Illinois Tool Works Inc. (NYSE:ITW) Q3 2022 Earnings Call dated Oct. 25, 2022.
Corporate Participants:
Karen Fletcher — Vice President of Investor Relations
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Analysts:
Scott Davis — Melius Research — Analyst
Tami Zakaria — JPMorgan — Analyst
Andy Kaplowitz — Citigroup — Analyst
Joe Ritchie — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Jamie Cook — Credit Suisse — Analyst
Joe O’Dea — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Steven Fisher — UBS — Analyst
Stephen Volkmann — Jefferies — Analyst
Julian Mitchell — Barclays — Analyst
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
David Raso — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Presentation:
Operator
Good morning, my name is Rob and I’ll be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the ITW’s Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] For those participating in the Q&A, you will have the opportunity to ask one question and if needed one follow-up question. Thank you. Karen Fletcher, Vice President of Investor Relations, you may begin your conference.
Karen Fletcher — Vice President of Investor Relations
Okay, thank you, Rob. Good morning, and welcome to ITW’s third quarter 2022 conference call. I’m joined by our Chairman and CEO, Scott Santi; and Senior Vice-President and CFO, Michael Larsen. During today’s call, we will discuss ITW’s third quarter financial results and our updated guidance for full-year 2022.
Slide 2 is a reminder that this presentation contains forward-looking statements. We refer you to the company’s 2021 Form 10-K and subsequent reports filed with the SEC for more detail about important risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations. This presentation uses certain non-GAAP measures and a reconciliation of those measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is contained in the press release.
Please turn to Slide 3 and it’s now my pleasure to turn the call over to our Chairman and CEO, Scott Santi.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Karen, and good morning, everyone. In what remains a very dynamic and challenging operating environment, we were pleased with our Q3 performance. On the top-line, we delivered 13% revenue growth with 16% organic growth from our base businesses. While we did see some softening in channel inventory reduction actions in our businesses serving the construction, auto aftermarket, commercial welding appliance markets, five of our seven segments delivered double-digit organic growth led by automotive OEM up 25% and food equipment up 23%.
With regard to margins, we were glad to see our incremental margins in Q3 return to our normal 30% plus level for the first time in five quarters as the impact of volume growth, enterprise initiatives, pricing actions, and some moderation in the pace of input cost inflation drove incremental margin of 39% and a 130-basis point improvement in operating margin in our base businesses. We’ve lost roughly 50 basis points of margin due to price-cost during this period of rapid inflation, which we fully expect to recover over time once the current inflationary environment stabilizes. And it was certainly good to see a nice solid first step in that direction in Q3.
On the bottom-line, strong growth and margin performance resulted in GAAP EPS of $2.35, up 16% versus Q3 of last year. And that 16% growth includes $0.13 of negative impact from currency. Excluding currency, earnings per share were up 23%. Looking at our current performance, our decision to stay invested in our long-term strategy and then our people during the pandemic and the quality of our team’s execution of our Win the Recovery strategy coming out of it are fueling the strong organic growth and financial performance that we are currently delivering.
While the economic outlook is becoming increasingly uncertain, demand remained solid across the majority of our business portfolio, and as a result, the company is well positioned to deliver a strong finish to what has been a very strong year.
With that, I’ll now turn the call over to Michael, who will provide more detail on the quarter and our updated guidance. Michael?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Scott, and good morning, everyone. In Q3, revenue grew 13% to $4 billion with strong organic growth of 16%. The MTS acquisition contributed 3% to revenue. Foreign currency translation was a 6% headwind compared to a 4% headwind last quarter. And despite $0.13 of year-over-year EPS headwind from foreign currency translation, GAAP EPS was $2.35, an increase of 16%. Excluding MTS, incremental margin in our base business was 39% which as Scott said was a welcome return to our normal historical incremental margin rates. As a result of our strong revenue and margin performance, operating income increased 16% to $983 million which was an all-time quarterly record.
