MillerKnoll Inc (NASDAQ:MLKN) Q2 2022 Earnings Call dated Jan. 04, 2022.
Corporate Participants:
Antonella Pilo — Vice President of Investor Relations and FP&A
Andrea Owen — President and Chief Executive Officer
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
John P. Michael — President, The Americas – Herman Miller
Chris Baldwin — Group President
Kevin J. Veltman — Vice President, Investor Relations
Debbie Propst — President, Herman Miller Group Retail
Analysts:
Steven Ramsey — Thompson Research Group — Analyst
Reuben Garner — The Benchmark Company — Analyst
Budd Bugatch — Water Tower Research — Analyst
Greg Burns — Sidoti & Company — Analyst
Alex Fuhrman — Craig-Hallum Capital — Analyst
Rudy Yang — Berenberg — Analyst
Presentation:
Operator
Good evening, and welcome to the MillerKnoll Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. As a reminder, this call is being recorded.
I would now like to introduce your host for today’s conference, Antonella Pilo, Vice President of Investor Relations and FP&A.
Antonella Pilo — Vice President of Investor Relations and FP&A
Good evening. Thank you for joining our call. We have posted the press release on our Investor Relations website at hermanmiller.com. Wherever any figures are presented on a non-GAAP basis, we have reconciled the GAAP and non-GAAP amounts within the press release.
I would like to remind everyone that this call will include forward-looking statements. For information on factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements, please refer to the earnings press release as well as our annual and quarterly SEC filings. Any forward-looking statements that we make today are based on assumptions as of this date and we undertake no obligation to update these statements as a result of new information or future events.
At the conclusion of our prepared remarks, we will have a Q&A session. Today’s call is scheduled for 60 minutes.
With that, I’ll turn the call over to Andi.
Andrea Owen — President and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Antonella. Hi, everyone, and Happy New Year. Joining me today are Jeff Stutz, our CFO; John Michael, our President of the Americas Contract Organization; Debbie Propst, our President of Global Retail; Chris Baldwin, our Group President, MillerKnoll; and Kevin Veltman, our Senior Vice President and our Integration Lead.
Our performance in the second quarter demonstrates the power of MillerKnoll and the strength of both our strategy and our business fundamentals and bringing together the best of Herman Miller and Knoll, we’ve created a stronger and more resilient organization built for long-term success. Throughout the quarter we built positive momentum and continued to see strong demand around the globe. Order levels were up in all four reporting segments again this quarter, both on retail and our contract businesses continue to grow. And we’re bringing new customers to our brands with growth initiatives like gaming, store and studio openings, and an expanding e-commerce presence.
As it relates to this last point, the past quarter, we launched new Herman Miller e-commerce sites in France and Germany, and both have exceeded our early expectations for sales and order activity. We have good [Phonetic] learnings from our previous website launches to create an exceptional online shopping experience for consumers in both countries and we’ll continue to benefit from our growing digital presence around the world as we move forward.
That said, we’re facing many of the same challenges as the rest of the industry, including inflationary pressures, supply chain challenges and labor shortages. We benefit from the increased size and reach of our larger organization and we’re leveraging on global distribution, production, design and sales capabilities to combat all of these pressure. We’ve leaned into the expertise and partnerships that exist across our collective of brands to build inventory positions of select high demand products and increase our shipping capacity. We’re making sure the progress in our integration journey and we remain focused on unleashing the power of all of our collective of brands.
At the close of the second quarter we had implemented $43 million in run-rate savings and we remain confident that we will deliver our cost synergy target of $100 million within two years of closing. In fact, as our teams completed integration planning, we’ve identified additional synergy opportunities and we now expect to increase run rate savings to $120 million by the end of year three. This meaningful progress along with our robust integration roadmap gives us confidence that we will achieve our planned cost synergies, even with the inflationary and supply chain pressures that we’re contending with every day.
We’ve achieved several important and symbolic milestones in the quarter. We finalized the company name change and are officially operating as MillerKnoll. We’re also trading under our new stock ticker MLKN. We completed the important work to cater new millenial [Phonetic] organizational structure, which involve tracking talent and integrating the teams into a newer operating model designed to capture efficiencies across the organization, while also strengthening the unique position of each of our individual brands.
One of the most compelling reasons for creating MillerKnoll is our combined portfolio and distribution network. MillerKnoll will have the largest and most capable dealer network in the world. Our customers will have more choice in terms of both product and partners and our dealers will have access to comprehensive suite of products and services in the industry, enabling them to sell more and better [Indecipherable] to meet the public customer.
