STERIS Corporation (NYSE: STE) Q4 2025 Earnings Call dated May. 15, 2025
Corporate Participants:
Julie Winter — Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications
Michael J. Tokich — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Daniel A. Carestio — President and Chief Executive Officer
Analysts:
Dave Turkaly — Analyst
Mike Matson — Analyst
Patrick Wood — Analyst
Mac Etoch — Analyst
Michael Polark — Analyst
Jason Bednar — Analyst
Brett Fishbin — Analyst
Presentation:
Operator
Good morning, everyone. And welcome to the STERIS plc Fourth Quarter 2025 Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please also note today’s event is being recorded.
At this time, I’d like to turn the floor over to Julie Winter, Investor Relations. Ma’am, please go ahead.
Julie Winter — Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications
Thank you, Jamie. And good morning, everyone. As usual, speaking on today’s call will be Mike Tokich, our Senior Vice President and CFO; and Dan Carestio, our President and CEO. And I do have a few words of caution before we open for comments. This webcast contains time-sensitive information that is accurate only as of today. Any redistribution, retransmission, or rebroadcast of this call without the express written consent of STERIS is strictly prohibited.
Some of the statements made during this review are or may be considered forward-looking statements. Many important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including without limitation, those risk factors described in STERIS’ Securities Filings. The company does not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events, or developments. STERIS’ SEC filings are available through the company and on our website.
In addition, on today’s call, non-GAAP financial measures including adjusted earnings per diluted share, adjusted operating income, constant currency organic revenue growth, and free cash flow will be used. Additional information regarding these measures, including definitions, is available in our release, as well as reconciliations between GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP financial measures are presented during this call with the intent of providing greater transparency to supplemental financial Information used by management and the Board of Directors in their financial analysis and operational decision making.
With those cautions, I will hand the call over to Mike.
Michael J. Tokich — Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Julie. And good morning, everyone. It is once again my pleasure to be with you this morning to review the highlights of our fourth quarter performance from continuing operations. For the fourth quarter total, as reported revenue grew 4%, constant currency organic revenue grew 6% in the quarter driven by volume as well as 210 basis points of price. Gross margin for the quarter increased 170 basis points compared with the prior year to 44.3%. Positive price, favorable mix, and productivity outpaced labor inflation. EBIT margin increased 110 basis points to 24.8% of revenue compared with last year.
The adjusted effective tax rate in the quarter was 23.5%. The year-over-year increase was driven by unfavorable discrete item adjustments. Net income from continuing operations in the quarter was $270 million. Adjusted earnings per diluted share from continuing operations was $2.74, a 14% increase over the prior year. We are pleased with our ability to grow earnings double-digits all year with lower interest expense following the divestiture of the dental segment.
Capital expenditures for fiscal 2025 totaled $370 million, while depreciation and amortization totaled $476 million. We continue to pay down debt during the quarter, ending with $2 billion in total debt. Gross debt to EBITDA at quarter end was approximately 1.4 times free. Cash flow for fiscal 2025 was a record $787 million, well above our full year guidance, driven by significant working capital improvements in particular inventory.
With that, I’ll turn the call over to Dan for his remarks.
Daniel A. Carestio — President and Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Mike. And good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us to hear more about our fiscal 2025 performance and our outlook for fiscal 2026. Mike covered the quarter, so I will touch on our performance for the full year and our outlook for fiscal 2026. From a total company perspective we ended the year with 6% revenue growth and 12% earnings growth. The diversified nature of our business allowed us to deliver results in line with our original outlook despite a few obstacles during the year.
Looking at our segments. Healthcare constant currency organic revenue grew 6% for the year, led by strong recurring revenue streams. Our outperformance in consumables and services continues to be driven by procedure volumes in the US as well as price and market share gains. Healthcare capital equipment revenue declined 5% for the year against our record year last year. Capital equipment orders grew over 12% for the full year as underlying demand remained strong. Margins improved nicely in Healthcare, hitting the 25% mark for the year with volume, pricing, and positive productivity offsetting labor inflation. Towards the end of the year, we also began to benefit from the restructuring cost savings, capturing approximately $5 million in savings in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025.
