Fabrinet (NYSE: FN) Q2 2023 earnings call dated Feb. 06, 2023
Corporate Participants:
Garo Toomajanian — Vice President of Investor Relations
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
Csaba Sverha — Chief Financial Officer
Analysts:
Samik Chatterjee — JPMorgan — Analyst
Alex Henderson — Needham and Company — Analyst
Fahad Najam — Loop Capital — Analyst
Tim Savageaux — Northland Capital Markets — Analyst
Presentation:
Operator
Good afternoon, welcome to Fabrinet’s Financial Results Conference Call for the Second Quarter of Fiscal Year 2023. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, today’s call is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the call over to your host Garo Toomajanian, Vice President of Investor Relations. You may begin.
Garo Toomajanian — Vice President of Investor Relations
Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us on today’s conference call to discuss Fabrinet’s financial and operating results for the second quarter of fiscal year 2023, which ended December 30, 2022.
With me on the call today are Seamus Grady, Chief Executive Officer; and Csaba Sverha, Chief Financial Officer. This call is being webcast and a replay will be available on the Investors section of our website located at investor.fabrinet.com.
During this call, we will present both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the Investors section of our website for important information, including our earnings press release and investor presentation, which include our GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliation.
In addition, today’s discussion will contain forward-looking statements about the future financial performance of the company. Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from management’s current expectations. These statements reflect our opinions only as of the date of this presentation and we undertake no obligation to revise them in light of new information or future events except as required by law. For a description of the risk factors that may affect our results, please refer to our recent SEC filings in particular, the section captioned Risk Factors in our Form 10-Q filed on November 8, 2022.
We will begin the call with remarks from Seamus and Csaba followed by time for questions. I would now like to turn the call over to Fabrinet’s CEO, Seamus Grady. Seamus?
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Garo. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us on our call today. We had a strong second quarter with revenue above our guidance range at $668.7 million. This new quarterly record was an increase of 18% from a year ago and 2% from the first quarter. After adjusting for the 14 week period in Q1, revenue would have grown 5% sequentially.
Supply constraints continue to act as a revenue headwind. While we continue to see pockets of relief in some areas, we have also seen increase in supply constraints in other areas. In aggregate, the revenue impact of supply constraints during the second quarter was approximately $20 million, a little smaller than anticipated. That said, we continue to face supply issues with certain commodity components. While these supply constraints could worsen before they get better, we continue to anticipate a better supply environments later this calendar year.
Our team executed very well in the second quarter, delivering non-GAAP operating margins of 10.9%, setting a new quarterly performance record. Including the impact of an $0.11 foreign currency loss, non-GAAP EPS of $1.90 was in the upper-end of our guidance, and would have been well above the range were it not for the foreign exchange impact.
Looking at the quarter in more detail, both optical and non-optical communications for quarterly and year-over-year revenue increases to new record levels. Within optical communications, telecom demand continues to be strong, but revenue decreased slightly sequentially, primarily due to recent component shortages. On the other hand in datacom, we reached a new quarterly revenue record, and also experienced our fastest sequential growth in 10 years.
Turning to non-optical communications, we had another record quarter for automotive revenue, supply improvements from the first quarter continued driving strong growth in newer automotive programs. This growth in automotive more than offsets declines in industrial laser revenue in the quarter. Investing in our long-term growth remains a top priority for Fabrinet. As you know, our recently opened Building 9 provides us with significant capacity to continue to scale our business over the next several years and we continue to ramp new programs for our customers in this state-of-the-art 1 million square-foot facility.
Looking ahead to the third quarter. We remain optimistic that the industries we serve can remain relatively resilient despite broader global economic trends. And this is reflected in healthy demand trends that we continue to see across our business. As I noted earlier, the supply environment is still challenging. Even though we continue to successfully mitigate the impact of supply shortages, we do expect greater revenue impact for supply headwinds in the third quarter than in Q2 and this is reflected in the guidance that Csaba will detail in a moment.