Creating the MillerKnoll dealer network is our top priority and we are well on our way. We have MillerKnoll dealer pilots in process in both Texas and Arizona. And we’re sort of learning these pilots to inform the plan by operationalizing the full network, which is on track to occur by mid calendar year 2022. While the world continues to wait and see the full impact of the Omicron variant, taking new variants feels like the new normal to us.
Our research and customer feedback tells us that executives across the variety of industries still had a strong desire to bring their teams back together this year. And what’s more, most employees want the flexibility and the option to return to the office as well. It’s not the same office they left in 2020. Employers recognize their workplaces need to be reimagined and redesigned to meet the changed expectations with the post-pandemic workforce.
MillerKnoll is the leader in providing adaptable solutions to create innovative, productive environments for the workplaces in the homes of our clients. We have the insights, the products, the surfaces and the tools to help our customers create high performing spaces that fall today in the community [Phonetic]. So we are continuing to collaborate with experts from around the world to make both returning to the workplace and working from home, healthier and more productive. And we’re using our own firsthand experiences with hybrid workplaces and a global insight partnerships to inform the future of work. Our business is strong. We’re powered by the preeminent portfolio of brands in the industry and we are built for growth. And are confident, that there is tremendous opportunity ahead for MillerKnoll and all of our stakeholders.
So with that, I’ll turn it over to Jeff who will cover a bit more about our results before we open it out for your questions.
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Andi. Good evening everyone. During the second quarter we drove growth across every segment and every region of the business. And we were able to leverage the breadth and depth of the organization to combat some of the macroeconomic pressures we faced in the quarter. Even with those challenges, we had a strong quarter and we’re confident about the future including our ability to deliver on the cost synergies associated with the Knoll acquisition.
Consolidated net sales of just under $1.03 billion were up 64% on a reported basis and 11% organically over last year. Our ability to ship orders this quarter was impacted by the supply chain disruptions that our industry is facing, which we estimate adversely impacted net sales by approximately $50 million in the quarter. Orders in the quarter of $1.16 billion were 84% higher than last year. And on an organic basis, orders of $796 million reflected sequential improvement of 6% compared to the first quarter and were up 26% over the prior year. As mentioned earlier, the strong demand were seen across all reporting segments. Global Retail had another strong quarter with orders up almost 21% over the prior year and sales growth were approximately 18%. The Americas Contract segment saw strong demand in all regions and sectors with notable momentum in the middle and southern regions of the US. Net sales in this segment increased 4%, while new orders improved 29% on a year-over-year basis.
The Knoll segment reported similar growth rates with year-on-year sales and orders increasing 5% and 30% respectively. Both the Knoll workplace and residential categories contributed to this growth in the quarter. The International Contract segment also saw strong orders in sales across all regions and brands, with orders up 30% and sales up 23% over the same quarter last year. Demand in Europe, including UK was especially strong with orders in Europe up 42% over last year.
Adjusted gross margin was 34.8% compared to 39% last year. Similar to what we reported to you last quarter, the year-over-year margin decline was driven by the impact of rising commodity costs, particularly steel, and other inflationary pressures in the categories of labor and transportation. In response to these margin pressures, we’ve been aggressive in the area of pricing, having implemented or announced multiple contract list prices since May. While we have realized some of this benefit to date, the impact has thus far been limited and will take time to layer into our results. This has been contemplated in our outlook for the third quarter.
Now with that said, you should know that these increases are ultimately geared to offset the cost pressures that we’re seeing across the business. And in the meantime, we’re carefully managing what we can control across the business as we work to mitigate the impact of these macroeconomic pressures.
Adjusted operating margin in the second quarter for the consolidated business was 5.9% compared to 11.7% in the prior year. And it’s worth highlighting that our global retail business has continued to deliver solid profitability despite the underlying cost challenges and tough year-over-year comparisons that that segment is facing. In addition to order growth of 20%, the retail segment reported adjusted operating margins of 11.3% this quarter. We reported a consolidated net loss per share of $0.05. And on an adjusted basis excluding special charges associated with the integration of Knoll, earnings per share in the second quarter was $0.51.
So with those brief opening comments, we’ll now turn the call over to the operator, and we’ll take your questions.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from Steven Ramsey with Thompson Research Group. Please go ahead.
