Medtronic PLC (NYSE: MDT) Q2 2021 earnings call dated Nov. 24, 2020
Corporate Participants:
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Karen L. Parkhill — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sean Salmon — Executive Vice President and President, Diabetes Group
Michael J. Coyle — Executive Vice President and President, Cardiac and Vascular Group
Analysts:
Bob Hopkins — BofA Securities — Analyst
David Lewis — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Robbie Marcus — JPMorgan — Analyst
Vijay Kumar — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Larry Biegelsen — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Matt Taylor — UBS — Analyst
Rick Wise — Stifel Nicolaus — Analyst
Matt Miksic — Credit Suisse — Analyst
Chris Pasquale — Guggenheim — Analyst
Kaila Krum — Truist Securities — Analyst
Presentation:
Good morning and welcome to Medtronic’s Fiscal Year 2021 Second Quarter Earning Video Webcast. I’m Ryan Weispfenning, Vice President and Head of Medtronic Investor Relations.
Before we start the prepared remarks, I’m going to share with you a few details to keep in mind about today’s webcast. Joining me are Geoff Martha, Medtronic’s Chief Executive Officer; and Karen Parkhill, Medtronic’s Chief Financial Officer. Geoff and Karen will provide comments on the results of our second quarter, which ended on October 30th, 2020. After our prepared remarks, we’ll take questions from the sell-side analysts that cover the company. Today’s event should last about an hour.
Earlier this morning, we issued a press release containing our financial statements and the divisional and geographic revenue summary. We also posted an earnings presentation that provides additional details on our performance, which can be accessed from our earnings press release or on our website at investorrelations.medtronic.com.
During today’s webcast, many of the statements we make may be considered forward-looking statements and actual results may differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statement. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ is contained in our periodic reports and other filings that we make with the SEC, and we do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement. Unless we say otherwise, all comparisons are on a year-over-year basis and are given on an organic basis, which adjust for foreign currency.
There were no acquisitions made in the last year that had a significant impact on our quarterly revenue growth. All references to share gains or losses are on a calendar quarter basis, unless otherwise stated.
Finally, reconciliations of all non-GAAP financial measures can be found on the attachment to our earnings press release or on our website at investorrelations.medtronic.com. And with that, let’s get started.
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Hello, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. Our Q2 results were significantly stronger than Q1 and came in well ahead of our expectations. Our recovery from the depth of the pandemic has been faster than expected, and we’re now approaching year-over-year growth.
Now, while we continue to monitor COVID resurgence around the globe, healthcare systems are by and large better prepared, and patients are more willing to seek the care they need. Obviously, there’s some near-term uncertainty, but I am encouraged by the steps we’ve taken over the past year to position Medtronic not only for continued recovery, but to maximize our performance over the medium and long-term.
Now, building on the strength of our pipeline, we’re going on the offensive and winning share in several of our businesses. We’re investing in opportunities to create and disrupt big markets and we’re seeing the results.
We’re supplementing our pipeline with an increasing cadence of tuck-in M&A, and we’re in the process of implementing our new operating model and re-energizing our businesses with a competitive focus on market share and being bold.
All of this is aimed at accelerating our growth and creating value for society and for our shareholders.
Now, like last quarter, I’m going to lead off with a discussion on market share and I’m pleased to note that we’re winning share in an increasing number of our businesses. Our pipeline is coming to fruition and we’re benefiting from recent product approvals across the company.
Since last quarter, we received 50 product approvals, bringing our total to over 180 regulatory approvals in the U.S., Europe, Japan and China since the start of the calendar year. We’re also benefiting from the actions we took earlier this year to partner with our customers through the pandemic. We’ve helped our customers in areas such as environmental safety, hospital productivity, patient engagement and remote monitoring and support and these partnerships are leading to increased market share in a number of accounts.
In Cardiac Rhythm, we’re notably outperforming the competition. We estimate we’ve gained nearly two points of share year-over-year. Our Pacemaker product line grew 6% globally as our Micra Leadless Pacemaker family continued to perform extremely well, growing 75% globally and 84% in the US. Micra is now annualizing at approximately $350 million.
We also continue to see the benefit of our recently launched Cobalt and Crome high-power devices with BlueSync distance programming and a patient app for remote monitoring. These are both important features in the current environment.
Our CareLink remote monitoring adoption is up 10% globally and transmissions on our unique CareLink Express system, which enables unattended in-clinic follow-ups, increased 40% quarter-over-quarter. Our CRT-D product line grew 4%, driven by the Cobalt and Crome launch and our improving replacement cycle.
In addition, we’re continuing to see strong adoption of our TYRX antibacterial envelopes, especially important during a pandemic where there is a renewed emphasis on avoiding infections of any kind. TYRX revenue more than doubled and it is utilized in over half of our U.S. CRM implants.
In Cardiac Diagnostics, we estimate we gained modest share year-over-year, as the launch of our LINQ II is offsetting Boston Scientific’s entry into the market. In Drug Coated Balloons, we grew in the high single digits and gained share both year-over-year and sequentially. We’re seeing strong adoption of our IN.PACT AV DCB, driven in part by its pivotal data that was published earlier this fall in the New England Journal of Medicine.
In Surgical Innovations, we held share year-over-year and our share is up nearly a point versus the prior quarter, driven by strong gains in Advanced Energy.
We’re earning share with superior products like our LigaSure exact dissector and our Sonicision Curved Jaw ultrasonic dissector. We’re also winning back share from reprocessors. In Advanced Stapling, our share was down year-over-year with difficult comps, given J&J’s recall in the prior year. However, we did gain share sequentially on the strength of our Tri-Staple technology.
In our Restorative Therapies Group, we’re beginning to see important share gain from recent product launches. Starting with Pelvic Health, we estimate we regained eight points of share in the U.S. and two points in Europe sequentially from Axonics. This is the result of our very successful launches of our InterStim Micro rechargeable device and our SureScan MRI leads.
We’re quickly recapturing share in the rechargeable space with Micro, as we get on contract in more and more accounts. From our FDA approval in August to the end of October, we believe our share of the U.S. rechargeable market has gone from 0% to over 50% in just three months, and we continue to see high trialing rates at a 125% of pre-COVID levels, driven in part by our basic evaluation lead, which is a strong leading indicator of future growth.
In Pain Stim, we continue to see strong momentum as the markets adapt our DTM therapy on our Intellis platform.
While we’re facing headwinds and replacements, given where we are in our cycle, we estimate that we gained new implant share in the U.S. Also, our new SCS implants in the U.S., grew in the high single digits in the quarter, and we saw strong trialing increases year-over-year, a leading indicator of future growth in this business.
Importantly, we’re seeing the majority of our new implant and trialing growth coming from competitive accounts, as we win share from competitors. This is all being driven by the strength of our DTM data, which showed superiority over conventional stem at three months, but we’ve strengthened this evidence last month when we showed DTM superiority is sustained at 12 months.
In Brain Modulation, we’re building momentum with our Percept PC device, the first and only DBS system that can sense brain signals. Now, we launched Percept in the U.S. this past quarter. While our U.S. share was down year-over-year, Percept drove increasing new implant share gains each month as we went through the quarter, returning Brain Modulation to growth.
In ENT, we gained share both sequentially and year-over-year. We launched several new products in the quarter, including our NextGen nerve monitoring program, NIM Vital, our PTI system for parathyroid detection, and StealthStation FlexENT, our new nav system to support outpatient ENT procedures. And going forward, we expect these launches to continue to drive share gains and market growth.
In Neurovascular, we had a good quarter in Aspiration, Coils and Access, resulting in overall growth for our Neurovascular business. While we had share loss in flow diversion due to new entrants in the U.S. market, we estimate that our share in Neurovascular increased overall, as we won share from both Penumbra and Terumo.
Now, turning to the businesses where we are holding share, we estimate that our procedure share was steady in both drug-eluting stents and TAVR on a sequential basis. In DES, we were one of the winners in the Chinese national tender, and we’ll receive volume that is being reallocated from our multinational and local competitors, whose tender bids were not accepted.
While our volume will increase significantly, this will be more than offset by significant price declines, as dictated by the tender. This will impact our business over the coming quarters. That said, we believe participating in the Chinese stent market is a long-term strategic opportunity, as our increased access to more Chinese hospitals will provide opportunities to pull through our full product line today, as well as in the future with products like TAVR and renal denervation.
Speaking of TAVR, we help procedure share in the U.S., Europe and Japan sequentially. We expect to be back to gaining share year-over-year in the U.S. next quarter, as we anniversary our share loss from our fiscal third quarter last year. The market is responding to our competitive messaging on our valve hemodynamics, which is a key determinant of valve selection in low-risk patients.
We’re also getting favorable customer response to our data in bicuspid patients, which make up a large portion of the low-risk population. And we’re continuing to increase our field personnel and open new accounts in the U.S., which we expect to lead to share gains going forward, both from Edwards, as well as winning share in Boston Scientific accounts, giving the recent decision to remove their Lotus valve from the market.
In MITG, we estimate we held share in both GI and Respiratory. In Respiratory, we saw strong acceleration in ventilator sales, with our revenue increasing nearly fourfold year-over-year and growing nearly 50% over Q1. This is driven by our ability to increase production and shift our mix to our high acuity PB980 ventilator to fulfill back orders and meet customer demand, particularly in the U.S. and Europe. We do expect ventilator revenue to decline sequentially in the back half of our fiscal year, returning to more normal levels in FY ’22.
In Spine, we estimate that we held share year-over-year with a slight gain in the U.S. We’re seeing strong double-digit growth in our surface-enhanced titanium interbodies that came from our acquisition of Titan Spine last year, which is now in our organic results.
In Spinal Robotics, while large capital equipment purchases continued to be pressured as a result of COVID, we estimate that we sold over 1.5 times the number of robots that Globus did.
We continue to grow our share in the Spine robot market, which is a good leading indicator of our future spine implant sales. In addition, we’re expanding the capabilities of our Mazor X robot. We received approval earlier this month for our navigated interbodies, as well as our Midas Rex High-Speed power drills.
While we’re growing and holding share in many important businesses, there are also areas in which we are losing share and we’re working to improve. In Diabetes, we’ve discussed with you our plans to return this business to market growth, and we’re seeing positive early signs as we lay the groundwork to create a business that can compete and win. We performed better than expected in Q2, but there is much more to do, and we’re laser focused on doing what it takes to return to market growth.
The Minimed 780G launch is off to a great start in Europe and we just started the limited release of the 770G in the U.S. last week. As a reminder, we plan to enable 770G users to upgrade their pump to a 780G through a software download once we get 780G approval.
We’re also pleased by the recent CMS proposal to cover all CGM devices. If finalized, it would ensure patients transitioning into Medicare have continued coverage for their Integrated CGM, and we’ll open up the U.S. Medicare market to our closed loop insulin pump systems as early as April.
Regarding Companion Medical, the acquisition closed in September and we’re excited to have the team onboard. Companion revenue was minimal in Q2, but we expect it to become more meaningful going forward. We announced the integration of our CGM data into the Companion InPen app two weeks ago. This will allow InPen users to have their Medtronic CGM ratings in real time alongside insulin dose information, all in one view.
We were able to deliver this solution ahead of schedule in just two months instead of two quarters, and this speaks to the strong integration work that is happening between our diabetes team and Companion Medical. It’s also a great example of how Medtronic is operating with speed and a sense of urgency across the company.
Now, let’s turn to our pipeline, which has a number of future opportunities for us to win share, as well as create and disrupt big markets. We covered this in detail with you last month at our Investor Day, so I’m going to give you the bridge version today.
Starting with CVG, we continue to make good progress on several opportunities highlighted in Investor Day. It appears to have been missed by the Street last week. But last Monday was a huge day for the treatment of AF. Our Arctic Front Cryoballoon was the subject of a simultaneous AHA data presentation and New England Journal of Medicine publication that promises to redefine the role of our cryoablation technology, making it first line therapy in the treatment of paroxysmal AF. We currently have CE Mark for this indication and anticipate FDA approval in the first half of next calendar year.
Regarding our DiamondTemp Cardiac Ablation System, it continues to roll out in Europe and we’re targeting a U.S. launch in the first half of next calendar year. Also, in CVG, we’re enrolling pivotal trials for our Extravascular ICD, our Intrepid Transcatheter Mitral Valve, our PulseSelect Pulsed Field Ablation System, and our Symplicity Spyral Renal Denervation system.
Now, Ardian represents one of our biggest opportunities to become an important therapy to treat the millions of patients around the world who struggle with hypertension. We’re aiming to complete the ON MED trial and present the data next calendar year.
In MITG, we’re excited about bringing our soft-tissue robotics system to the market. We continue to expect to file for CE Mark and U.S. IDE approval in the first calendar quarter of 2020. Although these filings are likely to occur later in the calendar quarter, as COVID is slowing some of our onsite activities.
In RTG, we’re making large investments in new products for neurovascular and ENT, and in enhancements to our Mazor X spinal robotic system. We’re also focused on expanding indications in spinal cord stimulation and bringing to market our steerable, lead and closed-loop system in DBS.
In Diabetes, we continue to work with the FDA on the most efficient filing strategy for the 780G. While on the sensor front, we submitted our sensor to the FDA in October. And we’ve completed our Synergy pivotal trial and we’ll file it when we complete the manufacturing module. We continue to get great feedback on Synergy, which is disposable, it’s much easier to use and half the size of our current sensor.
These are just a few of the many innovative products in our pipeline. We expect them to be the foundation for material future revenue growth and we’re excited to keep you updated on our progress.
I’ll now have Karen take you through a discussion of our second quarter financials and our outlook. And then I’m going to come back with some concluding remarks before we go to Q&A. Karen, over to you.
Karen L. Parkhill — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Geoff. Our second quarter organic revenue of $7.6 billion declined 1.5% and adjusted EPS of $1.02 declined 22% from last year. However, compared to the prior quarter, our revenue increased 18% and adjusted EPS grew by 65% as our end markets continued to recover. In fact, we continue to see sequential revenue improvement each month. And despite the number of COVID cases rising in many of our markets, October was better than September in all of our groups and regions, with the exception of China, given the impact of the national tender in drug-eluting stents.
MITG led the way with its growth rate increasing by over 20 points in both Surgical Innovations and Respiratory, GI and Renal. SI benefited from increased elective procedure volumes in Europe and the United States, driven in part by elective procedures that were delayed from the spring and early summer.
RGR’s improvement came from strong ventilator sales, as well as from GI Patient Monitoring and Renal Care products. Across MITG, we had growth in a number of our businesses in the second quarter, including Advanced Energy, Lung Health, Airways, Ventilators and Patient Monitoring.
CVG and RTG also delivered double-digit improvements from the first quarter, with increased procedure volumes and share capture; and several businesses returned to growth from the prior year. In CVG, we grew in pacing, CRT-Ds, TYRX, Aortic and drug-coated balloons. And in RTG, we grew in DBS, Neurovascular, Pelvic Health and China Orthopedics.
On the P&L, while we continue to see the expected deleveraging year-over-year, the recovery in our business is evident in the sequential improvement in our adjusted margins, over 300 basis points in our gross margin and nearly 600 basis points in our operating margin. Our better-than-expected revenue flowed through to the bottom line, resulting in EPS well ahead of expectations.
Turning to our balance sheet. Our financial position remained strong. In the quarter, we completed another Euro debt offering, EUR6.25 billion and used the proceeds to reduce our U.S. dollar debt and pre-fund our March Euro debt maturities, driving roughly $80 million of additional annualized savings.
This was our third euro transaction in the past year and a half. Combined, we have issued over 18 billion and our portfolio now sits with a weighted average maturity of over 12 years and a weighted average coupon of less than 2%, among the lowest of the large cap issuers and the lowest among our competitors in MedTech.
As I shared with you at our Investor Day last month, we remain focused on investing both organically and inorganically through tuck-in acquisitions and minority investments to drive our long-term growth strategies.
Last month, we announced the acquisition of AI BioMed to expand our ENT portfolio. In addition, we closed our acquisition of Avenue Medical and Peripheral Vascular earlier this month, and we announced the completion of our Medicrea Acquisition in Spine last week.
We expect both our organic and inorganic investments to fuel a longer-term revenue growth acceleration, ultimately creating strong returns for our shareholders supplemented by our strong and growing dividend.
We are an S&P Dividend Aristocrat, having increased our dividend for 43 years and our current yield of 2.1% places us in the upper quintile of S&P 500 health care companies.
Now, turning to our outlook. Particularly with the rising cases of COVID around the world, the impact to our business remains difficult to predict. So, we will continue to not provide our typical guidance. That said, I do want to give you a sense of the recovery ahead.
While it is still early in our third quarter, we’ve seen our average weekly sales track ahead of the same weeks in the second quarter. So, while there are pockets of more restrictions and delayed procedures around the globe, the impact to us has thus far been limited.
As we’ve said before, hospitals are better equipped now to handle COVID patients and remain open to serve non-COVID patients. And over time and with education, patient fear is not as heightened as it was last spring and early summer.
While there is still uncertainty ahead, if the recovery trend continues as it has to-date, our third quarter revenue could be flat to slightly up year-over-year on an organic basis, and we would continue to expect to return to normal organic revenue growth on a two-year stacked basis by our fiscal fourth quarter.
By group next quarter, MITG growth could be in the low single digits, a little lower than the second quarter, given the benefit we had from strong ventilator sales. RTG and Diabetes should deliver improvements from the second quarter, with the decline in the low single digits; and CVG should be roughly flat as we continue to recover and take share.
On the P&L, while we are continuing to invest in our product pipeline and launches during the pandemic, we still expect sequential operating leverage as we recover. For both our gross and operating margins, we would expect a couple of points of improvement in the third quarter versus the second. And we continue to expect to return to more normal operating margins in the fourth quarter.
Regarding currency, assuming rates hold constant, the tailwind on revenue in the third quarter should be similar to the second and the full-year benefit could be roughly $150 million. On the bottom line, we’d expect a $0.04 headwind per quarter for the remainder of the year.
As I wrap up, while the pandemic could impact our outlook, our ability to continue to invest in our pipeline, develop our markets and execute on product launches will allow us to outpace our markets.
I’m proud of the hard work from our employees this year and I’m excited about the impact we are having on millions of patients’ lives around the world. With our competitive spirit and focus on being bold, we will be at the forefront of the recovery.
Back to you, Geoff.
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Okay. Thank you, Karen. Now, to wrap up, I hope you’re seeing the strong execution that our organization is delivering. I want to take a moment to thank our employees across the globe for the great performance they have collectively produced this quarter.
To sum up the second quarter, we’re improving our growth, advancing our pipeline and winning share, and we’re doing all of this while operating in the midst of a global pandemic and while we make bold and comprehensive changes to our operating model.
And one last note regarding our operating model, we’re making solid progress on decentralizing and de-layering our businesses. We’re empowering our 20 operating units, gaining greater visibility into our end markets, upping our competitive game and holding our business leaders more accountable. We’re leveraging the strengths of our enterprise by centralizing manufacturing in certain core technology development.
We’ve increased our focused on allocating capital to our best opportunities and we’re supplementing this with an increased cadence of tuck-in acquisitions. And we’re enhancing the culture of this company by increasing our competitiveness and being bold, adding these on top of all the great attributes of our mission-driven culture.
We expect this to lead to more innovation, accelerate our growth and unlock a lot of value for our shareholders.
So with that, let’s now move to Q&A.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
It’s now time for the Medtronic Earnings Call Q&A session, where Medtronic executives will answer live questions from the sell-side analysts covering the company. [Operator Instructions] Please, also be advised that this Q&A session is being recorded.
For today’s session, Geoff Martha and Karen Parkhill are joined by Mike Coyle, EVP and President of the Cardiovascular portfolio; Bob White, EVP and President of the Medical Surgical portfolio; Brett Wall, EVP and President of the Neuroscience portfolio; and Sean Salmon, EVP and President of the Diabetes Operating Unit.
I’ll now turn it over to the Moderator, Ryan Weispfenning. Please go ahead.
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Great. Thank you. Let’s first go to the line of Bob Hopkins from BofA Securities. Bob?
Bob Hopkins — BofA Securities — Analyst
Great. Thank you very much and good morning, everybody. So, the first question I’d love you guys to comment is, is some of the geographic result you showed in the quarter, because I found the breakdown really interesting. Specifically, I’d love to hear your thoughts on — looks like Europe was up in the quarter, China was down in the quarter, maybe comment on some of the trends that are driving those results in Europe and China. And specifically on the China tender, was that worse than you thought in terms of the final outcome there, and was that tender contemplated when you gave the long-term guidance that you provided at the Analyst Day? Thank you.
Karen L. Parkhill — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes. Thank you, Bob, for that question. We were pleased with the geographic results that we saw. You’re right, Europe was up and certain parts of Asia were up. China was down, but that was really due to the national tender. Absent the impact of the National Tender, China would have been in strong growth territory. And on the tender, it was really close to what we expected. We — it was hard to predict, but we were pleased to be one of the five finalists in the tender. So, we expect to be gaining share or gaining share and volume as a result of that.
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Let’s say just — Bob, on the tender, I say I think it is in the — over the next couple of quarters, it’s going to be a headwind because we’re going to have a lot of volume increase here a matter of fact that — but it’s going to be offset by the price decrease. And so, but we view it as strategic overtime, because this is going to be one of the tip of the spear if you will for more aggressively taking our commercial organization into the lower-tier cities, the rural cities in China, Tier 2, Tier 3, and it will also help us pull through other products around Coronary today, plus in the future with TAVR and renal denervation.
So, not happy about the short-term impact, I think long-term this is, I guess, that is strategic and we’ll see the volume. The Chinese government has been reaching out to us and working with us to make sure we’re prepared, because they’re expecting us to have a pretty dramatic increase in volume here.
So, we’ll see how this plays out, but we do think that over the next couple of quarters, it’s more of a headwind than a tailwind.
Bob Hopkins — BofA Securities — Analyst
Okay. And then just really quickly for Karen, your comments on current trends, I appreciate those. I just want to be clear, so are you saying that what you’re seeing so far this quarter is not worse than what you saw in October in terms of year-over-year growth?
Karen L. Parkhill — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
That’s correct, Bob. What we’ve seen in the first couple of weeks in November is higher than what we saw in the similar weeks in the second quarter. That said, the first few weeks of the quarter don’t necessarily make a trend, so we’ll be closely watching any impact from the COVID surge. I would say that if these trends continue and there is only limited impact from the COVID surge, we do expect our revenue could be flat to slightly up in the third quarter.
Bob Hopkins — BofA Securities — Analyst
Thank you very much.
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Great. Thank you, Bob. Let’s next go to the line of David Lewis from Morgan Stanley. David, please go ahead.
David Lewis — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Just two quick ones from me. I’ll start with Karen. So Karen, the revenue numbers in the quarter and the forward momentum is very impressive. The drop-through on margins, Karen in the second quarter was actually weaker than the first quarter, so wondering if you could just talk about where this investment is going, how should we think about drop through into the back half of the year and where are we on the cost plan? Then I had a quick follow-up.
Karen L. Parkhill — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes, thanks for that question, David. Clearly, we have been focused on investing for the long-term through this pandemic. And as a result, our margins are a little bit more depressed than normal. We have said that we expect to be back to more normal margins in the fourth quarter all along and we continue to expect that.
In terms of the drop-through of the additional revenue, we did have some period expensing on the manufacturing front as well, similar to last quarter. We expect that to not be a headwind next quarter.
And we continue to invest below the gross margin line, particularly as we’re focused on driving the right commercial launches of some of our new products. And so, we’re focused on investing appropriately and ultimately getting our margins back to normal by the fiscal fourth quarter.
David Lewis — Morgan Stanley — Analyst
Okay, very helpful. And then Geoff maybe for you, I mean there’s been $1.6 billion of balance sheet deployment over the relatively near-term, over the next six to 12 months, should we expect a similar cadence of deals, should we expect sort of higher or lower? And then if Karen, if there’s any sort of quantification across that $1.6 billion in terms of what the revenue impact could be here over the next six months or so, that would be super helpful. Thanks so much.
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Yes, David, on the M&A, it’s — obviously, it’s hard to predict, right? I mean — but I would — I would suspect a similar cadence of these tuck-in type of deals. Again, it is hard to predict, but it is like you said part of our strategy, it’s something that we’re looking to do to augment our R&D.
Karen L. Parkhill — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes, and David, in terms of the revenue contribution, much of what we bought this year are really early stage tuck-ins and it goes along the lines of grow what we buy, don’t buy growth. So, these acquisitions are really expected to be larger contributors to revenue in the years ahead.
The combined expected revenue contribution for the rest of this fiscal year is small. And we’ll obviously evaluate — whenever revenue from an acquisition becomes meaningful to a business, we will certainly adjusted it from our organic results until we anniversary that.
