United Rentals, Inc. (NYSE: URI) Q2 2022 earnings call dated Jul. 28, 2022
Corporate Participants:
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Jessica T. Graziano — Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer
William “Ted” Grace — Vice President – Investor Relations
Analysts:
David Raso — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Tim Thein — Citigroup — Analyst
Rob Wertheimer — Melius Research — Analyst
Steven Fisher — UBS — Analyst
Seth Weber — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Clay Williams — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Ken Newman — KeyBanc — Analyst
Scott Schneeberger — Oppenheimer — Analyst
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
Presentation:
Operator
Good morning and welcome to the United Rentals Investor Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Before we begin note that the company’s press release comments made on today’s call and responses to your questions contain forward-looking statements. The company’s business and operations are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond its control and consequently actual results may differ materially from those projected. A summary of these uncertainties is included in the safe harbor statement contained in the company’s press release. For a more complete description of these and other possible risks please refer to the company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 as well as to subsequent filings with the SEC. You can access these filings on the company’s website at www.unitedrentals.com.
Please note that United Rentals has no obligation and makes no commitment to update or publicly release any revisions to forward-looking statements in order to reflect new information or subsequent events, circumstances or changes in expectations. You should also note that the company’s press release and today’s call include references to non-GAAP terms such as free cash flow, adjusted EPS, EBITDA and adjusted EBITDA. Please refer to the back of the company’s recent investor presentation to see the reconciliation from each non-GAAP financial measure to the most comparable GAAP financial measure.
Speaking today for United Rentals is; Matt Flannery, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Jessica Graziano, Chief Financial Officer. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Flannery. Mr. Flannery you may begin.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, operator and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining our call. I’ll start with the main takeaways from yesterday’s release. In the second quarter, our team executed extremely well in a robust demand environment. And as a result, we delivered very strong performance by any measure. Our rental revenue increased by 26% year-over-year to a second quarter record of almost $2.5 billion, well above expectations and adjusted EBITDA grew faster than the top line, up 31% to a record $1.3 billion. We also demonstrated good cost discipline. Our adjusted EBITDA margin expanded 360 basis points to 47.3%. This contributed to a strong flow-through of about 65%. And importantly we delivered a 230-basis point improvement in return on invested capital to a record 11.5%.
The three tailwinds we saw at the start of the year continued to fuel our momentum. The macroenvironment remained favorable which created more demand in the quarter and you could see that in our rental revenue growth which included fleet productivity of better than 11%. In addition, the customer trend toward renting equipment is alive and well. We see this as a secular shift that will continue to move the market from owning equipment to renting it overtime. And lastly, we’re confident that our growth is outpacing our industry as we continue to take share both in our core markets and with key customers. One reason, we’re gaining share is our positioning as a one-stop shop. Customers place a lot of value on being productive. And our combination of scale, job site solutions, superior service and technology is unique in our industry.
Customers also care about safety and we prioritize safety on and off the job site. And this is another area where our team delivered in Q2 by keeping our recordable rate well below one. And increasingly customers place a value on sustainability. In May, we announced an initial agreement to purchase over 500 all-electric trucks and vans from Ford, including the F-150 Lightning pickups. Now this partnership is a good example of how we’re continuing to add sustainable solutions to our rental fleet, while moving toward greener operations. We’re proud of the progress we’re making in many different areas of ESG including environmental stewardship and social impact. Yesterday, we released our 10th Annual Corporate Responsibility Report with comprehensive data covering 2021 along with more recent developments. You can find it on our website if you’d like to download it.
Another thing customers strongly care about is reliability. It’s high on their list and we’ve got a very high bar in response. Our team is trained to deliver a caliber of service that earns the next opportunity. And our employees like that challenge and they love being an arrow to our customers. That’s a big part of our culture at United and it helps with retention and recruitment. Our net headcount at the end of June was 9% higher than a year ago which is a solid gain in a tight labor market. Now I’ll repeat something I said before, we’re fortunate to have a world-class team standing behind our strategy. It gives us confidence in every target we put out there and that includes the updated guidance we released yesterday which raised our outlook for total revenue, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow.
We have strong visibility through the balance of the year, and the activity we’re seeing will create a lot of demand to get equipment on rent. There are plenty of positive signs to support this view. Virtually all of the external indicators are favorable including the Dodge Momentum Index, the ABI, contractor backlogs and customer sentiment. And the used equipment market remains robust. In the second quarter, we captured record recovery rates and margins on used sales. And I spoke to all of these dynamics coming out of Q1, and they’re all still true today. Now I’m going to pivot to look at demand at the ground level. Our gen rent and specialty segments, both performed extremely well in the quarter. All of our regions company-wide, delivered double-digit rental revenue growth. And in many ways, it’s a continuation of what we spoke about in Q1 broad-based activity across regions, stemming from a diversified mix of end markets and key verticals.
