RBC Bearings Incorporated (NYSE: RBC) Q4 2025 Earnings Call dated May. 16, 2025
Corporate Participants:
Rob Moffatt — Director of Corporate Development and Investor Relations
Michael J. Hartnett — Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Robert M. Sullivan — Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Analysts:
Kristine Liwag — Analyst
Michael Ciarmoli — Analyst
Steve Barger — Analyst
Peter Skibitski — Analyst
Ross Sparenblek — Analyst
Jordan Lyonnais — Analyst
Presentation:
Rob Moffatt — Director of Corporate Development and Investor Relations
Good morning and thank you for joining us for RBC Bearings Fiscal Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. I’m Rob Moffatt, Director of Corporate Development and Investor Relations, and with me on today’s call are Dr. Michael Hartnett, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer; Daniel Bergeron, Director, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and Rob Sullivan, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
As a reminder, some of the statements made today may be forward-looking and are made under the Private Securities Litigation Reform act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially from those projected or implied due to a variety of factors. We refer you to RBC Barings recent filings with the SEC for a more detailed discussion of the risks that could impact the company’s future operating results and financial condition. These factors are also listed in the press release along with a reconciliation between GAAP and non-GAAP financial Information.
With that, I’ll now turn the call over to Dr. Hartnett.
Michael J. Hartnett — Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, Rob and good morning and thank you for joining us. I’m going to start today’s call with a quick review of our financial results and I’ll finish with some high level thoughts on the industry, our outlook for fiscal 2026 and then hand it over to Rob Sullivan for more detailed color on the numbers. Fourth quarter sales came in at $438 million, a 5.8% increase over last year, driven by continued strong performance in our A&D segment and other very strong performance in the industrial businesses, particularly when viewed against the broader industrial trends. Consolidated gross margin for the quarter was 44.2% versus 43.1% for the same period last year and adjusted diluted EPS was $2.83 a share versus $2.47 a share up 14.6%.
Clearly we’re thrilled to see the results and this reflects the energy and commitment everyone invested to make this year successful. So, a big thank you to Team RBC. Total A&D sales were up 10.6% year-over-year with 11.6% growth on the commercial aerospace and 8.2% on defense. On the industrial side, the segment grew 3.3% year-over-year with distribution and aftermarket up 2.5% and OEM up an impressive 5.1%. In A&D we saw broad strength across the portfolio, our leading sources of growth came from engine OEMs, commercial spare parts, commercial fixed wing aircraft, missiles and guided munitions, and of course, space.
For the full year, A&D sales grew at 14%, with commercial aero up 13.3% and defense up 15.9%. Although the F&A — FAA constrained production and a prolonged strike at our largest customer, coupled with other challenges that the industry faced this past year, we still grew the business at 14% and expanded margins as planned. We clearly benefited from the breadth and diversity of RBC’s portfolio, giving us exposure to many different customers and many different parts of the supply chain. This includes a healthy balance between aftermarket and OEM, fixed wing and rotary craft, and commercial and defense.
We also benefited from highly targeted organic growth initiatives focused on specific customers and programs that not only contributed to fiscal 2025 but should continue to benefit us in 2026 and well beyond. Moving over to industrial segment, we delivered a 3.3% growth this quarter. We were able to grow the business on a full year basis even in an environment where the industrial economy has seen two consecutive years of contraction as measured by the manufacturing PMI. High service levels, lots of internal can do, and incremental progress on new product introductions were the reasons. Our outgrowth relative to peers and the broader industrial economy has been notable and I want to commend our teams for measuring up to the high bar they reached.
Results like this don’t happen by chance, they are the result of our relentless focus on our organic growth during our Ops meetings and the ambitious goals of our managers that are willing and those goals that they’re willing to take on. Coming into the year, we talked about how our focus at Dodge is in the early innings of evolving from delivering cost synergies to driving revenue synergies, and that accelerating growth was the major priority for fiscal 2025. I’m proud to say that these early efforts appear to be, paying off, year-over-year OEM sales growth in the Dodge business has been in the double digits for the past three quarters, and the very strong finish in the fourth quarter enabled them to finish with a double digit OEM sales growth for the full year.
