Corning Incorporated (NYSE: GLW) Q2 2025 Earnings Call dated Jul. 29, 2025
Corporate Participants:
Ann H.S. Nicholson — Vice President, Investor Relations
Wendell P. Weeks — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Ed Schlesinger — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Analysts:
Wamsi Mohan — Analyst
John Roberts — Analyst
Samik Chatterjee — Analyst
Steven Fox — Analyst
Asiya Merchant — Analyst
George Nader — Analyst
Mehdi Hussaini — Analyst
Joshua Spector — Analyst
Presentation:
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing-by. Welcome to the Corning Incorporated Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. At this time, all participants are in the listen-only mode. After the speaker’s presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded.
It is my pleasure to introduce to you Ann Nicholson, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
Ann H.S. Nicholson — Vice President, Investor Relations
Thank you, and good morning, everybody. Welcome to Corning’s second quarter 2025 earnings call. With me today are Wendell Weeks, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Ed Schlesinger, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
I’d like to remind you that today’s remarks contain forward-looking statements, that fall within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially. These factors are detailed in the Company’s financial reports.
You should also note that we’ll be discussing our consolidated results using core performance measures unless we specifically indicate our comments relate to GAAP data. Our core performance measures are non-GAAP measures used by management to analyze the business. For the second quarter, the difference between GAAP and core EPS primarily reflected non-cash mark-to-market activity associated with the Company’s translated earnings contracts, foreign denominated debt and constant currency adjustments. As a reminder, mark-to-market accounting has no impact on our cash flow.
A reconciliation of core results to the comparable GAAP value can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website at corning.com. You may also access core results on our website with downloadable financials in the Interactive Analyst Center. Supporting slides are being shown live on our webcast, we encourage you to follow along. They’re also available on our website for downloading.
And now, I’ll turn the call over to Wendell.
Wendell P. Weeks — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Ann. Good morning, everyone. We delivered outstanding second quarter results. Our record sales and EPS both exceeded guidance. Year-over-year sales grew 12% to $4 billion. Earnings per share grew more than double the rate of sales to $0.60. Operating margin expanded 160 basis points to 19%.Return on invested capital grew 210 basis points to 13.1% and free cash flow grew 28% to $451 million.
Overall, key secular trends and are more Corning content strategy drove demand for our capabilities and we continue to capture the powerful profitable growth outlined in our recently upgraded Springboard plan. As we look ahead, we expect our strong Springboard performance to continue.
We’re seeing a remarkable customer response to both our new Gen AI and U.S.-made solar products, and we’re driving more Corning content into our Mobile Consumer Electronics, Display, Automotive, and Optical Communications platforms. We also expect an additional growth driver to emerge in the coming months, as new and existing customers seek to leverage our large U.S. advanced manufacturing footprint.
Overall, we are well positioned to deliver durable growth through 2026 and beyond. But before we talk about the future, I’d like to take a moment to put our second quarter results in the context of our Springboard plan. We launched Springboard in quarter four 2023, explaining our plan to dramatically improve our sales and enhance our return profile, and to increase our operating margin by 400 basis points to 20% by the end of 2026. We’re now at the halfway point of our original Springboard plan,
When we compare our second quarter 2025 results to our launch point, we grew sales 24%, adding more than $3 billion to our annualized run rate. We expanded operating margin by 270 basis points to 19%, showing strong progress towards our target of 20%. We grew EPS 54% more than twice the rate of sales. We expanded return on invested capital by 430 basis points and we generated strong free cash flow. Clearly, this progress is impressive and we expect our strong performance to continue. So let’s look at our journey so far.
Our original internal Springboard plan, which was the output of the strategic planning process we run with each of our market access platforms, was to add $5 billion in incremental annualized sales by the end of 2026. These were our actual business plans. We set our objectives and our compensation based upon those plans.
When our businesses submit plans to corporate, they factor in a variety of probabilistic outcomes. They try to account for the known unknowns. The business plans aim for a 70% confidence interval, which means that based on their analysis, there is a 70% chance that they will deliver sales greater than or equal to that number. We then provided a higher confidence plan for our investors.
At the corporate level, we probabilistically adjusted for factors including potential macroeconomic slowdowns, changes in government policy, and timing of multiple secular trends, and our related innovations. Our risk adjustment was $2 billion. This is how we got to our original $3 billion high-confidence plan. Remember, we purposely drew this as a wedge.
We weren’t trying to guide every quarter for the next 12 quarters. It wouldn’t be a straight line. That being said, our quarterly performance through 2024 demonstrates our powerful momentum. This chart illustrates that we are hitting or exceeding our critical milestones as sales tracked well above both our internal and high-confidence plans through the first year. Our strategies are working and our customers are loving our innovations. Given our progress, in March of this year we upgraded our internal and high-confidence plans by a billion dollars to add $6 billion and $4 billion respectively.