Looking at it by end market. Our rental revenue from non-res construction was up 27% year-over-year, and infrastructure was up 15%. And more broadly almost every vertical showed year-over-year growth in rental revenue. In terms of project types, large data centers are continuing to break ground along with infrastructure projects and distribution centers, and manufacturing is coming back. The power vertical is also accelerating and there are more tailwinds in the wings. With infrastructure for example, the funding is now finalized in Washington and we expect to start seeing a benefit in 2023 and beyond. With manufacturing, the resurgence of the industrial sector in North America, is being driven in part by supply chain challenges in other parts of the world and that’s good for us. It’s already evident in certain sectors.
Companies are investing hundreds of billions of dollars in mega projects in the US and Canada, to build plants across a variety of verticals like semiconductors and automotive. These projects will require equipment for years to come, and they play to our competitive advantage with large customers. On the specialty side, the segment had another excellent quarter led by our power and mobile storage businesses. The segment as a whole grew rental revenue by 39%, including the benefit from General Finance. Pro forma specialty was up a strong 29%. We opened 24 cold storage through June, in specialty against a revised target of about 45 openings by year-end and that’s slightly higher than our original projection of 40 openings this year.
So as you can see, 2022 continues to be a landmark year for our company both financially and operationally. We delivered another record quarter in, what we expect to be a record year. Our flow-through in the quarter reflects the team’s discipline in navigating a challenging cost environment. And we continue to have the benefit of a strong balance sheet, low leverage and robust cash generation. This gives us the flexibility to act opportunistically on many fronts. This year we expect to make the largest investment in our history in fleet of about $3 billion and our suppliers are taking good care of us, and our capex spend is tracking to plan. We’ll also continue to explore growth through cold starts and acquisitions. We’ve made seven bolt-on acquisitions this year to date, for a total consideration of over $300 million.
Lastly, we expect to complete our share repurchase authorization this quarter. These are all prudent capital allocations, to create long-term shareholder value. And we know that the key to leveraging capital, is relentless execution and that’s what you’re seeing from us in our results. Now before, I hand it over to Jessica, I’d like to take this opportunity to thank her personally for her many contributions over the past seven years. As you all know, Jess will be leaving us to take on a new opportunity and Ted has stepped in as we go through the CFO search process. And I know I speak for our entire leadership team, when I say it’s been a pleasure to work with Jess and we wish her all the best in her new endeavor.
And now with that Jess, you’ve got floor.
Jessica T. Graziano — Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer
Good morning, everyone and thank you Matt, for your kind words. It’s definitely bittersweet to be on my last earnings call for United. My time here has been an incredible experience and not just with our amazing Team United and our Board, but also working so closely with Ted and the investment community. We’ve accomplished a lot together, so I’m grateful to have this chance to publicly say, thank you. As we look to the quarter, I’m especially pleased to be able to report such great results on my last call, record results actually. As Matt shared, the strength we’ve seen in demand across our end markets has exceeded our expectations for the quarter. It also underpins our increased guidance for revenue, adjusted EBITDA and free cash flow for the full year and more on that later.
Let’s start with a closer look, at the second quarter. Rental revenue for the second quarter was a record $2.46 billion. That’s up $511 million or 26.2% year-over-year. Within rental revenue, OER increased $383 million or about 23%. Our average fleet size increased by 13.6%, which provided a $223 million tailwind to revenue. Fleet productivity was up a very healthy 11.3%, contributing $185 million. And rounding out OER was about a $25 million reduction in rental revenue from fleet inflation, which we estimate to be a 1.5% drag. Also within rental, ancillary revenues in the quarter were higher by about $115 million or 42%, which is mainly due to increased delivery fees and other pass-through charges. And finally re-rent was up $13 million in the quarter.
Used sales for the quarter were $164 million, a decline of $30 million or about 15% from the second quarter last year. We continue to manage used sales to help ensure we have adequate capacity to serve the robust demand we’re seeing this year. We’re focusing those sales in our most profitable retail channel and together with a strong market overall and better pricing delivered a healthy 62.2% adjusted used margin for the quarter. That represents sequential improvement of about 440 basis points and year-over-year improvement of just over 1400 basis points. Let’s move to EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $1.31 billion another record for us and an increase of 31.2% year-over-year or $312 million. The dollar change includes a $324 million increase from rental. Now in that OER contributed $273 million and ancillary was up $51 million.
Used sales were a tailwind to adjusted EBITDA of $9 million and other non-rental lines of business provided $10 million. Other income also contributed $10 million of year-on-year benefit, in part due to some of the onetime costs from acquisitions we called out in the second quarter of last year. SG&A was a headwind to adjusted EBITDA of $41 million driven in large part by higher commissions on higher revenue. And as expected, we saw certain discretionary costs in SG&A continue to normalize. Adjusted EBITDA margin came in very strong at 47.3%, up 360 basis points year-over-year with excellent flow-through of 64.5%. And excluding the benefit from used sales in the quarter, flow-through would have been a healthy 59%. The strong performance across the core business reflects better-than-expected growth in rental.