Our business model remains very agile, flexible and resilient. Over the years, our ability to respond quickly to changing market dynamics has helped us to optimize our business in the face of changes in supply or demand. As such, we are confident that we can continue to operate very effectively in a dynamic global environment to the benefit of all our stakeholders.
In summary, we delivered strong second quarter results with revenue above guidance and record operating margins. While the supply environment remains volatile, our demonstrated ability to execute, reinforces our optimism that we remain well positioned to continue producing strong financial results as we look ahead.
Now I’d like to turn the call over to Csaba for additional financial details on our second quarter and our guidance for the third quarter of fiscal 2023. Csaba?
Csaba Sverha — Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Seamus, and good afternoon, everyone. We delivered record revenue in the second quarter that was above our guidance. Revenue was $668.7 million, which was up 18% from a year ago and up 2% from the first quarter, which you will recall was a 14 week quarter with an extra $20 million revenue contribution.
Adjusting for this extra week, sequential revenue growth would have been 5%. After delivering record operating margin in Q1, we again reached a new high point with non-GAAP operating margin of 10.9% in the second quarter. Our foreign currency hedging program continues to dampen the impact of FX fluctuation on operating margins.
But our bottom line results were negatively impacted by foreign exchange evaluation loss of $3.9 million or $0.11 per share in the second quarter. As a result non-GAAP earnings per share was $1.90 in the upper half of our guidance range. Without this $0.11 foreign exchange loss, non-GAAP EPS would have been well above our guidance.
Looking at the revenue in more detail. Optical communications revenue was $506.1 million, up both sequentially and from a year ago to a new record. Within optical, telecom revenue was $392.9 million, which was up 11% from a year ago, but a decline of 3% from the first quarter, primarily due to increased supply constraints for certain commodity semiconductors used in this product. Datacom revenue on the other hand was very strong at $113.2 million. This record data com revenue was up 15% from a year ago and 22% from Q1 due to a combination of continued positive demand trends and better component availability for these products.
By technology, silicon photonics revenue was $123.4 million and 11% sequential decrease due to the same supply constraints that impacted Telecom revenue. The impact of telecom products that also primarily newer, faster speed rated products and as a result, revenue from products rated at 400 gig or more also declined 11% sequentially to $173.6 million. I want to emphasize that we believe demand for these products remains robust and that this decline was primarily supply related.
Revenue from 100 gig products on the other hand was the highest we have seen in over two years at $153.4 million, up 10% both from a year ago and from Q1. Non-optical communications revenue was also another record at $162.6 million and represented 24% of total revenue. As in Q1, growth in non-optical communications was driven primarily by automotive revenue, which was a record $94.8 million, more than double from a year ago and up 9% from Q1.
In addition to a better supply environment for these products, they also benefitted from continued demand strength for newer automotive products. Industrial laser revenue was $30.9 million down 13% sequentially. Other non-optical communications revenue increased from a year ago and from last quarter to $36.8 million.
As I discussed the details of our P&L, expense and profitability metrics provided are on a non-GAAP basis unless otherwise noted. A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures is included in our earnings press release and investor presentation which you can find in the Investor Relations section of our website.
Our execution was very strong in the second quarter as reflected in our gross margins which tied our prior record of 13%. Tailwind from foreign-exchange hedges contributed approximately 20 basis points for this performance. And based on current FX levels, we anticipate that these tailwinds could turn into mild headwinds over the next few quarters.
Operating expenses in the quarter were $13.7 million or 2.1% of revenue. This produced record operating income of $73.1 million or 10.9% of revenue. As I indicated in my introduction, a strong Thai baht and weaker U.S. dollar resulted in a foreign-exchange loss of $3.9 million or $0.11 per share, primarily due to asset and liability revaluations at the end of the quarter.