So the one that we may end up adjusting for starting in next quarter is Companion Medical, because it could be impactful to the Diabetes business alone, but certainly not to the total company.
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Okay, Thank you, David. Let’s next go to the line of Robbie Marcus at JPMorgan. Please go ahead, Robbie.
Robbie Marcus — JPMorgan — Analyst
Great, thanks for taking the question and congrats on a nice quarter. I was looking at Diabetes, which to me is one of the businesses that could have the most upside potential if your turnaround plan works out. I was hoping you could walk us through maybe the next six to 12 months in terms of new product cadence, how that should impact numbers? And also, I know you’ve been deferring pump sales for a long time, waiting for 780G in the upgrade program. How do we expect that to play out into numbers of next 12 to 18 months when 780G hits the U.S.?
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Sure, Robbie. I will turn that one over to Sean with one edit — not if it happens, but when the turnaround happens. So, Sean will talk to that.
Sean Salmon — Executive Vice President and President, Diabetes Group
Great, thanks. Thanks for the question, Robbie. So, over the next six to 12 months, really the focus is going to be on rolling out the new pump platforms. We are off to a really, really good start for the European launch of 780G. So we’re in, I think, now 12 countries. We’ll continue to roll those out as time goes on here. And the 770G, as Geoff said, just started its initial launch in the U.S. We’ve had really strong demand for that, as we’ve got a number of these upgrade pathways in place. So the pathway to upgrade from the existing 670G, as well as the next tech pathway to get people to come into the new pumps.
We’ve seen an increase in the proportion of patients as new starts in the U.S. as compared to just replacements of in-warranty patients coming out of the warranty. And of course, Companion Medical is going to be a big focus. We’ve got now the integration with part CGM in real time which is a big deal. As we improve the sensor experience, that’s going to get to be even more of a big deal.
But more importantly, we’ve now trained up and have the entire sales force with this in their bag now in the U.S. as opposed to just the small sales force that came with Companion acquisition.
So, I think the near-term those are the priorities that roll out forward into what’s next. Obviously, the 780G launch for the U.S. is a big deal. The Zeus sensor globally would be a really important driver for us then. A smaller product, but important one. We just started a limited launch in Finland. It’s for a seven day infusion sets. This allows you to wear this infusion set for almost twice as long as what is normally required, and that product we’re ready with the U.S. We just locked the database on that, so we should expect that to be part of the mix going forward.
Of course, all of this flows. So you have hardware out there, it’s upgradable by software to 70, 80 and beyond. You’ve got the compatibility designed in for the sensor pipeline, as well as extended wear infusion set. So, I think we’re setting up for a really nice cadence of products that will drive us into growth.
Robbie Marcus — JPMorgan — Analyst
And maybe just a quick follow-up. Karen, there is a lot of nuance as we look at fiscal ’22, which is where I think a lot of the Street is focused in terms of valuation. So anything you could — sitting here today, I know it’s impossible to call the recovery trends when vaccines hit, but anything that you see in models that stand out that you want to point people to as they think about modeling into fiscal ’22, whether it’s on the top line or the expense cadence? Thanks.
Karen L. Parkhill — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes, thanks for that question, Robbie. It’s early. Obviously, we’re still five months away from starting our fiscal ’22 and we’re really working on our plans right now, plus the pandemic makes it a little more difficult to forecast. So, I would say we’ll wait to give more color or guidance on FY ’22 likely as we normally do on our fourth quarter earnings call. But clearly, you can expect that our growth should be higher than normal next fiscal year off of the depressed base and because we continue to launch our pipeline of products.
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Thank you, Robbie. Let’s next go to the line of Vijay Kumar from Evercore ISI. Vijay, please go ahead.
Vijay Kumar — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Hey, guys. Can you hear me?
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
We can.
Vijay Kumar — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Excellent. So, I guess I had two quick questions. One financial and one on, I guess, diabetes. On, I guess, the financial part, when we’re looking at this year-on-year organic growth, could you perhaps quantify what the impact from the move to consignment sales, the move — the shift away from bulk order was in the quarter? Because it looks like ex those impacts, perhaps organic year-on-year was in the low-singles territory, positive territory. I just want to make sure my math is correct.
And I think I heard you say Karen, Q-on-Q you expect margins to be up a couple of hundred basis points, I mean if revenues are almost flat to up in 3Q, perhaps talk about any margin headwinds for 3Q?
Karen L. Parkhill — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Sure, Vijay. Let me start with the conversation on bulks. We mentioned last quarter that the vast majority of the bulking impact was behind us, but there are still pockets in certain businesses where we continue to look at odd year-over-year comparisons because of bulks. I would say Biologics and Spine is one of those areas, TAVR is another. But if you look at the total company, the impact from bulks is largely behind us.
In terms of the quarter-over-quarter margins, we said that we expect both gross and operating margins to be up a couple of points sequentially from the second quarter. And so, if you look at the Street models, particularly on gross margin, it could be a little higher than what the Street currently has. Is that answering your question?
Vijay Kumar — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Yes, it did. And I guess on — because I guess I was confused on the TAVR commentary on share — market share being stable sequentially. When I look at your closest peer, they were up mid singles and you guys were minus six, so I just want to make sure how you get to the sequential stable share math?
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Yes, I know — Vijay, I understand it’s little difficult to track. Why don’t we have Mike Coyle walk us through that math there.
Michael J. Coyle — Executive Vice President and President, Cardiac and Vascular Group
Thanks for the question, Vijay. So, we would estimate that the overall TAVR market for the quarter was, on a constant currency basis, up around 2%. And as you just noted our reported numbers on a revenue basis year-over-year are down about six.
But when you basically consider the U.S. market dynamic of the deloading activity that’s been taking place where essentially we have shifted away from doing bulk purchasing and have actually moved customers onto consignment who essentially want to hold inventories, if you look year-over-year our hospital held inventories of TAVR product are probably down around $25 million.
So that basically when you correct for that in terms of just year-over-year comparisons, we’re essentially flat in terms of our global sort of TAVR market. So that’s the difference between sort of the year-over-year versus the quarterly comparisons.
As we look in the quarter, sequentially from last quarter, we essentially held market share in the United States. On a year-over-year basis our case volumes were essentially flat with the prior year which was a marked improvement over what we saw during Q1.