Operating margin was 24.5% with operating leverage of almost 300 basis points and a 110 basis points of enterprise initiatives. Excluding 60 basis points of margin impact from the MTS acquisition, operating margin expanded 130 basis points to 25.1%. Free cash flow was solid at $612 million, an increase of 46% versus Q2 and 12% year-over-year. The conversion rate of 84% is lower than our typical Q3 performance as we remain committed in the near-term to intentional working capital investments to support double-digit organic growth, mitigate supply chain risk and sustained service levels to our key customers. Finally, share repurchases in Q3 were $500 million. And our effective tax rate was 24% versus 21% in the prior year.
With that, let’s turn to Slide 4 and starting with organic growth by geography, we delivered growth in the mid-teens across all major geographies led by North America up 17%. Europe, which represents about 23% of our sales, grew 14% led by automotive OEM up 26% and food equipment up 15%. China grew 15% led by test and measurement and electronics up 32%. And automotive OEM was up 29%. Price-cost was accretive to income in Q3 and slightly dilutive by 40 basis points to margin. As we’ve said before, our business teams around the world have done an exceptional job of adjusting price to offset cost increases throughout the most significant inflationary cycle in over 40 years. And should the pace of raw material cost inflation continue to moderate, we expect price-cost to be accretive to income and slightly accretive to margin in Q4. As Scott mentioned throughout this unprecedented 2-year inflationary cycle, the company has absorbed as much as 250 basis-points of margin dilution impact from price-cost, which we expect to fully recover in the succeeding six to eight quarters after input prices stabilize.
Moving on to the segments. Automotive OEM delivered strong organic growth of 25% with North America up 21% and Europe up 26%. China was up 29% which included some sequential recovery from the lockdown impact in Q2. When looking at these year-over-year growth rates, keep in mind that the comparisons are against the Q3 last year when the chip shortage led to a low point for auto production. We continue to make-good progress on our content per vehicle growth as evidenced by our year-to-date organic growth rate of 9% compared to auto builds of 7% in line with our long-term market outgrowth target of two to three percentage points.
Consistent with our guidance all year, we do not expect a meaningful improvement in the chip shortage situation impacting automotive production until next year and we continue to take a more conservative approach to our guidance which assumes that automotive production essentially remains around current levels through the balance of this year. And as we’ve said before, as supply-chain issues eventually get resolved down the road, we remain confident that the automotive OEM segment is well positioned to be a very meaningful contributor to the overall organic growth rate of the enterprise for an extended period of time. And as that plays out, we also expect the utomotive OEM segment returns to its typical historical operating margin rates in the low-to mid 20s.
Turning to Slide 5. Food equipment delivered strong organic growth of 23% as North America grew 30% with double-digit growth in every major category and end market. Growth in institutional markets was 50% plus with strength across several categories, most notably lodging. Restaurants were up around 40% and retail growth was in the mid-teens. International revenue grew 14% with Europe up 15% and Asia-Pacific up 9%. Test and measurement and electronics revenue grew 29% with organic growth of 17% as test and measurement grew 20% and electronics was up 14%. Growth was broad based with continued strength in semiconductor and capex spending as evidenced by organic growth of 13% in the Instron business.
Moving on to Slide 6. Welding grew 14% organically with equipment up 13% and consumables up 15%. Industrial was the standout with organic growth of 32%. The commercial side of the welding business which sells to smaller businesses and individual users was down 10% due to lower demand and inventory destocking in the channel. However, due to the strength of the industrial side, North America still grew 14% and international grew 12%. Sales to oil and gas customers were up 12% in the quarter. Operating margin improved 150 basis points to 31.5%, which was a new record for the welding segment.
Polymers & Fluids grew 8% organically with polymers up 21% on continued strength in industrial applications. Softening demand due to higher gas prices and the impact on consumer discretionary spend impacted the automotive aftermarket business which was up 2%. Fluids was up 5% and overall North America grew 5%, international was up 14%. Construction delivered organic growth of 17% with continued strength in North America which was up 35%. U.S. residential grew 42% and commercial was up 17%. That said, we did see some signs of slowing towards the end of the quarter and we expect that to continue in Q4 which we have reflected in our updated guidance.
International side of construction is slowing with Europe down 1%. Australia and New Zealand was up 7% against an easy comparison. Specialty growth was essentially flat as product line simplification activities resulted in the elimination of a product line in one of our consumer packaging businesses. Excluding PLS, the segment would have been up 3%. Demand in our appliance components division slowed which we have reflected in our updated guidance.
