LyondellBasell Industries NV (LYB) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

LyondellBasell Industries NV (NYSE: LYB) Q4 2025 Earnings Call dated Jan. 30, 2026

Corporate Participants:

David Kinney — Head of Investor Relations

Peter Z. Vanacker — CEO & Executive Director

Agustin Izquierdo — Executive VP & CFO

Kimberly Foley — Executive Vice President of Global Olefins & Polyolefins

Aaron Ledet — Executive Vice President of Intermediates & Derivatives and Supply Chain

Torkel Rhenman — Executive Vice President of Advanced Polymer Solutions

Analysts:

David Begleiter — Analyst

Frank Mitsch — Analyst

Alex — Analyst

Jeff Zekauskas — Analyst

Matthew Blair — Analyst

Vincent Andrews — Analyst

Kevin McCarthy — Analyst

Aleksey Yefremov — Analyst

Michael Sison — Analyst

Joshua Spector — Analyst

Hassan Ahmed — Analyst

Presentation:

operator

It’s. Sam. Sa. Hello and welcome to the Lyondale Bissell Teleconference. At the request of Lyondale Bissell, this conference is being recorded for instant replay purposes. Following today’s presentation, we will conduct a question and answer session. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. David Kinney, head of Investor Relations. Sir, you may begin.

David Kinney — Head of Investor Relations

Thank you Operator before we begin the discussion, I would like to point out that a slide presentation accompanies today’s call and is available on our website@investors.lyondellbaselle.com today we will be discussing our business results while making reference to some forward looking statements and non GAAP financial measures. We believe the forward looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions and the alternative measures are useful to investors. Nonetheless, the forward looking statements are subject to significant risk and uncertainty. We encourage you to learn more about the factors that could lead our actual results to differ by reviewing the cautionary statements in the presentation slides and our regulatory filings which are also available on our Investor Relations website.

Comments made on this call will be in regard to our underlying business results using non GAAP financial measures such as EBITDA and earnings per share excluding identified items. Additional documents on our investor website provide reconciliations of non GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures together with other disclosures including the earnings release and our business results discussion. A recording of this call will be available by Telephone beginning at 1:00pm Eastern Time today until March 2nd by calling 877-660-6853 in the United States and 201-612-7415 outside the United States. The access code for both numbers is 137-462-15. Joining today’s call will be Peter Vanicker, Lyondele Pacell’s Chief Executive Officer our CFO Augustin Ezchierdo, Kim Foley, our Executive Vice President of Global Olefins and Polyolefins Aaron Laday, our EVP of Intermediates and Derivatives and Torko Runman, our EVP of Advanced Polymer Solutions.

During today’s call we will focus on fourth quarter and full year 2025 results and progress on our strategic initiatives. We will also discuss current market dynamics and our near term outlook. With that being said, I would now like to turn the call over to Peter.

Peter Z. Vanacker — CEO & Executive Director

Thank you Dave and welcome to all of you. We appreciate you joining us today as we discuss our fourth quarter and full year 2025 results. I am proud of our people and how they continue to navigate the cycle in 2025 while maintaining focus on our long term strategy. Despite some of the most challenging market conditions I have seen in my career, the team delivered exceptional results in our cash improvement plan while keeping safe and reliable operations at the center of everything we do. So with that in mind, let’s begin as we always do, with our safety results.

On slide 3, Leinder Basel delivered exceptional safety performance in 2025. Our total recordable incident rate reached a historic low, slightly surpassing even our record setting performance in 2022, making 2025 the safest year in our company’s history. These results are especially meaningful given the significant volume of maintenance and turnaround activity we executed across our sites in 2025 in Europe and US. Despite this elevated activity, our teams demonstrated operational excellence and an unwavering commitment to safety. Even under challenging conditions, safety remains our top priority. This consistent industry leading safety performance reflects the discipline and care our employees and contractors bring to every aspect of our operations.

I want to thank everyone across the organization for their dedication in keeping our colleagues and communities safe. Now let’s turn to Slide 4 as we navigate one of, if not the longest downturn in our industry. Leyndell Basel continues to execute on our three pillar strategy in a way that creates and protects value even when this means adjusting to the timing for implementing our plans. In our first strategic pillar, we continue to grow and upgrade the core. In 2025, we prioritized safe and reliable operations. We advanced our portfolio transformation with material progress on the divestment of four European assets which is on track for completion in the second quarter of 2026.

We also moved forward on strengthening our cost advantage position in the Middle east with a new allocation for cost advantaged feedstocks in Saudi Arabia. In our second pillar, we’re building a profitable circular and low carbon solutions business. Construction on Moratec One is progressing well and is on track for a 2027 startup. We’re also advocating for for supportive policy frameworks which will enable the successful and profitable transformation of our industry. While we executed on low cost and no cost energy efficiency initiatives across our sites, in our third pillar, we’re stepping up performance and culture. Our team is laser focused on value and cash generation.

I’m pleased to report that the Value Enhancement Program exceeded our original Target and achieved $1.1 billion of recurring annual EBITDA in 2025. This program has been a critical enabler of our cash improvements and cost discipline efforts, helping offset inflation, improve reliability and fund profitable growth. Building on this momentum, we are extending the Value Enhancement Program to and targeting $1.5 billion of recurring annual EBITDA by 2028. Importantly, these recurring earnings are based on mid cycle margins and operating rates. We expect the benefits of the Value Enhancement Program will become more prominent once volumes and margins recover from this prolonged downturn.

