General Electric Company (NYSE: GE) Q2 2021 earnings call dated Jul. 27, 2021
Corporate Participants:
Steve Winoker — Vice President, Investor Relations
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Analysts:
Andrew Kaplowitz — Citigroup — Analyst
Joseph Ritchie — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Andrew Obin — Bank of America — Analyst
Stephen Tusa — J.P. Morgan — Analyst
Julian Mitchell — Barclays — Analyst
Nigel Coe — Wolfe Research — Analyst
Jeffrey Sprague — Vertical Research Partners — Analyst
Deane Dray — RBC Capital Markets — Analyst
Markus Mittermaier — UBS — Analyst
Presentation:
Operator
Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the General Electric’ Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] My name is Brandon, and I’ll be your conference coordinator. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded.
I would now like to turn the program over to your host for today’s conference, Steve Winoker, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please proceed.
Steve Winoker — Vice President, Investor Relations
Thanks, Brandon. Welcome to GE’s second quarter 2021 earnings call. I’m joined by Chairman and CEO, Larry Culp; and CFO, Carolina Dybeck Happe.
Note that some of the statements we’re making are forward-looking and are based on our best view of the world and our businesses as we see them today. As described in our SEC filings and on our website, those elements can change as the world changes.
With that, I’ll hand the call over to Larry.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Steve, thanks, and good morning, everyone. Overall, we delivered a strong second quarter and first half performance and we’re encouraged by the early signs of the recovery.
Looking at the numbers on Slide 2, recall that the second quarter of 2020 was challenging, as we navigated the full negative effects of the pandemic. While we recognize that many are still facing continued challenges with new COVID spikes and variants, we’re seeing our businesses return to growth this quarter. Orders were up 30% organically, with growth across all segments: in Services, we’re up 50%; Industrial revenue grew in three of our four segments, we saw strength in Healthcare and in Services overall. At Healthcare and Renewables, in total, as well as in Power Services, revenue was back to levels similar or better to 2019. Notably Aviation Commercial Services were up substantially as we’re beginning to benefit from the market recovery.
Our adjusted Industrial margin expanded a 1,000 basis points organically with year-over-year expansion across all segments and sequential expansion in all segments except Aviation, where we took a non-cash charge largely related to one customer contract. We expect Aviation margins to expand for the rest of 2021. Carolina will cover this in more detail later.
Adjusted EPS was up significantly with all segments contributing. Industrial free cash flow was up $2 billion ex discontinued factoring programs, primarily driven by improved earnings and working capital. We’re encouraged by our second quarter cash performance and we’re raising our full-year Industrial free cash flow outlook to $3.5 billion to $5 billion, while our outlook for organic revenue growth, margin expansion and adjusted EPS remains unchanged.
I’ll take a moment here to speak to the dynamics at Aviation. Market fundamentals are improving. There was a sizable uptick in departures this quarter, with even greater momentum in June and July. Unsurprisingly, departure trends continue to vary by region: North America continues to improve, with Canada now picking up the pace; Europe has accelerated with departures now 40% below 2019 levels; China dipped down to 6% below 2019 levels due to increased COVID cases and government restrictions, while Asia Pacific ex China has been more tepid due to border closures and the spreading COVID variant.
Importantly, though, about two-thirds of our CFM departures are concentrated in regions with improved trends. We’re seeing a stronger recovery in narrow-body fleets versus widebodies, and freight continues to outperform passenger traffic. While green time utilization continues to impact us, we expect this to lessen in the second half. Shop visit volume and scope improved slightly sequentially. We anticipate continuing sequential volume growth and scope expansion through the year. Looking ahead, we’re still expecting 2021 departures to be up about 20% year-over-year and down 30% versus 2019, with customer behavior driving departure and shop visit trends.
I’m confident in our path to recovery in Aviation. We’re using lean to improve our operations and our cost structure, and no business is better positioned than GE Aviation to support our customers through the upcycle. With the largest and youngest engine platform, with more than 37,000 commercial engines and more than 60% of our fleet not yet having a second shop visit, our platform will generate value for decades to come. Overall, we’re building momentum across GE, evidenced by the significant margin expansion and positive free cash flow this quarter. And importantly, we continue to believe the improvements underway are built on stronger fundamentals and thus, are sustainable.
Turning to Slide 3, we’re making tremendous progress in our journey to become a more focused, simpler, stronger high-tech industrial. This quarter, the GECAS and AerCap combination achieved some key milestones. AerCap shareholders approved the transaction, the US Department of Justice concluded its review, and yesterday, the European Commission cleared the transaction. We expect to close by year-end. Broadly speaking, this combination serves as a significant catalyst, enabling us to focus more time, talent and capital on our four core industrial franchises: Aviation, Healthcare, Renewables and Power. It also allows us to accelerate our deleveraging plan with our actions post-closing, our gross debt reduction will be more than $70 billion since the end of 2018.
At the same time, we’ve been strengthening our operational foundation. This starts, of course, with the team. We’ve implemented new learning and development programs, such as leadership in action in our business in front-line leadership courses to a quick GE leaders at all levels to drive our lean transformation. This quarter, we also made some leadership changes that complement our existing bench of GE talent. First is the retirement of Kieran Murphy, who will be stepping down as President and CEO of GE Healthcare at the end of the year. Over his high impact 30-plus year career, Kieran has embodied candor and transparency and consistently delivered for our customers. I’m excited to welcome, Pete Arduini, who will join us from Integra LifeSciences, where he served as CEO for almost a decade. Earlier in his career, Pete, in fact, worked at GE Healthcare for nearly 15 years. Pete’s proven track record of driving growth across complex businesses combined with his respected leadership style makes him well suited to lead the important work at GE Healthcare.