Steven Ramsey — Thompson Research Group — Analyst
Hi, good evening. Maybe to start with on organic orders, how much of this is pricing driven and how much of it is volume? And how do you expect that to play out in the next several quarters? I guess, what I’m getting at is, if Jeff you could share a little bit more on the pricing commentary of how that flows through reported results?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Well, good evening, Steven, good to hear from you. Happy New Year. Yes, let me — I’ll start with maybe just the order trends in the quarter, because I think the crux of your question is, have we seen meaningful pull ahead in order activity in advance of some of these increases? And what was really encouraging for us is, as you looked across each of the three months of the quarter, order pacing was actually remarkably consistent. And so, from my perspective, we — for the increase that we had in the October, November timeframe, there was not a meaningful pull ahead impact from that increase. Intra-quarter orders for example in the Americas were — that we started off of 22%, we were kind of mid to high 30% growth in October and in high 20%, close to 30% in November, for a total increase in the quarter of 29%.
The Knoll business was even more consistent than that close to 30%, almost on the nose, in each of the months of the quarter. International similar, retail had some movement in the quarter, Debbie can speak to this, if you like to go further, but it had more to do with the timing of some of the promotional events this year versus last year. If you adjust for that Tier 2 retail order activity was quite consistent. So what I would tell you, Steven is that, the price increases in — early in the summer months and then again in October-November timeframe didn’t seem to have much impact. Now what I will also mention is that the increase that we have planned for January-February timeframe, we did start to see some of that pull ahead in the last couple of weeks. But it’s not out of line with historical levels. Let me pause there. Is that helpful on the order trends?
Steven Ramsey — Thompson Research Group — Analyst
Yes. Yes, that is. And then was trying to get a sense for in that orders dollar number. How much of that is pricing driven? And kind of try to get a sense for in the next couple of quarters, if the price increases you have successfully implemented start to impact results?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Yes. This is the challenge, and again, we’ve got to talk about this in two pieces. We have the positive side of this is the retail business, we fully expect will benefit from price actions much sooner than the contract business. And as we’ve talked with you in the past, right, it’s just a different animal in the retail business. On the contract side, the challenge that we have and this is — I think pretty consistent from what we’re hearing across the industry. We’re somewhat the victim of the good news in terms of the solid demand. Demand has outpaced our ability to producing shift by such a margin, that — by such a wide gap that the backlog we have. It’s going to take us a little time to work through it. And that backlog currently as it exists today has — I would say a mix of the last two price increases in it. Obviously none of the increase that will go into effect this month and in February. So the punch line to this, Steven, is this going to take us, we think a good part of the second half of this fiscal year to work our way through that. And frankly there is just not a tremendous amount of pricing benefit in that backlog. There is some, and it will ramp up as we move through Q3 and into Q4, particularly the later part of Q4. But really, it will be kind of early next fiscal year, where we really start to see the benefits of that flow through.
Retail is a bit different. I think our expectation is that the retail side of the business we’re going to see gross margin improvement steadily increase as we move through the back half of the fiscal year. I think in rough numbers gross margins for that business were maybe just under 44% this quarter. Expectations as we can move that as much as couple of hundred basis points over the spread of the next six months and that improve it from there into FY ’23.
Steven Ramsey — Thompson Research Group — Analyst
Okay. Yes, that’s very helpful. And then on the orders and shipments gap, is the growth rate of orders even beyond the quarter, is it still exceeding shipments? And to add on to that, is the rate of shipments going to increase at a faster pace than orders in the next, in Q3 or is it a little bit beyond that, that this pace of shipments can accelerate and reduce the backlog?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Well, I’ll give you my thoughts on this and then Chris and John, please feel free to chime in if you have views on this. Debbie, I assume, again the retail business is a little bit different. I think Steven from my perspective, first of all, we’ve not seen a meaningful change in demand since the end of the quarter. So that’s a positive, right. In fact, we saw some, as I mentioned what we believe to be some pull ahead of order activity in December that would be ahead of that January price increase. So the momentum continues and it’s been remarkable when you consider the effect of COVID and some of the disruption that seems to be creating socially around the world. Yet demand has been really, really strong and it’s pretty broad-based.
Your question about, will orders — will revenue in orders converge? I mean, we don’t know that, of course. I think our expectation just based on conversations with customers, what we’re hearing from design firms. Folks are busy and there is lot of companies are still kind of formulating their plans for return to office as we move into even mid-calendar ’22. So I think our expectations right now are for continued momentum on the order front. The challenge for us is throughput, much of it is labor driven. And we’re doing a whole raft of things as you would hope to try to improve our ability to ship more. It’s going to take us a little time to do that, but that’s really among our chief focuses as a business a leadership team right now. John and Chris, feel free to add.
John P. Michael — President, The Americas – Herman Miller
Thanks, Jeff. Hi, this is John. I think you said it well, Jeff. I think our expectation in terms of order pacing based on some of the leading indicators that we see is, we expect the order pacing to continue on a pretty robust pace. And I think to your point from a production perspective, we have the capacity from a production perspective to match from a revenue and an order perspective. But as Jeff said, there is a number of factors impacting our ability right now, whether that’s impact of COVID, supply chain issues, etc, etc. But as those hopefully smooth out over time, I think we’d expect production and then revenue and orders to be more closely matched.