Thanks to our strong balance sheet. We continue to benefit from a higher interest rate environment. The net interest income of $2 million or approximately $0.05 per diluted share, which partially offset FX losses. Non-GAAP net income was $70 million or $1.90 per diluted share. On a GAAP basis, net income was $1.71 per diluted share. Effective tax rate was 1.7% in the second quarter and we continue to anticipate an effective tax rate in the low to mid single-digits for the year.
Turning to the balance sheet and cash flow statements. At the end of the second-quarter. Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short-term investments were $527.6 million, up $27.7 million from the end of the first quarter. Operating cash flow was $44.5 million with capex of $13.4 million, free cash flow was $31.1 million. We will continue to execute on our plan to return surplus cash to shareholders though buyback activity was low during the quarter. Approximately $94.9 million remains in our share repurchase authorization.
On an operational note, earlier in the third quarter, we made the decision to exit our business in the U.K. Unlike our new product introduction facilities at Fabrinet West and Fabrinet Israel. Our U.K. operation has not become a meaningful or ramp to volume manufacturing in Thailand. Since the U.K. facility also operates at a relatively small scale, serving mostly local customers, the estimate that the impact on non-GAAP financial results will be immaterial. The expect the ramp-down to be substantially completed by the end of the fiscal year, during which we will help ensure a smooth transition for our customers.
We expect to incur restructuring costs of approximately $3.5 million, which we will be excluded from our non-GAAP results. Now I will turn to our guidance for the third quarter. We remain optimistic about the long-term demand trends across our business and our ability to manage supply constraints as effectively as possible. At the same time, our general supply environment has improved, the availability of certain components worsened in Q2 impacting Telecom revenue.
From what we are currently seeing, we expect these constraints to be even tighter in Q3. Therefore, our guidance assumes a supply chain headwind of $30 million to $35 million, which is about $10 million to $15 million greater than what we saw in Q2. With this incremental supply constraints and typical Q3 seasonality in mind, we anticipate revenue in the range of $640 million to $660 million. We anticipate non-GAAP net income to be in the range of $1.86 to $1.93 per diluted share.
In summary, we had a strong second quarter performance with record revenue and margins. While the supply environment is gradually improving, a small number of components continue to constrain our ability to meet customer demand. Nevertheless, we remain confident in our ability to continue to execute well in Q3 and over the long-term.
Operator, we are now ready to open the call for questions.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Samik Chatterjee with JPMorgan. Your line is open.
Samik Chatterjee — JPMorgan — Analyst
Hi, everyone. Thanks for taking the question. I have a couple, maybe if we could start with the telecom and the supply constraints you’re seeing there. Wondering if you can give us a bit more details about the kind of components you’re seeing sort of the more worsening constraints on, because it seems like it’s a bit counter to what investor expectations are at this point for a more broader sort of easing of the supply chain. So definitely we would be curious about sort of where you’re seeing these incremental constraints. And is it more about not really buying from those sort of broker market or just sort of not — the part not being available or the supply not being able to ship to it? And I have a follow0up. Thank you.
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
Yes. Hi Samik. Yes, it’s an unusual situation. I mean, overall we’re seeing the supply situation begin to improve in certain areas with certain suppliers who have been, let’s say, problematic historically for the last several quarters, but we’ve also seen some new suppliers pop-up. And because of the majority of our businesses, there’s telecom, it’s about 75% telecom, 25% datacom. The shortages that we’re seeing are about the same proportion.
The devices — the specific devices are components that we see in short supply. They also support very specific products used in certain telecom transceivers were demand continues to be healthy, but we still have a couple of outlier components. So I know it’s a bit of a mixed message, overall, we see things improving, we especially see things improving as we said before in the second half of this year. But last quarter we did have some, in this quarter again, we continue to have some component charges that are specific to telecom.
Samik Chatterjee — JPMorgan — Analyst
For my follow-up, maybe if you can spend a bit more time on the datacom side. I understand you’re still supply-constrained there, but we’ve seen a lot more sort of pull-back in the big customers and their capex sort of their overall spending plan. So when you think about sort of the current sort of pipeline there, are you seeing any softening of the pipeline outside of the supply constraints that you are still sort of navigating when you sort of look three to six months out, are you seeing any softening of the demand pipeline?