Keep in mind OEM wins today, pay after — pay in the aftermarket and MRO dividends for years to come. With fiscal 2025 behind us, let’s spend a little time talking about 2026. In terms of end markets, we believe commercial Arrow is poised for growth of at least 15%, driven primarily by the expected year-over-year production growth at Boeing and Airbus. Last year had its challenges for Boeing, but the company appears to be making substantial progress under its new CEO and recent trends are very encouraging to the industry.
On the defense side, we are comping against substantial growth of nearly 22% in fiscal 2024 and 16% in 2025. Even against this high bar, we believe we can grow the business at least in the mid-to-high single digits and likely more. We are adding additional capacity at several plants to accommodate very strong demand from a wide array of defense OEMs. Certainly this led to by growth in submarines coupled with broader strength across RBC’s portfolio in support of the government’s proposed $1 trillion dollar defense budget for the industrial businesses. End markets are a little tougher to predict due to the short term impact of interest rates, tariffs, consumer spending and general GDP expansion or not.
In any event, we feel the MRO side of the world that supports the staples of human life such as food and beverage, grain, aggregate mining, forest products, sewage treatment provide a steady demand for our North American product offering and are essential to keep the wheels of American industry turning and America’s population Fed. The last topic I want to touch on before handing the call over to Rob is the balance sheet, last quarter we crossed the two turn mark from a net leverage perspective and this quarter we pushed it even lower. In total we allocated $275 million to debt repayment in fiscal 2025, taking our trailing net leverage to 1.7 turns exiting the year.
We remain well poised to pursue additional accretive M&A and the team has been very active in keeping the pipeline full of ideas. Looking ahead, fiscal 2026 is poised to be another strong year for RBC. The backdrop for growth across all of our channels is substantial and our team is laser focused on executing at the highest level.
With that, I’d like to turn over the call to Rob Sullivan for more details.
Robert M. Sullivan — Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Mike. As Dr. Hartnett indicated, this was another strong quarter for RBC. Net sales growth of 5.8% drove gross profit growth of 8.5% with more than 110 basis points of expansion. The quarter benefited from strong manufacturing performance coupled with the structural drivers of our gross margin performance including Dodge synergies, increased utilization of our aerospace and defense manufacturing assets and the continuous improvement focus on the RBC Ops management process. Industrial gross margins during the quarter were 45.7% and aerospace and defense margins were 41.5%. On the SG&A line we continued our investments in future growth. This included a combination of investments in personnel costs and back office support, including IT.
This resulted in adjusted EBITDA of $139.8 million up 7.4% year-over-year and an adjusted EBITDA margin of 31.9% which was up 50 basis points year-over-year. Interest expense in the quarter was $12.8 million, this was down 31.8% year-over-year, reflecting the ongoing repayment of our term loan as well as a lower rate on the loan as the SOFR base rate has moved lower. The tax rate in our adjusted EPS calculation was 21.7%, reasonably consistent versus last year’s 21.2%. Altogether, this led to adjusted diluted EPS of $2.83 representing growth of 14.6% year-over-year, an impressive result given the choppiness in commercial aerospace customer production schedules and the macroeconomic softness in the industrial economy.
Free cash flow in the quarter came in at $55 million with conversion of 76% and compares to $70 million and 113% last year. The lower conversion rate this quarter was primarily the result of timing around accounts receivable driven by year-over-year increased sales. As usual, we used the cash generated to continue to deleverage the balance sheet, we repaid $82 million of the debt during the quarter, taking our total year-to-date debt reduction to $275 million.