And so, as we look forward, we are very confident about our ability to take share for a number of reasons. Obviously, the most important of those being the recent announcements from Boston Scientific here late in the quarter, the decision to essentially remove Lotus from the marketplace. And in addition from the TCT meeting, the SCOPE II data that basically had the ACURATE Neo product failing it’s noninferiority input point on a head-to-head trial versus Evolute R. So that gives us really I think an opportunity to take share from — that they have had where we have been disproportionately hit here over prior quarters.
And of course, just going forward, the hemodynamic benefits of the product really are encouraging in terms of how the customers are receiving that. We had another great TCT meeting here in terms of new data flow supporting the benefits of hemodynamics from our pacemaker rates, the self TAVI data was very encouraging in terms of direct comparisons of balloon-expandable to self-expanding valves, and we continue to rollout our cusp overlap technique for lower pacemaker rate. So all of that we think is going to be very helpful for us to continue to take sequential share.
Now, the third quarter a year ago, we saw a pretty big dip in share that we’ve been sort of calling back. And so you’re going to see it in the overall year-over-year numbers once we have anniversaried that Q3 event. And of course, as we get into Q4, we have normalized prior-year comparisons for the hospital inventory, adjustments that I just talked about.
So, by the time we get to Q4, we think we will look very similar what we’re looking quarter-over-quarter or year-over-year in terms of share dynamics.
Vijay Kumar — Evercore ISI — Analyst
That’s helpful, Mike. And Geoff, one quick one for you on Diabetes. I think you spoke about share gains. Are you see anything on — one, you look at the 3Q guidance, down low singles implies improvement over 2Q. What’s driving that? And are you seeing anything on the pump market side? We’re hearing some chatter about customers delaying pump upgrades, waiting for the Tidepool algorithm to come — waiting for the Tidepool algorithms. So, perhaps talk about the Diabetes pump market. Thank you.
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Sure. Vijay, I’ll have — Sean, why don’t you jump in on that one?
Sean Salmon — Executive Vice President and President, Diabetes Group
Yes. So, Vijay, I think that there is a quite a smaller proportion of the market that is waiting for Tidepool to become available. Really, I think the capabilities of that algorithm are really not anything advantaged over what — that we have in the pipeline. It’s certainly what’s available currently in the market.
So, I think the idea that this won’t run on a insulin pump and you can kind of pick your components is appealing to some. And to others, quite frankly, having to chase two or three companies around in order to kind of get your questions answered, track down what your challenges may be, is just not the kind of experience a lot of people are looking for. They kind of want 101 stop shop where they can get everything they need, all their questions answered in a single place, and that’s of course an advantage that will accrue to us as we get our pipeline of products out there.
So, I’d say it’s really much — it’s more of a niche opportunity and really not a big focus. I don’t see a lot of people waiting for it.
Vijay Kumar — Evercore ISI — Analyst
That’s helpful. Thanks, guys.
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Thanks, Vijay. Let’s next go to the line of Larry Biegelsen from Wells Fargo. Please go ahead, Larry.
Larry Biegelsen — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the question. Can you hear me, Ryan?
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
We can. Yes.
Larry Biegelsen — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Great. All right, great. One for Karen, one for Geoff. So, Karen, you talked about operating margins returning to normalized levels in Q4. How do you define that, is that the 30% we saw in fiscal Q3 2019 or should we be thinking about 29% for fiscal — the full-year fiscal 2019? And any comments on consensus EPS for Q3 and Q4 based on the commentary you’ve given on this call? And I have one follow-up for Geoff.
Karen L. Parkhill — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Great. Thanks, Larry, for the questions. In terms of normal operating margins in Q4, we’re thinking about pre-COVID for the full-year, so roughly around the 29% level. And then in terms of consensus, we clearly talked about revenue in the third quarter if trends continue and there is limited impact to COVID being around the flat to slightly up, which is higher than where consensus currently is and that would flow through down to margins as we’ve discussed approximately 200 bps, sequentially higher from the second quarter, and so flow through to the bottom line. So that’s what I would say on the Q3 consensus.
And Q4, because we’ve said all along that we expect to be back to more normal growth on a two-year stacked basis and more normal margins consensus is roughly right there already.
Larry Biegelsen — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Perfect. Thanks, Karen. And Geoff, on China, I heard your comments on the drug-eluting stent tender and the pricing there. China is an important market for you, roughly 5% of revenues, I believe. How concerned are you that what happened with drug-eluting stents could spillover to other areas of your business? How contained do you feel that is? Thanks for taking the questions.
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Larry, for that one. Yes, China is a strategic market for us and we are watching this tender process — this tender process closely [Technical Issues] Anyway, sorry, I hear this beep on the line here. I will keep going in, hopefully that will stop here, hopefully.
Anyway, in terms of China, we do think it’s more contained for us, at least for a couple of reasons. One, the coronary stent business is one of the few businesses at Medtronic that does have less differentiation I would say in the industry, the industry itself. The products aren’t as differentiated as we see in some of our other segments. And the other dynamic that was unique here is that 80% of the drug-eluting stent market in China was already local. So they had alternatives there.
And those two dynamics, the differentiation, lower differentiation and a robust local market, that doesn’t exist in most of our — the segments that we compete in China. So we do think it is — we don’t have a lot of exposure to that type of impact from a tender going forward. And matter of fact, this is where our diversification helps us. We’ve got a lot of growth levers in China and I do believe it is — still remains a bigger — a big growth opportunity despite some of these tender headwinds.
Larry Biegelsen — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Thanks, Geoff.
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Thank you, Larry. Let’s next go to the line of Matt Taylor at UBS. Matt, please go ahead.
Matt Taylor — UBS — Analyst
Thanks, Ryan. Can you hear me okay?
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
We can.
Matt Taylor — UBS — Analyst
Perfect. Okay. So, I just wanted to ask a question about progression of utilization. We’ve seen some stronger recovery here than lot of us might have expected with the current conditions. We’ve had a lot of good news around vaccines lately. I’m just wondering conceptually as we go through next year, can you talk about how you expect that to impact recovery and could we see a bolus or elevated demand after the vaccines take hold or do you think that we’ve kind of lost some of these patients in the shuffle and that you won’t see that kind of a resurgence?