So now let’s look at our most recent quarter. As you can see, we’ve added $3.1 billion of incremental annualized sales since the launch of Springboard. Looking ahead, we expect to add another $600 million to our annualized sales run rate in the third quarter. At the halfway point of Springboard, we are on track and expect strong momentum going forward.
Now, let me share just a few examples of what is driving our growth. Gen AI is clearly a positive force. First, in our Enterprise business, where we report sales for inside the data center, we saw a record $2 billion in sales last year. In quarter two, we grew Enterprise sales 81% year-over-year.
The primary technical driver behind that growth is what the industry calls the scale out of the network. That basically means that hyperscale customers are scaling out the GPO — GPU clusters with more and more connected AI nodes of server racks, or simply put, larger neural networks, because each AI node is connected to the others in the cluster by fiber, this creates more volume for Corning.
We also have another significant upside opportunity inside the data center. Driven by what the industry calls the scale up of the network, hyperscalers are creating more capable nodes that move from less than 100 GPUs per node today to hundreds of GPUs per node in the future.
Historically, an AI node has been within a single server rack. As hyperscalers scale up, AI nodes are shifting to stretch across multiple server racks. This causes the distance to link these GPUs within the node to get longer. This will eventually cause the links to reach about 100 gigabit per per second meter, what we call the electrical to optical frontier line, which roughly marks the point, where fiber connections become more techno economical than copper, creating a large potential opportunity for us.
To help understand the size of this opportunity, a single Blackwell like node has more than 70 GPUs with more than 1200 links using more than 2 miles of copper. As that node scales up, those 2 miles will eventually be replaced by fiber connections, and those miles will grow over time as more and more GPUs are included in the AI node.
I’m sure, you’ve seen announcements regarding co-packaged optics or CPO. That is one of the technologies that helps activate this scale up opportunity for us. If we succeed technically, the scale up opportunity is 2 to 3 times the size of our existing $2 billion Enterprise business and we’re working with key customers and partners as we speak, and making that future a reality. Another opportunity for our growth tied to Gen AI is playing out in our Carrier business.
Now we’ve been studying this space for some time and we’ve been seeing that most long-haul routes were approaching their maximum data rate capacity, creating a need for many new high bandwidth, low latency links between cities and data center campuses. And this essentially requires a rebuild of the long-haul networks.
Our customers consider the long-haul rebuilds as they think about that technically and economically, they see great potential economic benefit from fitting more fibers into a given conduit. This means they prefer denser fiber optic cables. To create a high density solution, we applied our core innovations from inside the data center to this outside plan challenge. We introduced this new technology package to connect data center campuses.
In the industry, this is referred to as DCI or Data Center Interconnect. We shared last year that we’d reached an agreement with Lumen Technologies to provide our new Gen AI fiber and cable system, that enables Lumen to fit anywhere from 2 to 4 times the amount of fiber into their existing conduit. And the agreement reserved 10% of our global fiber capacity for 2025 and 2026. We’ve now fully commercialized this product set and we have three industry leading customers adopting the technology. That being said, we are just in the very beginning of this new market. We expect this business to scale rapidly reaching a billion dollar opportunity for us by the end of the decade.
Now, I’ll turn to our growth opportunity in solar. At our March IR event we shared our low risk high return strategy to re enter the solar market. We generated over $1 billion in cash from 2020 to 2024 in this platform. We funded the expansion of our manufacturing assets with the growing cash flow generated from the assets we acquired for less than $0.10 on the dollar, customer funding and government support. All while generating positive cash flow every year. As a result, we have now built a strong foundation for rapidly accelerating growth.
We made advancements to serve higher end chip segment in semiconductors and we are on track to double our semiconductor business by the end of the decade. We activated idle assets to serve the need for domestic solar polysilicon. And we added the capability to transform our polysilicon into higher value domestically made solar wafers, all integrated together on our campus in Michigan.
We now have committed customers for 100% of our polysilicon and wafer capacity available in 2025 and 80% of our capacity for the next five years, because we built this platform so quietly while growing our cash flow, our new Solar MAP hasn’t garnered much attention from investors relative to the significance of the opportunity. We expect to triple our sales run rate by 2027, adding $1.6 billion of new annualized revenue to Corning’s earnings power.
Finally, we also expect an additional growth driver to emerge in the coming months, as new and existing customers seek to leverage our large U.S. advanced manufacturing footprint. It is still early days, but this could become a major trend depending how trade policy turns out. Watch this space and we’ll keep you posted.
With that, I’ll leave you with this. We delivered outstanding second quarter results that exceeded expectations. We’ve made great progress to date on our Springboard plan. Halfway through the plan, we grew sales 24%, adding more than $3 billion to our annualized run rate. We expanded operating margin by 270 basis points to 19%, showing strong progress on our target of 20%. We grew EPS 54% more than twice the rate of sales. We expanded return on invested capital by 430 basis points and we generated strong free cash flow. And we’re experiencing strong growth drivers that increase our confidence and and maintaining our momentum through 2026 and beyond.