It also reflects the impact of actions we’ve taken to pass through cost inflation in certain areas like delivery and fuel. Our team also did a great job managing costs across other areas of the business. Let’s shift to adjusted EPS, which was another record for us at $7.86, that’s up 68% or $3.66 versus last year. EPS this quarter includes about $0.55 from a one-time tax benefit. But even if we adjust for that benefit, I’m pleased to note our EPS would still have been a record this quarter. Looking at CapEx. Gross rental capex was a healthy $872 million in the second quarter. Proceeds from used equipment sales were $164 million resulting in net capex of $708 million, which was similar to the second quarter last year. Net capex for the first half of the year of $979 million is up $232 million or 31%.
Now turning to ROIC and free cash flow. ROIC continues to run well above our weighted average cost of capital at a record 11.5% on a trailing 12-month basis. That’s up 60 basis points sequentially and 230 basis points year-over-year. Free cash flow also continues to be very strong as we generated $392 million in the second quarter and just under $1 billion for the first half of the year, all while continuing to invest in high levels of capex to grow our business. I’ll share a few comments on our balance sheet. As I look back on my time here, I am especially proud of the work our team has done on the balance sheet. It is in fantastic shape. Our leverage ratio at the end of the second quarter remains at the lowest level in our history at 2.0 times. That’s flat sequentially and down 50 basis points from the second quarter of 2021.
Liquidity at the end of the quarter was a very strong $2.8 billion with the vast majority of that coming from ABL capacity of just over $2.5 billion. And notably within the quarter, we took a number of actions to further bolster our positioning including upsizing and extending both our ABL and AR facilities with improved terms. And I’d be remiss if I didn’t also mention that our next long-term note maturity isn’t until 2027. The last thing I’ll mention on our capital allocation relates to our current $1 billion share repurchase program. We leaned in a bit into the execution acquiring roughly $500 million in shares during the second quarter. Through June 30, we’ve spent $762 million of the authorization, repurchasing a little more than 3.5% of our fully diluted share count. With $238 million left to purchase, we expect we’ll finish this program in the third quarter.
Let’s look forward and talk about our updated guidance for 2022, which we shared in our press release last night. Total revenue is now expected in the range of $11.4 billion to $11.7 billion or an increase of $250 million at the midpoint implying full year growth of 18.9%. As I mentioned earlier, this increase is supported by robust demand that we continue to see broadly across our geographies and our end markets. We expect the profitability and flow-through on that higher revenue to remain strong. Our adjusted EBITDA range is now $5.4 billion to $5.55 billion, up $175 million from the midpoint of our previous guidance. This implies a 200 basis point increase in full year adjusted EBITDA margin and robust full year flow-through of about 58%.
Our range for gross and net capex is unchanged. We still expect to source about $3 billion of gross CapEx. We also expect the strength of the used equipment market will support used proceeds consistent with our original guidance, even though we’ll sell less fleet for the full year than originally planned. And finally, our free cash flow guidance has increased $150 million at the midpoint as we now look to generate between $1.85 billion and $2.05 billion. That’s mainly from higher operating profit we expect to deliver this year.
Now as I pass the baton, I’ve asked Ted to jump in on Q&A. So let’s get to your questions. Operator, please open the line.
Questions and Answers:
Operator
Certainly [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from David Raso from Evercore ISI. Your line is open.
David Raso — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Hi. Thanks for the time and congratulations Jess. Regarding — just sort of big picture, I mean we can dive into a lot of numbers but needless to say the results were pretty solid. So I’m really just trying to think about 2023 here if you can indulge me. Matt obviously you’ve been doing this for many years. And the backlog that you’re hearing from your contractors when they speak of where they are in the project development do they have financing, how committed they seem, something underpinning it be it infrastructure bill or whatever it may be? Just curious, when you look at this backlog today if you could maybe comp, it versus where it was this time last year? And just your history with this business the comfort that you have in these backlog numbers that I guess are still suggesting to you another year of solid growth in 2023.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Sure David. So obviously, we’ll go through our whole planning process this fall, but we’ll do a deeper dive and then update everybody, at year-end on what we expect 2023 to be. But to be clear, we expect to carry good momentum into 2023 whether that’s the great fleet productivity, which there’ll be some carryover effect, as a positive into 2023 or the larger fleet size. So just structurally we’ll have some momentum going into 2023. And additionally to your point about the backlog, it remains pretty consistent on our CCI where our customers at a high level have been consistent for six quarters and that hasn’t changed. So we’re not seeing any kind of deceleration in our customers’ expectation.
