Murphy Usa Inc (MUSA) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

Murphy Usa Inc (NYSE: MUSA) Q4 2025 Earnings Call dated Feb. 05, 2026

Corporate Participants:

Christian Pikul — Vice President of Investor Relations

Malynda K. West — Executive Vice President of Fuels, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Analysts:

Bobby Griffin — Analyst

Bonnie Hersock — Analyst

Irene Nattel — Analyst

Ed Kelly with — Analyst

Jacob Aiken Phillips — Analyst

Puran Sharma — Analyst

Corey Tarlow — Analyst

Brad Thomas — Analyst

Presentation:

operator

Sa. Thank you for standing by. My name is Carly and I will be your conference operator today. At this time I would like to welcome everyone to the Murphy USA fourth quarter 2025 earnings Q& A call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker’s remarks, there will be a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press Star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again. Thank you. I would now like to turn the call over to Kristen Pykel.

Please go ahead.

Christian Pikul — Vice President of Investor Relations

Hey, thanks Carli. Good morning everybody. Thanks for participating in our first Q and A only session covering fourth quarter, quarter and full year 2025 results. I would remind everybody to refer to the forward looking statements commentary we included in our prepared remarks yesterday, which I hope you all took the opportunity to listen to or read. With me this morning are Mindy West, President and Chief Executive Officer, Donnie Smith, Chief Accounting Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, and Ash Auld’s Director of Investor Relations and FP&A. Before I give the call back to Carly, I do want to remind everybody, in keeping with our prior protocol, please limit your activity to one question and one follow up question initially and then please go ahead and get back in the queue.

If you wish to ask additional questions time permitting. Carli, you can go ahead and open us up for questions.

Questions and Answers:

operator

Thank you. At this time I would like to remind everyone to ask a question. Press star and the number one on your telephone keypad. Pause for just a moment to compile the Q and A roster. Your first question comes from Bobby Griffin with Raymond James.

Bobby Griffin

Good morning buddy. Thanks for taking my questions and to the team, thanks for some of the additional information following the release, I guess.

Malynda K. West

Mindy.

Bobby Griffin

Yeah, I like the new format. Getting that out there after, after the press release, I guess, I guess my first question is more on the competitive comments that you, you put in the prepared remarks. Just curious if you can kind of conceptualize where the competitive kind of pressure is verse, you know, six, eight months ago, is it getting worse or getting better? And then I guess more importantly, after you see that initial competitive response of new entrants, how long does it take the store that’s impacted to kind of come back to what you’d say are, you know, company wide trends or company wide averages? Right?

Malynda K. West

That’s a great question, Bobby. Our same store gallons in particular impacted by those factors of competitive intrusion. And really the pressures vary market by market. So for instance, in 2025, some of our stores had average per store month volumes that were actually higher. We saw that in nine states that we operate in. Margins were higher in 10 states. But those markets are in different stages of competitive intrusion and pricing behaviors. When we look at Texas has both higher margins, higher volumes. Colorado and Florida though have lower volumes and lower margins. But those states over time are going to look more like Texas as they mature and stabilize.

And those new competitor entrance their share and then ultimately raise prices because they have to make a return on their sites to. So our new stores also take share from others and they’re outperforming the network, but same store remains under pressure. So we have to invest an extra penny or so in order to maintain volume. So typically when a new entrant enters a market, they do exactly what we do. They price very low at the outset while they try to gain their share from the other competitors that are already entrenched in the market. And that could take take three months, it could take six months, it could take a year.

And then it depends on how many stores that particular market entrant wants to build and what density do they want to build in that market as to how long it’s going to last. But ultimately everything goes back to normal and margins rise and we are able to increase our margins as well. So in a way we actually like competition because while it creates, creates disruption when it’s happening, as that market matures and stabilizes and the winners have acquired their share of customers, then the higher margins ultimately follow and we’re disciplined where we build and continuously upgrade.

So we’re going to be there for the long term and we’re going to be a winner also.

Bobby Griffin

Okay, that’s helpful and I guess secondly for me, and I’ll turn it back over, the comment there about the step up or the acceleration in the maintenance capital spending I found interesting and more so and just like the fact about it limiting disruption. So is there any, can you put any more details around how big of a drag those call it disruptions have been or is more this step up just kind of getting ahead of what could have been a drag and just kind of trying to see if, you know, we’ve been, you know, there’s been an EBITDA impact that actually will start to go away after you do this maintenance capital step up?