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
So, I mean, as you know Samik, we guide one quarter at a time. So we don’t comment really on six months out in our guidance. While we haven’t seen any particular softening, we’re still primarily supply-constrained on the datacom side, obviously we grew very nicely in the quarter and our datacom business remains quite strong. So we’re primarily a supply constraint on the datacom site and our business there continues to grow nicely, we had some good strong results for 100 gig products — 400 gigs remains strong, again, somewhat supply-constrained. But the demand remains strong for — across the product categories that we serve in the datacom side of the business.
Samik Chatterjee — JPMorgan — Analyst
Okay. Thank you. Thanks.
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Samik.
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Alex Henderson with Needham and Company. Your line is open.
Alex Henderson — Needham and Company — Analyst
Great, thanks. I’m definitely, equally puzzled on the supply side, because we had expected it to improve not erode here. There is clearly a semiconductor company or two from the United States that are cited frequently as the source of a lot of the consternation in the supply-chain. Is that typical source that is now improving? And we are seeing a shift to a different geography, perhaps the COVID lockdowns or other issues shifting it to a different geography is that where is the nexus of this particular supply-chain located?
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
It’s really two-fold. Some of it is, again, we’ve called out a slightly higher supply headwind number in Q3. I think we called the $30 million versus $35 million versus $20 million of about actual in Q2, some of that is, it’s a combination of really two areas, one is supply constraints that are COVID related I would say in China. So some of the suppliers who had gone through some lockdowns and what not in China, we are seeing a slight, not huge, but a slight headwind due to component-related supply constraints coming out of China this quarter.
And then secondly, we have a couple of some of the — and again I really don’t want to get into naming specific suppliers. But some of the component manufacturers who historically, certainly for the last several quarters have been problematic, have really improved and we are actually back to more normal lead times with many of the suppliers who historically were problematic, but unfortunately, one or two new ones have popped up. I think I’ll go through the same cycle as the other ones, sales increased capacity that improve output, and they get things improved, but we are seeing that supply headwind this quarter.
So I understand, Alex, it’s a kind of a confusing message, on the one-hand, we have certain commodities where things have improved, things have stabilized and we’re back to more normal lead times, but unfortunately, we have, as I say, some of these new component suppliers who have popped up as problematic, coupled with a certain amount of supply headwind coming out of China because of COVID.
Alex Henderson — Needham and Company — Analyst
So if I’m looking at the guide for the upcoming quarter, could you give us any granularity on the assumptions between datacom and telecom sequential or year-over-year growth or sequentially any way you want to phrase it?
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
Do you mean in terms of the component headwinds or…
Alex Henderson — Needham and Company — Analyst
No, in terms of the aggregate, what are you assuming in terms of the revenue growth by segment?
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
Yes, go ahead, Csaba.
Csaba Sverha — Chief Financial Officer
Hi, Alex, we typically don’t break this out in our guidance. But as you can see, we are calling out slight downward trends on a quarter-on-quarter basis. So the headwind is primarily supply related as we have discussed. So we will expect telecom to be moderating slightly and also datacom while has been very strong in the last quarter, it’s going to probably moderate slightly quarter-on-quarter basis. But both segments are continuing to be strong from a demand perspective. Nevertheless, the incremental headwinds are mostly concentrated around these two segments.
Overall demand side seems to be strong and robust, but our ability to fill that demand is really constrained around the material. So in both cases, I think we would expect a slight moderation or flat quarter-on-quarter in these two segments.
Alex Henderson — Needham and Company — Analyst
The $30 million to $35 million, is that all in the optical piece? And is it evenly split between the two categories?