Second is the retirement of Offshore Wind CEO, John Lavelle after a 40-year career with GE. John has positioned the business for success, leading the GE team that will help install of the first large-scale US Offshore Wind Farm. We’re excited to appoint Jan Kjaersgaard as the new CEO. With Jan’s prior industry experience, he’s well prepared to lead our Offshore business to $3 billion in revenue by 2024. We also promoted Scott Strazik from Gas Power CEO to CEO of all of GE Power. Scott and his team, which now includes Valerie Marjollet, who was recently appointed as Steam Power CEO will continue to run Power as four discrete business units, managing from the bottom up.
Our GE team has been at the heart of driving our transformation forward, building momentum through lean and embracing a more decentralized business model. This quarter, it was good, it was really good to spend more time with our teams, where I saw and heard countless Kaizen examples, and more broadly, how lean is being used to improve safety, quality, delivery, and cost across GE. One example that stood out was from Offshore Wind, where we have a global presence across 35 countries. In the first half of 2021, through good lean problem solving and daily management, we’ve realized about $150 million of year-over-year savings in sourcing and logistics, as well as through better execution on installation and commissioning cycle times.
Now, decentralized — decentralization goes hand-in-hand with lean. This means managing not only the four industrial segments we report, but the nearly 30 business units under them. In our operating reviews, I continue to see how our teams are managing our operating P&Ls at a more granular level. We’re having more meaningful operating reviews and, in turn, driving actions across high impact and high priority opportunities. This stronger foundation is enabling us to play more offense. The first priority, of course, is organic growth. We’re improving our team’s abilities to market, sell and service the products we have today.
There are many recent wins across GE, but let me highlight two. At Aviation, CFM secured a new agreement with Indigo to provide 620 of our fuel-efficient LEAP-1A engines with a multi-year service contract. This is one of the largest deals in CFM’s history. At Renewables, we finalized the contracts for the world’s largest offshore wind farm, Dogger Bank. In the third installment, we’ll supply 87 Haliade-X turbines, the most powerful offshore wind turbine built today. We’re also bolstering our offerings with new product introductions and future tech innovation to serve our customers and lead our industries into the future. At Healthcare, for example, we launched Xeleris V, an AI-enabled virtual radiology solution that provide simplified workflows, better data access and more time with patients. At Power, we’re supporting Australia’s energy transition with plans to supply a 9F.05 gas turbine, capable of operating with a blend of hydrogen and natural gas at the Tallawarra B Power Station. This adds to our experience on more than 75 gas turbines worldwide using hydrogen and associated fuels for power generation.
From time-to-time, we’ll augment our organic efforts with inorganic investments. Take Zionexa, a recent healthcare acquisition, whose molecular imaging agent aims to provide more targeted treatment for metastatic breast cancer patients. Zionexa further demonstrates our commitment to precision health, enabling more personalized diagnosis, improved treatment and decision-making and ultimately better clinical outcomes. All-in-all, our transformation is accelerating. We’re fortifying our competitive positions globally and unlocking further upside potential and profitable growth in cash generation.
With that, Carolina will provide further insights on the quarter.
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thanks, Larry. Our quarterly performance reflect continued progress in our transformation. During our recent operating reviews, we’re gaining traction with increased granularity across our financials. Our finance terms [Phonetic] are providing more insightful, faster analysis, which is driving better outcome. Looking forward, we’re focused on building even deeper visibility and accountability, partnering cross-functionally to unlock margin expansion and improving working capital management to generate more cash flow.
Now, looking at Slide 4, I’ll cover our highlights on an organic basis. In the quarter, we returned to growth on the top line, Healthcare and Services overall were strong. In particular, Services continued to keep us close to our customers and represent more than half of our orders and revenue. Total orders were up 7% sequentially, and Aviation and Power were up more than 40% year-over-year. Services orders were up 50%, where Renewables and Aviation doubled and Gas Power and Healthcare good double digits. Revenue was up across Aviation, Healthcare and Renewables. Power was flat as expected. We continued to reduce turnkey scope and gas power and exit new unit coal at Steam. We’re also seeing our mix shift towards higher margin services with total services revenue growing 15%. Notably, Aviation Commercial Services grew 50%, reflecting a recovering market but we’re still well below 2019 levels. Healthcare in total and Gas Power Services remain bright spots with growth above 2019.
Next, adjusted Industrial margins improved sequentially in all segments except Aviation, where margins declined, I’ll speak to this shortly. Year-over-year margins expanded 1,000 basis points with all segments expanding. About half of this improvement was driven by non-repeat of COVID charges and the other half was driven by our lean efforts, cost productivity and mix shift to Services.
Regarding inflation, we are seeing pressure, however, it’s a mixed story by business. Our shorter cycle businesses feel the impact earliest, while our longer cycle businesses are more protected, given extended purchasing and production cycles. Our Services business fall in between. Across the board, we are driving cost countermeasures and utilizing price increases and escalation features in our contracts to help mitigate this pressure. In our longer cycle project businesses, we manage cost performance versus our original as sold margins. We utilize lean to reduce cost and cycle time to execute delivery. In the second quarter, our countermeasures actually drove a slight net deflation impact on margins.
Looking forward to the second half of 2021 and into 2022, although inflation pressure is likely to increase, particularly in Aviation and Renewables, we expect the net inflation impact to be limited.