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Thanks for the question, Matt. On that one, right now, we do believe to the extent that there is pressure from the second wave or the spike if you will, it is limited as Karen said, both in-depth and in time. Like I mentioned, pre the vaccine, hospital CEO’s, we talk to them all the time, dozens a week, and their narrative has remained the same and that they’ve learned a lot of lessons on how to safely continue with elective cases despite COVID and they’ve been able to treat COVID patients more efficiently. And they believe that even in the spike, that they will be able to continue elective cases. We are seeing some pressure in some areas, but like I said before, and then Karen mentioned earlier, we do believe that’s limited.
Now, in terms of your question, once we get through, once the vaccine is out there, and it’s like pretty much an all clear signal for patients that are considering — that may have been holding back. I haven’t heard anybody yet talking about like a bolus of patients. I think we have worked through — by and large, there is a little bit of a backlog out there still, but we have worked through a lot in or more elective areas, if you will. But by and large, we’ve worked through a lot of that, and that backlog is relatively small. And we’re starting to get back to more of a kind of steady state run rate here.
And so, given all of that, I wouldn’t expect a big bolus. But we could be surprised that this is — I wish there were little more science around some of the numbers that we’re — but we are trying to quantify as much as the feedback we’re getting, but I haven’t heard anything about a bolus of patients waiting out there for the next year.
Matt Taylor — UBS — Analyst
Okay. Thanks for the thought, Geoff.
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Thank you, Matt. Let’s next go to the line of Rick Wise at Stifel Nicolaus. Rick, please go ahead.
Rick Wise — Stifel Nicolaus — Analyst
Hi. Good morning, Ryan. Good morning, everybody. I’ll just ask one question. Geoff, you were very clear at the Analyst Day about your focus on accountability, execution, innovation, the potential for improved growth and margins etc., etc., etc. Is it — I guess just two aspects of that is my question. Should we attribute — how much of the excellent quarterly performance we’re just looking at is tied to your initiatives, you’re energy that you’re bringing, your new vision you’re bringing to Medtronic? And second, maybe just at a high level, just talk to us about the progress you’ve made, where you feel like you are and how you — how we should think about the Martha plan going forward? Thanks so much.
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Thanks for the question, Rick. And it would be nice to say that the Martha plan had that big of an impact so quickly. But I think in reality, it is the product launches. That’s what’s really driving the near-term results, I guess the product portfolio and the pipeline rather is the best we’ve ever had. And we’ve got products launching now, which we listed a lot of those and then we’ve got products over the next 18 to 24 months. And the disruptive nature of those products in the 18 — next 18 to 24 months in and of itself has created a lot of energy across the company as people can feel the near-term impact of these products.
And things like we mentioned in the commentary here, our ablation business, our cryoablation business being with this New England Journal Medicine data being now a frontline therapy for AFib. And taking that information and that opportunity and making the most of it, that type of approach is getting people excited.
So I think right now it’s really about the product launches. Over time though, I think the changes that we made, the decentralization, the unnesting of these operating units, these 20 operating units, and pushing them to be bold, to think big, be bold and maximize their opportunity, and you know what, don’t be afraid to fail. Or, hey, I mean, we don’t want to fail, but if we’re too conservative, we’re not going to take advantage of these massive opportunities in front of us like Ardian, like renal denervation, like soft-tissue robot, like the example I just gave for ablation business. It’s a massive — AFib is a massive under-diagnosed problem here, we’ve got all kinds of therapies for this.
So that is creating energy across the company that I anticipate over time will translate into, I’d say above market growth and really expand the number of patients that we’re serving.
And I’ll end on, as we talk about, we touch or impact the lives of two patients every second, and that’s a pretty amazing statistic. But when you do the math, it’s like 80 million people year, while there’s over 7.5 billion people in the world. And so, I’d like to kind of reframe that question is like, why we’re doing so few given the technology that we have and really expand that patient base? And that kind of approach is creating a lot of new thinking and energy that I think over time will take hold here, because we’ve got big plans here. But what you’re seeing now is good, but I think we can do better over time.
Rick Wise — Stifel Nicolaus — Analyst
Thank you, Geoff.
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Thanks, Rick. Let’s next go to the line of Matt Miksic at Credit Suisse. Matt, please go ahead.
Matt Miksic — Credit Suisse — Analyst
Thanks. Can you hear me all right?
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
We can.
Matt Miksic — Credit Suisse — Analyst
Terrific. So, just a follow-up on some of the current trends commentary that you’ve given. We’re all watching hospitalizations and they have increased. And I’d say it sounds like your commentary was perhaps a little bit more optimistic and constructive — despite the surge — than some folks were expecting, which is great. And the numbers were terrific here in the second quarter. But maybe if you could talk a little bit about how you’re thinking about hospitalization trends in these conversations you’re having and maybe when and if at what level they do become a little bit of a concern? And then I have one follow-up.
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Basically, Matt, what we’re hearing is that, two things. And it’s — most of our feedback, I’d say 75% of it is coming from the U.S. hospitals and then the rest from Europe, I’d say. But in the United States in particular, the two things that would have to happen — again, given everything we said about the lessons learned and the commitment to hospitals, the commitment to keep elective cases going — the two things that could derail is literally they run out of space from so many COVID patients and then it becomes like a real estate issue within a hospital. That would impact obviously elective cases. They would be de-prioritized there. And in some cases we’re seeing that we’re getting closer to that level of capacity, so that’s what we’re watching.
And the second would be some sort of statewide mandate that could happen, it’s — in today’s political climate, I think it’d be foolish to try to predict anything, but some sort of statewide mandate could happen as well.
So those are the two things, and I think the hospital CEO’s and executives are more worried about the first thing. And some of the larger systems have the luxury that are more regional of moving patients around, both COVID patients and elective patients, you can move elective procedures from one hospital to the next in some of these larger systems. So, that’s — they’re really doing their best to manage those two things, but that’s why we’re I guess cautiously optimistic that the impact of this second wave will be limited. That, and with the optimism of the vaccine news is another driver here.
Matt Miksic — Credit Suisse — Analyst
That’s helpful. Thanks for that. And then just to follow-up on your comment on the New England Journal article and presentation at AHA, the first line therapy for paroxysmal. Can you talk about maybe how you expect that how investors should expect that to sort of show up in the numbers? Is it — is there a penetration pathway here that we can expect to hear more about over the next year or so?