Given the current market environment, we have focused our investments on the immediately profitable projects aligned with our long term commitments and we are reviewing the timing of achieving certain 2030 sustainability goals. We have also materially reduced our capital expenditure plans for circular solutions and prioritized markets that provide supportive regulation and resilient proven demand, such as Europe. We will update the market on our progress over the coming months, including the April publication of our 2025 sustainability report. Even as we accelerate select initiatives and adapt the timing of others, our strategic priorities remain intact. Our disciplined execution positions us to capture substantial value once the cycle turns and remained confident in our ability to deliver sustainable growth for our stakeholders.

Let’s turn to slide 5 and take a moment to reflect on where LYB and the industry or in the current cycle. 2025 was another exceptionally challenging year with industry margins remaining deeply depressed. Across all of our core businesses, industry margins were approximately 45% below historical averages, even worse than the already difficult conditions we saw in 2024. In North America, polyolefins margins reached their lowest levels in more than a decade. This margin erosion has weighed heavily on LYB and the entire sector. Several factors are pressuring margins. These include global trade disruptions, low demand for durable goods, a lower oil to gas ratio, ongoing global capacity additions and in Europe, increased competition from imports and structurally higher energy costs.

Even under these conditions, Leydel Brazil continues to generate positive free cash flow at the bottom of the cycle. While the environment remains tough, the market is responding with an increasing rate of capacity rationalization which is accelerating the rebalancing of supply and demand. Once margins begin to normalize, LYB is well positioned to capture significant upside, supported by our low cost positions, world class technologies and a disciplined approach to generating value and cash. Let’s now turn to slide 6 to discuss our 2025 full year highlights. Despite this backdrop of weak margins, our teams remained disciplined and focused on the actions within our control.

We generated $2.3 billion of cash from operations during the year. This performance reflects strong working capital, discipline, focused cost management and our ability to operate safely and reliably through a prolonged industry downturn. Our excellent cash conversion ratio of 95% illustrates the resilience of our operating model and the additional focus provided by the cash improvement plan. Even in an environment of compressed spreads, full year earnings were $1.70 per diluted share and EBITDA total $2.5 billion. Throughout the year, we remain focused on maintaining financial flexibility, prioritizing safe and reliable operations and low cost investments in VEP projects while preserving the ability to pursue selective investments in high value growth once cash flows improve.

And we will continue to maintain strong capital discipline to ensure we’re making the right decisions for the long term strength of our company and all stakeholders. Now with that, I’ll turn it over to Augustin to walk through our 2025 achievements in the Cash Improvement Plan.

Agustin Izquierdo — Executive VP & CFO

Absolutely, Peter, and good morning again everyone. Let’s Continue with Slide 7. Our disciplined execution throughout 2025 enabled us to surpass our initial targets for the Cash Improvement Plan. We set a goal to conserve $600 million of cash relative to our 2025 plan, and we exceeded that goal by roughly $200 million to achieve $800 million. This outperformance was driven by a $400 million reduction in working capital relative to our 2025 plan. We also reduced our global workforce by 7%, or approximately 1,350 employees, to the lowest levels the company has seen since 2018. Capital spending remained disciplined as we took advantage of opportunities to realign project schedules across the portfolio.

While we achieved our capital reduction goals on an accrued basis, cash realization lagged due to the timing of payments. Our teams executed on these priorities while maintaining focus on safe and reliable operations, reinforcing the culture of value creation we have been building over the past several years. Looking ahead, we expect to deliver an additional $500 million of incremental cash in 2026 relative to 2025 actuals. This increases the cumulative target for our cash improvement plan from $1.1 billion to $1.3 billion through the end of 2026. We are not considering any potential benefits from our European asset sale in these numbers.

This higher target reflects not only the strong progress we delivered in 2025, but also cost efficiencies we expect to achieve in 2026 and the lower capital expenditure plans which we have already announced. These efforts strengthen our ability to generate cash through the bottom of the cycle while protecting our financial flexibility and liquidity. Moving on to slide 8, I will review the details of our capital allocation. Maintaining an investment grade balance sheet remains foundational to our capital allocation strategy. During 2025, we generated $2.3 billion from operating activities supported by strong working capital execution, which released over $1 billion in working capital during the fourth quarter alone.

This strong performance enabled us to sustain excellent cash conversion even at the bottom of the cycle. We also took proactive steps to preserve liquidity, including issuing $1.5 billion in bonds to help address 2026 and 2027 maturities. As a result, we ended the year with $3.4 billion of cash and short term investments and $8.1 billion of available liquidity. Throughout the year, we prioritized safe and reliable operations while advancing strategic growth projects like More Tech one and Low to no Cost projects in the Value Enhancement Program while appropriately realigning other growth investments in response to current market conditions.

As markets recover, we will be ready to advance an attractive portfolio of opportunities including Flex 2 to balance olefin production, Mortech 2 to expand our circularity capabilities at the former Houston Refinery site and cost advantaged investments in the Middle East. In addition, the positive impact from completed VEP projects is expected to grow once sector margins and operating rates recover and we continue to provide cash returns to shareholders returning $2 billion in the form of dividends and share repurchases during 2025. Our capital allocation strategy aims to preserve flexibility while positioning Lyondell Basel to unlock value as industry conditions improve on Slide 9 we highlight the cash performance from our business during 2025.

One of the strongest indicators of our resilience is our ability to consistently generate cash from operations even at the bottom of the cycle. In 2025, Lionel Basel delivered $2.3 billion of cash from operating activities. Our cash conversion ratio remained exceptionally strong at 95%, well above our long term target of 80%. We achieved this level of conversion through strong cost control across all segments, tightly managing receivables and inventories while facing maintenance where appropriate to help ensure that earnings efficiently translated into cash even with lower operating rates. This consistent cash performance positions us well to fund essential investments in maintenance and advance critical projects while remaining ready to accelerate strategic value creation once margin begins to recover.

Now let’s turn to Slide 10 for an overview of our fourth quarter segment results. In total, our business delivered $417 million of EBITDA during the fourth quarter. Across most segments, we saw the typical year end seasonal pressure on volumes coupled with elevated costs for feedstocks and energy maintenance. Downtime contributed to lower operating rates in both our US and European operations. Oxyfuels performance softened sequentially as margins trended downward from unusually strong levels toward the end of the third quarter once industry outages eased and gasoline blend stock premiums normalized to typical winter levels. The fourth quarter included identified items of $61 million net of tax primarily associated with closure costs for the Dutch joint venture and the APS specialty powders business across the portfolio non cash LIFO inventory valuation charges reduced fourth quarter results.

These charges were partially offset by a reduction in bonus compensation accruals that benefited fourth quarter results. The net amount was quarterly impact of $52 million. As a reminder, our fourth quarter LIFO changes reflect movements in inventory valuation over the full year and are not necessarily linked to fourth quarter valuations. Before we review our segment level results in detail, let me discuss our capital expenditure plans for 2026. As we’ve previously announced, we are deferring some growth investments until later in the decade. Given the difficult operating environment for 2026, we expect our CapEx will be approximately $1.2 billion.

Our 2026 capital plan includes approximately $400 million for profitable growth and 8,800 million dollars of sustaining investments. The reduced capital plan prioritizes safe and reliable operations and the ongoing construction of Mortech 1. We expect our 2026 effective tax rate will be approximately 10% with a cash tax rate approximately 10 percentage points higher than the effective tax rate. We have provided additional 2026 modeling information in the appendix to this slide deck describing the expected impacts from major maintenance and other useful financial with that overview, I will turn the call over to Kim.

Kimberly Foley — Executive Vice President of Global Olefins & Polyolefins

Thank you, Augustine. Let’s move to slide 11 and discuss the performance of the Olefins and Polyolefins Americas segment. Fourth quarter EBITDA for the segment was $164 million down from the prior quarter. The sequential decline was primarily driven by higher feedstock costs and lower polyethylene margins as well as planned and unplanned maintenance across several sites. In olefins, ethylene margins weakened as ethane and natural gas prices increased, coupled with lower ethylene and propylene prices in polyethylene. Planned and unplanned maintenance across several facilities and seasonally lower domestic demand contributed to lower volumes and pressured margins. Sequentially, industry Inventories fell roughly three days or 500 million pounds as customers continued to draw down stocks ahead of year end.

Polypropylene continues to face challenges with subdued demand and weak margins during the quarter. We successfully completed the turnaround at our Matagorda polyethylene plant and implemented reliability improvements at our Hyperzone plant. These actions strengthened our asset performance and position us to capture value as demand returns. Our fourth quarter operating rate for the segment was approximately 75% with our crackers operating at approximately 90% during the first quarter. We expect tight year end inventories, reduced supply due to winter storm burn and stronger seasonal demand will all be supportive of our polyethylene price increase initiatives in the market. We expect to operate our O and P Americas assets at an average rate of approximately 85% in line with demand.

Now let’s turn to slide 12 and review the performance of our Olefins and Polyolefins Europe, Asia and international segment. Fourth quarter EBITDA was a loss of $61 million. Seasonally lower prices and higher levels of planned and unplanned maintenance pressured profitability in Olefins volumes were significantly impacted by weaker demand year end inventory control measures and maintenance events at several of our sites. Polyolefins markets in Europe continue to face soft demand driven by increased competition from low cost imports and ongoing destocking across the value chain. As a result, polyolefin margins remain under significant pressure and volumes were seasonally lowered in the fourth quarter.

We proactively aligned our inventories with market demand through targeted rate reductions. These actions helped reduce our working capital and generated positive cash flow from the segment. Even in a highly challenging environment, our teams executed safely and deliberately to provide a reliable supply of product for our customers while supporting our balance sheet. We continue to make steady progress on the planned divestiture of our four European assets. Regulatory reviews, work council consultations and transition plans are all advancing as expected and we remain on track to complete the transaction in the second quarter of 2026. This is a significant milestone in reshaping the regional footprint of our global OMP portfolio as we move into 2026.

Our ONP EAIAI segment has no major turnarounds scheduled for the coming year and expect improved volumes with lower maintenance activities. We expect to operate our European assets at a rate of 75% during the first quarter. With that, I will turn it over to Aaron.

Aaron Ledet — Executive Vice President of Intermediates & Derivatives and Supply Chain

Thank you Kim. Please turn to Slide 13 as we take a look at our Intermediates and Derivatives segment. Fourth quarter EBITDA was $205 million. The typical seasonal decline in oxyfuels margins was delayed due to planned and unplanned industry outages that tightened supply early in the quarter and supported stronger blend premiums. Additionally, propylene glycol demand improved due to aircraft de icing demand, while acetyls results were negatively impacted by the turnaround during the quarter. The team completed the turnaround at our Laporte Acetyls unit. This turnaround included key initiatives to begin converting our vinyl acetate monomer production to an innovative LYB catalyst system that improves margins and helps reduce our reliance on costly precious metal catalysts the turnaround was completed on time, but we kept the asset down longer to help manage inventory levels.

We began the startup process in early January and the asset has come back down due to cold weather. We expect the January downtime to impact first quarter EBITDA by approximately $20 million as seen in the modeling information in the appendix to our slides to align with maintenance and softer year end demand, we operated our IND assets at a rate of approximately 75% during the fourth quarter. As we begin the first quarter, we expect to see positive trends in our pond business with additional glycol sales into the de icing market and capacity rationalizations and in both Europe and the United States improving LYB’s market share.

Acetyls volumes are expected to improve following the fourth quarter Laporte turnaround and OxyFuels profitability should exhibit typical seasonal margin improvements towards the end of the quarter. Our plan is to operate our assets at approximately 85% during the quarter. With that, I will now turn the call over to Torkel.

Torkel Rhenman — Executive Vice President of Advanced Polymer Solutions

Thank you Aaron. Now let’s review the results of our Advanced Polymer Solutions segment on slide 14. Fourth quarter EBITDA was $38 million. APS volumes were lower due to typical. Fourth quarter seasonal demand patterns, including softer automotive production across all regions. Even with a softer backdrop, year over. Year, APS delivered 55% higher EBITDA along with substantial improvement in cash generation, reflecting meaningful progress in in our commercial execution and cost discipline. I’m extremely proud of the progress the. APS team is achieving in our transformation. Throughout 2025 we delivered substantial operational and financial improvements, drove exceptional fixed cost discipline. And strengthened customer centricity despite a challenging market. Looking ahead, we expect seasonal demand improvement across our key markets and and we will continue to regain market share with our renewed focus on customer centricity, reliable. Service and differentiated solutions. With that, I will return the call to Peter.

Peter Z. Vanacker — CEO & Executive Director

Thanks Torkel. I agree with you. The APS team is doing excellent work in managing their business turnaround despite all the market challenges to close out on the segments. Let’s turn to slide 15 and discuss the result for our technology business on behalf of Jim Stewart. During the fourth quarter, the segment delivered solid results, catalyst demand strengthened across key regions and revenue increased as a higher number of previously sold licenses reached revenue recognition milestones. Together, these factors contributed to segment EBITDA of $80 million in the quarter. Looking ahead, we expect first quarter results for the technology segment to trend lower, potentially approaching levels seen in the second quarter of 2025.

While we anticipate a typical seasonal Uplift in catalyst sales licensing revenue is expected to decline as fewer revenue milestones are expected in the quarter. The substantially lower demand for licenses is an indication of the ongoing trend of of reduced global investment in petrochemical capacity additions at the bottom of the cycle. Now let’s turn to Slide 16 for our near term market outlook. Following pronounced fourth quarter seasonality, we expect modest improvements as we move through the first quarter and we’re likely to consume some working capital as normal. In North America, we expect typical seasonal demand recovery.

Additionally, our polyethylene price increase initiatives are supported by low industry inventories while exports continue to play an essential role in balancing markets. In Europe, demand should also seasonally improve, although the impact of imports into the region continue to pressure pricing supportive regulatory frameworks for circularity along with the continued asset rationalizations in the region remain a helpful tailwind over the medium term. In Asia, near term capacity additions continue to weigh on margins while medium term rationalization announcements or an encouraging trend that should eventually help to balance global supply. In the packaging sector, demand remains stable and driven by essentials.

Consumer continue to be value focused and we’re seeing a sustained shift toward private labor brands across both North America and Europe. In building and construction, sentiment remains cautious. Low interest rates should provide some support, but we expect the environment to remain soft in the near term. In the automotive sector, North America continues to reflect challenged affordability dynamics even as interest rates decline. While Europe is showing signs of stabilization for Oxy fuels, geopolitical uncertainty is expected to keep markets volatile. We continue to monitor supply developments closely. Overall, while macro conditions remain mixed, we expect modest sequential improvement from the seasonal lows of the fourth quarter.

Our teams remain focused on execution, cost discipline and value driven growth as markets gradually strengthen. Even in this challenging environment, I’m confident that LYB continues to be well positioned and I’m proud of how our team continues to execute with discipline. Now with that, we’re pleased to take your questions.

Questions and Answers:

operator

Thank you. At this time we’ll begin the question and answer session. As a reminder, if you’d like to ask a question, please press the star followed by one on your touchtone phone. If you’d like to withdraw your question, please press the star followed by the two. We do ask you to limit to one question. Our first question comes from the line of David Begleiter with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question.

David Begleiter

Thank you. Good morning, Peter. Just on the dividend, your yield is twice that of your closest peer. You trade at a full turn multiple. Discount on EBITDA to that peer so investors aren’t really giving you credit for the higher yield, but. So why not just cut the dividend, invest that cash into your project pipeline? Because investors do pay for growth and move on from there.

Peter Z. Vanacker

Thank you. Thanks, David. Of course, I mean, that’s the core question. Very good question. I mean, to start with. Well, you have seen what we have accomplished during the year 2025. Yes, they’re very difficult market environments, but the team delivered cash from ops of 2.3 billion. In such a market environment, we overperformed on our cash improvement plan, $800 million. Give you a couple of data points. We’re running the entire company at the end of 2025 with 18,700 people. That’s a very lean organization that we have. And that’s 1350 people less than at the end of 2025, 2024.

That doesn’t mean, I mean, that we don’t continue to work on that as we announced also that we will continue to focus on our cash improvement plan during 2026 with a target of an additional $500 million. Of course, all that in the context of navigating the cycle. Needless to say, we said it multiple times that our investment grade balance sheet is the foundation of our capital allocation strategy. And of course, when we are focusing on our cash improvement plan, we will continue to prioritize, I mean, safe and reliable operations. I said it in the prepared remarks.

This has been the safest year 2025, I mean, at Line Del Basel. So it’s clear evidence that we prioritize safe and reliable operations, continue to work also on our value enhancement program. But we focus on projects that have a no cost or low costs and immediate return on investments. It’s clear that at the bottom of the cycle, we are evaluating the balance between cash returns to shareholders and growth investments, as you alluded to. And that in the context of a lower cash generation. And of course, also considering the metrics that are required for an investment grade balance sheet, you know, that we have delayed, I mean, certain Growth Investments, Flex 2, Moratec 2, some other smaller growth initiatives.

We continue to work on the projects that we have in Saudi Arabia, where we continue to get, I mean, quite a lot of support from the local authorities. And definitely also the last thing that I want to say to that is we have, of course, regular, robust conversations on our capital allocation strategy with our boards and decisions on whether we recalibrate the dividend to maintain our investment grade metrics. They are decided by our boards and they are regularly being reviewed during our scheduled Board meetings and the next one will take place in February.

operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from line of Patrick Cunningham Wissity. Please proceed with your question.

Alex

Hi, this is Alex on Fort Patrick. I had a question on your CapEx guide for 26. You’re guiding about 1.2 billion. Now, historically Lando was around somewhere between 2 billion. So I’m just wondering if the reduced CapEx guide is a function of just the recent asset sales or if there’s a change in your maintenance capex or if the new 800 million or on maintenance is the new normal baseline for Linedel. If you could help us understand your CapEx outlook for 26 and maybe the years beyond that, that’ll be helpful. Thank you. Yeah.

Peter Z. Vanacker

Let me start with your question, Patrick. Thank you for your question. Indeed. I mean 1.2 billion 2026 is the CapEx that we have communicated that we are planning and out of that, I mean 0.8 billion in maintenance. Let me put that a little bit into the context. We’ve been investing in our company in growth in reliability, in productivity, also through our value enhancement program, but also big investments like our POTBA facility that run above nameplate capacity, as you know, very successfully above depreciation during the last years. So we have invested in growth also Last year cash CAPEX 1.9 billion accrued.

CAPEX 1.7 billion is well above, I mean our depreciation level. So also here in 2025, I mean, we have continued to invest in growth, reliability, safety and productivity. So in that context, when we revisited our plan for 2026, we came to the conclusion that in 2026 we can actually postpone a couple of turnarounds because of all the work that we have done already in 24 and 25. We could of course also limit the maintenance CapEx safety and maintenance CapEx for 26, I mean to that 800 million. And then the delta is a couple of the growth projects.

But of course, important in that is our continued progress that we have on the MRT1 investment in Cologne. Anything you want to add, Augustine?

Agustin Izquierdo

Peter, that was a very comprehensive answer. I would say just, Alex, that the other point is this is also a fairly light year in terms of turnaround. We only have the turnaround in the Midwest plant. Then we have also smaller one for ind. And as Peter alluded, we have been very diligent on managing our maintenance CapEx and this time that’s why we can achieve now this 800 on 800 million for maintenance CapEx. And as he mentioned, 400 for growth projects.

Peter Z. Vanacker

But just to be clear, I mean, normally, I mean, we have turnarounds, I’d say in the environment of 3 to 4 per year. So we only will have, I mean, 2 in 2026. It doesn’t mean that you can take, I mean, 800 million safety and maintenance capex and extrapolate that for the foreseeable future. You know, that we have 1.2 billion in the past in safety and maintenance capex. Once we have fully executed our European assessments, we expect that number to go down to something around, let’s say 1.1 billion. But you can always steer it a little bit, I mean, from one year to the other, just like we do in the cash improvement Plan then for 2026 with the $800 million.

operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Frank Mitch with Fermium Research. Please proceed with your question.

Frank Mitsch

Good morning and thank you. So you shut down the Houston refinery a year ago and some may argue that things have changed with respect to the outlook in the midterm. You know, given the events at the beginning of this year in terms of Venezuela and as you know, that Houston refinery was perfect for running ven crude. I’m curious as to what your thoughts are. Obviously this was something that you were looking at possibly doing with more tech, et cetera, but given that it’s only been shut down a year, what might be the possibility that Lyondell would look to monetize that asset should some of the refiners look at, hey, if ven crude becomes more plentiful down the line, that asset could be rather valuable.

What are your thoughts there?

Peter Z. Vanacker

Hey, Frank, nice to meet you. Again, a good question. I mean, on the refinery in the context of what happened in Venezuela. I mean, our plan with the refinery continues to be, as we explained before, of course, we look at, in the context of the cash improvement plan, you know, that we have delayed, I mean, the investment in MRT2. One thing that I want to highlight as well. Remember, I mean, when we decided to shut down the refinery, we avoided capex of, I would easily say, I mean, one and a half billion, because we hadn’t done turnarounds anymore on the refinery since what, about eight years in total.

So in order to continue to run the refinery at that time, we would have had to take the decision, of course, to do that turnaround, which would have been quite costly, of course. I mean, the old refinery is not the only one in the United States that can take that kind of crude quality from Venezuela. There is quite a lot of refineries that can take that crude. So our plan, I mean, continues to be, as we have explained, I mean, transform, I mean, the refinery in the context, of course, from a timeline perspective of the cash improvement plan.

And as such, I mean, we continue to remain very open in what we can do, I mean, with the existing assets that we have there.

operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jeff Zakauskas with JP Morgan. Please proceed with your question.

Jeff Zekauskas

Thanks very much. The balance sheet was managed very, very. Well at the end of 2025. With your receivables and inventories really coming down, do those need to be built back up in 2026? And what do you think your working capital benefit or use will be in 2026?

Peter Z. Vanacker

Hi, Jeff, good question. I’m gonna start with some comments and then hand over to Augustine. I heard you saying that was very well managed at the end of 2025. Thank you for your comments on that. But of course, I would like to point out that we managed it very well also during the last, I mean, four years. If you look at our cash conversion since 2022, we have been consistently above 90% and yes, I mean 95% in 2025. I think that’s fantastic work. You see the discipline in our organization, fantastic execution by our people. And it was not just, I mean, in Q4, again, in the cash improvement plan.

I alluded to that already before, partly because of our portfolio management, partly before, because of further streamlining our organizations, we reduced, I mean, our headcount by 1350, which is quite substantially, if you take that from a 20,000 number, approximately, it’s quite an accomplishment that has been delivered by our people. Working capital, also over revenue, if you look at it, and you exclude the revenue of the refinery that we had historically. So apples to apples, I mean, we’re a trade working capital running the entire company somewhere between over the year, between 12 and 13%, which also in my history, having worked in different companies is extremely low, especially if you also consider that we don’t do any factoring.

So with that, Augustine.

Agustin Izquierdo

Yeah, thank you, Peter, for the answer. Jeff. So you’re absolutely right. Actually, the working capital level on an absolute value is the lowest we’ve had since 2020. And again, I commend the teams, really, for the excellent work they did on managing working capital, especially here on the second half and most importantly during Q4. To your point, yes, we will have to rebuild some working capital as we go into 2026, but this has all been factored now into our cash improvement plan and allows us, we have enough offsets and initiatives in place to allow us to deliver the 1.3 billion cumulative in 25 and 26. But yes, you should see some moderate build as we go through the year.

In working capital terms and

Peter Z. Vanacker

you would not be surprised.Jeff. I mean just like what we said on the cash improvement plan, 600 million target for 2025 and we over delivered that 800 million. That means that the entire team is of course very, very much focused in also finding ways and how can we over deliver the $500 million in 2026. That’s the way how we work.

operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Vincent Andrews with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question.

Vincent Andrews

Thank you very much. I’m just wondering if you could give us your assessment of the oxy fuels market for 2026. I know 25 had some peculiarities with another competitor, asset startup or refinery startup, as well as maybe some volatility negative in the, in the oil market, but how would you assess your opportunity there in 26 versus 2025?

Peter Z. Vanacker

Two points. And I will hand over, I mean to Aaron, I mean first point, you’re right. I mean Vincent, it was quite volatile in 2026. But the second point I also want to make is that if you look at average, I mean margins and you compare them historically they were slightly above and you saw that in the one slide that we, that we showed. So with that Aaron.

Aaron Ledet

Yeah, thanks Peter. And thanks Vincent for the, for the question. I think the short summary is that we are expecting oxytools to normalize following a pretty volatile 2025. To your earlier comment with typical seasonal improvements during the summertime. We’re watching crude along the comments that you made as well. Just all the geopolitical unrest that we’ve seen here in the first quarter, we’ve seen a lot of volatility and crude itself, whether it’s Brent or WTI, is up $8 a barrel over the month. So obviously that’s going to impact our profitability. Looking, looking forward. We did start the year with pretty low inventories consistent across all of our businesses.

And with some of the freeze outages here in the US Gulf coast, it created a little bit of upward price movement. But demand does remain seasonally low here in the first quarter.

operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Blair with tph. Please proceed with your question.

Matthew Blair

Great. Thank you and good morning. Could you talk a little bit more about the polypropylene market? Is it safe to say that polypropylene. Is actually weaker than polyethylene due to higher exposure to areas like autos in construction. And over the next couple of years, are you more optimistic on recovery in polyethylene or polypropylene?

Peter Z. Vanacker

Thank you. Very good, Matthew. Good question. I mean clear, I mean polypropylene, if you look at the different sectors and applications that polypropylene go in, which is let’s say also for propylene oxide, a bit the same. It’s more, I mean dependent on demand in durable goods and how demand and durable goods is actually behaving if it is growing or not. Now let me go back a little bit in history. Everybody knows that in 2021, demand for durable goods after the pandemic 2020 was exceptionally high. And since then it has been quite weak, which is a quite long period that demand for durable goods has been weak.

In addition to that, I mean everybody sees and knows that the inflation rates are coming down, interest rates little by little, but they’re coming down. Yes. Consumer confidence is not yet up to the level that we would like to see. But if that leads them into consumer confidence also moving up, then one may expect that both for polypropylene and propylene oxide, that demand would also recover with that. Let me hand over to Kim.

Kimberly Foley

Yeah, Peter’s alluded to the demand side of the equation. I’ll just make a couple of comments about the supply side. You know, we’ve mentioned in other calls and I’m sure you’ve heard from others, the polypropylene cost curve globally is pretty flat. So, so most players don’t export. I say most. For example, North America doesn’t export polypropylene, but the Middle east and China, because China is so heavily oversupplied in polypropylene they are exporting. And what you are seeing in the margin charts and the slides that we showed today is just that we believe polypropylene is at the bottom based on the combination of oversupply and the demand factors that Peter alluded to.

So as Peter alluded as demand would come back and as people are rationalizing, it could have to your question about which may bounce more, it may bounce higher initially

Peter Z. Vanacker

and you see quite some. Activities also going on in consolidation rationalization, not just amino of crackers, but of course also linked to that polypropylene and I would even say probably more heavy weighted to polypropylene today than it is to polyethylene.

Kimberly Foley

Agree.

operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Kevin McCarthy with vertical research Partners, please proceed with your question.

Kevin McCarthy

Yes, thank you and good morning. I’d appreciate your updated thoughts on the US Gulf coast market for polyethylene. So maybe for Kim, I would love your thoughts on kind of the contract. Pricing opportunity as you see it. I know some of the consultants are inclined to give pretty good credit for price realizations. Maybe you could talk through what you would anticipate on a gross basis and also net of any changes in annual contract discounts this time of year. February pricing that may be on the table. And then maybe on the other side of the coin, ethane feed has been. Quite volatile on the back of natural gas. So would love your thoughts on how you see that flowing through on a unit margin basis.

Kimberly Foley

Okay, Kevin, lots of moving parts in that question and let me just kind of talk through how I think about it. So if you think about the ACC data that many of us look at on the inventory side, you know, second quarter of 25 probably was one of the high points. With the 44 days right after liberation, you saw the industry kind of lower inventories in third quarter to 43 and a half. Now, while we don’t have December data yet, November data shows for the fourth quarter down to 40. So big pull in the fourth quarter.

I would anticipate December probably even took that lower. So you’re coming into the year on very, very low inventories in the industry. Number two, you had higher pricing in the fourth quarter. So on the upstream side, you had ethane that was higher, you had natural gas that was higher. So people were not making the profitability that they wanted to in the fourth quarter. Now here comes winter Storm Fernando, and you’ve seen the variability in ethane and natural gas price and you’ve seen industry producers like ourselves proactively take down derivative units through the storm. Now, that enabled a knees or seamless restart, but nonetheless it took even more capacity off short term.

So inventory or available inventory is very scarce. You also see export pricing increasing as we enter into the January time frame. And you’re now starting to see downstream converters announcing price increases. So I think when you put all those factors together, the price initiatives that are out in the market today are very supported.

Peter Z. Vanacker

Yeah, good answer, Kim. I mean, so you can clearly hear, I mean that we are seeing lots of indicators that are supporting, I mean, our announced price increases and we expect that integrated margins as a consequence should go up. I mean, demand has been very robust.

operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Alexei Yefremov with Cuban Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Aleksey Yefremov

Thank you. Good morning. You have a good window into China. And the local policy. What’s your latest thinking in terms of anti involution policies? Will it have any more specific news maybe in the next few quarters there? And has you thinking changed at all over the last three months?

Peter Z. Vanacker

Thank you, Alexei. It’s a good question. I mean on China, I mean a couple of points that I want to make, I mean we’ve seen, I mean in China that there has been also some price increases on a modest level, but there has been some price increases in January and that probably also has to do, I mean with the fact, I mean that there was some inventory depletion and growth, I mean continue to be at around a 4% level for polyolefins. When we look at the anti involution and with our people that we have on the ground and all the relationships that we have in our technology business units, there is a lot of movement, there is a lot of discussion and we’re waiting to see, of course what the decision will be.

But we believe, I mean that because of all the discussions that are happening, that there is a very diligent and very serious evaluation that is going on by the ndrc. So we expect that something will come out. Will it be in Q2? Remains to be seen. But I mean there is lots of pressure, I mean behind it and we hear, I mean for example criteria for asset rationalizations, not at 300kt for a cracker, but 500kt, these kind of discussions. Another thing I want to point to is you see some other policies that are being put in place.

Like we heard, I mean from a new NAFTA consumption tax that is being put in place, not small, I mean for merge and domestic transactions, $300 per ton, yes, refundable, but it would have to be paid first of all up front, which means, I mean cash flow and especially if you have non integrated players, non integrated Italy and cracker capacity in China is about 11 million tons, remember that. So that’s not, it’s not small. They would have to then pay upfront, I mean that new NAFTA consumption tax. So what I want to say is there is a lot happening, I mean in China that all points in the same direction and that is making sure that there is also rationalization going on in that market.

I’ve had another look, I mean also at the numbers that we presented on a global basis in terms of capacity rationalization. Remember the slide that we showed during the third quarter Earnings results. At that time, we talked about a little bit more than 21 million tons of Italian capacity rationalization and that did not include the anti involution. When we look at the further announcements here and there news on the ground, we’re now looking more at a bit more than 23 million tons of capacity rationalization. Again, Italian capacity rationalization. And still that does not include Amy the antin volution.

operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mike Sisson with Wells Fargo. Please proceed with your question.