Finally, adjusted EPS was up $0.19 year-over-year, about three quarters of this improvement came from our Industrial segment. As we walk from continuing to adjusted EPS, we need to exclude the positive Baker mark, the negative impacts of significant higher cost restructuring program, non-operating expenses, primarily pension and debt tender cost. Worth noting for EPS, our reverse stock split takes effect as of market open August 2. This will better align GE’s number of shares outstanding with companies of our size. Overall, we’re encouraged by our broader earnings performance, especially the underlying margin improvement and we’re well positioned to achieve our 2021 outlook for margin expansion and EPS.
Moving to cash, in the second quarter, Industrial free cash flow was positive $388 million, up $2.5 billion year-over-year on a reported basis, or up $2 billion excluding discontinued factoring programs in both years. The majority of this improvement was driven by cash earnings with all segments growing earnings. Underpinning our solid quarterly performance versus our early expectations was higher Aviation orders and in turn higher progress collections and lower AD&A, as well as strength at Healthcare and Power.
We’ve made good progress exiting the majority of our factoring programs in the second quarter. This was a big step forward to becoming more operational and getting back to basics on billings and collections. For context, currently, about half of our billings occur in the final month of the quarter, driven in part by the timing of deliveries, far too back-end loaded and inconsistent with the lean principles of flow and level loading. Our teams across commercial, operations and finance are working to deliver early to our customers and in turn bill and collect cash earlier in the quarter. Over time, this will help us generate more linear cash flow. The discontinuation of factoring was a $2.7 billion impact, which was adjusted out of free cash flow. For the remainder of 2021, the impact will be roughly $1 billion, split between the third and the fourth quarters.
Going deeper on working capital, this was a source of cash at $260 million this quarter. Despite increased volume, we saw significant year-over-year improvements, largely due to operational enhancements.
Looking at the flows in the quarter, I’ll speak to a couple. Receivables were a source of cash driven by DSO improvement across all segments. Take our Imaging and Life Care Solutions business in the US and Canada, for example. Our teams are using lean and automation to better manage contract deliverables, bill customers more accurately and faster, and thereby, generate cash quicker. This effort already improved DSO by seven days.
Inventory was a use of cash, largely driven by onshore wind inventory build for the second half delivery, as well as fulfillment and execution challenges. Overall, inventory turns improved from 2.4 to 2.6 sequentially with higher volume, but there’s much more to do.
We continue to manage our capital investments with focus on profitable growth. When the second quarter capex spend was down sequentially, our investments in new product programs increased. Overall, in the first half, on a reported basis, cash flow was negative $457 million, a $3.8 billion improvement year-over-year. After rebase lining for discontinued factoring programs and the BioPharma sale, we saw a $3.2 billion improvement. So, while there is more to do, our near-term working capital improvements are taking hold even as we grow. Together with higher earnings, this is beginning to drive more sustainable and linear free cash flow. And based on our 2Q performance, we are now confident that we can deliver free cash flow in the range of $3.5 billion to $5 billion for the year versus our prior outlook of $2.5 billion to $4.5 billion.
Turning to liquidity and leverage on Slide 6. We ended the quarter with $22 billion of cash and recently refinanced our backup credit facility. Due to our improved financial position and cash linearity with lower peak quarterly need, we reduced the facility size from $15 billion to $10 billion and extended the maturity date to 2026 at attractive pricing. We also continue to take meaningful actions on our deleveraging plan, completing a $7 billion debt tender. This brings our gross debt, which currently includes pension, to a reduction of $53 billion since the end of 2018.
Additionally, we continue to de-risk the pension. In the UK, as of January 2022, we’ll implement the proposed pension freeze. As mentioned previously, we don’t expect any further funding requirements for the GE Pension Plan at least through the end of the decade. Stepping back, we have a clear path to achieving a less than 2.5 times net debt-to-EBITDA over the next few years.
Moving to our business results, which I’ll speak to on an organic basis. First on Aviation, as Larry said, we’re starting to see improving fundamentals associated with the commercial market recovery across Services and OE production. The market sequential improvement met our expectations with GE, CFM departures currently down about 27% versus 19%. While departure trends continue to vary by region, we still expect the global recovery to accelerate in the second half. Orders were up year-over-year, both commercial engines and services were up substantially year-over-year. Key commercial wins this quarter include Indigo, Southwest and United driving momentum. In fact, since the beginning of 2020, new wins have now outpaced canceled orders. Military orders were down, largely due to timing of new orders and a tough comp versus last year, and you’ll recall we received a large military advance.
Revenue was up 10%, commercial services was up 50% with operational improvement. Shop visit volume trended better than our expectations, up over 30% and overall scope was up slightly sequentially. Broadly, we’re seeing higher concentration of narrow-body visits, which typically have lower revenue. Our spare parts rate was up double digits year-over-year and sequentially. This was partially offset by unfavorable CSA contract margin reviews, or CMRs, where revenue is adjusted to reflect latest margins based on cost incurred to date.
Military continues to be impacted by internal and external supply chain issues, with output expectations falling short this quarter. We’re seeing some improvement as we use visual management and standard work and also other tools to solve problems in real-time, and we’re working to fully resolve these issues. We are now targeting mid-single-digit revenue growth for the year, but our high-single-digit target remains in place through 2025.