Csaba Sverha — Chief Financial Officer
Yes. It’s primarily around optical communication. Our Automotive and Laser segment have been somewhat stable in the last two quarters. There has been significant improvement on the supply side in those segments. The $30 million to $35 million is mostly around optical communication and split around as a proportion of the range, probably 75% is telecom, about 25% is datacom related.
Alex Henderson — Needham and Company — Analyst
Great. Thank you so much. I’ll see the floor.
Csaba Sverha — Chief Financial Officer
Thanks, Alex.
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Alex.
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Fahad Najam with Loop Capital. Your line is open.
Fahad Najam — Loop Capital — Analyst
Hey, thanks for taking my question. So for the needling or specifics on the headwind on components. If I look at your sub-100 gig revenue, it’s growing pretty nicely in the quarter, even 100 gig. So is the 75% of the $30 million headwind mostly of 400 gig and above speeds?
Csaba Sverha — Chief Financial Officer
That is correct, Fahad. In the last quarter, it was mostly in the higher data rates [Technical Issues]
Fahad Najam — Loop Capital — Analyst
I don’t know if it was my end, but I couldn’t make out what you said, Csaba. Can you please repeat again?
Csaba Sverha — Chief Financial Officer
I’m sorry. So yes, the impact was in last quarter and this quarter mostly in our 400 gig and above product segments in the higher data rate segment. So both in Q2 and Q3, the expected headwinds are mostly going to be in that area — in that space. Again, these are very specific components impacting a couple of — handful of products in that range.
Fahad Najam — Loop Capital — Analyst
All right. And my next question was I know in the past, you’ve said that 400 gig ZR was at the high single-digit percent of your revenue. One, does this component headwind impact 400 gig ZR modules versus line cards or systems, and second is, can you also update us on the 400 ZR revenue [Indecipherable] revenue?
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
So, Fahad, yeah 400 ZR, we’re quite happy with the progress we’ve made there. We think we are a leader in our industry and supporting 400 ZR. So we’re very happy with, let’s say, our penetration rate into 400 ZR and our ability to grow our business with our customers in 400 ZR. Yes, the shortages, we talked about, we — as Csaba said, they breakout approximately. So first of all, let’s say, the automotive and the laser business. I don’t want to say the shortages are behind us, because it’s too early to declare victory, but certainly, they have been — they’ve become much more predictable and the improvements we made especially in automotive in the prior quarter seems to have continued in Q3.
So that — so the shortages we called out in Q3 are primarily relates optical communications and that breaks out 75% telecom approximately 25% datacom. 400 ZR depending on the applications and a lot of our 400 ZR business is categorized in our telecom number. So, yes, 400 ZR would be impacted. But again we wouldn’t be quite — wouldn’t be prepared to breakout the split between 400 ZR and other types of products that we make. But again for the DCI datacenter interconnect products would be categorized in our telecom business. So they would be included in that 75% number.
Fahad Najam — Loop Capital — Analyst
Got it. If I could also ask you, you had previously mentioned that you had one prominent customer for 400 gig ZR. I think you most recently said it was two. Any color on how many customers are now ramping 400 gig ZR volume?
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
We have more than two. We have two who are, I would say, ramping nicely. We have another couple of customers who are still in the earlier stages, new product introduction stages. But we have more than two customers I would say, more than two less than five. But it’s — we feel we have a very good, very good selection of customers there and we’re very happy with the growth in that business.
Fahad Najam — Loop Capital — Analyst
Appreciate the answers. Thank you.
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Fahad.
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Tim Savageaux with Northland Capital Markets. Your line is open.
Tim Savageaux — Northland Capital Markets — Analyst
Hi, good afternoon and a nice quarter. A question on your kind of non-speed rated portion of your business, which is at least the way I’m looking at the numbers up pretty nicely, both sequentially and year-over-year, something like 45% year-over-year. And I think historically we might associate that with kind of optical telecom, ROADM and amplifiers. But currently, I think you’ve got something else to add to the mix in terms of the PON business.