Chris Baldwin — Group President
Yes. The only thing — this is Chris. The only thing to add, Steven, is that our production output who cover the international business is increasing. And so we are shipping out more than we did sequentially. And the good news and also the challenge is that the orders are continuing to increase even at faster rate. So we’ll keep the production output growing and it may be that in the future, we will be at the same rate as the orders. But in the near term while the supply chain challenges are here, it’s clear that it will be slightly constrained.
Andrea Owen — President and Chief Executive Officer
And then on the retail side of the business, our backlog is historically high, largely due to longer lead times than expected on third-party in those products. And so sales as a percent of demand in Q2 was 84%. We expect that to improve in Q3 and have seen some improvement there in that ratio in December already.
Steven Ramsey — Thompson Research Group — Analyst
Great. That’s helpful. That’s helpful. And one more quick one maybe to add on to residential with the strong results there. Can you kind of ballpark or quantify no residential in relation to Herman Miller residential and if the trends are as good there and if the factors that may cause any gap between the two?
Chris Baldwin — Group President
Yes. This is Chris, I’ll take that one. So the trends are just as good. In fact the trends for Knoll’s residential business are quite strong. As you could expect with the power of now MillerKnoll and DWR and e-commerce. So clearly the former Herman Miller residential business is larger than the former Knoll business. But the Knoll business on the residential side is increasing dramatically.
Steven Ramsey — Thompson Research Group — Analyst
Great. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question will come from Reuben Garner with The Benchmark Company. Please go ahead.
Reuben Garner — The Benchmark Company — Analyst
Thanks. Good evening everybody.
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Hey, Reuben.
Andrea Owen — President and Chief Executive Officer
Hey, Reuben.
Reuben Garner — The Benchmark Company — Analyst
Maybe, let’s start with the guidance. So can — Jeff can you walk us through the bridge from what you just reported in earnings to the guidance for Q3? It looks like a similar top line number, I think if I’m looking at this correctly. And so some influential margin pressures there mix in there or is the price cost situation getting worse before it gets better. Can you just kind of go through the puts and takes?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Yes, great question, Reuben. Let me start — I’ll start with — there is some commentary I think both in gross margin and operating expenses that stand out here, that I think are worth highlighting. And by the way, all of this commentary on our outlook, and this is true we’re not guiding for the pull back half of the year. One of the — I might mention, one of the potential benefits of having this strong backlog and kind of a strange benefit of some of the production throughput issues we’re having is that, it does buy perhaps a little bit of time, if we can see some input cost come back in line or in favor.
Now we don’t expect that in a meaningful way on the steel front, but there are all kinds of other cost pressures that we’re facing. We may actually be able to benefit from that, particularly as we move into Q4, but set that aside for a minute, our guidance for the third quarter from a gross margin standpoint, we guided to a range of 33.2% to 34.2% at the midpoint of that — you’re at really 33.7%. So that’s a sequential decrease obviously from what we just reported. That the couple of large factors that are impacting is, there really commodities and freight and labor. The same major drivers that we saw in Q2, we are expecting continued pressure, particularly on the commodities front. We estimate about 60 basis points from commodities that’s principally steel prices, we’re still believe it or not working our way into the elevated full market price of steel.
And without making predictions, I would tell you that if steel prices were to stabilize, where they are now, where as we work through Q3 we’re kind of fully baked into the market price of steel. So that would be a benefit for us as we move forward beyond Q3. So commodities are 60 basis points, freight and transportation and labor account for — we estimate about another 30 basis points of pressure. And then that really tells the story. There are some other moving parts. We think mix might be a bit adverse just pure product mix across the business. But we think that pricing benefit from our recent price increases will help offset that, so those kinds of neutralize one another. But those are the major moving parts in our assumption around gross margin at the midpoint of the range that we’re guiding.
And then operating expenses, you’ll see that we’re guiding an uptick here again at the midpoint of that range, just for narrative purposes, where that puts us at about $310 million. There is really kind of four main categories of moving parts there. The first one, it’s really a bit of a phenomena related to Q3 and often the early part of Q4. It’s really more of a timing issue with some of our calendar year benefit programs. The accounting for those programs tends to front-end load, some of those are calendar year base and it tends to front-end load some of the costs associated with those benefit programs. Things like vacation accruals and health savings account programs to be more specific. So that accounts for maybe upwards to $5 million of the sequential increase. The benefit there is that tends to even out as we move through the course of the calendar year. So we should see the opposite effect of that, as we move towards back half of calendar ’22.