Segment margin expanded significantly year-over-year, yet down sequentially. Margin was impacted by the non-cash contract margin review charges of approximately $400 million. About two-thirds of this was related to one contract in a loss position. In this contract, continued COVID-driven utilization, contract-specific dynamics and operating behavior increased our estimated shop visit costs. While rare across our Service portfolio, the loss contract designation resulted in the accelerated recognition of all future forecasted losses into 2Q. Excluding this, Aviation margins would have been low-double digits.
Quarterly CMRs are part of our normal process and will continue in the second half. For Q2 — for Q3, we expect margins to expand sequentially. Our team continues to align fixed costs and our organizational profile to market realities. We’re maintaining our low-double-digit margin guide for 2021, supported by a second half recovery. However, based on the CMR and military dynamics, we now expect full-year revenue growth to be about flat versus 2020. These are temporary issues and we remain encouraged by the underlying fundamentals of our business.
Moving to Healthcare, market fundamentals are improving and the team delivered another impressive quarter. Starting with the market, global procedures volume grew mid-single digits for the fourth consecutive quarter. Europe, China and Japan was solid markets due to government spending, assigned or increasing expectations for better quality of care and patient outcomes. Private markets also grew in the US across key customers as recovery momentum continues. Demand remains robust amid that backdrop. Orders were up double digits year-over-year and versus second quarter 2019 and up 20% excluding the Ford ventilator partnership last year. Healthcare system orders were up 7%, with double-digit growth in imaging and ultrasound. This offsets a decline in Life Care Solutions lapping higher demand for COVID-19-related equipments. However, LCS was up double-digit versus second quarter 2019. PDx orders were up almost 50% year-over-year, following a depressed second quarter 2020 and also up versus second quarter 2019.
Revenue was also up double digits with HCS up 6% and PDx up almost 50%. All Asia regions delivered double-digit growth with China up high-teens. The teams worked across the supply chain to help mitigate industry-wide supply shortages related to electronics and resins, which impacted growth this quarter.
Segment margin expanded 460 basis points year-over-year and significantly versus second quarter 2019 ex BioPharma. Margin continues to be driven by profitable growth, cost productivity through lean and prior period’s restructuring. At the same time, we’re accelerating our growth investments, particularly in digital and AI-enabled applications with increased spend planned for the second half, and we’ll continue to evaluate inorganic investments to complement this, such as Zionexa. Based on our first half, we now expect organic margins to expand more than 100 basis points for the year. This will be influenced by how quickly we can ramp certain growth investments. However, our medium-term expectations remain 25 basis points to 75 basis points expansion. Our investment ramp will support continued innovation and help us drive higher revenue growth over time.
Turning to Renewables. We’re continuing to lead the energy transition, growing new generation, lowering the cost of electricity and modernizing the grid, with a focus on new product platforms and technologies that enable profitable growth and cash generation over time. Looking at the market, in Onshore Wind, we still expect the US market to decline in the near-term before stabilizing. We’re watching the potential US Production Tax Credit extension closely. A blanket long-term extension likely results in near-term uncertainty because it pushes out investment decisions for what could be years. This may impact our second half orders profile and positive free cash flow outlook for the year.
In Offshore Wind, global momentum should continue through the decade. The recent US Federal approval of the Vineyard Wind project supported by our Haliade-X represents meaningful progress for the US market. And as the global energy transition accelerates and government stimulus increases, the grid will need to be upgraded and more actively managed.
Orders grew mid-single digits, where onshore services more than doubled as repower orders increased, which will convert to second half deliveries. This was partially offset by lower onshore equipment orders due to PTC dynamics. While both onshore and offshore equipment orders are lumpy, we expect them to increase significantly in the second half versus first half.
Revenue was up 9%, driven by higher equipment revenue offset by lower services, and reported equipment was up 12% on the two-year view versus 2019. In Onshore, equipment was up year-over-year on higher international unit deliveries, while Services were down on fewer repower upgrades, though up sequentially, and Services ex repower grew double digits again.
Segment margin, while still negative, improved more than 500 basis points as we drive towards segment profitability over time. Onshore was profitable in the quarter and year-to-date. This was driven by continued cost out and volume leverage that more than offset mix and other headwinds, such as lower margin on new products, which typically improves our product lifecycle. In grid, cost productivity was offset by elevated restructuring. Looking ahead, we’re focused on our operational priorities including cost reductions to help offset increased medium-term headwinds from the market inflation and new technology and platform transition.
Moving to Power. The team performed very well with operational improvements across the business, particularly at Gas Power. Looking at the markets, global gas generation grew low-single digits, while GE Gas Turbine utilization continued to be resilient with megawatt hours growing high-single digits. Encouragingly, outage starts were up 50% year-over-year and up mid-single-digit versus 2Q 2019. For the year, we expect the gas market to remain stable with gas generation growing low-single digits. The dispatch of our fleet is well positioned with upgraded machines and the growing HA backlog. Outside of gas, markets remain mixed.
Power orders were up significantly, driven by Gas Power equipment. This quarter, we booked 12 heavy duty gas turbines and 35 aeroderivative orders, primarily LMs, that will complement variable renewable power by providing distributed fast response power to help deliver grid stability. Orders were also up in Gas Power Services, Steam, Power Conversion and Nuclear.
Power revenue was flat. Regas Power declined while Power Conversion grew. Gas Power was down slightly, largely driven by equipment, where similar to last quarter, we had lower turnkey scope projects. We also shipped six fewer heavy duty gas turbines. Gas Power Services was up significantly across both sales [Phonetic] and transactional portfolios, primarily due to higher outages. And Services growth is trending better than our initial outlook. Power Conversion was up with its highest quarterly sales level since third quarter 2018, and while Steam was down slightly, Services returned to pre-COVID level.