All in, this is another strong year for free cash flow generation and all of that cash flow is applied to debt reduction. This takes our trailing net leverage to 1.7 turns, leaving our balance sheet in an increasingly attractive position to pursue additional accretive M&A. Looking into the first quarter, we are guiding to revenues of $424 million to $434 million, representing year-over-year growth of 4.4% to 6.8%. That guidance embeds an operating environment that’s fairly similar to the fiscal fourth quarter. On the margin side, we are projecting gross margins of $44.25 to $44.75 for the quarter which at the midpoint would be up against the full year fiscal 2025 performance. Our focus on continuous improvement on the margin line marches on and can be seen in our outlook for full year gross margin expansion of 50 basis points to 100 basis points which will likely be back half weighted.
This is inclusive of all tariffs at the current levels, we currently expect tariff pressure to be minimal and believe we can mitigate the expected headwinds and still deliver margin expansion on a full year basis. Similar to prior years, we expect to reinvest some of this margin expansion into fueling future growth through investments in the SG&A line. We expect other factors to be normal as well including free cash flow conversion of 100%, adjusted taxes in the 22% to 23% range and CapEx in the range of 3% to 3.5% of sales. In closing, this was another strong quarter for RBC and we are poised for another strong year.
We remain focused on leveraging our core strengths in engineering, manufacturing and product development to drive both organic and inorganic growth. Continuous improvement in operating efficiency at high levels of free cash flow conversion.
With that operator, please open the call for Q&A.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Certainly, we now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is coming from Kristine Liwag from Morgan Stanley. Your line is now live.
Kristine Liwag
Hey, good morning, everyone.
Michael J. Hartnett
Good morning.
Robert M. Sullivan
Hi, Kristine.
Kristine Liwag
So, maybe first question on commercial aerospace and we’re starting to finally see Boeing production rate move in that positive trajectory. So, I guess I wanted to level set on — can you remind us, when we actually get to let’s say 50 per month for the 737 Max and 10 per month for the 787. I mean, how much bigger is your commercial aerospace OE business at that point? And then also when we think about margins, you guys have done an incredible job holding onto margins even though production rates have been uncertain. When we get to that full run rate, how should we think about the margin opportunity?
Michael J. Hartnett
Well, Kristine, you asked some difficult questions, as usual.
Kristine Liwag
And I’m hoping you’re going to have some great answers.
Michael J. Hartnett
Yeah, well, actually you would be the person I would go to to ask when Boeing is going to get to the 50 a month. So, right now we’re hoping to see them get to the 38 number, which I think they’re going to get to very soon, within a month or two. And then apparently they’re pretty far along with the FAA on approving their key metrics, and which sort of turns on the next ten planes for them. So, we’re thinking that, it’s going to be not too deep into calendar ’26 before we start seeing plane builds in the upper 40s,
On that — Is that, how you see it?
Kristine Liwag
Yeah, I mean, I just looked at the May deliveries and we’re only in the halfway part of May and they got to some pretty good production numbers. So, I think I would agree with your assessment of the 38 is going to be very soon, but what I wanted to ask you is when you do get to that 40s per month or even eventually 50, how much bigger could your revenue be because you won a Lot of shipset content for the max versus the NG that we didn’t really see the full benefit of because of the disruption in production.
So, I just wanted to understand, could your Boeing commercial OE revenue be at this point, 2x versus 2019, just some sort of level setting numbers around that Mike?
Michael J. Hartnett
Okay, well, let me do a little math here and maybe come back at the other end of the Q&A and I’ll have my math done.
Kristine Liwag
Sounds good. And then in the meantime, in industrials, I was wondering, I mean, you guys were very clear that this — the growth that you’re seeing is from the improvement of — from the strategy of your team versus the end markets. Can you give a little bit more color on exactly what kind of initiatives you took and how much that provided you in terms of incremental growth versus end markets? And could you sustain your leadership in growth versus peers in this cycle?
Michael J. Hartnett
Yeah, on the industrial side. Yeah, I think. Well, a couple of things there. I think first of all, there was some product lines that had service level problems at Dodge that after we acquired the company and we started working and making it a priority with the Dodge folks to improve the service levels and the production capacity for certain products. And certainly they did that and the market responded very well to that initiative. I mean, that’s sort of the easiest thing to fix because of — you don’t have to worry about product development and testing and long cycle kind of things.