And additionally, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, mega projects are going to be long term for us. So, they’re breaking ground now and funded and we’re talking billions, billions dollars of potential work out there. And we haven’t yet seen a couple of tailwinds that I mentioned. Shovel-ready meaning activated for our rental revenue, the funding for infrastructure and a lot more what we believe is going to be a manufacturing resurgence. So those are the tailwinds I call into play going into 2023. Some of it is structural for our larger and momentum that we’re carrying into 2023. And then, some of the macro areas that we have yet to enjoy that we think are going to be tailwinds in 2023.
David Raso — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Anything about what you’re hearing for those projects that should influence our thought on the margins, be it is going to be more national account or it’s going to be more of a different vertical that you’ve historically have better or worse than average returns? Because right now it looks like the incremental EBITDA you’re getting on the owned fleet it’s been over 70% now two quarters in a row right? Obviously, the ancillary and the re-rent drags it down a little bit to the overall 65. But it just seems that the drop-through has been so strong. I’m just trying to calibrate how much is it. Right now we’re just running at time but that you probably wouldn’t have thought were that possible. So the fixed cost absorption is great. But I’m also just trying to be thoughtful if I’ve got a different mix coming in 2023 to show how to calibrate how to really think about the incremental margins from here.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
No. Operationally, we actually see some efficiency on the large project. Admittedly some of the real large-scale customers our largest national account may have a little bit better pricing but they kind of even off. And the consistency and the longevity of rental for major projects is a positive offset for us. So I don’t expect to see a big margin profile change based on the project sizes or duration. So I think that was the basis of your question.
David Raso — Evercore ISI — Analyst
Okay. Thank you very much for the time. I appreciate it.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, David.
Operator
And our next question comes from Tim Thein from Citigroup. Your line is open.
Tim Thein — Citigroup — Analyst
Thank you. Good morning and congrats again Jess.
Jessica T. Graziano — Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer
Thank you.
Tim Thein — Citigroup — Analyst
Pretty nice of you to hand the keys over to Ted with — leaving the balance sheet in such good shape. So…
Jessica T. Graziano — Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Tim. Thank you.
Tim Thein — Citigroup — Analyst
Yeah. And actually just I was kind of continuing on that Matt. Just as — you mentioned that accelerating the repo into the third quarter, how are you thinking given where — I mean what you just outlined for potentially another strong year in 2023 and where the balance sheet likely sits heading into the year. How are you thinking about the priorities beyond the buybacks? There’s M&A just maybe an updated view in terms of either M&A. Does the dividend potentially come into the picture? Just maybe a few thoughts on that in terms of how you’re thinking about capital returns.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Sure Tim. I’ll categorize all this as our capital allocation prioritization. So, as you accurately depicted, we will finish a quarter in advance our $1 billion authorization and that was just a great opportunity for us to utilize excess cash that we have. And we’ll still live in the bottom if not below the bottom of our leverage range. So we’re very comfortably operating in that range and there’s no magic to it. If we go below it for a little while that’s not a concern of ours either way. The bigger statement I’d like to make is our prioritization of our robust balance sheet usage as well as our free cash flow. And first and foremost, it’s to support the business whether that’s organically as we’ve done a lot of this year or through smart M&A.
And the opportunities we have to then disperse excess cash is not in any way indicative or a replacement for those first two opportunities. We absolutely can do — this is an and strategy not an or strategy. We’re fortunate that the business is in great shape and the balance sheet as Jess pointed out in our prepared remarks is in shape that we can — on organic growth we can do some deals and still return excess cash to shareholders. And I won’t get ahead of our Board, but as we think about the options in which we can do that we’ll update everybody maybe as soon as October.
Tim Thein — Citigroup — Analyst
Got it. Okay. And then maybe Matt just a quick follow-up. Just from a fleet standpoint, how can we — or how should we think about the — just given the strength in recovery values what the fleet — the kind of the composition from a to the extent you’re ending you’re selling fewer units than you thought how do we think about the fleet from a value versus unit perspective just given how the net capex is playing out assuming that makes sense? Is — how much larger is the fleet than it really is?
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
So, first off, we’ll be up somewhere around 10% range at year-end with over $17 billion of fleet approximation when we end the year in 2023. So we’ll have a larger fleet. And when we think about the value of that fleet we haven’t really seen a tremendous increase. We haven’t changed our plug for inflation in our fleet productivity. And even if that picks up a hair and I know we’re hearing a lot of noise about that I think the opportunity that we’ve had and that we’ve executed on driving strong fleet productivity can offset that. And when I think about what the supply chain is going to look like next year which will kind of be the back half of that question we’re already for over a month now early this year earlier this year than usual for sure talking to our OEMs about what our needs are going to be as they try to forecast out what kind of capacity they’re going to need to fill the demand.
So we’re way ahead of the ballgame on planning with our OEMs. I know they’re working their tails off not only just to get us the $3 billion that they’ve committed to us this year which we’re on track which is great news, but also for the future. And so I know they’re working hard and we have some that are doing better than others. But in aggregate the vendor base is really doing a good job for us and we expect the same in 2023.