Malynda K. West

Sure. What I would say is it’s more the latter. It’s more of a getting ahead of things before it happens. We have been entirely within a break fix mode for our history. That means that maintenance comes in lumps. It’s difficult to predict. And as our market, as our fleet ages, we found the need to go ahead and proactively invest in equipment that is end of life or near end of life, because that does two things. It results in maintenance expense that we can predict. It also enhances uptime with that equipment, so enhances the customer experience and therefore their loyalty to us.

So the kinds of things that we’re talking about doing as a step up in proactively replacing some dispensers, H vac units, safes, things like that, which are going to cost us a little bit in capital from the beginning, but we’ll improve it in uptime and store performance over time. And we think the projected savings from just doing that is roughly, you know, 6 to 8 million. Somewhere in that range of maintenance costs, maintenance expense that we would avoid by doing that. And then of course, the impact on our customer goes even beyond that by being able to serve them in a more consistent fashion.

Bobby Griffin

Thank you, that’s helpful. Best of luck here in the first quarter.

Malynda K. West

Thanks, Bobbi.

operator

Your next question comes from Bonnie Hersock, Goldman Sachs.

Bonnie Hersock

Hi, sorry, trying to get. Hi, how are you? I actually had good. I actually had a question on your, you know, your long term guidance, I guess through 28 and I guess I’m just thinking about it, you know, you know this for modeling purpose guide this year of $1 billion. You know, it does imply stronger EBITDA growth in I guess 27 and 28 to ultimately reach that long term guidance of EBITDA target of the 1.2 billion. So Mindy, I was just hoping maybe you could talk about the drivers of maybe faster expected growth in the out years and where you see maybe the most upside or maybe most downside.

Just trying to think through the potential for you to kind of meet that long term EBITDA guidance. Thank you.

Malynda K. West

Great question, Bonnie. What you’re seeing in our EBITDA guidance is really a function of several factors for 2026. So the guidance is capturing the timing and scale impacts of our new store program. So as we get to a level where we can sustain 50 plus NTIs a year and those classes mature, then that EBITDA contribution becomes more visible because we would expect that 50 stores can contribute 35 to $40 million of EBITDA once they complete their three year ramp. However, for this year, when an entire class of 50 from last year opens at once, it does create a temporary drag that outweighs the strong two and three year contributions that we are getting.

From our earlier smaller classes. So it isn’t that the stores aren’t performing. It’s about scaling up our program to deliver the 50 plus stores going forward. So that’s one of the factors is us just being able to build 50 plus stores a year and then ramping as expected. Expected. The other factor is in a more normalized, more volatile fuel environment, our EBITDA growth will become even more sustainable. Because as you know, and we’ve talked about at length, the current fuel environment does impact our same store performance that the new stores right now are not able to offset this early into their ramp.

And that’s going to be a headwind this year. Now when you look at the path to the 1.2 billion, it really depends on three levers, only one of two, two of which we can control. We talked about one, the normalized fuel environment. That’s one. Unfortunately we cannot control sustaining the 50 plus NTIs annually. We can and we are in a great position to do that and accelerate our growth there. Also executing on our initiatives. So making our business better is also a material driver of that future growth. So when the environment changes, I think investors are going to be very surprised about the earnings power of this business.

But if I was going to handicap, you know, how can we achieve 1.2, what am I, you know, what are the pluses and minuses? I believe in the pipeline that we have. I believe it’s a quality pipeline that will deliver the 35 to 40 million dollars at ramp and a 50 plus store rent per year. I believe in our ability to achieve our initiatives. But again, the 1.2 does depend on a little bit more volatility. And I think as we saw in the fourth quarter, when we can just get brief spurts of that, our business is functioning well and we are attributing the value to the company that we would expect in periods like that.

But we do need a little more help from the macro environment in order to get to the 1.2.

Bonnie Hersock

Yeah, that’s super helpful and honestly it makes a lot of sense. And yes, volatility is your friend, as you kind of suggest. And maybe a quick follow up then on that. Because, you know, also just in the context of that, the fuel margin, I know again it’s for modeling purposes, but you did suggest a 30 and a half, you know, CPG. And so, you know, if I’m crying, I think that’s, you know, maybe, you know, four years of flat to down fuel margins. So just trying to think through that for, you know, how you’re kind of thinking about fuel margins and again and then also just the break even costs like how have they been trending recently.