On a geographic basis, North America was down 2% and international grew 4%.
Okay, let’s turn to Slide 8 for an update on the year, and starting with the top-line, we’re raising our full-year organic growth guidance to 11% to 12% due to the strength of our Q3 organic growth performance. And projecting current levels of demand which remained strong across most of our businesses. But we are also anticipating further slowing in the end markets we talked about including global residential construction, automotive aftermarket, commercial welding and appliance components that combined represent about 20% of total company revenue.
The MTS acquisition is expected to add 3% of revenue and at current exchange rates, currency translation will reduce revenue by 5%, resulting in total revenue for the year up 9% to 10%.
For Q4, we’re well positioned to deliver a strong finish to a very strong year with organic growth of approximately 10% and GAAP EPS growth of about 40%. In Q4, and consistent with our previously announced plan to divest certain business units, we completed the sale of a division within the Polymers & Fluids segment with an estimated after tax gain of $0.45 per share. We have included this Q4 gain in our updated full-year guidance. And per our usual process, we have narrowed the range for the year with one quarter to go and updated our guidance to reflect current foreign exchange rates, which resulted in additional foreign currency headwind versus our prior guidance.
So as a result of including the gain on sale and updating guidance with current foreign exchange rates, our updated full-year GAAP EPS guidance range is USD9.45 to USD9.55. We are projecting operating margin of approximately 24% for the full year which includes. Approximately 100 basis points contribution from enterprise initiatives, about 200 basis points contribution from volume leverage, an estimated 100 basis points of negative margin impact from price-cost and about 50 basis points of margin dilution from the acquisition of MTS.
We expect free cash flow conversion of approximately 80% which as we’ve talked about is below our typical 100% plus conversion rate due to the intentional near-term working capital investments that support the company’s double-digit revenue growth, mitigate supply chain risks and sustain customer service levels.
And finally, share repurchases are now expected to be $1.75 billion for the full year, an increase of $250 million versus prior guidance. Looking forward, we’re obviously not immune to the macro challenges and uncertainties that may lie ahead. But through the execution of our enterprise strategy, we’ve positioned this company to deliver top-tier results in any environment as reflected in our differentiated performance at the depth of the pandemic and in a very dynamic and challenging conditions that have characterized recovery over the last two years.
We remain confident that the combination of the powerful competitive advantages we derive from ITW’s proprietary business model, our high-quality business portfolio and our team’s proven ability to consistently execute at a very high level help us well prepared to continue to outperform in whatever economic conditions emerge in 2023 and beyond.
With that Karen, I’ll turn it back to you.
Karen Fletcher — Vice President of Investor Relations
Okay. Thanks, Michael. Rob, let’s open up the lines for questions.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Your first question comes from the line of Scott Davis from Melius Research. Your line is open.
Scott Davis — Melius Research — Analyst
Hi, good morning, Scott, Michael, and Karen.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Scott Davis — Melius Research — Analyst
I’m not very good at math but just thinking through this with your guidance on the full year on price-cost, I think it implies that you’re actually going to be in meaningful positive territory on price-cost in Q4. Is that — am I reading that right?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
That is correct. So we are going — we’re expecting that if inflation stays where it is and so based on the known increases and decreases and based on the the price that we expect to realize in the fourth quarter, hat price-cost will be accretive on a EPS basis and also for the first time in a while accretive on a margin basis as well.
Scott Davis — Melius Research — Analyst
Okay, that’s super helpful and how do you. I mean. It seems like we’re walking into a construction recession but how do you guys. I mean, are you planning — how do you plan for that given 80-20 and just the business model that you have it’s not like you’re going to go do a bunch of restructuring but how do you get ahead of that so that you can limit the impact of it?
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Well, we’ve talked about this before but what one of the fundamental elements of 80-20 is that we are — that we have a very flexible cost structure, so we are — we do a lot of outsourcing upstream, we want to assemble, we want to control the manufacturing elements that really matter from the standpoint of control of quality control delivery. But we don’t necessarily have to bend all the metal, we don’t have to necessarily do all the upstream work and so what that gets us fundamentally in fact we prefer not to what ultimately that gives us is a relatively flexible cost structure. So we are a read-and-react company, our businesses are going to respond to whatever the demand is that sits right in front of them, we’ve talked about that before, we don’t do a lot of forward forecasting, we are producing today what our customers bought yesterday. And as demand rates start to decline in places like construction, then those adjustments will take place real-time.