So, you really want to get at the service level problems first. And then on the longer cycle they had, Dodge had several products that were through the test cycle when we acquired the business, but weren’t, weren’t capitalized or capitalization and wasn’t encouraged. I think it was just they were busy selling the business for a couple years. So, things, priorities change and so, we were the benefit benefactors, beneficiaries of that business and we were able to turn on some of those new products pretty quickly and so, that’s certainly accruing to the overall benefit.
And then I think the third thing, there’s longer-term opportunities that Dodge has that sort of are in the pipeline right now that will take a little bit longer to mature, but have some significant market positions once matured. So, it’s overall a pretty healthy outlook for them.
Kristine Liwag
Great, thank you.
Michael J. Hartnett
Yeah.
Operator
Thank you. Next question today is coming from Michael Ciarmoli from Truist securities, your line is now live.
Michael Ciarmoli
Hey, morning guys. Nice results. Thanks for taking the questions. Hey Rob, do you happen to — I know we’ll get it in the queue, do you happen to have the gross margins by segment for the quarter?
Robert M. Sullivan
I did read them out in my script, but I will repeat them. The industrial gross margins were 45.7% this quarter and A&D was 41.5%.
Michael Ciarmoli
Got it. And do we — how are we, I know you gave some color on ’26. Any thoughts? I mean, I guess the gross margin expansion maybe seems a bit conservative assuming we get the volumes and I know that’s, still a bit of a wild card. Everything from Boeing sounding better but, if we get more margin expansion, I’m assuming it comes on the aerospace and defense side. Is it fair to say there’s more Runway there?
Robert M. Sullivan
Yeah, I think we certainly see a lot of Runway, you can see the gap between and industrial and where A&D is today versus where it’s demonstrated its ability in the past leaves us opportunity to expand with more throughput in the plants. We’ve spoken about some of the contract renewals that will come up late in the year and the increased volumes all kind of contributing. So, we think that the gross margins in A&D certainly have some Runway there. And as I mentioned, that expansion looks like it could be back half weighted 50 bps to 100 bps.
Michael Ciarmoli
Got it. And then, you guys gave some pretty good detail on ’26 with I’d say more of that contained to Arrow and I get the industrial environments probably a little bit more fluid and harder to predict but I mean if we kind of mash it together, it sounds like the Arrow side of the house can grow low teens. I mean if you kind of imply low-single, maybe mid-single for industrial. Are you guys comfortable with a $1.7 billion to $1.8 billion revenue kind of bogey for next year?
Robert M. Sullivan
I think we’re really sticking to the direct guidance for the next quarter as we always do. Yeah, we’ve offered some color on the A&D for the full year and we’ll go from there.
Michael Ciarmoli
Okay. Last one and I’ll jump back in the queue. You talked about minimal tariff impact. I mean, is there any change in your thought process around kind of your sentiment or views on tariffs? I mean that the commentary last quarter, I think it was talking about adding spice and fuel that would strongly net good for the business. So, has anything kind of changed around tariffs ability to offset with pricing? Are you seeing any share gains as customers potentially rethink their supply chains looking for domestic sources?
Michael J. Hartnett
Well, I think short-term versus long-term, I mean, short-term we have a certain supply-chain and so on and so forth. So, there’s a — we’ve looked at it pretty, pretty closely and we think short-term we’re neutral on, for the most part on tariff impact. For the long-term, I think it’s, depending upon the extent of the tariff. The larger the tariff, the more we’re going to benefit. Just because there’s going to be shortages everywhere and the right mix will find us.
We won’t have to search for it.
Michael Ciarmoli
Got it. Understood. All right, thanks guys. I’ll jump back in the queue.
Operator
Thank you. Next question today is coming from Steve [Phonetics] Barger from Keybanc Capital Markets. Your line is now live.
Steve Barger
Thanks. Good morning.
Michael J. Hartnett
Good morning.
Steve Barger
Mike. You talked about organic growth initiatives targeted at specific customers and programs, but I know the team is always in front of people. So, is this an acceleration of existing programs, are you trying something new? And what does that look like?