Now, I’ll turn it over to Ed for more detail on our results and outlook.
Ed Schlesinger — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Wendell. Good morning, everyone. We delivered excellent second quarter results that exceeded the expectations we set in April. Year-over-year in Q2 sales were up 12% while EPS grew 28%. Operating margin expanded 160 basis points to 19%, ROIC grew 210 basis points to 13.1% and free cash flow grew 28% to $451 million.
Looking ahead, we expect Q3 to be another strong quarter. We expect double-digit year-over-year sales and earnings growth with sales of $4.2 billion and profit again growing faster than sales with EPS in a range of $0.63 to $0.67.
We expect to continue expanding our operating margin as we march toward our springboard target of 20%. We also anticipate continued strong growth in our Enterprise business driven by our new products for Gen AI and we’re advancing significant growth opportunities across the Company as Wendell just described.
Two other points I want to note related to our third quarter guidance. First, in Q3, our guidance again factors in about $.01 to $0.02 for the impact of currently enacted tariffs about the same level we saw in Q2. Our long standing philosophy will locate our manufacturing operations close to our customers, serves as a natural hedge against tariffs and mitigates the financial impact.
Second, we shared with you last quarter, that we are accelerating our production ramp for new products. Given high customer demand for our new Gen AI products for inside and outside the data center, and for our new solar offerings. Our third quarter guidance includes temporarily higher costs associated with these ramps of $0.02 to $0.03 in the quarter. We expect the impact of these costs to dissipate as our production and sales increase.
Overall, we feel great about our Springboard performance to date. As you can see by our guidance, we expect our momentum to continue and we’re energized by the tremendous opportunity for value creation we built for our shareholders. With that, let me share some more detail on what we’re seeing in our businesses.
In Optical Communications, second quarter sales grew 41% year-over-year to $1.6 billion. Growth was led by strong adoption of our AI products in the Enterprise space, which was up 81% year-over-year. We also saw strong growth in our Carrier business, which was up 16% year-over-year. This was driven by two factors. First, as a reminder, we categorize our Gen AI products that interconnect data centers in our Carrier business. We began shipping these products in the first quarter. We doubled sales from first quarter levels in the second quarter. We’re still in the very beginning of this opportunity and as you heard from Wendell, this could be a billion dollar business for us by the end of the decade.
Additionally, Carriers have completed drawing down inventory they built during the pandemic and they are now purchasing at their rate of deployment. This also contributed to year-over-year sales growth in our Carrier business and as noted in recent public statements, Carriers are planning to expand their fiber networks going forward. So this sets the stage for additional growth. Net income for the second quarter was $247 million, up 73% year-over-year with strong incremental profit on the additional volume.
Moving to Display. In the second quarter, sales were $898 million and net income was $243 million, both consistent with with the first quarter. For the full year, our expectations for the retail market remain unchanged. We expect TV unit sales to be consistent with 2024 and TV screen size growth of about an inch. As a reminder, we successfully implemented double-digit price increases in the second half of 2024 to ensure that we can maintain stable U.S. dollar net income in a weaker yen environment.
We hedged our yen exposure for 2025 and 2026 with hedges in place beyond 2026. In 2025 we reset our yen core rate to JPY120 to the dollar consistent with our hedge rate. We are not recasting our 2024 financials, because we expect to maintain the same profitability in display at the new Corning.
We guided full year net income of $900 million to $950 million in 2025 and net income margin of 25% consistent with the last five years. Clearly, we are tracking ahead of that guidance in the first half of 2025. We expect our profitability levels to continue in the second half and now expect to be at the high end of the $900 million to $950 million net income range and for margin to be at least 25%.
Looking ahead, we expect the Q3 glass market and our volume to be similar to Q2, and for our pricing to be consistent sequentially. In Display overall, we are maintaining our market technology and cost leadership, while benefiting from market growth and a glass supply demand environment that is balanced to tight.
Turning to Specialty Materials. Sales were up 9% year-over-year, primarily driven by continued adoption of our premium glass innovations in Gorilla Glass. Additionally, some OEM customers purchased in advance of anticipated tariffs. We expect OEMs to adjust their purchases in the second half of 2025 and have factored that into our Q3 guidance. Net income was up 29% year-over-year to $81 million, primarily driven by strong demand for our premium glass innovations.
Turning to Automotive. As a reminder in Q1, we graduated our Auto Glass business and together with our Environmental Technologies business created this segment. We ended 2023 with a triple digit Automotive Glass business and we expect it to triple by the end of 2026. In the second quarter, Automotive sales were $460 million, down 4% year-over-year, primarily driven by weaker light and heavy duty markets in Europe and North America. Net income was $79 million, up 11% year-over-year, driven by strong manufacturing performance offsetting lower sales.