Total Power margins expanded roughly 900 basis points and improved sequentially. Gas Power has stabilized through rightsizing the cost structure, improving underwriting, and operating better with lean. Margins were positive, largely driven by service equipment mix and lower costs. Now, Q3 is typically our toughest service quarter with lower activity compared to the spring and the fall outages, which are in the second and the fourth quarter, respectively. But we’re confident in our high-single-digit margin outlook for the year.
Steam was negatively impacted by COVID in India, which drove work stoppages and delayed project execution. But we’re on track with the planned exit of new-build coal. Just over half of the planned $600 million to $700 million cash actions from restructuring, legal and project close out were realized in the first half. Once exit is completed, Steam will be two-thirds Services. Overall, Power is on track to deliver the outlook targets and high-single-digit operating margins over time.
Moving to GE Capital on Slide 8. Continuing adjusted earnings were positive $28 million, a significant improvement year-over-year. This was primarily driven by lower marks and impairments, as well as higher gains at EFS, better performance at Insurance and the discontinuation of preferred dividend payments, which are now a GE Industrial obligation. At Insurance, we saw positive investment results and lower claims continue. However, favorable claims trend due to COVID are slowing in certain parts of the portfolio. And EFS enabled $1.1 billion of orders, supporting customers at Renewable and Gas, including third-party financing.
Based on our first half, we expect to reach the better end of our earnings outlook of negative $700 million to negative $500 million. Within discontinued operations, capital reported a loss of approximately $600 million, primarily due to the recent decline of AerCap stock price, which is updated quarterly.
Moving to corporate, costs were up slightly given the variable nature of EHS and other and the elimination activities. Importantly, functional cost and operations were better. In the first half, total costs were down more than 20% as we improved functions and operations and digital operations. Moving forward, our cost — our focus on decentralization and leaner processes continues, which will drive cost and cash improvement. For the year, we’re on track for the $1.2 billion to $1.3 billion of costs.
In all, we delivered a strong quarter. I’m encouraged by the work underway at Aviation, the ongoing strength in Healthcare and our progress at Renewables and Power.
Now, Larry, back to you.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Carolina, thanks. We turn to Slide 9. I’m incredibly proud of the GE team’s performance in the second quarter. If you’ve seen orders and revenue returned to growth, operating margin expanded across all segments and we generated positive free cash flow. Importantly, Aviation is showing the early signs of a recovery, and we’re clearly building momentum across our businesses. Combined, this gives us the conviction to raise our free cash flow outlook to $3.5 billion to $5 billion for the full-year.
So I hope you see, what I see. A transformation that is accelerating. GE is becoming a more focused, simpler, stronger high-tech industrial. And our efforts and impact extend beyond GE. We’ve always felt a heightened sense of responsibility when it comes to creating a more sustainable future. We recently released our Annual Sustainability Report this month, which shares how we’re tackling the world’s biggest challenges through innovative solutions, developing the future of flight, advancing precision health and leading the energy transition. For example, the CFM RISE program that we’ve announced with Safran, demonstrates our shared vision for the future of flight. As we target reducing fuel consumption and carbon emissions by more than 20% versus today’s most efficient engines. So, as we rise to the challenge of building a world that works, serving customers in vital global markets, we’ll stay focused on profitable growth and cash generation, which I’m confident will lead to high-single-digit free cash flow margins over the next few years.
Steve, with that, let’s go to questions.
Steve Winoker — Vice President, Investor Relations
Before we open the line, I’d ask everyone in the queue to consider your fellow analysts again and ask one question so we can get to as many people as possible. Brandon, can you please open the line?
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Thank you, sir. [Operator Instructions] And from Citigroup we have Andy Kaplowitz. Please go ahead.
Andrew Kaplowitz — Citigroup — Analyst
Good morning, guys.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Andy.
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Good morning, Andy.
Andrew Kaplowitz — Citigroup — Analyst
So your Industrial free cash flow result was good in the quarter and that looks like it’s helping you to be able to raise your Industrial free cash flow guidance. So, could you give us more color, where cash has been trending better than your expectations? It looks like Aviation, Healthcare, Steam ahead. And then, could you also talk about the differences between your performance in cash flow and earnings as you, obviously, didn’t raise your EPS forecast for the year despite the significant raise in cash guidance?
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Andy, that will be my pleasure. So, let me start with the second quarter and what happened in the second quarter. So when we were talking to you mid-quarter, we were expecting around negative $400 million in free cash flow for the quarter. While that was the target we thought was achievable, we clearly came in much better and we were able to do much better. And where did that come from? It’s a combination, both Power and Healthcare continued to be strong, both on profit and on cash. In Aviation, we feel cash come in much better, and that was really twofold. One part was the new orders with progress payments that came. And on the other hand, we had less AD&A, because our customers didn’t ship as many aircrafts as expected, and therefore, we paid out less AD&A.
So, with that bid [Phonetic], you can say that basically we’re rolling that bid into our updated free cash flow guide, right? So we’re raising it from $2.5 billion to $4.5 billion to $3.5 billion to $5 billion, and if you do the midpoint there, you basically see that cash roll through. About half of that improvement comes from earnings and half comes from working capital and other offsets.
And if we then compare with what happened on earnings, so clearly on earnings, we also saw the improved or the strengthening from Power and Healthcare. And we had underlying Aviation as expected. What we also had in the quarter was a small [Phonetic] charge of $400 million, and that’s a non-cash charge. So if you take our guide for EPS, which is $0.15 to $0.25. We are now, obviously, rolling in the results of the second quarter, including that non-cash charge into that number. That said, we do expect to be in the better part of that range for the full-year. Thanks to the good momentum that we are seeing in the business, it’s both on Aviation recovery and the other businesses strengthening their operational performance.
Operator
From Goldman Sachs we have Joe Ritchie. Please go ahead.
Joseph Ritchie — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Hi. Good morning, everyone.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Joe.
Steve Winoker — Vice President, Investor Relations
Good morning, Joe.
Joseph Ritchie — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
So two-part question for me, because there is a lot of focus on Aviation margins this quarter. I really want to ask about the contract margins and also green time utilization. So, on the contract margin reviews, I know that you guys do these quarterly, but I remember last year, when you were doing your impairment tested, you really made a concerted effort to look at the 20% of your portfolio that was high-risk. So, I’m curious, as you kind of think about the expectations for low-double-digit Aviation margins for the rest of the year, I’m just wondering what confidence do you have that you won’t take another charge on the contract margin reviews. And then, any other color that you can provide us on green time utilization impact for the second half and into 2022?
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
So, let me start with the CMR and the margins. And I think stepping back, Aviation service margins are very attractive. And what we had in this quarter was a loss contract and that’s very rare. We have about 200 CSA contracts in our portfolio and there are only a couple of them are loss-making and we’re not expecting that impact to repeat. I mean, the length of the contract is around what 15 years to 20 years. And the processes we have are rigorous and the controls are working, and it’s really a cross-functional efforts where because the R&D operations and commercial are working together to update the estimates with actuals from last year and then making a calculation for what the margin should be. So, in this quarter, with this one contract, is [Phonetic] that turn into a loss-making contract? What technically happens then is that, you don’t only sort of update history to that new margin, you also pull forward all the expected or possible losses that you would have going forward on that contract into the second quarter, and that’s why we had such a big impact in the quarter with almost 300 from that.
What I would say, though, is that, more importantly is, how we’re working to improve how we operationally do our services. So, we’re working to reducing turnaround times. We’re working to get the engines back to our customers faster and lowering the cost of our overhaul. So, if you think about that, that brings us to lower cost, lower cash and happier customers. So that’s operationally what’s really important for us.
And then your question was, what about this going forward? So, when we look into the second half, as we’ve said, we do expect departures to improve. And if you look at the Aviation margin in the second quarter, excluding the CMR impact, it would have been 11%-plus, so double digits or low-double digits and that’s why we’re holding the low-double-digit margin. And I would say, when we look at the second half, what will impact the second half? We talk about shop visit, the volume, the mix, the scope and we do expect that the shop visit trend will move favorably for us and then we’ll continue to have the quarterly CMR process as is.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah, Joe, you — just to add to what Carolina said, with respect to green time, and that clearly is one of the variables, it’s not the only one that sits between the departure trends and what we see with respect to shop visit activity, right? So I think our view is that, we will continue to see strong year-over-year shop visit numbers. I think we’ll see a gradual continuation of the improvements sequentially as well. That suggests a number of these impediments like green time fade with time, but they don’t disappear, I think as we work through the second half. So, sequentially, we think we’re going to see continued gradual improvement, we think we will, as Carolina just said, see some slight improvement with respect to scope, all good. We’re obviously watching some other variables here like the delta variant. But at this point, I think we’re optimistic about the second half performance in Aviation services.
Operator
From Bank of America we have Andrew Obin. Please go ahead.
Andrew Obin — Bank of America — Analyst
Hi, guys. Good morning.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Good morning, Andrew.
Andrew Obin — Bank of America — Analyst
Just a question on Aviation. Can we just talk about shop services versus spare services up 50%, spares up 15%? Can we just talk about the used serviceable parts dynamic perhaps driving the gap and more importantly, how do you expect this to develop over the next 18 months, right? How should we think about the shape of the aftermarket recovery incorporating this used serviceable parts phenomena? Thank you.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Well, keep in mind, when we talk about — well, we use the word spares in a couple of different context, but primarily, spare engines are really a function of fleet planning, and given where folks are at this point, both in terms of activity and cash conservation, I think, in part that’s why you see the spares of recovery perhaps being a bit more muted than the strong bounce back we’re seeing in shop visits.
Andrew, we talked about green time earlier. I’d say, USM is another one of those variables that sits between a direct one-for-one transfer from departures to our activity. That said, I think that we haven’t seen much by way of USM to date. I think as we play forward through the second half of this year and in the next year, I think we’re anticipating that that will be a growing but still modest headwind for us. So we maybe trade out a little less green time for a little bit more USM. But keep in mind as well, USM doesn’t happen through GE Aviation, we’re an active consumer, user of USM as well. So, it will help us in some respects. It lower our costs with respect to the delivered services we provide our airline customers. So a number of dynamics there, but certainly, one that we have an eye on as well as we think about the back half, but maybe more importantly 2022.
Operator
From J.P. Morgan we have Steve Tusa. Please go ahead.
Stephen Tusa — J.P. Morgan — Analyst
Hey. Good morning.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Steve.
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Hi, Steve.
Stephen Tusa — J.P. Morgan — Analyst
Thanks for all the details as usual. Just a question on the receivable side in Note 4 on the unconsolidated receivables activity. For the first half, I think it’s been about $5 billion, it’s kind of consistent with what you did in the first quarter. Is that number — it’s been running kind of $10 billion to $12 billion, I think over the years. Is that number going to be consistently in that range?