Michael J. Hartnett
Well, it depends upon whether you’re talking A&D or industrial. I mean, obviously the way the A&D works, you’re always in front of people with new programs. I mean, it’s just, it’s just the way the way the business is working, seems like it’s always worked that way. Industrial, it’s a little different, I think Dodge has had pretty much over the years a pretty fixed mix and a well honed process and so, Dodge, we’re taking a few additional steps to invigorate their OEM business. And that’s having modest gains.
Steve Barger
Is that targeting more wallet share with existing customers or are you casting a broader net for new customers?
Michael J. Hartnett
Both, absolutely both. And we’re doing some things to make it easier for new customers to do business with us. And we’re opening up some geographic regions that have been where we really didn’t have significant representation or customer reach in the past.
Steve Barger
Got it. You may have talked about this in the past, but what are the new regions that you’re really targeting?
Michael J. Hartnett
Well, I think there’s, the most productive regions are in North Americ, the more exotic and higher risk regions are elsewhere in the world, South America, India, Mexico, places Like that.
Steve Barger
Got it. And then last question. I know capacity utilization is always a tricky question because of productivity initiatives and your ability to run over time or add a shift. But if you’re going to post double digit growth in A&D and we also get a firmer industrial production cycle, how much flexibility do you have in the plants to support that higher growth right now?
Michael J. Hartnett
Well, I’m glad you asked that question because, we’ve got a lot of plants and the demand on these plants isn’t the same on all the plants. I mean some plants are overloaded with demand, some plants are just well balanced and so on the A&D side of it, looks like about 70% of our revenues, plants that make 70% of our revenues are way over demand. Demand is in capacity are not balanced. There’s far more demand than there is capacity. So, that’s, we’ve had what double digit growth for the last couple of years, those businesses, and inevitably we kind of hit a capacity ceiling in some of those businesses and we’re working our way through that ceiling now.
And so, that’s capital, machinery, labor. So, we’re adding labor, we’re adding hours and we’re adding machinery and actually we’re moving machinery from, from plants that are balanced and can do with less machinery to plants that, where demand is, and capacity is constrained. So, all that is taking place as we speak and so we’re going to grow our throughput in those A&D plants through the, through this year and it’s going to continue next year. It’s going to be the same process, at least for the next two years. We’re just going to be chasing this for a while.
But that’s, that’s a great thing to have to deal with. I mean of all the problems I, I have, if you call this a problem, I’ll take it.
Steve Barger
Yeah, for sure. That’s a — it’s a great problem to have. Did you — maybe I missed it, did you throw out a CapEx number for the year?
Robert M. Sullivan
It’ll be in the 3% to 3.5%.
Steve Barger
Got it. Okay, thanks.
Operator
Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question — our next question, I should say is coming from Peter Skibitski from Alembic Global. Your line is now live.
Peter Skibitski
Hey, good morning, guys.
Michael J. Hartnett
Good morning, Pete.
Peter Skibitski
Maybe one for Rob. Hey, Rob, I think you said the free cash conversion target for ’26 is 1 times. You had this big receivables build here in the fourth quarter. I don’t know how fast you expect to collect on that, but it seems to the extent you can collect on that, since it’s pretty large, that maybe 1 times conversion is kind of conservative, unless you think as you grow here, that fourth quarter will be kind of ongoing receivables delays but was wondering if you could have some color on that?
Robert M. Sullivan
Yeah, I mean the 1 time is always our target. Hopefully we’ll beat it, we are continuing to grow sales so, there’ll always be some of that pressure, but we’re going to do what we can to exceed that.
Peter Skibitski
Okay, fair enough. And then just on the CapEx profile, I guess maybe, Mike, if this reconciliation bill goes through and defense budgets grow well into the double digits, is that going to kind of set off another CapEx cycle for you guys, just given that’s a pretty big step up in potential demand there. I don’t know what this current cycle kind of enables you for capacity wise?