Tim Thein — Citigroup — Analyst
Okay. Thanks for the time.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Thanks Tim.
Operator
And our next question comes from Rob Wertheimer from Melius Research. Your line is open.
Rob Wertheimer — Melius Research — Analyst
Thanks and good morning everybody.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Hey Rob.
Rob Wertheimer — Melius Research — Analyst
So, Matt you touched on this earlier and I know you like to talk fleet productivity. And I’m not I guess asking for the level on time utilization. But it does seem like — obviously rate is going up but it feels like there’s more to the performance this quarter than just rental rates coming up. And I assume time is hitting new records. For one is that roughly accurate? And for two, is that an operational shift where you’ve learned how to unlock a little bit more productivity and keep it up, or is it just a super-hot market and people aren’t taking top off rent and there’s less turnover or something? I’m just wondering if that’s a sustainable change if it’s there.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Yes. In short, Rob, that’s a yes and yes, right? So, certainly necessity is the mother of invention here. But all kidding aside I guided in April and I was never so pleased to be wrong that we’d be somewhere in the mid-single digits in fleet productivity. And all three components of fleet productivity whether it be rate mix or time exceeded our expectations. So that’s why you see this robust fleet productivity. But the one that was most surprising to me was time because I had said publicly we were in so hot last year in the back half of the year. I’d have been pleased if we repeated it and the team outdid it.
So, that was the one that was surprised not numerically the largest value of the three. I’m not saying that. As you know I’m not going to give numbers but it was the most surprising to me because we had a real high bar to get over it. So, that’s how I would qualitatively talk about the really strong fleet productivity that we drove.
Rob Wertheimer — Melius Research — Analyst
And then the sustainability of that, have you learned new ways of getting there to pushing it to new levels? Any comments on how you got there if you could?
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Yes. As you know because you visited our branch and we talk a lot about it. The technology that we’ve been embedding in our operations and the efficiency and productivity, that’s borne out of that for many, many years, right, starting back as far as 10 years, has really given us an advantage over all the data that we see throughout the industry actors. So, we’ve always enjoyed time utilization gap to the positive. And part of that is scale, part of that is the network that we have and the density of that network, but it’s also embedded by technology, and we’ve actually improved upon that.
So, we do think it’s sustainable. Admittedly the team surprised me and set new heights this year, but I don’t think that it’s not sustainable. At some point, the more interesting part is what is the level of optimal timing? Do we ever get a point where we want to make sure that we’re still being as responsive as we are? And all the metrics tell us that’s still happening. So, we’re very pleased.
Rob Wertheimer — Melius Research — Analyst
Thank you.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Operator, next question?
Operator
All right. Our next question comes from Steven Fisher from UBS. Your line is open.
Steven Fisher — UBS — Analyst
Hey, thanks. Good morning. Just wanted to follow-up on M&A and maybe the smart M&A, as you call them, Matt. You’re doing a bunch of bolt-ons. I guess, in general, how are the prospects for larger deals? And related to the bolt-ons, are you kind of seeing increased desire from sellers? Are you doing more bolt-ons, because the larger deals are harder to get done? Is there more something specific things you’re targeting that it makes sense to do via bolt-ons? Just a little color there please. Thanks.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Sure. Thanks, Steve. And we’ve always had a pretty diverse and robust pipeline of M&A, and that has not changed. As a matter of fact, it may have even increased a little bit, specifically in some of the bolt-ons, as you call them the smaller ones, where people have fully repaired their businesses from COVID. And now, there’s probably a few people out there that would have sold just before COVID, but they weren’t going to sell at those low levels. So, those people have repaired their business and have put themselves back on the market.
And what you saw our execution on was really just spot opportunities in a given market where our local teams needed some more capacity whether that’s people facility or fleet right? And that’s the way I’d categorize capacity. But there are some big deals to be had and we’re still working that pipeline. It’s just a matter of which ones get over the transom right? And when I say smart M&A, it’s because it’s going to have to fit all three legs of our stool that we’ve talked about, and that last check on the smart is the financial. So we got to have agreeable terms and a willing seller to get them over the final leg. But we’re working the pipeline on both big and small deals.
Steven Fisher — UBS — Analyst
That’s helpful. And then, on the capex front, what would you have to see to raise your capex guidance for this year on the gross side? Is it more near-term demand strength? I mean, it sounds like it’s kind of going all out there. Or is it just more confidence that suppliers can deliver?
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Yes, it would be the latter. There’s not a demand issue in any way shape or form. And as a matter of fact, Jess alluded to we’ve even sold less used to help fill that demand since we — in a normal year, we would have the OEMs pull forward — have already had some capex pull-forward into Q2. And as you see, we’re stuck to our original plan of around 900 and then another 1.1 in Q3.