Instead of incentive bonus plans, we expect might be a tick higher in the third quarter as we move towards measuring ourselves against the back half targets, that we’ve established. Investments in retail, digital program marketing dollars we expect to increase a bit to help continue to drive momentum in order activity. And then this last one I’ll mention to you is in our guide, we’re going to do everything we can to manage this one, but there is some incremental selling related expenses including T&E, that are a factor in that as well. And offsetting all of those items which if you were to say all of what I just said, call that $20 million as an estimate, we expect to layer in incremental synergies related to the integration work that we’re doing. So the net change there at the midpoint is about $16 million.
Reuben Garner — The Benchmark Company — Analyst
Okay, perfect. And just the quick clarification there. On the synergies, are those showing up all in the Knoll “segment” or are they spread out over the different businesses? How is that being recognized, as you laid out as you recognize them?
Kevin J. Veltman — Vice President, Investor Relations
Hey Reuben, this is Kevin. The synergies are coming really across the path across all of the businesses as we’ve looked at how do we bring MillerKnoll together. And so you see some of the benefits from synergies hitting each of the segments.
Reuben Garner — The Benchmark Company — Analyst
Okay. Next question for me is on the international profitability. Can you talk about the difference for you guys in your international business. I assume that a lot of the inflationary pressures that they’re facing or that you’re facing in the Americas are similar inputs. I assume steel as an example, elevated in Europe as well. How you’re able to maintain the margins over there? What are the differences in the business models, anything else that you can add?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Yes. Chris, let me start and then you chime in, if you don’t mind. Yes, Reuben, the one thing I always — this is actually something we’re super proud of. I mean, the international business has been a shining star in our business for several years now and it’s really showing up in a big way the last couple of quarters. There are some differences and I think Chris will probably unpack some of these a little further. But in terms of the cost pressures and inflationary pressures and supply chain pressures that we’re feeling in North America vis-a-vis outside of North America. One of them — we’ve in fact really aren’t feeling the same magnitude of commodity pressures internationally, as we’re seeing in North America. And then you add to that the fact that the labor constraints that we’re feeling in our production facilities in North America are not nearly as significant in our international operations.
And then, Chris, before — the last thing I’ll say is, we tend to have a fairly favorable overall product mix with our international contract business. It tends to tilt a bit more towards seating, which is a good thing in our business and task seating is a high margin product. And for many, many years that would — it’s always been true for the international business. For so many years we didn’t have the kind of the base level of volume pushing through those factories to really be able to leverage those overhead costs. And in recent years, we’ve seen a real change, the volumes have grown, those — our operations teams have done brilliant work, they’re much more efficient now and that’s translating to better profitability. Chris, go ahead and add whatever you’d like.
Chris Baldwin — Group President
It’s hard to add much to that, Jeff, that’s pretty comprehensive. The only thing that I might add, note that the sales in the quarter [Technical Issues]. So because we were able to get a better labor position, internationally, we were able to get increased throughput through the [Technical Issues]. So we also were able to protect — that are there, I mean, the steel is there, steel increased costs and things like that. But we will be able to grow [Technical Issues].
Reuben Garner — The Benchmark Company — Analyst
Okay. I’m going to sneak one more in, if I can.
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Sure.
Reuben Garner — The Benchmark Company — Analyst
Back to the Americas, the pricing, the backlog situation, I think you mentioned profitability in the backlog being somewhat constrained. Is there a point where maybe you don’t take as many orders, because you’re not able to keep up and the profitability isn’t as attractive as normal? Or do you view it as a longer term positive to just take anything that you can at this point? How do you guys weigh that?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Yes, I’ll let John add any insight to it, as he is closer to the customer side of things than I am. But what I will tell you is that, with this — with our most recent price increase — as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, I think super important that you all at least are on the same page with us that we’ve geared these price increases with the idea that commodity input costs, labor costs, while they likely are going to remain elevated that they stabilize, but not — they does not assume that they come back down. Now that could happen in some cases, and in that case we think we benefit from that. But we’ve heard these price increase as such, that they’re set to ultimately offset what is currently a very elevated cost environment. So orders that we take from here forward will largely be reflective of the series of price increases that we put in place and we actually feel quite good about taking that business. John, please add whatever else you have.
John P. Michael — President, The Americas – Herman Miller
Hi Ruben, it’s John Michael. I would just add to what Jeff said, I think in the short run, as we’re waiting for the price increase impact to begin to layer into new orders. The other way we address those challenges is through our discounting methodology. And just making sure that from a day-to-day discounting perspective, looking at accounts and project etc, that were being or being smart about our discounting methodology. And making sure that discounting methodology will obviously over time begin to regulate demand in such a way that it matches our ability to produce. So I think it’s just one more lever that we pull to try and balance out those two.