Scott Davis — Melius Research — Analyst
Okay, that’s a helpful reminder. Thank you, guys. I appreciate it and good luck.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Tami Zakaria from JPMorgan. Your line is open.
Tami Zakaria — JPMorgan — Analyst
Hi good morning, how are you? Thanks for taking the questions.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Tami Zakaria — JPMorgan — Analyst
So, I have two quick ones. The first one is, can you comment on which end markets you’re anticipating further slowdown, meaning, the 10% implied fourth quarter organic growth, are you currently run rating of that but you’re anticipating further slowdown and hence you’re guiding to about a 10%?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, that’s correct. So this is not our typical run rate, this has been adjusted with some anticipated further slowing in the end markets that we talked about.
Tami Zakaria — JPMorgan — Analyst
Are you able to share like what the current run rate is?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
It is higher than the 10%.
Tami Zakaria — JPMorgan — Analyst
Got it Got it. Okay. That’s helpful. And then the second one. Can you comment on the price versus volume you saw in the third quarter because the last time you raised organic growth guidance earlier this year. I think you had mentioned that you saw some volume pickup. Did that sustain? Like what’s the expectation for price versus volume in the fourth quarter?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, so as you know, Tami, we don’t report price and volume separately. But what I think we can tell you is that we are seeing in Q3 we saw meaningful volume growth across the company including particularly in, if you look at the strength in auto, food equipment, test and measurement, you’re not going to put out numbers like that without a meaningful contribution from volume.
Tami Zakaria — JPMorgan — Analyst
Got it and you expect volume to sort of sustain in most of these end markets in the fourth quarter as well?
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah I think that’s a reasonable — it’s obviously — this is a very dynamic environment but there is a lot of strength in the businesses that I just talked about that, more than offset some of the slowing we’re seeing in about 20% of the company, so I think we’re really well positioned for a strong finish here in Q4 and if you look at the implied guidance, we’re looking at organic growth like we said double-digit, we’re looking at margin improvement of more than 100 basis points, GAAP EPS growth of 40%, 50% excluding the divestiture gain that we talked about earlier, so really strong finish to what’s been a very strong year for the company.
Tami Zakaria — JPMorgan — Analyst
Okay, perfect, thank you so much.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Sure.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Andy Kaplowitz from Citigroup. Your line is open.
Andy Kaplowitz — Citigroup — Analyst
Good, morning, everyone.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Hi Andy.
Andy Kaplowitz — Citigroup — Analyst
Scott, maybe just focusing on construction for a second, last quarter you mentioned some potential incremental weakness in Europe and Australia, it seems like those are hanging in there, obviously, North American residential up 42%, you’ve talked about a little bit of weakening, so is this just strong share gains for ITW that have held up these businesses within construction? I know you mentioned you saw some slowing late in the quarter, if you could give us more color into the rate of that slowing going forward?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Well. I think what we’ve seen is primarily a slowdown on the residential side which is about 80% of our business. And we’ve talked about some softening on the international side here on our call last quarter. And so we did see Europe down 1% and I think that’s pretty broad based. UK, Continental Europe at this point given some of the challenges, that’s probably what you would expect. Australia and New Zealand is also slowing here, and as the comps get a little more difficult, you’re going to see those growth rates start to come down. I think in North America, there’s still a fair bit of obviously strength in the business and then late in the quarter we’re really starting to see the order rates starting to come down on the residential side. So —
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I think the only thing I would add is it is among the most interest rate sensitive end markets that we serve and so you’re seeing in the housing start data and a lot of other things that the rapid pace of interest rates rising and certainly starting to buy in the housing markets. This points to the fact that it remains a very strong, very profitable business for us and it points just the value of the diversified portfolios we’re going to see some some pressure in some places but we’ve got plenty of other places that are more than picking up and that’s really by design. That’s how we’re trying to position the company ultimately to outperform in any environment.