Michael Sison

Hey, good morning guys. In OP Americas, how much of that capacity do you export? And you know, export margins have been noticeably kind of zippo or very low relative to domestic, you know, what do. You think needs to happen to get. That part of the those margins up over time? And you know, should you reduce your exposure to export given, you know, it’s, it seems like it’s more structurally impaired than the domestic profitability.

Peter Z. Vanacker

But Mike, historically, I mean, we always had, I mean, lesser exports. If you look, I mean, because your question mainly goes, I assume, I mean to polyethylene, we always had lesser exports because of the portfolio of products I mean that we have that are more differentiated. So we are selling more in the domestic market as a consequence and therefore lesser dependent on polyethylene exports. With that, Kim, anything you want to add?

Kimberly Foley

Yeah, I would just say in general, I think we’ve typically said to the investment world that we’re, you know, 10 to 15% lower than the industry on our exports. So if you look at LYB’s exports in 24 and 25, we were 34 and 38% versus an industry number of closer to like 48. The other thing I would say is you asked kind of about pricing and how to make that a better margin. I think 25 was a very difficult year to look at export pricing and actually I would even say domestic regional pricing. There were so many changes and thoughts around tariffs and supply chains were constantly changing.

I think an upside to 26 is that tariffs normalize, supply chains will normalize and everybody will have an opportunity to, to have the best net back to their individual region.

operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Josh Spector with ubs. Please proceed with your question.

Joshua Spector

Hey, good morning. Just a quick one. I was wondering on the olefins eai, I know there are a number of shutdowns and outages, some outside of your control. From a supplier perspective, how much of a detriment was that in fourth quarter and how much of that do you Expect to come back in first quarter. Thanks.

Kimberly Foley

So the olefin’s impact for EAI in the fourth quarter was 35 million.

operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Hassan Ahmad with Alembic Global. Please proceed with your question.

Hassan Ahmed

Morning Peter. Peter, I just wanted to get a little more granular about, you know, a couple of comments you made earlier. Earlier about rationalizations. You know, you Talked about that 20 million ton figure of rationalizations that you guys highlighted in your Q3 presentation going up to 23 million. And obviously that not including the Chinese anti involution potential. I mean, you know, as I sort of sit there and run the numbers and try to sort of identify identify announced rationalizations where an actual facility named facility, you know, has been identified, you know, the number comes up closer to around 10 million.

And I know that obviously the Koreans are talking about, you know, two and a half to three and a half million. But again some of the facilities have not been identified. So I guess long winded way of asking you how comfortable are you with that 23 million tonne figure clearly with some of the facilities not having been identified as yet.

Peter Z. Vanacker

It’s a good question, Hassan, and thanks for asking that question. I mean first of all, I am comparing my baseline is 2020, just to be clear on that, to your questions on South Korea. I have nothing included in those numbers on closures to date since 2020 or announced closures. But it is in my number as an anticipated closure of around, I mean 3.7 million tons of Italy in capacity. So the vast majority clearly continues to be in Europe where we see closures to date of around 5 million tons, announced closures on top of the 5 million tons of 2 million tons.

And I have not included yet any anticipated closures in the European region. But if you ask me, I think we’re going to see more. I think we have not seen everything. There may be more, I mean to follow there has been some closures, I mean of course also in China that maybe not a lot of people talk about since 2020, which adds up, I mean to around 5 million tons. And there have been some closures in the meantime, smaller number that have been announced. And as I said, I mean anti involution is not included in that.

And then of course in Southeast Asia there have been closures announced by our peers like in Singapore. So you need to add them up as well. Yeah, it’s about 3 million tons in Southeast Asia closures to date and then another million tons of announced closures. So and then I haven’t talked about Japan. But also in Japan you already have closures that have been executed to date. And then you also have announced closures. So in total that adds up to about two. We’ve anticipated another one and a half million tons. So I hope that helps you, Hassan.

operator

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. That concludes our question and answer session. I’ll turn the floor back to Mr. Vaneker for any final comments.

Peter Z. Vanacker

Thank you again for all your excellent questions. And as I said in my prepared remarks, this is one of the most challenging and longest downturns in our industry. But we see clear evidence of reduced rates of capacity additions and rationalization of all their assets being implemented globally. That should help, I mean, to accelerate a recovery. Our LYB team has over delivered on our promises to control the controllables by outperforming in safety, operational excellence, our cash improvement plan and our value enhancement program during 2025. And that resulted in the fourth consecutive year delivering an industry leading cash conversion that exceeded 90%.

I want to thank the global LYB team for delivering value and maximizing cash conversion during these challenging times while operating safely and reliably. This performance has convinced us to target another $500 million cash improvements in 2026 compared to 2025. And continue to progress on our Value Enhancement program by raising the bar to $1.5 billion of recurring annual EBITDA by 2028. We remain committed to our long term strategy, but have focused our investment on projects that are immediately profitable. Another way to look at this prolonged downturn is as follows. I mean, the longer we are at the bottom of the cycle, the closer we get back to an up cycle and LYB will be ready to capture value accordingly.

I wish you all a great weekend. Stay well and stay safe. Thank you.

operator

Thank you. This concludes today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.