We’re focused on executing our More Corning growth strategy in Automotive as additional content is required in upcoming vehicle emissions regulations and as technical glass and optics gained further adoption in vehicles. In Life Sciences, sales were consistent with the prior year and net income grew 6%. And finally, in Hemlock and Emerging Growth Businesses, sales were up 31% year-over-year, driven by increased solar and semiconductor polysilicon volume.
Our new solar business currently sits in this segment. We plan to build it into a $2.5 billion revenue stream by 2028. We’re commercializing our new made-in-America ingot and wafer products. We expect our new wafer facility to come online in Q3, and we expect to begin shipping later this year. We have committed customers for 100% of our polysilicon and wafer capacity available in 2025 and 80% of our capacity for the next five years. As we guided, our Q2, net income reflected the temporarily higher production ramp costs for our new solar offerings.
With that, I’ll shift from segment results to free cash flow. We continue making strong progress in 2025. In the second quarter, free cash flow grew 28% year-over-year to $451 million. We continue to expect to generate a significant amount of free cash flow this year, and we expect to invest approximately $1.3 billion on capital.
Moving to capital allocation. As we previously shared with you, our upgraded Springboard plan includes higher sales and higher profit. We expect to convert that higher profit into more cash flow, and as I just noted, we’re making nice progress. So how do we choose to invest the expected higher cash flow?
Companies do capital allocation in different ways. We prioritize investing in organic growth opportunities that drive significant returns, and we grow primarily through innovation. We believe this creates the most value for our shareholders over the long-term. Our investors have confirmed this. As we see high return opportunities in the future, we will invest those opportunities.
We also seek to maintain a strong and efficient balance sheet. We’re in great shape. We have one of the longest debt tenors in the S&P 500. Our current average debt maturity is about 21 years, with only about $1.5 billion in debt coming due over the next five years, and we have no significant debt coming due in any given year.
Finally, we expect to continue our strong track record of returning excess cash to shareholders. We already have a strong dividend. Therefore, as we go forward, our primary vehicle for returning cash to shareholders will be share buybacks, and we have an excellent track record.
Over about the last decade, we repurchased 800 million shares, close to a 50% reduction in our outstanding shares, which at today’s share price has created $26 billion in value for our shareholders. Because of our growing confidence in Springboard, we started to buy back shares in the second quarter of 2024 and we’ve continued to do so since then. In the first quarter of 2025, we invested another $100 million into share purchases. In the second quarter, we continued to buy back shares and we will expect to continue buying back shares in the third quarter.
So I’ll quickly wrap up today. We delivered outstanding second quarter results exceeding guidance with record sales and EPS. We expect Q3 to be another strong quarter with double-digit sales and earnings growth. Since the start of Springboard, we’ve significantly grown sales, we’ve grown EPS more than twice the rate of sales and and we are generating strong free cash flow. We’ve substantially improved our return profile. So overall, we feel great about our progress.
With that, I’ll turn it back to Ann.
Ann H.S. Nicholson — Vice President, Investor Relations
Thanks, Ed. Okay, operator, we’re ready for our first question.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Thank you [Operator Instructions] The first question will come from Wamsi Mohan with Bank of America. Your line is now open.
Wamsi Mohan
Yes. Thank you so much. Wendell, some of your customers are facing maybe more disruption than you are relative to tariffs. Can you comment on, where you’ve seen pull forward activity within that customer base both in the second quarter and where you’re expecting some of that might into the third quarter of this year as well? If you could just — it’s clear that something happened in specialty, but if you could share some color on that and if there are other markets where this is happening as well. Thank you.
Ed Schlesinger
Hey, Wamsi. This is Ed. I’ll take that one. So I think the two places in particular where we did see some customers buying ahead of expected tariffs were in Gorilla, as we shared on the call and in Display. We are expecting that to adjust in the second half. And in both of those spaces, we’re not changing our view of the markets for the full year, the retail markets or the end markets. So we expect that to normalize. Now, our guidance for Q3 and the way we’re thinking about going forward factors that in.
Wamsi Mohan
Okay.
Wendell P. Weeks
That makes sense to you, Wamsi. So basically, we do our calculation and our estimate of what we think that is. Right. And then we try to take it out of our next quarter guide. May happen that way, may not happen that way, but we try to conservatively portray what we see as supply chain movement.
Wamsi Mohan
Right. No, that makes sense. I guess. Just to clarify, you’re saying that in Q2 you did see an uptick in Specialty, so that impacts Q3, Q4 versus first half. But more specifically, are you seeing any impact in Q3 in your guide from a full power perspective as well? Understanding that your full year didn’t change, does that mean that sequential trends in Q4 should be worse than normal?