Andy Kaplowitz — Citigroup — Analyst
Totally understand. And then maybe just backing up, what you’re seeing across your industrial businesses, I mean, we talked a lot about the consumer businesses. Obviously, most of those businesses in the 20% are consumer-facing. Have you seen any incremental weakness in your capex type businesses? Are they generally holding up?
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Not yet.
Andy Kaplowitz — Citigroup — Analyst
Should be enough. Thanks guys.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Joe Ritchie from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.
Joe Ritchie — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Thanks. Good morning, everyone.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Joe Ritchie — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
So nice to see the incremental margins ex MTS come back, just given the comments that you’re making around price-cost and turning positive, if inflation kind of holds at these levels and we’re closer to peak inflation, would you expect to continue to achieve the same type of incremental margins going forward?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I think it’s reasonable to assume that our incremental margins will be a little bit higher than our normal range, just given the recovery on price-cost that we talked about. So — Assuming again Joe that from a — on the inflation side that things stay where they are or continue to moderate, then that would be a reasonable expectation.
Joe Ritchie — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Okay, great. And then you mentioned, Michael, that 23% of your business in Europe obviously there’s a lot of concern out there, as we head into the winter on rising energy costs and potential recession in the region. I know that you guys you have given already some color around trends but just just maybe anything else that you can kind of tell us about that region and then specifically from a cost perspective how that impacts your business?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Well. I mean, I think there’s certainly a reason to be a little more concerned about Europe just if you look at the macro picture. I think the fact is our businesses are performing at a really high level right now. And so if you just look at Q3, I’ll just go back to a little bit of commentary on Europe specifically. We had six segments growing between 9% and 26% and so double-digit growth in five of the seven segments and only construction was down one. And it’s not all auto, if you take out auto, Europe still grew 10%. I think obviously we expect those growth rates to moderate here in the fourth quarter. But I think we’re really well positioned in Europe to deal with just like the rest of the company deal with whatever it’s ahead. And if we have a little bit more softness maybe in Europe, maybe we have a little more strength in other parts of the world and that’s kind of how the company is set up as Scott said. So, we’ll read and react, we’ll deal with whatever is ahead of us, but we’re confident that we’ll continue to outperform on a relative basis.
Joe Ritchie — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Okay, great, thank you.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Jamie Cook from Credit Suisse. Your line is open.
Jamie Cook — Credit Suisse — Analyst
Hi good morning and congrats on an excellent quarter.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Jamie Cook — Credit Suisse — Analyst
I guess my first question, I know on the top-line, you addressed the trends that you’re seeing in construction. I was surprised a little bit on the margin in the quarter, so if you could first provide a little color around that, that would be helpful. And then —
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah, Jamie, it’s price-cost in construction, so a little bit more headwind here than in some of the other parts of the company and so I will also say that. 25.7% operating margin in construction is not too shabby at this point, so — but still you’re right, relative to prior year we’re down due to the price-cost dynamic.
Jamie Cook — Credit Suisse — Analyst
Okay and then. I know you didn’t want to answer in terms of as we’re thinking about the organic growth which surprised on the upside. I know you don’t want to answer what you’re seeing in terms of price versus volume but is there any update you can provide on which segments you’re seeing the most success in terms of gaining market share and how sustainable you think this market share is going forward? Thank you.
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Well. I think from the beginning in terms of the sustainable — so, one we are confident that we are gaining market share across the portfolio and the kind of the guidance was only strategic long-term market share gains and not opportunistic kind of onetime orders from new customers, so we’ve really focused on serving our 80 customers as we call them our best customers better than anybody else and because of our Win the Recovery positioning we are doing that. And as a result of gaining market share. I mean it’s hard to — we have 83 divisions, so it’s hard to point to specific areas but if you just look at our overall at the enterprise-level organic growth of 16% in the third quarter, I think relative to other industrial companies that would probably compare pretty well.
Jamie Cook — Credit Suisse — Analyst
Okay, thank you.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Joe O’Dea from Wells Fargo. Your line is open.