Reuben Garner — The Benchmark Company — Analyst
Great. Thanks guys.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question will come from Budd Bugatch with Water Tower Research. Please go ahead.
Budd Bugatch — Water Tower Research — Analyst
Good afternoon and Happy New Year to everybody. And I look forward to…
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Hey, Budd.
Budd Bugatch — Water Tower Research — Analyst
Hey, Jeff. And I look forward to a year where the pandemic recedes into the background. And I hope we all get there. Forgive me for going on the cost issue. I was trying to make sure, I was trying to understand how to walk from the margin profile we had, let’s just say in Americas, which I think was down 700 basis points, I think we show in the gross margin. What’s the walk to get you — from 35.6% to 28%. How much of that is cost, and how much of it are other things?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Well, Budd, this is Jeff. Let me first talk at the consolidated level and my caveat here would be the categories of commodities, freight and labor are most acute in our North American manufacturing operations. And so at the consolidated level in Q2 from a year ago to — till the Q2, we’re just reporting, we have 240 basis points of commodity pressure year-on-year. We had 90 basis points of freight and transportation pressure. We had a roughly 90 basis points of labor and overhead pressure. Mix accounted for another close to 50 basis points. And on that point in particular, I would remind you that we benefited last year with tremendous task seating mix, particularly on the retail side of the business. So that one is a little less tied to the Americas segment. And then we’ve got some, but not a terribly meaningful amount of price benefit that helped offset that about 30 basis points. So, but — I guess the best way I can answer the question in quantified terms is to talk about it consolidated. But what I would just emphasize is commodities, if it’s 240 basis points at the consolidated level, it’s more than that at the Americas segment level and the same would be true for freight and labor.
Budd Bugatch — Water Tower Research — Analyst
I totally understand that. I was just trying to reconcile that to the 60 basis points, and I think it was 30, 30, 30 for freight, labor and transportation that I heard a few minutes ago.
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Yes, and that’s by the way — but just so that we’re not talking past each other. I was just giving you the walk for Q2 year-over-year. My earlier comments were with respect to our guidance going forward into Q3. And that makes sense to you, right? So in other words, we think we’re going to get another 60 basis points of pressure from commodities as we move from Q2 into Q3, and that’s at the consolidated level. But my comment was still…
Budd Bugatch — Water Tower Research — Analyst
240 or incremental to the 240?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
It would be — it’s incremental. Yes, another 60 basis points over and above what we felt in Q2.
Budd Bugatch — Water Tower Research — Analyst
Got you. So then that would be scheduled at 300 basis points in the third quarter. That’s what I’m trying to — that’s what I was trying to walk to.
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Yes.
Budd Bugatch — Water Tower Research — Analyst
Okay. That’s great. That’s very helpful. And I do understand that the Americas is significantly or is meaningfully more than the pressure elsewhere, and you know how hard that is to factor that? For my follow-up, just wanted to make sure I want to talk about the backlog, and it look to me like orders outstripped some revenues of sales by $130 million or so. So that’s just added to the backlog, right, that goes into the backlog?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Yes. That’s correct. Yes. Our backlog ended the quarter at $967. And you’re absolutely right, the change from beginning of quarter was about that $130 million.
Budd Bugatch — Water Tower Research — Analyst
Okay. So at the beginning back always $967?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Ending Budd, ending backlog was $967.
Budd Bugatch — Water Tower Research — Analyst
Okay. And that’s $130 million higher than where it began. Okay. All right and that’s very helpful. And I appreciate that. And obviously best of luck and best wishes to everybody going forward. Thank you.
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
You as well, Budd. Thanks.
Operator
Thanks, Budd. Thank you. Our next question will come from Greg Burns with Sidoti & Company. Please go ahead.
Greg Burns — Sidoti & Company — Analyst
Hi. I just wanted to follow-up again on the price cost gap you’re seeing. Is there anyway you could quantify like what it was this quarter, or what do you expect it to be next quarter? And over what timeframe given the price increases that you’re layering in, when you expect that to be completely offset?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Yes, Greg, good evening. I’m going to — let me take a stab at your question. And I think this is what you’re asking, I’m just going to kind of recap a couple of the numbers that I just mentioned. In terms of basis point impact on gross margin from year ago levels, we had about 30 basis points of improvement due to net price benefit. Yes, we saw a pretty meaningful decline in overall gross margin performance. And so that 30 basis points was not enough to offset all those other pressures that I mentioned: commodities, freight, labor, and so forth. Is that helpful?