We don’t think we’re going to have the opportunity to pull any more forward from those numbers. And I’m not — our suppliers are working real hard to fill that and I know the challenges they have. And that’s why you didn’t see us raise our CapEx. In a normal supply environment, you probably would have seen some increased CapEx. But we are using the used sales lever and pulled out all the — any broker and auctions or trade-in. We don’t really do a lot of auction and trade-in sales to make sure we use that extra capacity to support the business.
Steven Fisher — UBS — Analyst
Perfect. Thanks.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Thanks, Steve.
Jessica T. Graziano — Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer
Thank you.
Operator
And our next question comes from Seth Weber from Wells Fargo. Your line is open.
Seth Weber — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Hey. Good morning, and congrats Jess as well.
Jessica T. Graziano — Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer
Thank you, Seth.
Seth Weber — Wells Fargo — Analyst
It was a pleasure to work with you. Yeah. Matt, I’m sorry, you might have just addressed this but — and I might have missed it. But the capex cadence for the second half of the year, can you just talk through that? I mean some of your suppliers are obviously talking about getting constraints getting stuff out the door. I assume third quarter is meaningfully up from the second quarter but is there any way to frame just the cadence of the third quarter versus fourth quarter on gross CapEx?
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Yes, sure. It will be — and as we had stated in April, it really hasn’t changed our plans. We expect to do about 900 this year, which we’re right about there. And then, we do about 1.1 — I’m sorry, in Q2 900 and about 1.1 in Q3. And we think we’re on track to do that. And then that leaves you another depending on where we end up in the range, let’s say, 5.5 for fourth quarter.
So, our expectations haven’t changed all year. And as I stated earlier, we just don’t have the opportunity. There’s not a lot of wiggle room for the vendors to accelerate or to increase that at this point and that changes — we’ve updated everybody. We do not expect that to change in the mid of the rental season, which is Q2 and Q3.
Seth Weber — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Right. Okay. That’s helpful. Thanks. And then, just on the used sale margins very, very strong. And I know you called out some mix benefit — just channel mix benefit. But can you just talk to — I mean there’s obviously a lot of lot of concerns around used equipment pricing, prices that we see, which seems to be inconsistent with the prices that you guys are capturing. So I don’t know can you just help people connect those dots as to your confidence in used equipment pricing to stay high for the foreseeable future versus some of the concerns that are out there in the market around pricing rolling over? Thanks.
William “Ted” Grace — Vice President – Investor Relations
Yes. Seth this is Ted. I’ll take that one. Look in the quarter itself you saw really strong results. So we certainly are not seeing pricing headwinds. On a sequential basis, we were up high single digits. So it’s certainly something we’d be keeping an eye on, but it’s not something we’ve seen in our own results.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Yes. That’s quite contrary, right? We’re seeing — a part of the great strength you see is that we’re primarily selling the retail channel. And we’ve built a unique engine in that way compared to the rest of the industry. So we’re not going to stop that, because that’s driving great pricing. But even within retail on — year-on-year retail we’re seeing strong pricing. So we’ve heard a little bit recently about people talk about that rollover. Maybe that’s auction driven, but we’re not seeing it in our experience or in the retail channel.
Seth Weber — Wells Fargo — Analyst
Right. Okay. Very helpful. Thank you, guys. And again, Jess, good luck.
Jessica T. Graziano — Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer
Thank you. Thank you very much.
Operator
And our next question comes from Jerry Revich from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.
Clay Williams — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Hi. Yes. This is Clay Williams on behalf of Jerry. Good morning.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Clay Williams — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Can you talk about how General Finance is performing and if the supply availability of containers has eased? Thanks.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Sure thing, Clay. Performing very well. If you recall, we had said when we announced that deal that we wanted to double the size of that business in the next five years and we’re ahead of schedule. The team is really doing a great job and the supply chain has helped. And ironically, when we initially bought them, that was probably the toughest time for quite some time to get containers and the pricing was up.
But things have a remedy for that and the team has taken full advantage. And as you heard on my prepared remarks, such a great job that I wanted to call them out specifically for the growth they’re doing. So we’re excited to see that the thesis we had around the deal and buying that platform and growing it organically is executing ahead of schedule.
Clay Williams — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Yes. And just a follow-up there. Can you talk about what has enabled you to scale that business so quickly ahead of plan across your branches?
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Our network, right, so relationship with our customers. And these were products that we knew our existing customers, where we had deep relationships with, wanted and now we’re able to supply them. And that was a big reason why we looked at adding that product to our mix, with a platform that was big enough, so that we could support most of the network, but also small enough that we could grow it organically and then pay for the multiple that we paid for it. So it’s really been a win-win from a strategy perspective and the customer support.
Clay Williams — Goldman Sachs — Analyst
Thanks.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Thank you.
Operator
And our next question comes from Ken Newman from KeyBanc. Your line is open.
Ken Newman — KeyBanc — Analyst
Hey, good morning, guys.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Good morning.
Ken Newman — KeyBanc — Analyst
I was just curious, obviously, there’s been a lot more concerns around consumer-facing end markets as inflation ramps. I know that that’s probably a much smaller part of your business, but maybe just remind us how much of your sales are consumer-facing, whether it be from entertainment or within the commercial segment. And then, just talk a little bit about what you’re hearing from customers in terms of whether or not you’re seeing any changes in customer behavior.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Yes. Ken, I’ll take the first part of that for sure. The direct customer — or consumer-facing parts of our business are really small. I guess, if you look at non-res, which, call it, between public and private it is probably 40% or so of our mix. Some fraction of that might be the component of retail within commercial, but we certainly don’t think it’s very significant. And frankly, it hasn’t been kind of a strong market for a number of years. Obviously, strip malls and businesses like that have been under assault from e-commerce. Some of the aspects that might be more kind of consumer-facing could be things like entertainment. But there we focus on live sporting events that have been quite strong, so think PGA events, auto racing and things of that sort. So the direct piece is very small and I’d say, even the indirect piece is pretty small. Does that answer the first part of the question?
Ken Newman — KeyBanc — Analyst
It does, yes. And then, I think the second part was just around — go ahead.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Yes. As far as customer behavior, which I think the second part was, Ken, we’re actually — because the market is so tight here, we always are about repeat customers building loyalty, building partnerships. And I would say in a tight demand environment — I mean supply environment for the robust demand, our customers are really relying on that. So we — our team has done a great job meeting the challenge, but it’s in a tight environment. We’ve got to make sure we come through for those customers and we think that bolsters our relationship selling opportunity and the one-stop shop value that we bring to these customers. And I would say, if anything, the relationship and appreciation of being able to be a one-stop shop has improved.
Ken Newman — KeyBanc — Analyst
Got it. And then, just for my follow-up, real quickly, just to clarify. I know you guys talked a little bit I think, in fact, you had guided to that mid-single-digit fleet productivity number. Just given all the commentary that you’ve given so far on the quarter, should we start thinking about fleet productivity in the high single digits here into the back half to kind of get to what’s embedded in your – in the midpoint of your guide?
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
You beat me to it Ken, absolutely. So I – that’s what’s embedded. If you use the midpoint that would imply a high single-digit fleet productivity for full year and that’s where we think we’ll end up.
Ken Newman — KeyBanc — Analyst
Got it. Thanks for the time.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Thank you.
Operator
And our next question comes from Scott Schneeberger from Oppenheimer. Scott, your line is open.
Scott Schneeberger — Oppenheimer — Analyst
Thanks very much. Congrats on the quarter. And Jess and Ted congratulations and best wishes in the new roles.
Jessica T. Graziano — Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer
Thank you.
Scott Schneeberger — Oppenheimer — Analyst
You’re welcome. The – I guess, that last question was a great segue to my first which would be clearly a very strong year this year and in 2022. And it looks like you’re going to be ending the year quite well. So as we think about fleet productivity exiting 2022 and going into 2023, how should we think about the carryover impact? Just any thoughts and magnitude on what we can enter next year carrying? Thanks.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Well, yes, as you know, Scott, I’ll be painfully consistent in not giving quantification of the metrics. But just qualitatively, you’re seeing what our other peers are reporting. The whole industry is doing a good job driving fleet productivity including rate. So naturally, there will be some carryover. I’m not going to quantify it, but there’ll be some carryover just on the rate alone. And as far as mix and time the team – although, we don’t give the numbers the team works really hard on making sure we’re driving positive fleet productivity in every metric under their control. And although, the comps on time certainly and I’ll sound like a broken record, as I said that, this year will be a challenge. So we expect that to moderate. We still think that there’ll be opportunity to well exceed our expectations of that initial 1.5% for fleet productivity.
Scott Schneeberger — Oppenheimer — Analyst
Great. Thanks, Matt. And I appreciate the qualitative response. And I guess, Jess, where are you in the delivery expense? If you could speak to how in this inflationary environment how that’s trended in the first half how you all have been managing that in a tough labor market internalizing transportation versus maybe using third party just commentary on that? And also, how you’re managing any pressures with fuel and any new lessons learned on the go forward? Thanks.
William “Ted” Grace — Vice President – Investor Relations
Yeah. Scott, this is Ted. So certainly, if you look at our results in the first half both first and second quarter, it would be embedded in that ancillary line item that Jess called out in her script and you can see in our financials. And from that standpoint, you can certainly see, it’s had kind of a – it’s been considerably positive call it contribution margin from the entire ancillary line items would be running in call it the – probably, the upward 30s.
So certainly, we’ve been able to manage all that very effectively. And as a reminder, only a component of that entire line item that you see in ancillary would be isolated to the fuel component of pickup and delivery. But I think it makes the point that the team has done a great job of passing that through to customers and making sure that we’ve been able to at a minimum protect margin. Does that help with the fuel piece?