Joe O’Dea — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Hi, good morning.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Joe O’Dea — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Can you talk about the raw materials and source components waiting within COGS and then what you anticipate in terms of the timing of seeing each of those start to sort of flow-through with maybe a more favorable situation in the P&L?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah so, if I understand your question so we’re currently running at about three months on hand where typically we’re running at two months on hand in terms of inventory. And as supply conditions here begin to normalize and we’re going to see a return to normal levels in that two months on hand. When exactly that happens is difficult to predict but we are starting to see some signs that supply chain is improving, so I think it’s reasonable to assume that once conditions normalize that will take us about six to eight quarters to get back to two months on hand and obviously just like our conversion rate is below our historical typical levels at this point, they’re going to be above for that period of time as we benefit from significant working capital release whenever — when exactly that plays out is difficult to say, it’s not all going to come back to one quarter, I mean we’ve built this up over two years, it’s going to take some time. Together back-out again but we’re confident we’ve added the right level of inventory and It’s really put us in a great position to serve our customers, mitigate supply chain risk and like we said take market share.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
I think [indecipherable] I think the question was more in terms of our cost of goods, what percentage of those are material costs. Correct me if i’m wrong.
Joe O’Dea — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Just kind of — yeah, so — it’s helpful and I guess related to just with raw mats coming right, will raw mats flow-through [indecipherable] will you get cost down on that or do you think that’s a trickier dynamic?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Well, there’s a lot of factors that go into the last part of your question. I think the simple answer to your first one is that the percentage material — the material cost percentage as overall versus the overall COGS is going to vary but let’s just say roughly 60%, 65%, 35% freight, labor, other elements of the cost structure if that helps.
Joe O’Dea — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Yeah. Okay and, then I wanted to ask one about the the fourth quarter margin excluding the divestiture, I’m getting something like a 50 basis point sequential decline from 3Q to 4Q. If that’s accurate, can you just help with the bridge. I assume there’s a little bit of sort of sequential decremental on lower revenue but then price-cost should be more favorable. Just any other items to kind of consider in that bridge?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. I think if you look at historically, typically Q3 is our highest quarter and we go down in Q4. The primary driver is that there’s just less shipping days in the fourth quarter. So I think this year, there’s 61 shipping days in Q4. There were 64 in the third quarter and so that’s really the main driver here.
EPS obviously implied is slightly lower than what we just did in Q3 and the delta there is the foreign-exchange piece.
Joe O’Dea — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Got it. Thank you.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Steven Fisher from UBS. Your line is open.
Steven Fisher — UBS — Analyst
Thanks. Good morning. Just wanted to clarify on the construction side of things, you mentioned the slowing in Q4 on the U.S. residential piece, but I didn’t hear any follow-up comments on the commercial piece. Is that expected to slow too?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Well, usually, residential is kind of a leading indicator, so we just haven’t seen it yet.
Steven Fisher — UBS — Analyst
Okay, so maybe that will be something more like a 2023. I guess related to that, have you done any analysis to kind of look at the various stimulus programs that have been put in place and kind of to assess how that might end up flowing through your businesses?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No, we haven’t really. If you have any great ideas, lend them over, but we are a short-cycle company, we read and react to what’s in front of us and trying to predict what the government is going to do. I think it’s not really been a winning equation for us anyway, may work well for others but not in our case.
Steven Fisher — UBS — Analyst
Okay and then just one clarification maybe on the last question about the margins in Q4. I guess you know are there any particular segments that you anticipate margin is actually improving in the fourth quarter or any that stand-out kind of one direction or the other?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I think the fourth quarter looks a lot like the third quarter except the organic growth rates are coming down and so from a margin standpoint it’s pretty close to the third quarter.
Steven Fisher — UBS — Analyst
Okay, thank you very much.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Stephen Volkmann from Jefferies. Your line is open.
Stephen Volkmann — Jefferies — Analyst
Hey good morning guys, sorry I’m maybe beating a bit of a dead horse here but I just wanted to make sure I get this right because it feels like there’s a lot of declining prices in various inputs from commodities to transportation even energy, are you seeing any of your input costs actually declining yet?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes, we are. I mean we saw a meaningful decline here in Q3 from Q2 and we expect to see the, same thing in Q4.