And then secondly, just on this charge, can you just give us some color as to like what type of engine, is it narrow body and should we expect kind of the same at Safran, if that’s the case?
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Okay, Steve. So maybe I’ll start with the receivables question there. I think it’s important when we look at receivables to put that in context with our volume, and obviously looking at it excluding factoring, so that we can see what traction are we really getting and what is our DSO because that’s the best way of measuring how we’re improving or not on our underlying performance on working capital management.
And when it comes to receivables and DSO, we have actually improved significantly compared to a year ago. I would say, all the working capital metrics, that’s the one that is moving — well, that’s moved the furthest. Of course, you have seasonality with the volumes and the different businesses, but that’s how I would look at it to look at traction and we’re very happy to say that that positive trend has developed over the last year with all the work we put into it. And I do believe that now with factoring soon well out of the game, that will help us drive billings and collections earlier in the quarters, and therefore, also improve overall the DSO. So good improvement there, but probably even more opportunity going forward on that topic.
And the other question you had was on the charge?
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Steve, on the CMRs, it was a narrow-body oriented contract that we trued up in the quarter. With respect to the second part of that question, regarding Safran, we’ll leave their reports to — they maybe able to report later in the week.
Operator
From Barclays we have Julian Mitchell. Please go ahead.
Julian Mitchell — Barclays — Analyst
Hi. Good morning. Just wanted to perhaps switch the focus to Renewables for a second. Understand that there was a lot of headwinds already from sort of legacy projects and so forth in aspects such as grid and hydro, but also on the wind side, it seems there is more cost pressure and maybe some project re-evaluations going on as well at some of your peers. So just wondered if you could give us an update on how comfortable you are with that trajectory of profitability expansion at renewables. And how much more concerned you are about cost headwinds in that business this year and into next?
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Good morning. Yes, when we talk about Renewables, I would just start by saying that we’re proud with the improved margin. We improved 520 bps year-over-year in Renewables. But when looking at Renewables, you really need to look at the different pieces, a bit like you did, right? So, starting with Onshore Wind, this is the second quarter where we are positive for full Onshore Wind and that’s a significant improvement compared to last year, and we expect to be positive already in 2021 for the full-year. And in the second half, we will see — where we expect to see Services come back even more, including more repower and we will continue our journey to take more costs out. Offshore Wind, that’s more of the investment for the future. I would say, you’ll see more of that in our numbers beginning 2022.
Grid — in Grid, well, we’re continuing the turnaround and we saw good momentum in that. We see a better cost out, we saw better project execution. We are being tougher and having deal selectivity and the restructuring is progressing as planned here. So if you take all of that together, you get to that 520 bps improvement year-over-year, but it also gives us comfort that we will be positive in 2022, just building on that momentum of operational improvements. We’re cautious of inflation and we’re watching the PTC dynamics and how that will impact us, but we do see good tailwinds from growth, increased services and digital, as well as our cost reduction.
Operator
From Wolfe Research we have Nigel Coe. Please go ahead.
Nigel Coe — Wolfe Research — Analyst
Thanks. Good morning, everyone.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Nigel.
Nigel Coe — Wolfe Research — Analyst
I’ve got a question on progress collections, but I do want to just clarify on your comments on the factoring, Carolina. And just to confirm, it’s not the sales that the important thing here, it’s the amount outstanding, right? It’s the balance outstanding. And I think the 10-Q says that’s down from $6.6 billion on Jan 1 to $3 billion at the end of June. So just confirm that’s the real metric we should be focused on here?
And then on the progress, there has been a $1.3 billion headwind in the first half of the year. Just wondering how you see that develop in the second half of the year recognizing that there is some volatility with renewables. But what’s in your plan for the second half on progress?
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes. So, Nigel, on the receivable and on the factoring, you’re right, that’s exactly how to look at it. We started the year with almost $7 billion in factoring receivables. We took $800 million of that out in the first quarter. You saw us take another $2.7 billion out now and we have about the $1 billion to go until year end and then we’ll end the year with around $2 billion, which is what we’ve talked about, right? So that’s how you get to those numbers, so you’re absolutely correct.
When it comes to progress, so if you look at the quarter this year, you have to compare it to — well, progress last year because if you sort of look at the delta here, progress last year was including the big military progress payments that we got, which obviously didn’t repeat now in the quarter. This quarter, we had a lot of deliverables in Renewables. So basically taking down progress and that’s really why it was negative compared to the deliverables.
For the rest of the year, well, that will depend a bit on the dynamics of the PTC because we’ve talked about that the biggest variable for our guide, the cash guide that $3.5 billion to $5 billion, one of the big parts there is the PTC dynamic and if that will change our customer behavior, so that they will push out the orders that we were expecting to be placed before year-end to next year. And the other one on progress will obviously be also depending on Aviation and how that plays out over the second half of the year.
Operator
From Vertical Research we have Jeff Sprague. Please go ahead.
Jeffrey Sprague — Vertical Research Partners — Analyst
Thank you. Good morning, everyone.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Jeff.
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Hi, Jeff.
Jeffrey Sprague — Vertical Research Partners — Analyst
Good morning. Yeah. Another one just on cash flow and factoring here just to make sure we have all this squared away. Just on the unconsolidated receivable facilities, can you just give us a sense of what kind of volume you will run through that this year? And just kind of on an all-in basis, is that facility isolated to itself actually a source or use of cash flow in 2021 versus 2020? And also, just why continue with that particular facility — if the factoring is driving behavior, you don’t like kind of the factor and forget sort of behavior. What is it about maintaining this particular facility? Why does it makes sense in this sort of particular business that you’re running through this facility? Thank you.