Greg Burns — Sidoti & Company — Analyst
Yes, I guess, I mean, I’m just kind of wondering what’s the path like do you expect the gross margins in the third quarter to be the low and then given the price increases. If everything else stays constant, should we see kind of a steady sequential increase in gross margins over the next few quarters, like how — when do we get back to the neutral?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Yes. No, I think that’s the second part of your question and it’s a great one. And I would say, if you allow us to just assume for a minute that we don’t see further degradation in the cost environment, which are already pretty at a fairly elevated level. Then I think it would be fair to expect improving margin profile moving out of Q3 into Q4 and beyond. Certainly, we expect that in retail, and there is no reason to believe that as we improve our ability to ship more product work through this backlog, we should feel even more pricing benefit flow through. Now it’s not going to be a rapid improvement, we don’t expect, but to shift the improvement.
I think if you want to think of it in terms of pre-pandemic margin levels versus where we are today, you probably argue on a pro forma basis for the consolidated business, a more accurate pre-pandemic gross margin level would be somewhere around 37%, that’s kind of going back to FY ’19. We fully expect that with the pricing that we’ve done, we can work our way back there. And in fact, it won’t be into the early part of FY ’23 likely, but we think late Q1 into Q2 of next year we should be able to get there and arguably better than that, given the performance of retail. And frankly the underlying cost performance and the synergy work that we’re doing.
Greg Burns — Sidoti & Company — Analyst
Okay. And can you just talk about how you hedged steel or how you purchased it — just because steel has come off pretty meaningfully from the peak, at least from what I’m tracking. So can you just talk about how that structural benefit might flow through like do you buy it like six months out, like how does that work?
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Yes. Generally speaking, Greg, we don’t really formally hedge with — like derivative type hedging steel prices. But what we do is, we buy on a lag to the market. And because we buy a decent amount of steel, we get a bit of a discount off of the published market price of steel. And so you’re right, steel has come down off the high. I think the latest is — exactly quote me on this, but it’s something just north of $2,000 a ton for steel. It was as high as — Kevin, you might have the number $2,100 or $2,100 plus. So it has come down a little bit. But what we do is we buy on a lag, so it tends to be about three months, about 90 days. And as a result, we kind of — in a period of inflation, we lag into that over the course of many months. And then as prices start to come back down, the opposite happens. It takes us a little while longer to work to stabilize and then start to realize the benefits of a declining steel market. So that’s why I mentioned earlier, I think if you assume for a minute that steel stays roughly where is that today, we should kind of level out or if you will peak in Q3, and then from there we should start to see some relief from steel prices.
Greg Burns — Sidoti & Company — Analyst
Okay. And just lastly, in terms of the dealer — the network integration. Can you talk about what’s involved in the pilot programs you have going on in Texas and Arizona? Is that just allowing them to sell the full products across all the brands? So what is involved in those and are you seeing any early benefits from those?
John P. Michael — President, The Americas – Herman Miller
Hi. Sure, I’ll take that one. This is John Michael. I think we’ve seen a number of benefits. Before I get to that though, in terms of what’s involved, it’s really working through the readiness and training of both the Millerknoll sales organization, as well as the dealer sales organization. So that the legacy Knoll dealers are trained up on the Herman Miller products, and how to go to market and position the products. And conversely how the legacy Herman Miller dealers are trained up on the Knoll products and how to go to market. And really what’s the compelling value proposition for the market, for customers, for influencers, etc of this amazing collective and portfolio that we have right now.
We’ve learned a lot in both instances in terms of what works and what we need to improve upon, in terms of training the sellers to get them ready. And also really making sure the support staff, that supports them, interior designers, project managers, etc are up to speed as well. So I think it’s really informed a lot of the work that we’re doing for our broader readiness and rollout over the next several months. And we’re looking forward to it, and I know the dealers are ready for it.
Greg Burns — Sidoti & Company — Analyst
Okay, great. Thank you.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question will come from Alex Fuhrman with Craig-Hallum Capital. Please go ahead.
Alex Fuhrman — Craig-Hallum Capital — Analyst
Great. Thanks very much for taking my question. It looked like retail continues to show really strong growth. Can you talk a little bit more about what’s been driving that growth, in terms of e-commerce and your stores? And how long do you think that growth can continue into 2022 and beyond?