Scott Schneeberger — Oppenheimer — Analyst
Yeah. That’s great. Thanks. I’ll turn it over.
William “Ted” Grace — Vice President – Investor Relations
Thank you.
Operator
And our next question comes from Mig Dobre from Baird. Your line is open.
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
Hi. Thank you. Good morning. Congrats Jess and best of luck to you.
Jessica T. Graziano — Executive Vice President And Chief Financial Officer
Thanks Mig.
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
So I’m going to try to kind of ask a question that a few folks have hinted at already. If we’re sort of looking at your revenue guidance for the back half of the year the implied guidance assumes here about another $1 billion of revenue. And you’ve been running quite well year-to-date, especially in the second quarter in terms of all the metrics surrounding the fleet. So I’m wondering, how are you thinking about the moving pieces as to what generates this sequential lift of revenue? Is it time you would still? Is it maybe a little more rate? Is it fleet? What are some of the moving pieces there?
William “Ted” Grace — Vice President – Investor Relations
Yeah. Mig, this is Ted. I would say it’s all of the above, right? I mean, it’s certainly, the expectation that we’re going to have more fleet on rent as an example. It’s the idea that we’ll certainly have positive fleet productivity. And certainly, you’ll see – the used sales are obviously implied to also be up in the second half versus the first half as we’ve held back fleet in the first half to make sure we’re satiating customer demand.
So I don’t know that, I would pinpoint it to kind of one or two variables. It’s really kind of a continuation of the fact that, the business is performing very well and matching the seasonal curve that we would usually see in our industry, right? So Q3 is always that lift up from Q2 and admittedly to your point off a high base, but we think a lot of that momentum will continue.
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
And you anticipated, where I was going to go with this. Is there a comment you want to make Q4 relative to Q3? Is there – should we expect Q4 to be high relative to Q3? And again, I’m just sort of asking as to what’s baked into your assumptions. Who knows how it’s going to play out?
William “Ted” Grace — Vice President – Investor Relations
Yes. What’s baked into our assumptions is consider the normal seasonal patterns that we usually enjoy, but now at a higher level, partly driven by a little bit more fleet than we thought by selling less used although the bigger needle mover is the strong fleet productivity. So we’ve created a higher base off which to go to. But if you look at the curve overall, we expect the year and implied in this guidance is the standard seasonality just off a higher base.
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
And I’m sorry to be a stickler for this. It’s just that seasonality has been kind of screwed up with COVID and everything else that came from that. So, can you maybe remind me as to what the normal seasonality that you’re referring to would look like?
William “Ted” Grace — Vice President – Investor Relations
Yes. Mig, I mean I don’t have those numbers off the top of my head. But certainly, if you were to look at kind of the sequential revenue patterns, historically that would be a reasonable way to think about normal seasonality.
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
Okay. And then my final question. You obviously sound very optimistic about 2023. And within that context, I’m kind of curious as to how you’re approaching your capex discussions with your partners. Is it reasonable for people to think that capex is going to be up in terms of demand for you ’23 relative to ’22? And I’m curious, are you getting OEMs to commit to firm pricing, or is it just a discussion around production slots at this point? Thank you.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Yes. So, I’ll take the latter part of your question. We’re simply talking about the production slots right now. I don’t — to be fair to our partners, I don’t think they know what their costs are going to be at the time. It’s really to prepare all the raw material get ready to build these assets. So, we’re focused on production. We’ll expect to get win-wins with our partners as usual. Ted, I don’t know if you want to take the first part of the question.
William “Ted” Grace — Vice President – Investor Relations
Sorry. Mig, could you repeat it again?
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
Yes. You guys obviously sound really good about ’23 and I’m wondering, if we should be expecting capex to be up at this point.
William “Ted” Grace — Vice President – Investor Relations
Look, I think it’s early to kind of get ahead of guidance on ’23. But certainly from our tone, you can hear we feel pretty good about the outlook looking certainly through the end of ’22. In terms of what that translates to we’ll have an update in January. And certainly — and we’ll be working on the ’23 plan, as we get into the fourth quarter, so certainly more to come there.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Yes. Just to be clear, we do expect 2023 to be a growth year. We’re just not ready to give details on that. We’ve got a whole lot of work to do from ground-up planning process that will start this fall and we’ll finalize in the fourth quarter.
Mig Dobre — Baird — Analyst
Thanks for taking the question.
Operator
And with that, it appears there are no further questions. I’d like to turn it back to the speakers for any closing remarks.
Matthew J. Flannery — President And Chief Executive Officer
Thank you, operator and thank you everyone for joining us. We’re happy to share such a strong midyear outlook and we’ll have more when we talk again in October. And in the meantime, you can reach out to Ted any time with your questions or comments. Operator, please go ahead and end the call.
Operator
[Operator Closing Remarks]