Turning to AST. Constant currency organic revenue grew 9% for the year with 7% growth in services. Med device customers remained stable, while bioprocessing was a bit lumpy during the year. Capital equipment shipments more than doubled compared to the prior year and exceeded our expectations. EBIT margins for AST were 44.8%, down slightly year-over-year as we continue to face energy and labor headwinds, and had a negative mix shift from capital equipment shipments. Constant currency organic revenue increased 1% for Life Sciences for the full year, driven once again by strong growth in consumables and services offset by a decline in capital equipment revenue. Margins increased to 42.3%, a 360 basis point improvement benefiting from favorable mix, pricing, and the divestiture of the CECS business. From an earnings perspective, we ended the year strong and exceeded our revised outlook with adjusted EPS of $9.22. The upside to our estimates was driven by lower corporate spending and improved profitability in both Healthcare and the Life Science segments.
Turning to our outlook for fiscal 2026. As noted in the press release, we anticipate as reported revenue from continuing operations to grow 6% to 7% in fiscal 2026. We do not have any acquisition or divestiture impacts heading into the new fiscal year, and changes in foreign currency are expected to be neutral to STERIS. As a result, constant currency organic revenue growth is also expected to grow 6% to 7%. Included in this outlook is approximately 200 basis points of price. Each segment is expected to grow revenue in the range of 6% to 7% for fiscal 2026. One minor note on AST revenue growth, our outlook reflects high single digit growth in services revenue which will be somewhat offset by a decline in capital equipment to get to the 6% to 7% growth total for the year.
As you saw in the press release, we have estimated the impact for tariffs for fiscal 2026, which are reflected in our outlook. We manufacture a significant number of products in North America for use in the US with about 85% of the products sold in the US coming from North American manufacturing. This significantly reduces our tariff exposure compared to many others, but we are not immune to the impact of tariffs. Our fiscal 2026 outlook of $9.90 to $10.15 includes $30 million of tariff costs. The EPS range implies 7% to 10% growth in earnings including tariffs, which is impressive performance. I want to take a moment to thank our supply chain and commercial teams for all their efforts on this front.
The anticipated tariff impact is a net number, we do expect to leverage the strength of STERIS to mitigate some of our exposure. The $30 million estimate is based on global tariffs currently in effect, including the 10% global tariff and the recently announced 90-day trade deal with China. For your modeling purposes, at the high end of our earnings range, we would expect EBIT margins to increase approximately 20 basis points, reflecting our ability to offset tariffs. The effective tax rate is planned at approximately 23.5%. As we enter into the new fiscal year, we are well-positioned to deliver both top and bottom-line growth in 2026.
That concludes our proposal for the call. Julie, would you please give the instructions so that we can begin the Q&A?
Julie Winter — Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications
Thank you, Mike and Dan for your comments. Jamie, can you please give the instructions for Q&A, and we’ll get started.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, at this time we’ll begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] And our first question today comes from Dave Turkaly from Citizens. Please go ahead with your question.
Dave Turkaly
Hey, good morning and congrats on the quarter and the year. I guess we’re looking at the segments, the biggest implied deltas, and then that Life Sciences [Phonetic] and I was just curious to get some color on your comfort in that kind of bouncing back to that 6% to 7% range.
Daniel A. Carestio
Yeah, we did extremely well this year in our recurring revenues, especially our chemistries and consumables business, and we would expect that to continue. Where we were down significantly was obviously in capital equipment, with a lot of uncertainty in pharma, the orders just dried up in the first half of the year. However, we saw a really strong rebound late in the year and we are coming into fiscal 2026 with a pretty good backlog and a pretty good rate of order. So we’re confident that we’ll be able to deliver the bulk of those in the fiscal 2026, and continue on with the growth that we’ve seen historically within our consumables business.