Malynda K. West

So for fuel margins, our outlook for the year really reflects what we believe is the highest probability and most likely environment. So we think it’s going to still be characterized by relatively low volatility. As we go through the year, we think we’re going to see relatively stable and still low fuel prices which impacts our business model because it makes our customers on margin a bit less price sensitive. So we believe it is a base case similar to last year. And of course we’re comping several years ago when we experienced the other extreme of things which we benefited from tremendously where we saw really high volatility, higher prices, which made our offer even more compelling.

So we are going to focus on the things we can control and improve our business and the earnings power, including levers that in the future could be more fuel immune. But for right now, for the fuel margin we think that that 30ish cents all in is right where we need to be and it’s still reflective of that structural component because to be able to earn margins at this level despite the fact that we’re putting a penny or two on the street and despite the fact that we have low volatility is really speaking to that structural element that that is still there and supporting the stock, the margin.

So when you talk about the break even, what I can say is the cost to serve is really not going down and that break even component is still alive and well and playing out industry wide. So the fact that margins are flat this prior year, given the low volatility and really nothing that was there to macroly support margins being that high shows you that those marginal retailers are still requiring those higher margins to break even, much less continue to invest in their business, which they’re not able to do and we are able to do, that actually makes sense.

Bonnie Hersock

So I appreciate that and I’ll pass it on. Thank you.

Malynda K. West

Thanks Bonnie.

operator

Your next question comes from Irene Nattel with RBC Capital Markets.

Irene Nattel

Thanks and good morning everyone. Before I get to my question, I just wanted to clarify something you just said, Mindy, which is you’re still planning on putting 1 to 2 cents a gallon on the street this year and even with that you’re still looking at 1 to 3% same store volume pressure, is that correct?

Malynda K. West

We still think that we will continue to see volume pressure in this lower price environment and we will still need to protect our position, especially against competitive entrants in certain markets by putting some sense on the street in order to do that and maintain our competitive position. So.

Irene Nattel

Yes, yeah, understood. Thank you. And then just moving into the. Onto the backcourt. Can you talk about how you see the nicotine environment unfolding this year? We had some bright spots last year. How do you think it plays out in 2026 and moving ahead?

Malynda K. West

I think that we are still the ideal retailer for manufacturers as they help our customers progress down the risk spectrum from cigarettes to other products. We will continue to be very promotion driven throughout the year and I think that we have delivered strongly on promotions. I think you saw that earlier in the year when we have a promotion, our Sal can get behind that and really sell it. We are having our national leadership conference over these several weeks. I just got home from St. Louis where we toured the Midwest. We had all our store managers from the Midwest in one location.

A couple of weeks ago, we were in Houston for the Southwest. And I can tell you all of those store managers are so excited and they are very promotion driven. They are very contest driven. And I think that culture really underpins our ability to be the most effective use of our manufacturers promotional dollars. And meanwhile, we still continue to take share in cigarettes and we will continue to do that. But the other categories, the other nicotine categories are growing strongly and we don’t expect that to slow down any. Now, we do realize that we’re going to be comping a very special one off promotion.

So we are not anticipating in our guidance able to duplicate that. But we have put in our numbers accelerated promotional funding from what we had last year.

Irene Nattel

That’s very helpful, thank you.

operator

Your next question is from Ed Kelly with Wells Fargo.

Ed Kelly with

Hi, good morning. I wanted to ask you about per. Store expense growth, yet a very strong. Year in 25 below the initial guidance that you had mentioned. 26 outlook, you know, assumes that you’ll still be running, you know, below that sort of 5% level that I think, you know, at one point you maybe thought was more normal in terms of run rate. I’m just hoping that you could talk about the drivers of that for 26. And then just taking a step back, what’s the right or the correct run rate over time for per store expense. Growth over the next few years?

Malynda K. West

Great questions. Let me take that. And you’re right, we have. The team has done a great job of managing their expenses, so hats off to them. Delivering OPEX at only up 3.3% last year was really good. And obviously our guidance is still forecasting that we’re going to be below that 5% number. I’ll talk about some of the drivers this year that we expect to maintain. Going into this year we’ve done a lot of work with our store excellence campaign and our self maintenance in particular. And just changing. Being able to change our card reader batteries ourselves versus calling in a technician allowed us to save almost $2 million on maintenance expense last year.

Our team has also done a great job of cutting overhead almost in half. And that’s attributed to our store managers just doing a great job with staffing and with scheduling and motivating their teams and running their stores more efficiently. And then done a great job on loss prevention as well. We’ve moved some of the higher shrink items closer to the register. We also really dialed in on our cash loss and our merchandise inventory management. That alone allowed us to catch shrink by over $4 million. And that’s inclusive of price increases growth. We were still managed to save over $4 million.