Stephen Volkmann — Jefferies — Analyst
Okay, that makes sense. Thank you. And then just curious can you update us on where you are with the various divestitures, is there — usually be expecting more here, are you kind of ramping that back up or is it just kind of whenever it happens?
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
I think there is maybe one more potentially here in the near term and then we’ll have to assess the remainder and whether now is a good time to move forward with those. But I think our views haven’t changed in terms of the portfolio and the raw material that we need in order to continue to deliver the type of results that we’re delivering and so we have about a handful of businesses that we had flagged for potential divestiture, we just completed one, maybe one more to go and then the balance will kind of reassessed in the new year.
Stephen Volkmann — Jefferies — Analyst
Got it. Thank you.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Julian Mitchell from Barclays. Your line is open.
Julian Mitchell — Barclays — Analyst
Thanks very much and good morning. Maybe one element I just wanted to dial-in again was around sort of inventories and the cash flow outlook, so the conversion only around I think 80% now this year which is obviously some way below your very-high standards. I think, Michael, you were quite guarded as to the pace of when that cash-flow conversion comes back up, so maybe help us understand how you see inventories at the customer level, and the pace of your own inventory liquidation and how you’re thinking about capital spending within the cash flow?
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah I’ll maybe start on the first part with regard to inventory and that is that we haven’t seen enough stability yet on the supply chain side to make us comfortable that we can start backing off, so our first priority is to preserve our ability to serve our customers and so at this point we are still in the mode of keeping inventories where they are. As we start to see things become more let’s call it reliable and consistent there and then we’ll certainly start making a move but as of right now we have — we are not in the mood of — are in the mode of starting to reduce inventories.
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
So, yes, so it’s not a matter of whether or not we’re going to benefit from working capital coming back down to normal levels, that we are sure of we just don’t know when. And in the near term we’re absolutely committed to what Scott talked about which is intentional working capital. Including inventory to support double-digit growth and significant market share gains, so we’ll update you if and when that changes and then we’ll let you know what we think exactly how it might play out from a free cash flow standpoint.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
There’s a question on capex.
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Well, capex, I mean I think we’ve always funded every good project inside of the company including during the pandemic and I think that’s going to continue, we’re really fortunate that we are not a capital-intensive business not we’re fairly asset-light business model as Scott described earlier and so and maybe less than 2% of sales, capex doesn’t suck up a significant amount of our total cash-flow. So we’re very comfortable with continuing to invest in the business as we have done for many years including throughout the pandemic.
Julian Mitchell — Barclays — Analyst
Thank you and then just my follow-up would be on the demand outlook in test and measurement and electronics, very good growth there in Q3. There’s obviously a lot of noise, different customers on electronics in particular within that division but you’re still putting up mid-teens organic growth. So maybe sort of help us understand some of the exposures in that piece and do you think this strong growth is sustainable again given what’s going on in terms of a lot of customers in consumer electronics, semiconductor equipment, semiconductor devices, how you’re managing to grow at this rate?
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Well, yeah, so we think that the growth is sustainable, we’ve not seen anything to suggest that it’s slowing down, we’re obviously a big beneficiary from all the growth on the semi side of things. But also on the capex side with our Instron business which I think you’re familiar with, we’re seeing double-digit growth. And then so everybody — electronics business, I think it’s a little bit different. I think when I just look at the businesses in there including electronic assembly, contamination control, the pressure-sensitive adhesives adhesives, we’re still showing really solid double-digit growth. North-America up 18%, international up 16%. So there’s still some supply-chain issues but I think the team has done a great job staying on top of those and gaining share, so we feel very good about the outlook for the test and measurement, and electronics business.
Julian Mitchell — Barclays — Analyst
Great. Thank you.
Operator
Your next question comes from the line of Mig Dobre from Baird. Your line is open.
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
Yesah, thank you, good morning, everyone. Michael, just just wanted to go back to make sure I have this correct. The implied fourth quarter guidance, you said it was going to be down sequentially relative to Q3, can you be a little more specific as to what the midpoint implies? And then I’m kind of curious as we’re thinking about the year-over-year bridge relative to ’21, I mean last year in the fourth quarter we had a 200 basis-point hit from price-cost, this year, it seems like we’re going to be down positive, I’m sort of curious how we bridge that and then think about the incremental volume and also whatever is going on in terms of your internal initiatives that are flowing through.