Dave Turkaly
Great. As one quick follow-up, it seems like the tariff impact might be, I don’t know, $0.24 or something like that on the EPS line. Yet you’re still getting into a double-digit range at the high end. I guess if you could just talk about some of the puts, and take maybe even on the interest expense. I know you’ve delevered a bunch but to get to that, even despite the tariffs, just maybe some color there.
Michael J. Tokich
Yeah, Dave, this is Mike. So as normal there’s quite a bit of headwinds or tailwinds or puts and takes. First and foremost we are going to benefit from about $20 million of restructuring cost savings that will be in FY26, so that’s a good guy. In addition to that, we do not anticipate spending $20 plus million in ETO litigation. We anticipate spending about $5 million, so there’s $15 million to the good also. But offsetting that is incentive comp getting back to 100% bonus, that is a negative $15 million. Obviously, the tariffs are another negative $15 million. And then if you look at our lower interest expense is really going to offset our higher tax rate. So that’s just a reconciliation for FY26 of the puts and takes.
Dave Turkaly
Thank you.
Michael J. Tokich
You’re welcome.
Operator
Our next question comes from Mike Matson from Needham & Company. Please go ahead with your question.
Mike Matson
Yes, thanks. So just your cash flow guidance is a little bit down from ’25. I know you called out the working capital improvement you saw in ’25. I mean, is that the mean kind of differential between the two years?
Michael J. Tokich
The big thing, Mike, is we anticipate paying $40 million legal settlement for ETO, which is in FY26. So that’s going to negatively impact cash by $40 million. And of course, we are not anticipating to overachieve or reduce inventory as dramatically as we had in FY25. But the big difference is the ETO legal fees, plus the impact of tariffs, will negatively impact free cash flow also.
Mike Matson
Okay, got it. And then just your leverage ratio is down quite a bit. So, just maybe you can give us. An update on M&A, I’d expect you probably be looking to do some more deals if you can find things, but.
Daniel A. Carestio
Yeah, this is Dan. What I would say, Mike, is that we have the capacity both from a financial perspective and from an intellectual perspective at this point, having not done any meaningful M&A now for a few years. So if the right opportunity presents itself, we’ll be involved.
Mike Matson
Okay, thank you.
Operator
Our next question comes from Patrick Wood from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead with your question.
Patrick Wood
Awesome. Thanks, for taking. Just two quick ones. It’s probably too early to say, but how the conversations with the customers been around potentially like onshoring back to the US. I’m trying to think of I know some of the outsourced contract manufacturers have seen a big pickup in people trying to pull production back. I’m just curious, is that something that you think is actually going to happen, or is it more just a nice bullet point on a McKinsey slide?
Daniel A. Carestio
It’s probably the latter. But I do think there is some opportunities. I assume you were talking about MeTtech in particular, but I do think there are some opportunities many of those large companies have manufacturing for local regions and to the extent that they may be manufacturing in Europe for the US and they have US based manufacturing for similar products, you may see some shift of volumes going, east or west, depending on the benefit that they can do in terms of tariff. And how easy it is to do it. Keep in mind, highly regulated industry, it’s not easy to move production volumes if they don’t have all the regulatory permits and things like that. So it takes time, but there’ll be some fluidity to it, I’m sure.
Patrick Wood
That’s awesome. And then just quickly around the kind of that M&A angle again. What have you been hearing from some of the smaller players? Niche app compliance, costs, all those sorts of things. Is there a situation where I know EO capacity is tight, but is there a situation where they end up having to force sell themselves essentially to you guys or your peers? How do you think about industry consolidation on the back of the one-off cost there?
Daniel A. Carestio
I mean, in a general sense I do think there will be some industry consolidation, but we’d be in a much better position greenfielding than we would be buying assets that are 30-plus years old.
Patrick Wood
I mean, I’m 40, so I take offense at that, but thanks guys.
Daniel A. Carestio
Well, you’ve been compliant your whole life.
Patrick Wood
That’s definitely not true.
Operator
Our next question comes from Mac Etoch from Stephens Inc. Please go ahead with your question.