Wendell P. Weeks
No, what we did is see what actually happens. But what you note, what Ed is saying is it in — for instance, we did this in Q1, we had this question as well, which was, do we see any effects from our customers trying to build supply chain ahead of tariffs? We said, yes, we see some. And what we do is we made an estimate of that and then we basically put in our Q2 guide that the supply chain would be reduced. So in other words, it depressed our revenue guide and our earnings guide for Q2. We’re doing the same type thing here for Q3, which is we take a look at the first half.
What do we think since we haven’t changed our total year outlook, what do we think our customers have done to do any pull ahead? Right. And then what we’ve done is we’ve actually reduced quarter three in our guide by what that amount is. So actually just to be precise with you, we already tried to take that out of our Q3 guide. Does that make sense, Wamsi or you and I still.
Wamsi Mohan
No, no. That’s great. That makes a lot of sense, Wendell. And if I could just — could you share any color on — you seem very, very bullish on the solar opportunity. We just had some legislation passed that’s taking away some of the incentives on renewables. Can you just put that in context for us, how we should be thinking about Corning, specifically your progress in that market?
Wendell P. Weeks
Yes. If you look at the reconciliation bill, there’s a lot of changes but one thing didn’t change is that, the U.S. Government is continuing to incent U.S. manufacturing of solar products and its preference for domestic content. This plays out a number of different ways in the actual text of the legislation. But the core piece is that, the hunks that we needed around the advanced manufacturing tax credits, they remained in place and there were additions too of various pieces of that, that encourage more domestic content, more U.S. based manufacturing and that was our long-term belief on what the vector would be, is that there would be a requirement for U.S. manufacturing of energy. And that continues to be in place.
Wamsi Mohan
Okay, great. Thank you so much.
Ann H.S. Nicholson
The next question.
Operator
And the next question comes from John Roberts with Mizuho. Your line is open.
John Roberts
Thank you. I’m looking at Slide 38. That’s got the solar and semiconductor profitability. You’ve got startups coming in the third quarter as well. So is the recovery in earnings fourth quarter quarter or is it out into 2026, if you give us a sense at kind of how long we’ll be under these pressures from the startup expenses?
Ed Schlesinger
Yeah, a couple of thoughts, John. Thanks for the question. So as we shared, we started up our wafer factory here in the second quarter. So we expected to have ramp costs for that. We’re seeing that continue in the third quarter. We expect to commercialize our new wafer products in the third quarter and for that — for those sales to start to ramp as we go into the fourth quarter, I think over time the ramp costs will get better for two reasons. We’ll be actually running the factory at full utilization rates and that will improve our output, but also we’ll be selling product. So I don’t know that it necessarily all is done by the end of the year, but I would expect it to continue to improve as we go through the year and into 2026.
John Roberts
Great. Thank you.
Ann H.S. Nicholson
Okay, next question.
Operator
And the next question will come from Samik Chatterjee with J.P. Morgan. Your line is open.
Samik Chatterjee
Hi, thanks for taking my question. And Wendell, maybe I’ll ask you a broader one just on the Springboard plan here. If I’m looking at your wedges. Based on Q3 guide, it looks like if you were to sort of look at where you’re tracking rated to your plans, you’re tracking more closer to the internal plan than the high-confluence plan. So is there anything from the internal plan that you’ve sort of envisioned but did not really pan out as you sort of look at the status of things today? And then I’ll take your sort of take you up on the high the forward opportunities that you talked about with customers looking to leverage Corning’s manufacturing in the U.S. and would that represent upside, and which verticals would you think that’s more focused on? Thank you.
Wendell P. Weeks
Let’s take a look at the second one first and then come back to your deep question on the first. So the second one, I can’t share too much right now, Samik. These are all confidential negotiations, but we have 34 factories in the U.S. We’re engaged with a number of our major customers in a number of our maps to basically make a major commitment to U.S. based manufacturing and to help us utilize those factories going forward. Some are our current customers, some are new to us and we should know the answers to the beginning of these, these negotiations should close out sometime in the pretty near future.So watch this space, my friends. Sometime in the next few months we should be able to be a little more clear about the first, before I move to your first question, is that okay on the second, Samik?
Samik Chatterjee
Yes, I will. I’ll wait and watch on that one. Thank you.
Wendell P. Weeks
Okay. On the first one, what a fascinating question. Of course, what has happened to us is a mix of a stronger positive reaction to many of our new products and that has been more than offsetting. Some of the places where the secular trends were a little bit later are not as significant as we would have thought. Let me give you a good example. Sort of our new sets of products for bendable devices. When we built the original plan, we had planned for a more significant uptick in terms of the popularity and placement of some of that foldable tech.