Michael J. Hartnett
Yes, it will. And we actually, our planning a five year kind of outlook for a couple of our plants and sort of what do we need for capital and how do we adjust? Because when you look at what the growth is going to be in some of those plants over the next five years, given sort of the A&D profile that we’re looking at, we have to act now to get ahead of it.
Peter Skibitski
Okay, makes sense. Last one for me, just on, I think Steve kind of asked about the SG&A investment side, I think I might have missed some of it. Could you just update us on the timeline in terms of — have you reached kind of peak incremental spend on some of the incremental IT investments and the indie investments that you guys wanted to do. And so, I don’t know if we should expect some operating leverage at this point going forward or are you still kind of growing that investment and maybe what’s the return timeline on that?
Robert M. Sullivan
Yeah, so, we’re continuing to invest in the growth. Obviously we’re trying to grow the company at a healthy rate, but the key takeaway would be of that margin expansion that we’re seeking, we’re always aiming to see a good amount of that fall down to the EBITDA line. That’s the best way, I’d frame it.
Peter Skibitski
Okay, fair enough. Thanks guys.
Operator
Thank you. Next question is coming from Ross Sparenblek, from William Blair. Your line is now live.
Ross Sparenblek
Hi. Good afternoon, guys.
Michael J. Hartnett
Good afternoon, Ross.
Ross Sparenblek
Hey, on the defense guidance, I believe you guys said, mid-to-high single-digit plus for 2026 seems like a, generally broad range there. So, it’d be great to just gauge the sensitivity and what’s informing the lower end versus the high end. Is it more just ramping capacity or is it kind of just customer timing?
Michael J. Hartnett
It’s probably ramping capacity, Ross. It’s, we’ve are working our way through some pretty substantial contracts with the majors, both plane builders and the defense agencies or the — the defense OEMs. And so, a lot of them are already booked or in process or late to book because of administrative delay on the other side. But, it’s definitely going to be a capacity challenge for us.
Ross Sparenblek
Okay, understood. And then maybe just on industrial, can you just elaborate on some of the end market dynamics there? On the strength on the OEM side? Noted Dodge being strong, maybe just on the RBC Classic?
Rob Moffatt
Hey Ross, it’s Rob Moffatt. Just looking at the end markets. Mining metals was our strongest, we’ve had a couple decent quarters there, aggregate and cement was number two. And warehousing and logistics is an end market that has turned very nicely positive for us. Those are our top three contributors for growth.
Ross Sparenblek
Okay. So, I mean you get the sense that, the worst is kind of in the rear view here, oil and gas is still expected, second half, ’25. So, maybe it’s more just a mix when we think about the first quarter margin — gross margin, step down to just strengthen the OEM for RBC classic?
Michael J. Hartnett
You’re talking about the, you talk about the Q1 versus Q1 last year. I think I would just point to the fact that, Q1 last year was an exceptionally strong margin quarter, we had a nice product mix there coupled with some expedites that were flowing through, if you recall. So, I just kind of remind you that the overall implication for the Q1 margin is above the full year FY25 performance?
Robert M. Sullivan
Ross, if you’re thinking in terms of growth, I mean we do still have headwinds in the oil and gas segment in the semiconductor end markets. Still think that those are going to turn, if you look at the strong performance that we had in industrial, it’s a lot of the things that Dr. Hartnett talked about earlier, organic growth initiatives, really strong performance at Dodge, picking up pockets of market share in different places. It’s the things that we focus on during Ops that are driving that.
Michael J. Hartnett
More so, than markets.
Ross Sparenblek
Awesome. Thanks, guys.
Operator
Thank you. Next question is coming from Jordan Lyonnais from Bank of America. Your line is now live.
Jordan Lyonnais
Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. I appreciate the comments on the debt repayment, but could you guys, give a sense of what you’re seeing for M&A pipeline? Has anything changed in the market for you or what’s coming up that you’d be interested in?
Robert M. Sullivan
Well, on M&A, I would say that first of all we’ve been working hard looking at alternatives and lots of alternatives and so, we’ve been busy. Fit and synergy is important to us in our aspects of selection and we’re very selective. But, we’re spending considerable amount of time here on candidates and it does burden. It’s a big burden for the staff, let’s put it that way.