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
I’ll maybe let Mike provide a little more details on that data.
Michael J. Coyle — Executive Vice President and President, Cardiac and Vascular Group
Sure, Matt. Currently, because no ablation therapy is approved for first line therapy, a patient has to fail a series of antiarrhythmic drugs before they become eligible. And we’d estimate that’s about a two-year period of time that physicians will essentially titrate antiarrhythmic medications. And basically, the data that was shown in the New England Journal says less than half the patients who actually go down that path will wind up being symptom-free.
So, essentially, you’re taking a large force, I think the entire diagnosed portions of patients with symptomatic atrial fibrillation and you’re delaying them two years from coming in and losing a lot of them to follow-up there. And of course, 45% of them will just stay on medications by basically showing that cryoablation will have 75% of those patients symptom-free in a year. If we can push that into first line, we not only accelerate the curve, but obviously a lot of patients who wound up on antiarrhythmic will then essentially not require them because they become symptom-free with ablation.
So, there’s obviously a lot of education that has to take place at the referral channel level. We think these data will be very compelling to be able to have that take place. Obviously, we need FDA approval of the labeling indication, which as Geoff mentioned we would expect to be in our next fiscal year. But we’re very excited about being able to outreach to that referral community with a much better solution for the patients.
Matt Miksic — Credit Suisse — Analyst
Thanks so much.
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Matt, this is — yes, this is like a trend that we’re starting to see where our kind of definition of market development is expanding to not just to the specialist physicians around the world that we’re used to dealing with, but to more the general practitioners, and in this case even just general cardiologists and to the patients themselves. And so this is a muscle that this kind of hybrid B2C, B2B-B2C, this kind of go-to market, this muscle of market development we need to develop, because there is other areas across the company that we’re seeing. Obviously, diabetes is more in this camp, and this is something that Medtronic and a lot of MedTech historically haven’t done, but I do think it’s a muscle we need to develop here.
Matt Miksic — Credit Suisse — Analyst
That’s great. Thanks.
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Thanks, Matt. Let’s next go to the line of Chris Pasquale at Guggenheim. Chris, please go ahead.
Chris Pasquale — Guggenheim — Analyst
Thanks. One quick one on Diabetes, then one on CVG. For Diabetes, Sean, could you just clarify the expected timing of the 780G U.S. launch? Is that like there may still be some uncertainty about how you go about the filing strategy there?
Sean Salmon — Executive Vice President and President, Diabetes Group
Yes, sure. So situation we have, I think, as you probably already know is that the FDA’s division that regulates the Diabetes sector is also involved in a lot of the COVID diagnostics work. So, it’s really been a resource drain on their part for medical reviewers in particular.
So at their request, we’re pulling together a lot of parts to that submission, including the pediatric data, not separating that out from just the adult data, so one submission for all patients, as well as the integration of the Zeus sensor into that package.
So that’s the summary of the package, how we can consolidate down to fewer component parts need to be reviewed, which will add efficiency for them and time to market for us for the entire package.
Chris Pasquale — Guggenheim — Analyst
Okay. But in terms of when we should expect to have 780G available for U.S. patients, any sense for when that could be?
Michael J. Coyle — Executive Vice President and President, Cardiac and Vascular Group
That’s hard to predict, the review cycle time that we’re intending to submit that in this quarter.
Chris Pasquale — Guggenheim — Analyst
Okay, that’s helpful. Thank you. And then just quickly on the Chinese tender, the impact there in the back half of the year, you characterized 26 million this quarter as reserve, which to me implies a pulling forward of the headwind, but then you also talked about continuing to be an issue on a go-forward basis. So how much of the sort of annual impact of that was recognized this quarter versus still to come? Thanks.
Karen L. Parkhill — Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Yes, thanks for that question, Chris. The reserve impact from the China tender is really because we’ve got product in the dealer channel and we needed to compensate for the price that will be impacted in the dealer channel as soon as the tender is effective. So that’s what’s going on there.
In terms of go forward, obviously, the price go forward is 95% lower and so that will continue to impact us. But it was a bit of a larger impact now since we had to do the reserve as well as the shorter impact for the quarter.
Chris Pasquale — Guggenheim — Analyst
Thanks.
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Thanks, Chris. Let’s take one more question and go to the line of Kaila Krum at Truist Securities. Kaila, please go ahead. Kaila?
Kaila Krum — Truist Securities — Analyst
Can you guys hear me okay?
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
We can, yes. Please go ahead.
Kaila Krum — Truist Securities — Analyst
Perfect. Thanks, Ryan. Thanks, guys, for taking our questions. So, you guys had mentioned that you are talking to dozens of hospital CEO’s every week, so I’m just curious what you’re hearing in terms of their appetite for capital spending and particularly as they’re budgeting for calendar 2021, just any additional color there you can add would be helpful. Thank you.
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Yes, so capital, it is — obviously, the capital budgets in hospitals are pressured, but we’re finding two things that are helping us out. One, is that our capital tends to be — is tied to — for them, profitable elective procedures, like in Spine. And so that helps a lot. And the other thing is providing flexible financing options is the second one.
So, although there is some pressure on just general capital, when that capital is supporting an elective procedure that is profitable and critical to the hospitals financial recovery, that’s really helping. And so they’re continuing to have these conversations with us and we’re continuing to buy capital and I think talking to our Spine division the other day they anticipate the Mazor sales to get back to normal levels here, so which is evidence of what I just said.
And the second thing that’s helping is, we’re working with a number of financing companies to provide various different financial — flexible financial solutions for the hospitals. So those two things have really helped us. And although there is some pressure, it’s not like maybe you might see with general imaging or something like that.
Kaila Krum — Truist Securities — Analyst
Great. Thanks so much for taking the question.
Ryan Weispfenning — Vice President – Head of Investor Relations
Thanks, Kaila. I’ll ask Geoff to conclude with his remarks, Geoff?
Geoff S. Martha — Chief Executive Officer
Okay. And thanks everybody for the questions and the great engagement and we really appreciate your support and the continued interest in our company. We hope that you’ll join us for our Q3 earnings broadcast, which we anticipate holding on February 23rd, where we’ll update you on our continued quarterly progress.
So, thanks for tuning in today. Stay healthy and safe. And for those in the U.S., I’d like to wish you and your families a very happy Thanksgiving and have a great day everybody.