So we expect the impacts of those things to continue and even amplify. And then things like I talked about with proactively going ahead and replacing some of our equipment. Those will earn some savings in our maintenance line over time. And then I think your last question was what should you expect going forward? I would expect something around 4% going forward. And bear in mind we are building a lot of new to industry stores. Those stores are bigger than some of our existing networks. So those are going to come with higher costs from the beginning and especially in the beginning as we are going to make sure that those stores are fully staffed to make a really good first impression to our customer.

And then of course the fuel on the merch will ramp over time. So a lot of the driver of our opex is actually the new to industry growth building the bigger stores. But we are going to hold the line on making sure that we are operating as efficiently as possible.

operator

Your next question comes from Jacob Aiken Phillips with Melius Research.

Jacob Aiken Phillips

Hi, good morning. I just wanted to double click on that. The larger format stores and some of the cost pressures. I think last year there was a dynamic where a lot of stores opened towards the end of the year or beginning of the year and the winter storm in February like exacerbated some of those cost pressures. We had this January storm and I guess February still pending. But how should we think about like the 1Q dynamics there and then the evolution of that or cadence throughout the year.

Malynda K. West

What I would tell you is we will experience some higher maintenance costs from this first quarter winter storms. But we also got were the beneficiary of some higher margins too heading into those storms. So we think that on balance all that is going to offset and was fully baked into, you know, kind of the billion dollar ish that we already talked about. So you are correct that when we build a bunch of stores, these larger stores all at one time, those come with full OPEX really from day one, while our fuel takes a bit of time to ramp and merchandise takes a full three years to ramp.

And then of course the fuel does ramp faster. But we are also pricing very aggressively in order to take that share as well. So that definitely has an impact on our overall opex. And I would that, you know, half of it or so is just attributable to those larger stores.

Jacob Aiken Phillips

Got it. And then just on the small tuck in acquisitions like you just did four and then could potentially do some this year. It’s newer dynamic and I’m just curious what exactly do you look for? And I know it’s early but like what do you envision the like economics improvement of the stores when like you get the Murphy’s merchandising into the stores?

Malynda K. West

We really liked that Colorado acquisition in particular because we got to pick and choose which ones we wanted versus taking a whole portfolio where you get the good and the bad and you just have to make the best of the bad. In this case, we got to kind of cherry pick and it was a market in which one we wanted to add density. This was a very quick and easy way to do it. It was also an economic way to do it. And we were able to get those stores open in what, 30 days or so, less than 30 days.

We were able to put our signage up, get our assortment how we wanted it, get those stores back open. So we were able to hopefully retain most of the customer base that was already going there and then leverage our Murphy Drive Rewards loyalty app and our density of stores in that market to drive more traffic into that store. So we liked it from the standpoint. We got to cherry picket. It was a market in which we wanted to add density. It also allowed us to do that very quickly without having to go through. We like organic growth, but it takes a long time to go through the let’s pick the site, let’s permit the site, let’s construct the store, let’s get all our opening permits.

That just takes a long time. So having the ability to bolster that with some of these maybe smaller onesie 2Z 5Z type acquisitions, we are certainly in the market looking at some of those Right now.

Jacob Aiken Phillips

Thanks Minnie. Congrats on your new rule.

Malynda K. West

Thank you very much.

operator

Your next question comes from Puran Sharma with Stevens Inc.

Puran Sharma

Hey, good morning and thanks for the question. I just wanted to Amanda, good morning. Just wanted to maybe start off with understanding the contribution from from the ntis in year three. I think you you mentioned 35 to 40 million in the in yesterday’s prepared comments and today as well. And I think you mentioned or in the prepared comments you maybe expected was it two years worth of these 50 class builds contributing 30 to 35 to 40 million. So higher level should we be thinking that you’re going to get about 70 to 80 million in in contribution dollars from these stores and then that would rise to around 100 to 120 million by 2028 or just wanted to get the right way to frame up that contribution.

Malynda K. West

It’s more of a stair step and granted we’re always going to be for the foreseeable future we’re going to be building a new class of 50 which are going to be a drag on that as they then incur full cost but have to go to ramp. So what we said was we expect each new build class of 50 stores to generate between 35 and 40 million of EBITDA at maturity after their three year ramp. So as we enter 2027 we will have the 32 new stores from our 2024 bill class, the 51 stores from our 2025 bill class and the 45 to 55 from this year’s helping to grow EBITDA in 2027.

So cumulatively this will begin to move the needle even if the fuel environment does not normalize. And we expect and continue to potentially increase our ability to add more than 50 stores in the network as we look even beyond 2027. So that’s why we say looking back 2026 will be viewed as an inflection point in our ability to deliver sustained EBITDA. But the 120 is a bit extreme because you’re going to still have that 50 new stores coming on which in that first year especially are a decrement to ebitda.

Puran Sharma

Okay, that’s very helpful. Appreciate the color there. And I wanted to maybe understand kind of the higher than expected PS&W and RINS contribution for the quarter. Wanted to understand more specifically what the dynamics at play were during 4q and and as we looked and think about the S and W margins in 1Q I know you’re you’re expecting 2.5 cents per the year for the year but just with the, with the run up in in RIN prices, should we expect PSNW margins to sit to stay a little bit above that 2 to 2.5 cent per gallon range you’d previously mentioned?

Malynda K. West

Sure. When you compare the fourth quarter versus prior year and psnw, this year’s were really supported by stronger arbitrage, stronger line space values, but less than prior year because we did have some downward movements in the price. So that’s what’s explaining that. But just there was a lot little more volatility in the fourth quarter than in the third quarter, for example. And so you saw the benefit of that in the PSNW line as we look forward into the first quarter. Obviously these winter storms are having an impact on the network. It’s also having an impact on price.

Too early to say where we’re going to end up on PSNW for the quarter at this point because the swings can be pretty dramatic. But safe to say for the full year we think that we’re still going to be within that band unless we can see some more prolonged volatility sustain itself. But that’s where we would expect the S and W to land for the full year. Too early to say really for the first quarter. And then with regard to the rins, as we always say, the price of the RIN is baked into the price of the gas we pay.

So while there may be some temporary dislocations, if RINs run up very quickly or run down very quickly over the sweep of time, it all balances out.

Puran Sharma

Okay. Appreciate the color. Thanks.

operator

Forum, your next question comes from Corey Tarlow with Jefferies.

Corey Tarlow

Great, thanks. Can you talk a little bit about what happened on the tobacco side from a margin perspective in the quarter and then also maybe what to expect ahead there?

Malynda K. West

Sure. And that’s a great question. What you were seeing there is something we talked about frequently last year. So for the fourth quarter it’s really the time of promotional dollars impacting that cigarette category in particular and the volumes. So importantly though, although volumes were down, we did grow share of market in the cigarette category for both the 4 week and 13 week periods ending January 4th. So our volumes did remain strong compared to the market. But keep in mind these categories are highly promotional, so you won’t necessarily ever see straight line growth even on a year to year basis.

But as we’ve demonstrated over longer periods of time, we have significantly grown those contribution dollars in the overall nicotine category and we are definitely seeing strength in pouches and other products. And I will tell you too. The business has already normalized in January and we expect to continue to show consistent margin performance when viewed over time. But it can be lumpy quarter to quarter.

Corey Tarlow

Okay, great. And then I have two quick follow ups. I know we’re lapping severe weather from last year. Can you provide any context around the storm impacts this year and then also any impacts from changes in SNAP as well? Thanks so much.

Malynda K. West

Well, I would just reiterate what we said for January. You know, it’s shaping up to be a good month. We are lapping winter storms from last year, but we’re not finished with the winter storms from this year because now we have one impact, the Carolinas and other parts of our network. So while we were pleased with January’s results, that was one of the reasons, quite frankly, that we were not willing to increase EBITDA guidance materially because we don’t know what’s going to happen for the rest of the year. And we know that we’re going to have some impacts on the back end of these winter storms as well.

So turning to snap, though, that is a great question. And, and we do have some exposure there, but it is relatively small. It’s actually less than 2% of our sales. But we did have those SNAP changes take effect January 1st in five of the states in which we operate. As you I’m sure know, they primarily affect candy, pac, Bev and specifically energy drinks. I’ll share with you some data points, but I want to caveat. These are very preliminary, but our early reads suggest kind of a modest headwind in candy and energy drinks. We’re going to continue to monitor the data obviously as this phases end and we do expect some impact in the very discretionary categories which is included in our guidance.

By the way, we put in our guidance ahead when I think it’s roughly less than 5 million overall for Snap, our top EBT item, you might not guess it. It’s actually Red Bull. And so while some customers may pull back, we believe that most are going to continue to buy those products even if they are not eligible for the SNAP benefit. So there is some category noise there, but the overall impact to the business is modest. As I said, It’s $5 million or less.