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Hi, Jeff. So, on factoring, I would say that the important part is to taking it down to a reasonable level. What we are talking about is, ending this year with our revenues to have about $2 billion of factoring and that’s basically long-term securitization, and that is part of normal doing business, and that’s similar to what other peers are doing. So, I would say, that is an effective part of financing and reducing risk and sort of using it for the right reasons. While all the rest we’re taking out to make sure that we focus on the core, which is really the billings and pushing billings up earlier into the quarter. If you’re not going to get that money automatically by the end of the quarter, you’re going to be much more motivated to start collect — to start billing and collecting earlier in the quarter.
Operator
From RBC Capital we have Deane Dray. Please go ahead.
Deane Dray — RBC Capital Markets — Analyst
Thank you. Good morning, everyone.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Deane.
Steve Winoker — Vice President, Investor Relations
Good morning, Deane.
Deane Dray — RBC Capital Markets — Analyst
Hey. Since it’s such a big sector-wide headwind, I wanted to ask about the supply chain pressures and I think you called it out twice or two areas, military aviation and in healthcare and healthcare resins and electronics, so that’s pretty much what we’re expecting. But could you size for us, are there missed revenues or would they be deferred revenues? And for Carolina, the increase in inventory, is that for buffer stock or also to anticipated increase demand and what’s the mix there? Thanks.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Deane, I think if you look at what we have been wrestling with resin semiconductors like so many and other commodities on a spot basis, I think the vast majority of the effects are basically in our backlog today now passed through to customers, right? So, I don’t think we’re going to try to frame that size-wise, but it did have, I would say, modest impact on our revenues and our cash this quarter and we really want to make sure that we’re doing all we can both with the vendor base and frankly, with our own processes to clear that. We don’t like the foregone revenue, more importantly, we’re late with the customer in a number of instances.
I think as we look at business that we might have lost, I’m not sure we can really pinpoint particular orders that went elsewhere because our lead times have been pushed, again because I don’t think this is an isolated GE dynamic, but we’re working hard to make sure that doesn’t happen to the extent we can avoid it in the second half. So, it’s a day-to-day battle, it’s tactical far more than it is strategic on balance, but the teams are hard at it as you can imagine on a daily basis.
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. And on your inventory question, I would say, a couple of things. So, within inventory, one part is volume built for Renewables and delivering expected to be in the second half, right? But we also have, I would say, a bit too much inventory still because of the fulfillment delays that we have assumed [Phonetic]. We talked about it in Aviation, but there’s also some stretch in Healthcare. Overall, we are improving the turns in inventory as well, but it is getting tougher with the challenges on the supply chain side. So, more work to do even in this environment.
Operator
And from UBS we have Markus Mittermaier. Please go ahead.
Markus Mittermaier — UBS — Analyst
Yeah, hi. Good morning, everyone.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning, Markus.
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Good morning, Markus.
Markus Mittermaier — UBS — Analyst
Good morning. Just a quick one on Power, if I may. Power Services, you mentioned that is now again above 2019 levels, how should we think about that? Is that sort of a catch up on outages from last year? Or is it already reflecting the strong inflows that we had in 2017 to 2019 those coming off warranty?
And then, finally, Carolina, you mentioned that once the Steam restructuring is done that revenue stream will be two-thirds Services. Any indication of sort of what we should expect there in terms of margin? Thank you.
H. Lawrence Culp — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Markus, I think you’ve got a pretty good handle on what we’re seeing in Gas Services, right? We’ve got two quarters here in a row now that have been positive. Clearly, the comps a year ago that we’re working against are fairly easy. But if you go back to 2019, we’re up against 2019 levels for a number of the reasons that you highlighted. We do know the second half, given the way COVID played out last year, will present some tougher comps. But I think we’re encouraged by both what we saw with CSAs and the transactional activity. As we look to the second half, I think, in all likelihood, going to do better than that low-single-digit revenue guide that we talked about for Services. Now that will be more a first half result than it will be the second half, but we do see, I think, higher outages with the contractual business. I think the teams on the transactional side are doing a better job day in, day out. We had higher backlog coming into the year. I like the execution improvements that we’re seeing largely by way of lean.
And in turn, I think as we put more emphasis on the top, you’re also seeing that flow through to the bottom, which is part of the reason we’re seeing the strong margin improvements in Gas and in Power broadly, not only year-over-year, but again, with respect to the comparison versus 2019, where, for the segment, I think the margins are up now over 600 basis points versus the second quarter of 2019. So, we know that this is never going to be a high-growth business for us. But certainly, it’s a business we can run better and can be a stable business for us. I think you see that shaping up here in 2021. Carolina?
Carolina Dybeck Happe — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes. And on Steam restructuring, so I will start by saying that Valerie and her team are doing a really good job in this big transformation of Steam. And on the other side, that’s why we mentioned it, this will be mainly a Services business. So, obviously, that’s a good place to be in.
What the margins will be? Well, I would just say that Service margins are always expected to be strong and we expect them to be strong, probably slightly lower than Gas, but we’ll see where that ends.
Operator
Thank you. And we’ve reached the end of our time today. We’ll now turn it back to Steve Winoker for closing remarks.
Steve Winoker — Vice President, Investor Relations
Thanks, everybody. Appreciate your time. I know you have a very busy earnings day. My team and I stand ready to help. Take care.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]