We think progress is being made. We think the balance sheet’s in good position to do something if we need to act. And if we do see something we like will act quickly.
Jordan Lyonnais
Great. Thank you so much.
Operator
Thank you. Next question today is coming from Kristine Liwag from Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your follow up.
Kristine Liwag
If I wanted to get back in queue, Mike, to check on your math, I know you’re really good at it, so I just want to make sure you didn’t forget.
Michael J. Hartnett
Kristine, I thought. I was hoping you’d forget. This is the way my math — This is the way my math came out. And I’ll let you do it by I did it by 10 plane build rate for the 737. Okay. A 10 plane rate annually would add about $24 million. For the 777, a five plane rate would add $24 million. And for the 320, a 10 plane rate would add $12 million.
Kristine Liwag
Great. Wow, these are great numbers. And then — So, thank you. So, I’ll do some number crunching and follow up with you offline, but I was wondering maybe since I’m back in queue, another follow up on the previous question on M&A. Speaking to some industry folks, I actually think that a lot of people are really surprised what you’re able to do with a Dodge asset, right? I mean who would have thought that by now your industrial business would be a few hundred basis points higher in gross margin than your aerospace defense business. So, I guess, looking at, you’ve always had faith in your team and you’ve had a pretty structured way of training all your employees.
But, I think that kind of performance really surprised the industry in Dodge. So, I was wondering now that you have seen the size, I mean, doubling your revenue and getting over 1,000 basis points in margin within 18 months of ownership, these are all pretty spectacular accomplishments, really on operations. I was wondering, does that give you more confidence? Does that widen your aperture? Regarding deals, you could look at assets that you think you could turn around or extract more value from. And also when you look at your priorities for that balance sheet at 1.7 times that that EBITDA, you do have a lot of Runway and with your organic business, you don’t need to acquire but can you give us some sort of guidance regarding what kind of assets would be interesting to you? Is it more industrial? Is it more aerospace, defense? Like, are there some sort of milestones or markers either in size or proprietary content that we can kind of follow? Thanks.
Michael J. Hartnett
Sure. Well, certainly on the aerospace, defense side, we like companies that, sell to our customers because, the customers in that sphere are very sophisticated. The terms and conditions are very difficult and time consuming to negotiate. And so if you a customer where you’ve negotiated your terms and you’ve — you understand how the customer makes decisions and the people at the account and how they think and you have the account covered with marketing people that have been servicing the account for a decade, you feel pretty comfortable in a company that, looking at a company that services that account too.
So, you can quickly identify, what the company’s position is, what its reputation is, how it goes to market, how it prices its product, so on and so forth. So, that’s part of the profile that we really, we really like. And that also would add scale at that account to us, which, overall helps in your statement of work. So, that checks a big box and we like that box checked, and when it comes to making things, we have, I don’t know, probably more than a 1,000 engineers that know how to make stuff, and they’re very good at manufacturing processes.
So, our ability to absorb the manufacturing world for the target is very high ability and so, if they’re doing something that we can improve, we can identify it right away and we can bring in the right specialist that deals with that particular aspect of manufacturing and sort of off we go and so there’s nothing for us, there’s nothing scary about it and it takes a lot of risk off the table, at the same time, the account, the manufacturing, the plant efficiencies, what you can do to improve the plant efficiencies, maybe what the pricing mechanism is different than maybe you would want to — you would price. So, you can see a long way when there’s candidates that have that kind of a profile.
Kristine Liwag
Great. Thank you.
Michael J. Hartnett
Yeah.
Operator
Thank you. We reached out of our question-and-answer session. I’d like to turn the floor back over for any further closing comments.
Michael J. Hartnett
Okay. Well, I have no more comments. I think I’m pretty much commented out, but I appreciate everybody participating today. And there was a lot of good questions. I hope we gave you good answers and we look forward to talking to you later in the summer. Thank you.
Robert M. Sullivan
Thank you.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks].