is it concerning. It’s important to keep in mind that in the near term, the rate and pace of our revenue growth is much more a function of component availability than on our quarterly product order growth. With RPO of over $31 billion, almost $17 billion, of which will be recognized as revenue over the next 12 months, and a record backlog, we have great top line visibility. Thanks to the relentless effort of our entire organization, the business remains stronger than before the pandemic.

From a demand perspective, we continue to experience solid customer activity beyond our ability to deliver as is reflected in the growth of our backlog that we saw throughout the quarter. While our business is not immune to macro trends, we will remain disciplined in our operations, while benefiting from robust multiyear investment trends and the technology transitions I mentioned earlier. Our innovation is helping our customers and partners navigate an increasing amount of complexity, and there is a greater sense of urgency to leverage leading-edge technologies to deliver on their strategic objectives. This is leading them to consistently look to Cisco and our unique and differentiated innovation to help them advance their most pressing business priorities.

We recently held our Cisco Live customer event in-person for the first time in three years and had over 15,000 in attendance, including thousands of our largest customers and many more participating virtually. Our discussions with them focused on strategic projects, supply assurance and the critical role Cisco can play to support their long-term technology road maps. They did not indicate any fundamental shift in their commitment to technology investments. Regardless of what the coming quarters may bring, we have a proven track record of being able to adjust in difficult environments. Our value proposition to our customers remains as strong as ever.

In our webscale business, we continue to see momentum even as the business becomes larger, as product orders were up more than 50% on a trailing four-quarter basis. We see significant opportunity ahead as these customers build out massively scalable cloud networks and increasingly turn to Cisco to help them meet accelerating demand for cloud services.

Our leadership in silicon, optics, software and systems enables us to win as hyperscalers value industry-leading performance and innovation. We are expanding our footprint, driven by data center build-outs with our Silicon One-based Cisco 8000 routers, the fastest-growing platforms in Cisco’s history.

Together with optics from Acacia, we have a strong foundation for 400-gig and beyond to re-architect the Internet with routed optical networking. In addition, we recently booked and shipped our first 800-gig systems to one of our webscale customers. On the IoT front, we also now have more than 200 million connected things on our cloud platform with growth driven by connected car. We finished fiscal ’22 with product orders in excess of $1 billion and growing double digits. We continue to make progress on our transformation to more software and subscription-based recurring revenue. ARR of approximately $23 billion was up 8% with product ARR increasing by 13%.

We had strong subscription revenue this quarter, driven by our growing portfolio of recurring offers. While our software revenue was down slightly, once supply constraints improve and we begin to increase product shipments, we expect to see an improvement in software, subscription and services that are attached to hardware products in our backlog. The investments we’ve made in innovation are paying off as our competitive position is very strong.

In Q4, we introduced several new cloud delivered innovations across our portfolio to help organizations drive productivity and resiliency. We launched Nexus Cloud, a platform to help our customers deploy, manage and operate their data center networks from the cloud. In addition, we introduced Calisti and Panoptica, two new cloud native API-first tools for faster and better application development. We also announced AppDynamics Cloud, a next-generation version of our observability platform for cloud native applications.

In addition, we shared our strategy to help our customers connect their entire security architecture with our new platform, Cisco Security Cloud, which will be a game changer for them as they look to secure their multi-cloud environments with a single cloud-delivered security platform. This is just one part of our broader security innovation cycle. Building on the double-digit growth we saw in security this quarter, we are investing across our security business, focusing on cloud based offerings, best-in-class AI driven threat detection and end-to-end security architectures. These innovations position us well for leadership in the security market.

In summary, we executed well on our strategy and transformation during what remains a very dynamic time. This led to a strong close to our fiscal year, setting several records across our business, thanks to the solid execution from our teams, our market-leading innovation and our continued growth of recurring revenue. We also took decisive actions to help offset inflation and build resiliency in our supply chain, while investing in our business to position us well for long-term growth. The power of our technology continues to be a critical driver of economic growth and productivity. Our results and outlook demonstrate the critical role that Cisco plays as a leader in bringing innovative technology solutions to customers today and into the future.

As we move into fiscal 2023, we remain guided by our purpose-led culture and deeply committed to delivering value for our customers, partners and investors as well as continuing to be an amazing place to work for our employees.

I will now turn it over to Scott.

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Chuck. I’ll first provide some detail on our financial results for the quarter, then cover the full fiscal year, followed by our guidance.

Our overall Q4 results reflect strong execution in an environment with continuing supply constraints. And as Chuck mentioned, increased costs reflected in our gross margins. We’re very pleased that our shipment levels were above our expectations and that total revenue of $13.1 billion exceeded the high end of our guidance range as we saw improvement in supply as a direct result of the numerous actions we’ve taken over multiple quarters. Our non-GAAP operating margin was 32.4%, down 110 basis points and in line with our guidance. Non-GAAP net income was $3.4 billion, down 3% and non-GAAP earnings per share was $0.83, coming in at the high end of our guidance range.

Looking at our Q4 revenue in more detail. Total product revenue was $9.7 billion, and service revenue was $3.4 billion, both flat year-over-year. Within product revenue, Secure Agile Networks was down 1%. Switching declined in both data center and campus driven by supply constraints. We saw growth in our Catalyst 9000, Nexus 9000 and Meraki switching offerings. Enterprise routing declined, primarily driven by Edge and SD-WAN offset by strength in access. Wireless had strong growth, driven primarily by our Meraki wireless offerings. We also had double-digit growth in servers.

Internet for the Future was down 10% with strength in web scale revenue, offset by declines in cable, edge and optical. Collaboration was up 2%, driven by growth in collaboration devices, partially offset by declines in our meetings and calling offerings. End-to-end security had record revenue with strong growth of 20%, driven by strength across the entire portfolio.

Our Zero Trust portfolio continues to perform well, driven by strong performance in our dual offering. Optimized application experiences had solid growth of 8%, driven by double-digit growth in our SaaS-based offering, ThousandEyes.

We continue to make progress on our transformation metrics, as we shift our business to more software and subscriptions. We saw strong performance in our ARR of $22.9 billion, an increase of 8% with product ARR growth of 13% driven by several large software transactions closing during the quarter.

Total software revenue was $3.9 billion, a decrease of 2% with software subscription revenue up 1%. Bear in mind, we continue to have well over $2 billion of software orders in our product backlog. 83% of the software revenue was subscription based, which is up 2 percentage points year-over-year. Total subscription revenue was $5.8 billion, an increase of 2%. Total subscription revenue represented 44% of Cisco’s total revenue. And RPO was $31.5 billion, up 2%, product RPO increased 6%, service RPO decreased 1%, and our total short-term RPO grew 4% to $16.9 billion.

Total product orders in Q4 were the second highest in our history. While product orders were down 6% for the quarter, it’s important to keep in mind that that compared against 31% growth a year ago, which was the highest product orders in our history. On a sequential basis, product order growth was up over 15%, with double-digit growth in enterprise, commercial and public sector.

Looking at our geographic segments year-over-year. The Americas was down 9%, EMEA down 4%, and APJC up 1%. In our customer markets, enterprise was down 15%, public sector was down 3%, service provider was down 7% and commercial was up 1%.

From a non-GAAP perspective, total gross margin came in at 63.3%, down 230 basis points year-on-year; product gross margin was 61.3%, down 370 basis points; and service gross margin was 69%, up 160 basis points.

In our product gross margin, higher component and commodity costs as well as higher freight and logistics related to supply constraints were the predominant drivers of lower-than-expected margins. We saw increased benefits from the pricing actions we have taken as well as from mix.

Once again, we had a significant increase in our backlog levels for both hardware and software, well beyond our normal historical levels. As Chuck said, our ending product backlog was a record for the year. And just a reminder, backlog is not included as part of the $31.5 billion in remaining performance obligations.

It’s important to note that the combined total of our backlog and RPO gives us great visibility into our fiscal ’23 top line growth. We ended Q4 with total cash, cash equivalents and investments of $19.3 billion. Operating cash flow for the quarter was $3.7 billion, down 18% year-over-year, primarily driven by advanced payments and inventory purchases to secure future supply. In capital allocation, we returned $4 billion to shareholders during the quarter, which comprised of $2.4 billion of share repurchases and $1.6 billion for our quarterly cash dividend.

Turning to the full fiscal year results. Overall, our financial results were solid in a year where we faced significant supply constraints, rising component and related costs and the war in Ukraine. Our financial performance was highlighted by strong demand, with product order growth of 14%, including two quarters of truly impressive 33% growth, though our performance was clearly impacted by the supply constraints.

Revenue was $51.6 billion, up 3%, while non-GAAP earnings per share were up 4% at $3.36. In terms of our software metrics, total software revenue was flat at $15.1 billion with the product portion up 2%, 81% of software revenue was subscription-based, which is up 2 percentage points year-on-year. Total subscription revenue was $22.4 billion, an increase of 2% and total subscription revenue represented 43% of Cisco’s total revenue.

Total non-GAAP gross margin was 64.6%, down 150 basis points and our non-GAAP operating margin was 33.6%, up 10 basis points. On the bottom line, non-GAAP net income was $14.1 billion, up 3%.

We delivered operating cash flow of $13.2 billion, down 14% compared to fiscal ’21, driven primarily by advanced payments for inventory purchases to secure component supply. While these payments had a negative impact on full year operating cash flow, these and our other related actions helped to improve the supply situation in Q4 and future quarters.

From a capital allocation perspective, we returned approximately $14 billion in value to our shareholders via cash dividends and stock repurchases, representing 109% of our free cash flow. This was comprised of $7.7 billion of share repurchases and $6.2 billion in quarterly cash dividends. We also increased our dividend for the 11th consecutive year in fiscal ’22, reinforcing our commitment to returning excess capital to our shareholders and our confidence in the strength and stability of our ongoing cash flows. Our strong balance sheet and overall financial position is clearly a competitive advantage in tough environments.

To summarize, we executed well in Q4 and had a solid fiscal year and a high complex environment, while continuing to make progress in our business model shift and making strategic investments and innovation to capitalize on our significant growth opportunities and expanding addressable markets. The demand for our products and services is strong as we drive innovation through continued investment and the shift to more recurring revenue delivering growth and driving shareholder value.

Turning to our financial guidance for Q1, we expect revenue growth to be in the range of 2% to 4%. We anticipate non-GAAP gross margin to be in the range of 63% to 64%. Our non-GAAP operating margin is expected to be in the range of 31.5% to 32.5%, and non-GAAP earnings per share are expected to range from $0.82 to $0.84.

For fiscal ’23, our guidance is as follows: We expect revenue growth to be in the range of 4% to 6% year-on-year. Non-GAAP earnings per share guidance are expected to range from $3.49 to $3.56, also up 4% to 6% year-on-year. In both our Q1 and full year guidance, we’re assuming a non-GAAP effective tax rate of 19%.

I’ll now turn it back to Marilyn, so we can move into the Q&A.

Questions and Answers:

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Thanks, Scott. Michelle, let’s go ahead and queue up the list of Q&A.

Operator

Thank you. Sami Badri with Credit Suisse, you may go ahead.

Sami Badri — Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC — Analyst

Hi. Thank you. I actually had two questions. First thing is for fiscal year ’23, your revenue growth expectations came in a bit stronger than most Street expectations. And maybe you could just walk us through the composition of the segments and what’s driving the strength and maybe which segments may potentially lag, some of the stronger segments? And then my other question is, maybe you could just give us some color on the composition of gross margin regarding pricing and productivity in fiscal 4Q of ’22, that would be helpful.

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. Thanks, Sami. As we look at the forecast that we’ve given you for fiscal ’23, balance growth again, 4% to 6% growth on the top line, 4% to 6% growth on the bottom line. When you start to peel that back, of course, we don’t guide at that level, what we have seen, as you’d expect, is again nice demand, as Chuck talked about on the call, through the end of the fourth quarter, but a little bit different by industry vertical. Retail, not surprisingly, under a little bit of pressure. Financial services under a little bit of pressure. Pretty much strength across most of the rest of the sectors, a little bit of pressure in healthcare as well. So that’s — as we roll into fiscal ’23, that’s what we’re seeing kind of vertical by vertical. We saw good double-digit growth sequentially, again, Q3 to Q4, because the year-on-year compares are quite difficult with that 31% growth we had a year ago, but good sequential growth, if you look at it by customer market in both enterprise, public sector and commercial. So, again, seeing pretty balanced growth across the board and that’s our expectation as we roll into fiscal ’23.

On the gross margin question, we are getting a benefit from price. One of the things that we’ve talked about, though, is there’s a lag from between the price increases that we put in place and what we see actually showing up in reported revenues. And I know you know this from prior quarters, Sami, we saw some of that benefit in Q4, and you’ll see this in our filings on our 10-Q or our 10-K [Phonetic] filing for the end of the quarter. It’s about 1% up year-on-year gross margin driven by price and then, of course, the offset coming from higher costs, both component costs and freight and logistics.

Sami Badri — Credit Suisse Securities (USA), LLC — Analyst

Got it. Thank you.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Next question, please.

Operator

Tim Long with Barclays, you may go ahead.

Tim Long — Barclays — Analyst

Thank you. Just wanted to ask on — maybe two quick ones. One on the software business. Chuck, you talked about kind of flattish performance, but still have carrying a lot of backlog there. That’s been a case for a few quarters here. So, maybe you could just talk a little bit about what you think it’s going to get taken to get this business moving a little bit more aggressively towards that software model. And then I did want to follow up on the cloud vertical, still running really strong orders there. Can you talk a little bit about — is the breadth of portfolio shipping into that growing? I know the 8-K is strong, but any other highlights of strength there that would be great? Thank you.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Tim. So, let’s start with the software. And you’re right, the software is flattish. There’re two things that I would point out. We have — we, obviously, have been transitioning from perpetual software model, which is in decline, and that’s by design. We want to decline our perpetual software and increase our subscription software. And the way I think about it is, our perpetual was down roughly 14% during the quarter. And we also, as Scott said, have over $2 billion, and it’s actually a higher number exiting Q4 than it was in Q3 of software in backlog, as you said, connected to hardware. So, those are two contributing factors, which is why we really should be thinking about the ARR situation because that’s reflective of the ACV that we basically had exiting the quarter. And it’s — so, that’s an indicator of future software revenue. So, we’re comfortable with it. And I think once we get through some of the supply chain stuff, then we’ll start to see that be a little more reflective of what we’ve been planning on.

On the cloud vertical, we continue to win new insertions. That business is approaching $3 billion [Phonetic] annually now after just two or three short years ago, it was pretty close to nothing. And so, the teams have done a fantastic job. It is — obviously, over the last four quarters, it’s grown 50%. From a revenue perspective, it’s very supply chain dependent. So I wouldn’t get too wrapped up about the revenue versus the orders right now. I think we’ll work our way through that over the next four to five quarters. But overall, really pleased with where we are.

Tim Long — Barclays — Analyst

Okay. Thank you.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Thanks, Tim. Next question, please.

Operator

Rod Hall with Goldman Sachs, you may go ahead, sir.

Rod Hall — Goldman Sachs — Analyst

Yeah. Hey guys, thanks for the question. I guess, I wanted to dig into this order growth a little bit. Obviously, very strong numbers there, but somewhat inconsistent with the way that we would have expected them to come out, and I just wanted — and the thing that’s inconsistent is you guys are saying up over 15% in the quarter, but then down 6% on a year-over-year basis. We would have calculated closer to flat, like minus 1 [Phonetic]. So, we’re just curious whether there was any restatement of the July quarter last year. You guys had called out 31% order growth there or anything else going on with the dynamics of these orders that might help us to understand that discrepancy at least in our numbers? And then I’ve got a follow-up.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, Rod, I saw some folks who thought we would be down 15%. So, I think it’s just different ways of modeling. When we were thinking about this question, and we obviously know that 31% and then in Q1, we’re comparing, it is 33%. We were trying to find other ways to look at the business to indicate the reality of the demand signal. So, let me just give you a few of those characteristics. First of all, from a product order perspective, as I said, it was the second highest in history, which would be only eclipsed by Q4 a year ago, and it grew 15%. And on a sequential basis, that’s actually in range with our historicals. If you go back to — if you take out last year, which was an abnormal sequential, then it’s very much in line, it’s in the range of what we’ve seen for the last 10 years, the 15%. You had enterprise, public sector and commercial, all growing in solid double digits on a sequential basis, and again, growing sequentially off our largest third quarter product bookings ever. We also have continued growth in the pipeline. As we exited Q4, we saw very good growth in pipeline, which is a good indicator of going forward. And the final thing I would tell you is that if you — the way our sales teams forecasted the quarter at the beginning of month three, they revised their forecast for the quarter, and they finished stronger than they thought they would, and we had strength as we exited the quarter. And so linearity was solid. And so we just haven’t seen anything that would indicate a significant shift in the demand signal from our customers.

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, Rod, so there was no — to be clear on your question, there was no change in the way we report year-on-year. It’s exactly the same. The only other thing that I would add too to the comments that Chuck just made, linearity in the quarter was quite strong. In fact, the last week of the quarter was actually the same size as it had been in the prior year and the month-to-month linearity was exactly in line with last year and with prior year’s expectations. So, we saw strength right through the end of Q4.

Rod Hall — Goldman Sachs — Analyst

Got you. Okay. And I — just as a follow-up, could I ask you guys on inventory? I know inventories moved up quite a bit again. Do you think inventory starts to come down next quarter, or just curious kind of where we are in that ebb and flow of inventory given the supply shortages and so on?

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. What’s sitting in inventory, Rod, is the rest of the parts that aren’t under constraint, so that as the ones that are constrained free up, of course, we can square the sets and get the product shipped out the door to our customers. So, it is growing. It’s up about $1 billion year-on-year, sitting at $2.5 billion. Our advance payments are up as well. Both of those are a bit of a headwind to cash flows, as you saw. But yeah, it’s much more a statement of making sure we’ve got everything we need so that as those constrained parts clear up, which we saw a little bit of that toward the end of Q4, we can square the sets and get it out the door and in the hands of our customers.

Rod Hall — Goldman Sachs — Analyst

Okay. Great. Appreciate it guys. Thank you.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

All right. Next question, please.

Operator

Thank you. Amit Daryanani from Evercore, you may go ahead.

Amit Daryanani — Evercore — Analyst

Thanks for the taking my question. I have two as well. The question I have is just on gross margins or maybe when I think about the EPS guide of 4% to 6% for fiscal ’23, how are you thinking about gross margins in that backdrop? And then are buybacks embedded in that guide as well?

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. So, there’s no added buyback in there. We’ve talked about our cap allocation policy. Our share buybacks have both a systemic component to it that’s just offsetting the shares that we issued through our equity plans and an opportunistic component. On the — what’s our expectation on gross margin through the year. Of course, we don’t guide that for the full year, Amit. But what I’d say is, my expectation is, as we go through the year and we can work through the backlog, we’ll begin to ship out of that backlog more and more orders that actually reflect the price increases that we put in place last year. And as we do, of course, that will be a tailwind to margins throughout the year. So, I would see margins going up as much as 50 basis points between our first quarter guide and where we end the year.

Amit Daryanani — Evercore — Analyst

And then, if I could just follow up, there’s been a firm amount of fear that higher interest rates will slightly [Phonetic] impact enterprise spending across the board, your print, your guide doesn’t seem to suggest you’re seeing any signs of that. But I’d love to get your perspective. What are you hearing from your customers as the macro environment is changing? And really related to that, are you seeing any shift in how they procure or what they want to buy from you as the macro environment changes?

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, it’s a good question. And we — what I would say is that we are not immune to any significant change in the macro that would result in enterprise spending shifting up. My comments are just that we haven’t seen a material demand signal change as we’ve entered into Q1. So, that’s where we are. I think on last call, I believe I talked a lot about how I believe that post pandemic, the view of technology by our customers is much different than it would have been seven, eight, nine years ago there. I think if you ask our customers if they would pause spending during a crisis, they would probably respond, when is there not going to be a crisis, given what we’ve dealt with the last three years. And so, in general, we don’t hear a lot of difference. Relative to your question around have we seen any different buying behavior or what are they trying to buy from us, in some cases, customers are looking for a little shorter ROI, so that affects how they think about what products they’re buying in these kinds of times. In some cases, customers are looking ahead to lead times to fiscal ’23 budgets and trying to better understand what their budgets are going to look like, because the shipments and the payments would be in the ’23 time frame. But other than that, we’re not seeing anything significantly different.

Amit Daryanani — Evercore — Analyst

Perfect. Thank you. Congrats on a nice print.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Amit.

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Amit.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Thanks, Amit. Next question.

Operator

Thank you. Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley Investment Research, you may go ahead.

Meta Marshall — Morgan Stanley Investment Research — Analyst

Great. Thanks. A couple of questions from me. Maybe, just on kind of increasing supply availability, I just wanted to get a sense of how much of that do you feel like is just some of these lagging edge components are starting to become more available? And how much of that is a result of kind of redesigns that you’ve done over the course of the year that have just kind of given you more optionality? And then, maybe, just a second question for you, Chuck. Just as we’ve seen, kind of, evaluation, correction on a lot of kind of the software space, like, how does that change your view of strategic activity? Thanks.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Meta. So, on the first one, I’d say that it’s a combination of both of those. As we said earlier, we saw increased volumes in the broker network during the quarter, which candidly was an opportunity we took advantage of, which is why you saw the higher top line, we were able to get more products shipped to our customers, which we obviously were very happy about, but we had to pay more for those components, and we think that will continue probably over the next 60 to 90 days. And then, we think some of those purchases will begin to become available from the same suppliers that have put the excess inventory into the marketplace. At the same time, we have — and I think I said this on our last call, we’ve had hundreds of product design — redesigns going on. And two of our high volume products that also have good margins will begin to ship in the redesigned space sort of towards the latter into Q1, and then into the balance of the year, which we think will be helpful as well. So, it’s a combination of both of those things. And that’s what gives us a little bit of optimism that things will continue to improve during the year.

On the second question, I mean on the valuations, I’ve had this one a few times, and I’ve been asked if our M&A strategy has changed because of the valuations, and I’ve said that, our strategy hasn’t changed, but the openness to talk to us from some of the companies that thought they had different strategic exits might have changed. And so, we haven’t changed our strategy. We just think that it potentially creates more opportunity for us with companies that might not have been willing because they thought there was a high-flying IPO ahead of them that they may not believe is the case right now. And the market is obviously taking a much different view on profitability versus just growth.

Meta Marshall — Morgan Stanley Investment Research — Analyst

Perfect. Thank you.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Thanks, Chuck. Next question, please.

Operator

Thank you. Tal Liani with Bank of America Securities, you may go ahead.

Tal Liani — Bank of America Securities — Analyst

Hi, guys. I’m trying to distinguish between the growth next year, which is probably a function of better supplies and backlog, very high backlog in between the spending environment, and you started touching on it when we asked about the enterprise. So, let me maybe expand the question about the environment. When you go through your various, what you call, use of theaters [Phonetic] and you go through cloud and service providers and enterprise, etc., can you take us through your expectations for the spending environment and maybe how long it takes to close deals versus before when you look into the next few quarters? I’m trying to understand if the environment, as you see it today, whether it deteriorates or not at all, or which are the areas where we see a slowdown or not?

And I have a second question, just if you can touch on security. Security was good again. It was good, actually much better, and there is improvement throughout the quarter, if you can touch on your position in security?

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Great. Thanks, Tal. So, if we — I think Scott has touched on it that the revenue for fiscal year ’23 is much more a byproduct of component availability than it necessarily is connected to demand. But I will tell you that our current models would have us exiting fiscal ’23 with roughly the same backlog as we’re entering FY ’23. And then as you look at the different segments that you’ve described, we had small business growth in Q4. I think it was double digits on a global basis, which is a good sign that that’s continuing to grow. And then when we dissect it, commercial grew 39% a year ago, so sequentially in double digits. Enterprise was up in the mid-20s last year, so sequentially growing in high double digits. Those are good signs for us. And then, the pipeline growth that we’ve seen as we exited the quarter just says that there’s still a lot out there. And so right now, we’re modeling for just the things to continue as we see them and taking into consideration as you ask me to go around the regions, I think Asia and Europe, we had conversations with our team this week and they seem to — they continue to be reasonably optimistic as we are in the Americas. And so, it was a pretty consistent story. Scott?

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. Probably the only thing I’d add is as you look at that 4% to 6% growth that we’ve forecasted now for fiscal ’23, it is absolutely supply constrained. So, while the supply situation we saw late in our fourth quarter that we just closed, there was some easing. Easing doesn’t mean it’s over. We’re going to have supply constraints throughout fiscal ’23 and just a few areas. Were it not for those, we would be growing much more quickly. It’s not a case of demand. We’re not demand constrained. We were supply constrained in fiscal ’23.

Tal Liani — Bank of America Securities — Analyst

And when it comes to your answer about service providers and cloud, same as the answer for the enterprise, meaning you don’t expect much of a change as of now in the environment?

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

No, we don’t see anything. What I would tell you about the service provider business is that because of the long lead times, we started a process of doing long-term planning with them that I’ve talked about before. And so we actually have deferred bookings that don’t show up anywhere right now, approaching $0.5 billion, that because they’re outside of our standard shipment window when they would like to get those. So, we’ve got orders out quarters from now from them that are all non-cancelable because of the contracts that we’ve done. So, we feel good about that momentum. We think that those customers will continue to spend in all of the trends that we’ve talked about. And given that we just shipped our first 800-gig system to one of the web scale players, we can continue to see them take advantage of these higher speed platforms.

Tal Liani — Bank of America Securities — Analyst

Greta. Thank you.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Now, Tal, you also asked about security?

Tal Liani — Bank of America Securities — Analyst

Yes, I did.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

So, we saw — I think Scott mentioned this in his — we had some really good growth and some backlog movement, to be honest, on the firewall side. So, we had a really solid quarter on shipments from a firewall perspective. But we also had strength in our endpoint business. We had strengthened our Zero Trust business. And we’re continuing to — that is the number one investment area for the Company this year, and we’re continuing to drive, I think, greater innovation there and evolve that portfolio as we’ve described strategically. So, I think we’ll just continue to see improvement. But this quarter did get a boost from us clearing some backlog in the firewall space.

Tal Liani — Bank of America Securities — Analyst

Thank you.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Thanks, Tal. Next question.

Operator

Samik Chatterjee with J.P. Morgan, you may go ahead.

Samik Chatterjee — J.P. Morgan — Analyst

Hi, thanks for taking my questions, and congrats on the good execution this quarter. I guess I wanted to dive into the order numbers a bit here. And historically, you’ve talked about sort of SMB or commercial being a bit more of a leading indicator into enterprise trends. But when you look at the order trends right now, it does seem like you’re seeing a bit more of a volatility around the enterprise orders related to the commercial segment. And so I wanted to see if there’s anything that you can help us in terms of thinking about the trends we’re seeing there? And just a second one there is sort of collaboration and it seems like a very tough backdrop to turnaround collaboration results, and so how should we think about sustainability of the growth here for collaboration?

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, Samik, thank you. I’ll comment on — the small business was again strong, as I spoke about just a moment ago. I think it’s really important when you have these abnormal year-over-year comparisons for us to find other ways to assess the strength, which is why we looked at the sequential growth. And sequentially, they’re both up in double-digits, both commercial and enterprise, which — against a very large quarter, a quarter ago. And so we’re comfortable right now that they’re moving as they should be. Candidly, for commercial to grow at all after the extreme growth that we had a year ago was actually quite positive. So, I actually view that favorably given the strength that they showed a year ago, it was probably the highest growth rate we’ve had in forever in that space or at least in the last 10 years. So, overall, I think we don’t see any sort of significant demand shift, as I said earlier. On the collab front, it’s a little bit like the security message that I gave a few minutes ago. We had a — we did clear a lot of device business in the backlog. So, the growth, as Scott said in his opening comments, was driven largely by the device business and offset by some declines we had in meetings and calling. But I will say that the teams are working really hard on the meetings and calling side. Those have been strong. The calling side has been strong for us in the past few quarters. The product portfolio is in really good shape. The Net Promoter Score for our meetings platform is now 64 and that was 1 million customer responses. So, it’s a hugely improved experience. And this year, the teams are really focused on trying to get that back to growth. But we’ve got a lot of work to do.

Samik Chatterjee — J.P. Morgan — Analyst

Yeah. Thank you. Thanks for taking my questions.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Next question, please.

Operator

Ittai Kidron from Oppenheimer, you may go ahead.

Ittai Kidron — Oppenheimer & Company, Inc. — Analyst

Thanks. A couple from me. Maybe first on the supply chain. I just want to make sure I understand your expectations for component availability, and maybe you could talk about price changes of components. It doesn’t sound like you’re assuming any changes in pricing. Is that correct? And if there will be a change in pricing, what are the odds that you actually take down the prices of your products?

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. This — I’ll start, Chuck, and if you want to jump in, let’s do that. From a component availability standpoint, Ittai, that’s been the most fluid area of our forecast over the last several quarters. And as we look ahead, we did see signs of stability during Q4. And as I said, late in Q4 that we just closed, we actually saw some improvement. The way that improvement showed up was availability of some of the constrained parts that we have been chasing in the broker network. And obviously, when you buy from the broker network, you pay a premium for those and you see that reflected in the gross margins. I think there’ll still be some of that in Q1. You see that reflected in our gross margin guide in Q1. And then, it gets better as the year goes on, not because — I’m not assuming any price declines or any cost declines coming from our suppliers. I think the — I don’t see them lining up to come back and say, hey, good news, Scott and Chuck. We’re going to charge you less for the component parts. There may be some benefit in freight and logistics we’ll see, as commercial airlift comes back online. I think the benefits we’ll get will be much more from shipping more out of our backlog that are orders that were received after we did the price increases last year.

Ittai Kidron — Oppenheimer & Company, Inc. — Analyst

So, as I think about your fiscal year, fiscal ’23 guidance, what is the underlying assumption regarding volume component availability exiting fiscal ’23? How much better are you expecting it to be in your guidance? What’s embedded there?

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. Again, our guidance assumes that we continue to be supply constrained through the year. As I said, if we could get more supply, we would be growing more quickly in fiscal ’23. So, we’ll continue to be supply constrained. Our modeling shows that our backlog, as we exit fiscal ’23, Chuck touched on this earlier, that we think the dollar value — obviously, it’s not the same orders, but the dollar value is roughly unchanged from the dollar value we roll into fiscal ’23 with. So, I think we’ll continue to face component availability headwinds throughout the year.

Ittai Kidron — Oppenheimer & Company, Inc. — Analyst

Would you expect your order growth in fiscal ’23 to exceed your 4% to 6% top line guidance?

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. We don’t forecast order growth, as you know, Ittai. So, that’s not one that I want to jump into at this point. I think the — probably the key takeaway would be we’re not demand constrained, we’re supply constrained, as you look at FY ’23.

Ittai Kidron — Oppenheimer & Company, Inc. — Analyst

Okay. Thank you.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Thanks, Ittai.

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Ittai.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Next question.

Operator

Paul Silverstein with Cowen, you may go ahead.

Paul J Silverstein — Cowen & Co — Analyst

Thank you. I know my questions have been touched on previous comments and responses, Chuck. But I want to ask you anyway. There are big picture questions, one on revenue, one on margins. The first one, from your comments and the comments of your peers about networking, it looks like networking demand is in the best shape it’s been in since the bubble of the late ’90s, And that, of course was a bubble. But its — the supply constraints, it’s making it hard to discern what’s going on from a competitive landscape standpoint. And I’m sure you guys are aware, I know it’s come up in previous calls, but there’s this sense, I think, created by your competitors, rightly or wrongly, but I want to let you respond to that, in campus enterprise in particular, which is still core to what you all do, that you’ve got competitive pressures. Any thoughts you can share on what you’re seeing in your campus enterprise business, both on the wire line switching and on the wireless LAN side? You clearly talked about strength from an order perspective, but I want to let you respond. And then I’ve got a question on margins.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Okay. First of all, I think market share is a very difficult thing to assess right now to your point because of everything sitting in the backlog. I do believe that Q4 was the second largest Cat 9000 shipment quarter in the history of the product. So, that would indicate that it’s strong. And I think as we continue to clear our backlog or work through it, not clear it, but as we work through our backlog, you’ll see some share come out. But I would encourage you to look at market share over a trending quarter time frame as opposed to a point in time because you just never know. We’ve got some products that we’ve been redesigning that we have backlog that we’ll begin to ship in mass that will actually flip market share numbers pretty significantly. And my competitor is going to be telling you exactly what I’m telling you right now. So, it’s something you just got to watch over time. And so, I’m not — I mean, clearly, we have competition in the campus. We have very strong competition. We always have. And — but given the volume of the products that we’re shipping right now, I don’t feel like we’re losing significant share.

Paul J Silverstein — Cowen & Co — Analyst

Okay. And also from a big picture perspective, once upon a time, networking in general, and Cisco in particular, was the canary in the coal mine. When there was a macro downturn, you guys were the first to see it, networking was the easiest thing to push off, everyone let their networks run hotter with their enterprise carriers, etc., that seems to flip where networking is actually not seeing weakness that other technology product markets are seeing. I just want to make sure that I’ve got that concept right. And the real question though on the margin side, you all were at record or near record gross and operating margin levels going into the pandemic before input costs, I see semis freight, which is, etc., spikes. Any thoughts on where you can get — where the long-term model can get back to once supply chain normalizes. I assume that freight and logistics mix and pricing will go back to pre-pandemic levels. It will help you and others out. But I also assume that the increase in [Indecipherable] input costs are not going back to where they were, you’ll be able to offset some, but probably not all of that with your price increases. Let me let you respond.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. So let me take the networking — the resilience of the networking market first. And then, Scott, you can take the margin question. So, Paul, I think you’re right. And I’ve said this repeatedly. I think what what’s driven this is there are two things. Number one, the pandemic revealed the impact of not keeping your core infrastructure technology up to speed. Customers struggled, and I think it made them realize that they had a lot of tech debt that needed to be dealt with. And they don’t want to get in that position again. So, that’s the first thing.

But the second thing is all of these mega trends that I mentioned in my opening comments, I mean these customers are re-architecting their entire infrastructure for the first time in years to deal with hybrid cloud and to deal with all of the mobile workers. We see IoT exploding. You see all of the climate activity is going to be a tailwind to our business, because you have to connect all these industrial systems to be able to control them. You’ve got to shift to 400 gig. I mean, let me just — I’ll give you a data point, 400 gig ports we’re up almost 700% year-over-year for us. We’ve got over 1,000 customers now that have bought 400 gig and we shipped our first 800 gig. So, it’s just — all these trends continue, you got 5G, you’ve got WiFi-6, you’ve got this application observability, the re-architecture of applications. So, I think it’s a combination of the realization of the pandemic brought on around technology debt and never letting them get to that point and then these mega trends that are going on. And Scott, do you want to take the gross margin question?

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. I think, Paul, on the gross margin question, I think you nailed the trends. I don’t expect input costs, particularly around semis to come down. I look forward to the day that I come to the office and there’s a message from our semiconductor suppliers saying, “Hey, good news, your price is going down.” I just don’t see that happening. Price will offset part of it. I think you got that part right too. I think the other — the only thing I would add that probably in your thinking, but you didn’t say it, so I will. Over the longer term, as we mix more software in, that will be a tailwind at the gross margin line. So, just add that to your thinking, and I think you’ve got it nailed.

Paul J Silverstein — Cowen & Co — Analyst

Scott, can you go back to that record level?

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

I don’t want to get into forecasting the longer term at that level of granularity right now, Paul.

Paul J Silverstein — Cowen & Co — Analyst

I appreciate. Thanks, guys.

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Okay.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Thanks, Paul. Next question.

Operator

Ben Bollin with Cleveland Research, you may go ahead.

Benjamin J. Bollin — Cleveland Research — Analyst

Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for taking the question. The first one, you talked about backlog expected to sustain at current levels exiting fiscal ’23. I think you said software backlog was north of $2 billion again in the quarter, but what was the product backlog? Where did that finish the quarter?

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. We didn’t give that stat and that’s not one that I want to start giving every quarter. Ben, what we did say qualitatively is it grew again. And what I’ll tell you is, it was up actually up triple digits again on a year-on-year basis. The overall backlog, software backlog is a pretty significant headwind to our software growth. It’s well north of the $2 billion that we talked about.

Benjamin J. Bollin — Cleveland Research — Analyst

Okay. And then one other item. I’m not asking for a forecast on RPO. I guess that’s a precursor to sort of asking for one. But when you think about RPO in the concept of the broader 4% to 6% rev guide for the year, is the assumption as you shift more to software that RPO should consistently outperform your top line growth? How do you think about the relationship for those two metrics longer term?

Scott Herren — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. There’re a couple of dynamics going on in RPO. So, I’d say, in general, you’re right, obviously, duration has an effect on RPO as well, but it varies a bit by product line. So, for the quarter, we just announced the 6% product RPO growth. We had double-digit product RPO growth in Secure Agile Networks, in optimized app experiences and in security, I almost forgot. And we had high single-digit growth in Internet for the future. I’d say that the headwind there, of course, is collab from an RPO standpoint. So, longer term, I think you’d expect those dynamics to continue. And as we turn around the go-to-market and the sales side of collab, that will flip from being a headwind to more of a tailwind on product RPO growth.

Benjamin J. Bollin — Cleveland Research — Analyst

Thanks, Scott.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Okay. We have time for one more question.

Operator

Simon Leopold from Raymond James, you may go ahead, sir.

Simon Leopold — Raymond James & Associates, Inc. — Analyst

Thanks for taking the question. I’ve got one sort of short term and one longer term. On the short-term side, we heard some anecdotes that some multi-product projects have been split up because of the supply chain constraints. And I want to get a sense of whether or not that’s something that’s happening as a way for you to work around some of the bottlenecks and to get some projects out the door that might not have and how that might factor into the numbers. And in terms of the longer term, Todd Nightingale had made a comment in a meeting about Cisco no longer managing to the org chart. And I wanted to see if, maybe Chuck, you can elaborate on what the implications are by that particular statement? Thank you.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

So, Simon, if I could ask you to clarify for me is on the short-term question, I didn’t quite understand. You’re saying that we are breaking up orders or we’re asking customers to — or customers are making that decision or what exactly was the question?

Simon Leopold — Raymond James & Associates, Inc. — Analyst

Yeah. So, I’m not 100% sure, but I think it’s customers asking to break apart some larger projects where they’re buying a multitude of components from Cisco and essentially saying, “Let’s not wait for the components you can’t get. Ship me what you can. I’ll get the other stuff elsewhere.” I’ve heard these as anecdotes, and I’m trying to understand how substantive it is?

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. I have not heard any discussion on that particular topic, but it wouldn’t surprise me. I mean, if I was a customer and if I had a project that I could actually drive some constructive ROI by doing part of it, then I would split it up to try to get the part that I could get, for sure. I’ll tell you what we are seeing, we have — customers are being really good with us about telling us what they desperately need and what they’re okay waiting for. They’ve been really great about saying, “Look, I’m not going to come tell you this guy is falling and tell you I need everything in backlog tomorrow. But here’s what I really need, here’s what I need this time, here’s what I need this time.” And so we’ve been working through that a lot with customers and that may be a variation of what you’ve heard. So, that’s the only thing that I can think of. On the Todd comment on the org chart, I think the comment is we don’t want to ship our org chart. And we talked at Cisco Live about a huge number of cross-business unit technology combinations that we were delivering. I’ll give you a couple of examples, but this is what he’s talking about. Like our Secure Connects Plus that we started shipping includes SD-WAN technology from the enterprise networking team and cloud security from the security team brought together in a managed as-a-service offer for customers. There’s integration going on between AppDynamics and ThousandEyes that actually will be bidirectional intelligence. It will flow between those two. You’ve got AppDynamics doing the same thing with Talos and other aspects of the security portfolio for that exact reason. You’ve got — before Jonathan took on all of the portfolio that Todd had and his own, there was a lot of work Todd was doing with Jonathan’s team around private 5G and how do we build private 5G services through a combination of those. So, that’s what Todd was talking about. I think the teams have done a good job of really leading with what the customer needs and not building from the way the org chart is built. And that’s what he’s talking about.

Simon Leopold — Raymond James & Associates, Inc. — Analyst

Great. Thanks for that clarification.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Okay.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Thanks, Simon.

Chuck Robbins — Chair and Chief Executive Officer

Good. All right. Well, thank you all. Before we wrap, I want to make a few closing comments. I just first want to say I’m really proud of what our teams have achieved. It’s obviously a very dynamic environment, and the teams have really shown great execution and great focus. We did have tough compares, and so we worked really hard to try to give you a different way of looking at the demand, and we’ll just — we’ll let you know if we see anything change when we come back together in the next call. But right now, demand remains solid. I think customers really do understand the value that technology brings to their strategy. I also appreciate what our supply chain teams have achieved, and we’re encouraged by what we’re seeing and how that supply, hopefully, will continue to ease throughout the year. The business model transition is really helping us give you more visibility and predictability. And I’m also proud of how our team has rallied around our purpose. Just a couple of comments. This year, we set another a record, a record high number of employees who were given back into their communities. Our Net Zero by ’24 target and near-term targets were just approved by the science-based targets initiative under its Net Zero standard. So, we’re not only committed to our own goals, but also building technology that helps our customers meet their own goals. Lastly, we’ve been named the number one Great Place to Work in 20 countries around the world. And on any day, I will be proud of that, but this is super important right now given the competition for talent around the world, and it really does make a difference when we’re trying to hire new talent into the organization. It really makes us more resilient than ever, and I think we’re well positioned for long-term growth, and I want to thank all of you for spending time with us today. Thank you.

Marilyn Mora — Head of Investor Relations

Thanks, Chuck. So, I’ll go ahead and close out the call. Cisco’s next quarterly earnings call, which will reflect our fiscal year 2023 first quarter results, will be on Wednesday, November 16, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time, 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time. This concludes today’s call. If you have any further questions, feel free to contact the Cisco Investor Relations group, and we thank you very much for joining today’s call.

Operator

Thank you for participating on today’s conference call. If you would like to listen to the call in its entirety, you may call 866-517-3736. For participants dialing from outside the U.S., please dial 203-369-2047. [Operator Closing Remarks].