Mac Etoch
Hey, good morning. I’ll add my congrats on the quarter and the year as well. Maybe just touching on the outlook for FY26. You commented on AST kind of coming in line with 6% to 7% growth for the year. Low single digits for capital equipment, high single digits for services. But can you flush out what you’re seeing within the respective customer bases there? I think there’s a little bit of a delta between what maybe I and the street were expecting versus your internal expectations. So if you could just provide us a little color there, that’d be great.
Daniel A. Carestio
Yeah, I think what we’re doing here is we’ve seen a lot of just movement month-to-month, quarter-to-quarter in terms of volume. It has started to sort of modulate down. But, our view is let’s take a little more conservative approach on how aggressively some of the bioprocessing is going to recover. And also, as customers reassess where they’re manufacturing and if there is any movement going on, and what implications that may have on total volume.
Mac Etoch
Got it. And then just in light of like the current macro and everything that’s going on with general policy. Is there how are conversations progressing with clients? Have there been any change in behaviors relating to Life Sciences or the AST segment?
Daniel A. Carestio
Nothing that I would point to, number of discussions, but I can’t say there’s anything concrete.
Mac Etoch
Thank you for taking my questions. Appreciate it.
Daniel A. Carestio
Sure thing.
Operator
Our next question comes from Michael Polark from Wolfe Research. Please go ahead with your question.
Michael Polark
Hey, good morning. Maybe two on Healthcare. The first one, the allusion to market share gains driving growth in the fiscal year and quarter. I know we’ve talked about this before, but is there any service or business line that really stands out to you there as to STERIS doing way better than market? If so, what is it, and what’s going right?
Daniel A. Carestio
Honestly, I would say it’s just across the entire segment right now. Our teams are just doing a phenomenal job in particular in the North American markets that we’re just, we’ve just built out such a great portfolio and enterprise solution for large systems around sterile processing in particular, and all the services that go along with that, that we continue to do really well.
Michael Polark
And for the fiscal year ahead, 6% to 7% growth for the Healthcare segment. Would you call out any expected variances between how consumables services and equipment should grow in ’26?
Daniel A. Carestio
No, we’re not going to provide that level of granularity. I will hit back on the fact that we had a great order year for that bodes well in terms of backlog for capital going into next year, and so we’re optimistic about that.
Michael Polark
Thank you.
Operator
Our next question comes from Jason Bednar from Piper Sandler. Please go ahead with your question.
Jason Bednar
Hey, morning, everyone. Nice finish to the year here. Wanted to see if we could spend just maybe a bit more time on tariffs. Really topical for all companies here this quarter. Maybe break down if you could what the $30 million looks like across your network. I think it’s you know, you had $30 million in the press release. Mike, I think you made some comment at one point, I think very early on around $15 million but just want to confirm it’s $30 million net.
And then if you’re, if possible, break down maybe again how much exposure you have here around like China-related tariffs and how much of the non-China side. It would just be helpful so we can update our own thinking as we see the next updates on the tariff front.
Daniel A. Carestio
I mean, just. Dan, I’ll let Mike add to this, but at a high level, it’s about half China and half sort of the 10% global tariff, and it’s about $30 million.
Michael J. Tokich
No more to add on that.
Jason Bednar
All right, I like it. I think you said that $30 million again is a net number. Are you assuming any mitigation actions in that $30 million figure? Kind of what does the pacing of that activity look like throughout fiscal ’26? And then I’ll just sneak in one extra here. It looks like share repo was a little lighter in the fourth quarter compared to the prior few quarters. But the stock’s been hanging around a similar level now for some time. Well-off its highs. Maybe just talk about the decision to pause some of that activity, and is there a signal we should draw from that pause?
Michael J. Tokich
Yeah, I would say that in general, we had bought about $200 million of shares during FY25. We had bought those earlier in the year compared to the previous year. I would say there’s no signal that we’re driving there. It is almost double what we’ve typically bought just offset dilution. And obviously, with our debt levels and debt ratios being where they are, we would definitely consider doing additional share buybacks beyond our offsetting, just offsetting dilution in the future.
Jason Bednar
Sorry. On the mitigation activity on tariffs.