So that’s a long way for me of looking for an update on the recent relationship with DZS to what extent, was that a major contributor to that growth in non-speed rated business or sub 100 gig, however you want to call it? And what is your current assessment there in terms of getting up to kind of an initial full run-rate and has your perception of the opportunity at DZS changed at all over the last little while? Thanks.
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
So, Tim, I’ll let Csaba go through the specifics in a moment, but overall in relation to DZS, we are very happy with the relationship, very happy with the pace at which the business is moving and we’re just looking-forward to doing a very good job for DZS, they’re a great company and we are very happy to be participating in their supply-chain. Certainly in terms of transfer activity, we’re nicely along and we’ve completed the bulk of the transfers, I would say, and we really looking to start ramping to volume now.
So we’re probably a little bit ahead of even though the total revenue, let’s say, last quarter was not so huge from DZS. But we’re happy with the progress we’re making on the transfers and really looking-forward to ramping that over the next few quarters. A you rightly pointed out, the non-speed rated business, it’s an attractive mix of several type of products. And maybe I’ll let Csaba talk to the details of that.
Csaba Sverha — Chief Financial Officer
Hi, Tim. This is Csaba. Again on the non-speed rated business, we don’t break it out. So it is a combination of lower than 100 gig products and non-speed rate amplifier, ROADM type of business, and we also have some other category there. So what we have seen particularly on year-on year basis, I think it’s mostly supply-related situation have improved significantly, if you look at year-on year basis. So the growth is really in the amplifier space that, I would say, if I look back a year ago, probably that area was [Technical Issues] year ago, and since then I think the supply situation has significantly improved in that space. So again, the growth is indeed coming from on the ROADM and amplifier space. And the other category, the below sub-100 products remains stable, that’s pretty much the color I can offer in this area.
Tim Savageaux — Northland Capital Markets — Analyst
Well, if I can follow-up on that briefly, since you kind of pointed to the year-on-year compare as being driven by ROADM and amplifiers. Is that imply that there’s some other driver of the sequential compare? And I’ll leave it there. Thanks.
Csaba Sverha — Chief Financial Officer
I think it’s the — on the — what we see is really the supply environment have been, again, I think it’s overall, the team has been over the last year. This business have been probably harder hit in the early part of the last couple of quarters. So the situation have been somewhat improving, but I wouldn’t want to speak on behalf of our customers, how these businesses breaks out on a sequential basis. We do see supply constraints improving and the demand seems to be robust, again, both sequentially and on year-on-year basis.
Tim Savageaux — Northland Capital Markets — Analyst
Okay. Thanks.
Csaba Sverha — Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Tim.
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] We have a follow-up from Fahad Najam. Your line is open.
Fahad Najam — Loop Capital — Analyst
Thanks for taking my question again. I wanted to clarify because a number of Investors couldn’t understand the response to my earlier question. So more explicitly the telecom component shortages that you’re seeing on the 400 gig. Are they more on the ZR side versus non-ZR can you clarify?
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
I think Fahad, what I said was we’re not going to break that out any further than we have already. We’re not going to specify whether it’s ZR or other products. It’s — approximately of the $30 million to $35 million we’ve called out, approximately 75% of that is telecom products. And I was just pointing out that telecom includes, obviously, pure telecom products, but also our DCI or data center interconnect products, which will include 400 ZR.
Fahad Najam — Loop Capital — Analyst
Got it. Thank you for the clarification.
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Fahad.
Operator
Thank you. I’m showing no further questions in the queue. I would now like to turn the call back over to Seamus for closing remarks.
Seamus Grady — Chief Executive Officer
Thank you for joining our call today. We delivered strong second quarter results. As we look ahead, we remain confident that we can continue to perform well based on strong broad-based demand and our demonstrated ability to execute through all kinds of market conditions. We look forward to speaking with you again soon and seeing those of you who will be attending the OFC conference in San Diego next month. Goodbye.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]