And that’s been delayed some. And that’s just an example. And in each of these different maps, you’ll see a combination of those pieces where it went a little faster than we thought and those where it went a little slower than we thought. There’s very few areas that come to mind for me, where we’re where we don’t feel good about the fundamental secular trend that we were believing in.
The other is always timing on cyclical return. I’d say, the carriers took a little bit longer to clear out their inventory build than we thought by maybe a quarter or so. But that’s now they’re back to buying at deployment level. So we’ve got a good foundation for their growth going forward. But those are some small examples. Those the areas that you were looking for, Samik?
Samik Chatterjee
Yeah. And maybe just then if you aggregate all of that, is there any big missing pieces related to your internal plan to the high-confidence plan today? Are there any big chunks that you said sort of fell out from the internal plan initially?
Wendell P. Weeks
So I think it’s which way to look at it. So on the high-confidence plan. Absolutely not. Right. Because that really, remember what we did is we built into that risk adjustments for big macroeconomic cycles, a variety of sort of big events that we wouldn’t have necessarily in our business cycles. In the internal plan, if what we’re really seeing in that pattern, what we’re trying to show in the graphic, is that we are hitting or exceeding almost all of our critical milestones. So if anything, what we’re seeing is building momentum, now we have to see as some of the next layers of growth that we’re planning for on Springboard continue. If they do, then we’ll have to deeply think about whether or not we upgrade our plan again. But that’d be a high class problem. So let’s wait and see how we do in the coming quarters?
Samik Chatterjee
No, great. Thanks for the comment. Thank you.
Ann H.S. Nicholson
Next question.
Operator
The next question is from Steven Fox with Fox Advisors. Your line’s open.
Steven Fox
Hi, good morning. Can you hear me okay?
Ann H.S. Nicholson
Yes.
Steven Fox
Great. I guess first of all, Wendell, I was wondering if you can give us your fiber market share by region, add a couple decimal points.
Wendell P. Weeks
Too soon with the human. Too soon. Okay, sorry.
Steven Fox
I did have a question on fiber, that I think you can answer. You’ve mentioned a couple of longer term sort of optionality around scale out DCI, et cetera. Some of those trends you’re seeing more indications of, but you’re talking longer term about them. I was wondering, like what kind of internal and external inflection points should we be looking for that will then translate into those, that sort of next wave of demand starting to take off. Thanks.
Wendell P. Weeks
Well, first of all, I appreciate the humor on my CNBC appearance this morning. Thank you, my friend. Secondly, what a great question. So what we look for is, we are engaged right now with multiple innovation partners/customers, and what we’re looking for is does our technology, do we win that platform? Once we win those platforms, then it will be do those platforms then become the successful architecture for those particular chip sets in their deployment in servers?
I think the biggest thing you can look for is, you’ll see announcements by our customers and will be named as one of their partners. You just recently saw a couple of those, I forget when, not that long ago, from Broadcom and from NVIDIA, right, where they showed us as partners for some of their significant CPO platforms. So I think that’ll be the first indications that things are going well and that we’re well positioned.
Then the next will be when does that architecture slide in? And that’s a little bit tougher, because within all the majors what you have is the competing platforms, do we switch to a photon-based architecture right, in the server racks, in the AI nodes or how much further we can press the electron-based ones or the copper-based ones. And, that struggle will continue, but the key is to get positioned for that long-term innovation secular wave when it happens. Is that responsive to your question, Steve?
Steven Fox
Yeah, very much so. I was just wondering on the DCI stuff if there’s anything else you would add there.
Wendell P. Weeks
DCI, great question. Yes, you will see additional announcements in DCI. You’ll see customers will want to talk about it, because it’s so important to them and they’re trying to be able to position their offerings to their customers as being advantaged with the latest Optical technology. So you will definitely see customers coming out on that front as well.
Steven Fox
Great. Thank you so much.
Ann H.S. Nicholson
All right, next question.
Operator
The next question is from Asiya Merchant with Citi. Your line is open.
Asiya Merchant
Great. Thank you. Hopefully you can hear me. Great results here. Just on the Optical Communications market again, if I may. Have you been experiencing any supply constraints there and how should we think about pricing power here in the Optical segment? Is there an opportunity for quality Corning to further strengthen their moat, just given the technology advancement you have and is that reflective in pricing currently? Thank you.
Wendell P. Weeks
Both excellent question/suggestion. Things are tight right now, mainly on our new product set. We and we expect that to continue. As part of the new product introduction, we introduced pricing that would enhance our margin performance. So far a lot of that has been eaten up with these with our productivity startups ramping strongly, as you would have heard from Ed, when he lays out the sort of how many cents in EPS on startup of some of the various elements of it we would. So in a way you haven’t seen the power of that pricing be reflected in our financials yet. So that’s the most basic answer to your question.
Beyond that, to your suggestion. I think it’s an excellent suggestion that we continue to evaluate that. This is a very fast changing environment. The key for us is, can we create enough value for our customers that using our tech is actually economically advantaged for them? If it’s economically advantaged for them, then we usually come to some arrangement to split that value creation. So it’s much more about the innovation than it is about short-term supply demand squeezes. Is that responsive to your question?
Asiya Merchant
That’s great. And if I may. No, that’s great. Thank you, Wendell. Just on the productivity ramps that you guys have talked about, just help us understand like, when are we looking at that powerful margin performance that you’re talking about actually being reflected? Like what are some milestones here that we need to be? I mean, is this an environment which is going to be continually tight, just given the ramps that you guys are constantly ramping? Or is there some sort of line of sight where you see those ramps sort of pretty much business is normal and then you start to see big margin inflection.
Thank you.
Ed Schlesinger
Yeah, Asiya. I would add to what Wendell said. So our Optical Communications business, net income grew significantly faster than sales both year-over-year and sequentially in the quarter. So despite us absorbing some of those ramp costs or productivity costs that Wendell talked about, we’ve made nice progress. I believe our net income margin went up by about a point sequentially, and we’ll continue to march up. I think it’s a combination of us selling more for sure and us being able to make at the right level as we ramp for our new products. So I think there’s room to run in Optical and we can actually continue to improve. But we’ve made some nice progress and we expect to do that even in the third quarter as we’ve guided these costs remaining.
Ann H.S. Nicholson
Great. Thank you.All right. Next question.
Operator
And our next question comes from George Notter with Wolfe Research. Your line’s open.
George Nader
Hi, guys. Thanks very much. I guess back on that same line of questioning. Look, I know you guys made a lot of investments in Optical kind of coming off the supply chain crunch, unfortunately, going into the excess inventory situation. But there were facilities in Gilbert, I think a couple of facilities in Hickory, some Poland facilities you guys added. Can you give us a sense for where you are in terms of capacity in those places? Is there still a lot of excess utilization that you can kind of grow into or is most of that filled up at this point?
Wendell P. Weeks
It depends on the component. Right. I think the best way to think about this is, we still have the opportunity to increase our utilization and therefore help drive incrementals that you just heard from Ed. Right now, our strongest tightness is on our newest products and they’re much as you would expect since they’re new. Right. Those tend to be quite tight.
We still believe, we’re in really good shape overall for our available capacity in our fiber assets and our cable assets. It is when you get more specific to some of these new high density opportunities that we’re feeling that strong tightness.
George Nader
Got it. And then just as a quick followup.
Wendell P. Weeks
More productive to meet all that demand, but if demand continues to increase, we’ll sit down with our customers and we’ll figure out what to do about that at the right time.
George Nader
Could you give us a sense on lead times on some of those next gen products? I’m thinking about some of the fiber connectivity pieces in the data center and then also some of the high density fibers you’re putting in long-haul optical networks. Is there a sense you could give us on lead times?
Wendell P. Weeks
Yes. So the connectivity piece, when we build those bespoke systems for each of the actual buildings that we’re going into, that lead time is fast. We’re built to be flexible and go at our customer speed, because that’s what they need to be able to get their installations in place. When you come to core componentry, fiber, cable and the connectors themselves, these new high density offerings, that’s a brand new fiber, brand new cable, brand new connector, those we’ve actually been working on for years to be ready for this moment. And all you’re seeing when you hear from Ed about, we’d like to see that productivity increase is it’s just ramping those faster and faster, and then taking over pieces of equipment that we’re making the older generation tech.
And so, it’s less about lead time and it’s more just about the rate of growth and how quickly we can turn over our equipment and make those strong modifications to that equipment to be able to manufacture our newest products. But we designed them to be able to work on our fundamental manufacturing platforms.
George Nader
Thank you.
Ann H.S. Nicholson
Great. Next question.
Operator
The next question comes from Mehdi Hussaini with Susquehanna Financial Group. Your line is open.
Mehdi Hussaini
Yes. Thanks for taking my question, Wendell. I want to go back to overall strategy with Hemlock. I see in the disclosure that now you’re involved in manufacturing poly, solar, wafer and module. And in that context, can you elaborate how the mix is today, the mix of revenue between polysilicon, wafer and module? And what is the strategy here? Do you want to ramp the manufacturing of poly or do you want to be equally distributed or exposed to various parts of the solar? And as a follow up to that, how should we think about the capital intensity required for scaling that business unit compared to capital intensity for other business units? Thank you.
Wendell P. Weeks
Great question and good job building modules. Our core approach to the low risk, high return strategy was to take advantage of a trend opportunity that we saw. Do we believe strongly that by nature of policy, there would be strong encouragement of American made renewable energy as well as carbon-based energy and to put those advanced manufacturing plants here in America.