Debbie Propst — President, Herman Miller Group Retail
Hi Alex, this is Debbie. Thanks for asking. We’re really pleased with the continued growth we’re seeing in our retail segment. The predominant driver of this growth has continued assortment and expansion and we’re seeing growth across both the brick-and-mortar and e-commerce channels and across all of our brands. And with assortment expansion being the predominant growth lever we feel like that will continue to be a scalable opportunity for us. Coupled with optimizing some of the other investments that we’re making in our business, like the improved POS, some of the marketing investments we’re making on CRM and how we’re using customer data to drive our marketing performance. And ongoing investments in the overall infrastructure to improve customer service. So we continue to look with retail growing at double-digit comps and we’re excited and confident about that. Are you there Alex?
Alex Fuhrman — Craig-Hallum Capital — Analyst
Thank you. Thank you very much for that. And as a quick follow-up if I could. How much of that double-digit growth as you look forward, you expect to come from e-commerce versus continued brick-and-mortar growth? And presumably opening more stores over the next two years?
Debbie Propst — President, Herman Miller Group Retail
We’ll continue to open stores at about the pacing that we have been opening stores. We opened an additional two stores in Q2, we’ll open three more in Q3. And the confidence that we have from the store performance as we open them remains very strong. And these stores predominantly through the Herman Miller brands are really proving to be a strong point of customer acquisition for us, allowing us to engage with a new audience as a result of some of the adjacencies we have with these stores. And we’re engaging with customers who care about our physical well-being and their overall physical performance. And those are customers that we believe we can continue to engage in, beyond the pandemic trends. And so we will continue to invest in new stores, but our base business remains very strong. We had double-digit comp growth as well as double digit total growth. So the improvements that we’re making in our site experience and our marketing optimization and our assortment are driving the base business as well.
Alex Fuhrman — Craig-Hallum Capital — Analyst
Great. That’s really helpful. Thank you very much.
Debbie Propst — President, Herman Miller Group Retail
No problem.
Operator
Thank you. Our next question will come from Rudy Yang with Berenberg. Please go ahead.
Rudy Yang — Berenberg — Analyst
Hey, guys. Happy New Year and thanks for taking my questions.
Jeffrey Stutz — Chief Financial Officer
Hi Rudy.
Rudy Yang — Berenberg — Analyst
So I guess just on run rate synergies, you’re now expecting $120 million after year three. Is that more because of greater success that you initially expected in recognizing the synergies this quarter? Or were there separate opportunities you’ve uncovered? And I guess if that’s the case, could you provide some more color on what is now expected to help drive that additional $20 million?
Kevin J. Veltman — Vice President, Investor Relations
Yes. Rudy, this is Kevin. So as the teams have been working through the integration planning, our original targets were for the $100 million by the end of two years after close. And as we’ve talked in the past, a lot of those savings were coming from org structure and procurement types of savings. As the teams dug-in, they started to look deeper into other categories like manufacturing or logistics, some other procurement opportunities that maybe have a little longer lead time. And so as we looked at it, we identified — we actually see $120 million of opportunity, but that incremental $20 million is some of those longer lead time opportunities in the manufacturing areas or supply chain types of areas. But it was a grounds-up review by the teams looking at not just what could they do within two years but where their opportunities — if given a little more time that we could get after as well.
Rudy Yang — Berenberg — Analyst
Got it. I appreciate that. And then secondly just to kind of get a little bit more color on retail order patterns. I guess, I’m just curious as to how the patterns in terms of product mix has changed as hybrid working has emerged over the last year. Are you seeing customers now accept the reality of work from home more? And as a result they’re kind of pulling the trigger on more essential products, such as heating, which obviously is a higher margin product for you guys. Our ancillary and other alternative home office products starting to — I guess now become more popular.
Debbie Propst — President, Herman Miller Group Retail
So in the retail business we have seen a decline at our overall performance heating, as a percent to our total business year-over-year. However, that is more than offset by our gaming business which is within a seating category. Obviously, it is targeting a different audience. However, we are really pleased with the growth that we’re seeing in other — some of our other core categories, predominantly upholstery, seating and dining and outdoor where we have very high penetrations of private label products within those categories. And therefore some great opportunities in terms of margin enhancement within those categories as we continue to localize our sourcing capabilities. So despite the fact that, we have a slight decline and true performance seating, and we are very confident in the growth that we’re seeing in the rest of our categories, which are double-digit growth in across all those categories with the exception of 9% growth.
Rudy Yang — Berenberg — Analyst
Great. That’s super helpful. I appreciate it. Thank you, guys.
Operator
Thank you. I’m showing no further questions in the queue at this time, I would now like to turn the call back over to management for any closing remarks.
Andrea Owen — President and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, and thanks everybody for joining us today. We really appreciate your continued interest in MillerKnoll. And we look forward to updating you again next quarter. Happy New Year. Bye everyone.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]