Corey Tarlow

Great. Thanks so much and best of luck.

Malynda K. West

Thank you.

operator

Your final question comes from Brad Thomas with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Brad Thomas

Good morning. Thanks for me in here, Mindy. I’ll just add my congratulations as well on your first call as CEO and I know that last quarter the main message. You’re welcome. I know Last quarter, the main message was around much of the leadership transition, keeping the core strategies of Murphy in place. But just wondering if I could ask directly if there’s specific areas that you think the priorities will change a little bit now that you’ve taken over.

Malynda K. West

That is a great question. Thank you actually for asking that. What I said in those certain terms, you know, some things are going to stay the same. Our everyday low price strategy, our continuous improvement mindset, capital allocation will remain unchanged. So when I think about it, it’s really more of our culture that is evolving. So we’re pushing for things like quicker collaboration, more nimble decision making, reorganize the company to create more clear roles and accountability. We’ve already made some leadership changes to help us work better together, remove some inefficient reporting structures and increase accountability. I can tell you people are excited because their work and ideas can have more impact and then that excitement ends up being infectious.

And we have an incredibly strong platform to improve this business and are 100% dedicated to growing shareholder value. So our five strategic pillars in which we have grown the company since then are still intact. It’s really just a culture shift which I think is necessary to make sure that we are agile and adaptable and really unafraid to challenge ourselves and stretch further and try new things. So you may see us be, and I hope you will see us be a bit more innovative going forward than we are in the past. And as we have these macro conditions pressuring our stores, we have accelerated competition.

I think that’s a smart thing to do. We need to be able to fight back in our business model, reducing our reliance on fueling tobacco where we can, but still preserving the strengths in both of those. We need to figure out how to attract and retain new customers, how to grow trips and spend and how to make our store teams life easier and our stores more productive. And then what are those niches of opportunities of value that we can exploit? So we’re going to be looking to innovation to support our core business and also drive for more business.

And we’re really already looking at it around three main pillars which are our portfolio, our customer and advanced technology. And we’re going to attack all of those types of opportunities and absolutely believe that we have untapped potential in this business to improve not just our existing stores and serving our existing customers, but the ability to stretch for more with different stores and different customers. So I’m excited about the future. I know the team is too. And stay tuned to see what we will deliver on this topic.

Brad Thomas

That’s really helpful, Mindy. If I could squeeze in one last follow up just on the Quick Check brand. I don’t think I heard any commentary about how it performed in the quarter. Could you just address that and how you’re thinking about its impact on EBITDA in 2026? Thanks.

Malynda K. West

Yeah, great question. It is continuing to exhibit stronger sales margins, continue to be pressured. Traffic continues to be pressured. What we’re doing really there is really simple. We are refocusing on the fundamentals of the business. We are focusing on the core, which are mainly coffee, breakfast and sandwich. As our traffic drivers, we are simplifying the menu, rationalizing the assortment based on performance, not legacy, not what we’ve always done. So we’re choosing where we win and really not trying to be everything for everybody. We’re also focused on improving margin. We need to balance the innovation with cost and margin control because while growth is important, we have to earn money.

I can’t take growth to the bank. We have to take margin to the bank. So being disciplined around that and then building a better operating model that simplifies operation, reduces complexity, enhances that customer experience because our speed to service is better. So overall at Quick Tech, really just a recognition that execution and ability to scale are as important as idea generation because ideas which can’t be implemented well or executed consistently are actually a bad idea. So I would add too that we have new leadership at Quick Check and that new structure and that will help speed up execution and also I think spark some innovation.

So I really like where the team is headed and I believe they’re focused on the right thing. So really appreciate you asking about that part of our business.

Brad Thomas

That’s helpful. Thank you, Mindy.

Malynda K. West

Thank you.

operator

There are no further questions at this time. I’ll turn the call back over to Murphy’s presenter panel for any closing remarks.

Malynda K. West

Thank you for your time and your participation on the call. All great questions. As we look to upcoming calls, I want you to know that we are committed to strengthening our core business while pursuing incremental sources of value that endure across the fuel cycle. And we are building from a very solid foundation. I have solid conviction in this leadership team’s capacity to unlock Murphy USA’s next level of potential. So thank you again and I look forward to next quarter’s call.

operator

This concludes today’s call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect. Sa.