Michael J. Tokich
Yeah, the $30 million is a net number, Jason. So it’s significantly higher than that. Obviously, there’s a lot to be done to mitigate. Timing is always the question. Obviously, our supply chain guys and girls are working very hard to offset as much as possible. But yeah, it’s a net number of $30 million, and we anticipate that that will hit us about equally throughout the calendar year.
Daniel A. Carestio
I would just add to that, with the 90-day pause or sort of redirect on the China tariffs, it gives us an opportunity to be much more strategic and thoughtful in terms of anything that we’re changing as it relates to either vendors or manufacturing location or supply. So I would expect more weight on the back end.
Julie Winter
And also I don’t think we’ve said there’s more weight on Healthcare that primarily be impacting the Healthcare segment with a little bit in Life Sciences.
Michael J. Tokich
And very, very little, if any, in AST.
Jason Bednar
All right, very good. Thank you, everyone.
Daniel A. Carestio
You’re welcome.
Operator
[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Brett Fishbin from KeyBanc. Please go ahead with your question.
Brett Fishbin
Hey guys, thank you very much for taking the questions, and good morning. Just wanted to ask another question on Healthcare capital equipment. Sounds like you’re not trying to give specific guidance on growth, but maybe just talk a little bit more about the capital equipment backdrop. You’re exiting the year with some growth in the backlog, but really just curious how some of the recent macro developments have impacted either ordering patterns or hospitals willingness to do implementations versus any deferrals you may be seeing.
Daniel A. Carestio
We’ve talked about this a lot in the past, and that is the capital equipment that we offer is really more of a utility than a luxury item. If you’re going to see procedural growth and migration of procedures to different places, you can’t accommodate that growth without having sterile processing capacity or surgical suites. So, at times when it may impact replacement business, if those things can be deferred, it doesn’t really impact the new equipment in terms of going into expansion. Sp, we had a great order year last year, growing orders 12%. We’ve got our backlog into a very comfortable position. We haven’t seen anything at this point that would indicate that’s slowing for us, and in fact had really good volume in terms of orders going into the Q1. So we’re excited about the opportunity there.
Brett Fishbin
And then just as a follow-up, I’m going to switch gears a little bit to AST. I think it was a pretty good sequential progression in FY25 from an AST growth standpoint. Just looking at FY26 for services sounds like high single digits is kind of the starting point. I’m just curious, if demand were to be higher than expected, do you have enough capacity to theoretically return to double-digit growth in AST service? Or is capacity starting to become a little bit of a limiting factor? Thank you very much.
Daniel A. Carestio
Sure. It’s not a governor for us right now. We are well-positioned to accommodate the industry’s growth.
Operator
And our next question is a follow-up from Michael Polark from Wolfe Research. Please go ahead with your follow-up.
Michael Polark
Thank you. Just one more also on AST. As you reflect on fiscal ’25 in the services line, the December quarter was up 10%, March quarter up 6%. Dan, it sounds like bioprocess is a little lumpy. Is that the gyration or anything else to kind of spike out on the phasing of the last 12 months that makes more sense to you? My one other idea is any evidence that there was kind of front-loading of inventory building ahead of the Trump tariff era in the December quarter? Could that have been an influence in that period? Any other color would be great. Thank you.
Daniel A. Carestio
Sure. Yeah. No, we did not see that in terms of anybody front-loading tariff. But I think you’re giving the industry way too much credit to be able to see that coming. What I would say is we had a phenomenal December, an extraordinary December in terms of year-over-year comps, and then nobody showed up for the first seven days of January. So, just the plant restarts from a customer perspective was very abnormally slow this year. One day shorter of February in terms of processing days. And then we had a wonderful second half of February and March in terms of growth so. But overall, those things impacted the quarter. I don’t think it was anything more than that.
Michael Polark
Thank you.
Operator
And ladies and gentlemen, with that, we’ll conclude today’s question and answer session. I’d like to turn the floor back over to management for any closing remarks.
Julie Winter
Thanks, everybody, for taking the time to join us this morning, and we look forward to catching up with many of you in the coming weeks.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]