So we took a look at which of those areas our skills would fit, both in the near-term but also the long-term. For instance, in modules, we have some significant innovations we’d like to try out in glass, in thermal design, in optical coatings that we believe that can significantly increase the conversion efficiency of solar to be able to innovate that effectively, we needed a module position.
Of course, in that module position in and of itself, we believe that will be strongly profitable for us and modules are not capital intense and we could just bring our fundamental manufacturing expertise to bear. Our primary product that you see reflected in poly that is what we brought from semicon, we’re now applying it to solar, that is the bulk of the revenues that you see today. That was our business. We’ve been activating idle assets to do that and upgrading some assets to be able to do that.
Then we have wafers on our latest hunk of activated poly. We’re transforming that into higher value wafers and that’s what we’re doing on that same base. So today, almost all that revenue you see in that segment is coming from poly, our basic entry point. You’ll start to see a hunk of the modules come in, in these coming quarters and as you heard from Ed, you’ll start to see our wafer facility ramp and turn into revenue starting in quarter four. And we don’t have an overall balanced approach to say, like we expect this much out of modules, this much out of wafers, this much out of poly.
But in terms of volume, the most of the volume will be in poly. There’ll be a lesser amount in wafers, because we want to serve both the total market and then make sure, there’s a U.S. source of wafers and then of that only a portion of our wafers will end up in our modules. It’s a little like, if you like you’ve studied our Optical Communications approach, it’s like that.
We always believe in each of our component levels. Each has to be competitive. So we will sell to our competitors on that next layer up. So our base hunk is fiber. We sell that to cablers all over the world, but then we also make our own cable for a significant amount of our fiber output. Then we sell those cables to people who build connectorized systems all over the world, but then we do an even less amount than we then do in our full connectorized system.
So we’re the only one who’s fully integrated end-to-end, but we enable people along the way. Same approach in solar. Is that responsive to your question?
Mehdi Hussaini
Yeah, absolutely. Thanks for detail. And just if I may, the capital intensity differences between solar and the rest of the business units.
Wendell P. Weeks
It’s a little like fiber optics again, to keep that analogy. That final product modules is not capital intense at all. Right. The most capital intense would be the poly, that we already have and wafers is in between, kind of like cable. I think that’s a good way to think about it.
Mehdi Hussaini
Okay, very helpful. Thank you.
Ann H.S. Nicholson
Thanks, Mehdi. We’ve got time for one last question.
Operator
And the last question will come from Josh Spector with UBS. Your line’s open.
Joshua Spector
Yeah. Hi. Good morning. I wanted to follow up on some of the margin commentary earlier. I guess if I look at your 3Q guidance, it looks like it’s around a 50% free tax EBIT margin incremental. You’ve been running closer to 25% to 30%. So can you comment on the driver there? I would normally think seasonality in 3Q would probably be a higher incremental, but we talked about some pull forwards. So is this mix cost savings? Anything else you call out specifically? Thanks.
Ed Schlesinger
Hey, Josh. Thanks for the comments. So maybe backing up. We’ve started Springboard about a year and a half ago, about halfway through our plan, and we’ve been kind of marching up on gross margin and on operating margin. We set that 20% operating margin target. We did 19% in the second quarter.
And I think first of all, we have a lot of the capacity and the technical capabilities and the cost in place. So as we grow our sales, we would expect to get really nice incrementals on those sales. In certain places where we’ve had accelerated demand on some of our products and maybe added capability and added a little bit of cost, that’s actually dragged the margin in those places. And we talked a little bit about that in optical and in solar, and we continue to manage our operating expenses quite nicely.
So as we think about going forward in general, I think our Q3 guide reflects this. Our view is that, we’ll continue to expand our margins, sort of step-by-step as we get to that 20%. And then to the extent we get there, we’ll provide an update on how we think about it going forward. So our third quarter guide really reflects higher sales and our managing of our cost structure as we continue to grow.
Wendell P. Weeks
It’s sort of core to Springboard. Josh, is that what we expect is, because we have a lot of the capabilities, the technical capabilities and the manufacturing capacity in place, we expect to have really strong incrementals. And that was what’s behind the significant improvement in our return profile that we put in Springboard. And I think all you’re seeing is that we’re making faster progress than we originally planned for and so as you look at those numbers and you are working through your modeling, you’re seeing enhanced profitability and yeah, you’re not doing your math wrong.
Joshua Spector
Great. Thank you.
Ann H.S. Nicholson
Thanks, Wendell. Okay, I’ll wrap it up today. I want to thank everybody for joining us. Before we close, I’ll let you know that we’re planning to attend Citi’s 2025 Global TMT Conference on September 4, and will be scheduling management visits to investor offices in select cities. Finally, a web replay of today’s call will be available on our site, starting later this morning. Once again, thank you for joining us. That concludes our call. Please disconnect all lines.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]