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yeah. I don’t know Mig that I can tell you something I didn’t say already. I think if you take our full-year guidance and the fourth quarter kind of implied, as we said, organic growth of about 10% solid incrementals. In our normal range maybe a little bit higher than that. Operating margins improved more than 100 basis-points, on a year-over-year basis, we would expect another 100 basis points from enterprise initiatives. Price-cost goes from negative to slightly positive from a margin standpoint and also positive accretive to income as I said. So those are kind of the high-level view on the the fourth quarter and again we’re not as — we’ve adjusted our run rates on the top-line which is a little bit different than in prior years, we are just wanting to be a little conservative hopefully and account for some of the softness we’re seeing in about 20% of the company but also incorporate our strength in the businesses that we talked about including auto, food equipment, test and measurement, welding, and so that’s — that’s maybe those are kind of the key elements of the fourth quarter.
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
No. I appreciate that. I ask because I’m also not very good at math, you know, as I’m kind of looking at your guidance here, to me, it looks like you raised your revenue by call it $300 million, you reduced your operating income margin by 50 bps, that’s more or less neutral to operating income, EPS came down $0.15 on a core basis, so I’m trying to understand that there’s something below-the-line that going on here that we don’t have full appreciation for it.
Michael M. Larsen — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No, I think I’ve said this earlier Mig, the reason why we’re taking the EPS number down is incremental foreign currency headwind by incorporating current foreign-exchange rates the growth is due, so that’s what’s accounting for the EPS adjustment.
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
All right, well, I’ll leave it there, thank you.
Operator
And your final question comes from the line of David Raso from Evercore ISI. Your line is open.
David Raso — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Hi, thank you. You mentioned earlier your capital spending businesses are not yet seeing a slowdown, I assume we’re getting close enough to where you’ve had some conversations with those customers about their ’23 planning. Are you getting capital budgets for ’23, they’re also very supportive of solid growth or is that very much a 90 day type comment, even though you would think capital-intensive businesses must give you better visibility then a quarter at a time.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yeah [indecipherable] we don’t — it’s a little early in the planning cycle for us in terms of ’23, number one. Number two, I would say given our sort of traditional delivery and lead times which are relatively short, we don’t get a lot of forward visibility even in our capex businesses. So, regardless of what anybody has to say in terms of their outlook for the year and that’s going to certainly be a number that’s going to move around in our sort of core operating MO is that we’re going to produce what based on what orders we’re getting today, we’re not going to sort buy then the forecast on their how optimistic or pessimistic and we have the flexibility in our systems to do that, so. I don’t have a lot of forward — we don’t — through coming back to our businesses and our customers we don’t have a lot of input. In terms of strong points of view one-way or the other at this point.
David Raso — Evercore ISI — Analyst
I appreciate that and I have a quick follow-up on the M&A environment, the divestiture obviously a nice gain there, can you just give us an update on how you’re looking at further divestitures and M&A versus obviously you’ve bumped up the share repo.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Yes. I think I said earlier, one, more potential divestiture that we’re working through. And then we have three that are kind of in the pipeline that we’re going to spend a bit more time on next year and determining whether now is the best time to sell those businesses, they’re all performing at a high-level significantly better than obviously pre enterprise strategy and so it’s just a matter of timing on those divestitures. On the other side of this, we talked about the M&A pipeline and most of these calls. I mean, nothing has really changed. I mean I think to the extent we find acquisitions that are a good fit for us strategically, which really means that they can grow at 4% to 5% organically over a sustained period of time, we have significant margin improvement through the implementation of the business model and we can — and the valuation is reasonable in the sense that we can generate a rate-of-return that makes sense for the company then just like we did with MTS when those opportunities come along we are definitely going to lean-in. And I think we’ve called our posture kind of aggressively opportunistic, so when those come along, we don’t have a lot of those but when we do see them, we’re definitely going to lean in hard just like we did with MTS. And there’s nothing in the pipeline here in the near-term. It’s what I can offer. So —
David Raso — Evercore ISI — Analyst
That’s helpful. Thank you very much.
Ernest Scott Santi — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
All right. Thanks, David.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]